cover of episode Presidential Immunity And More Debate Fallout

Presidential Immunity And More Debate Fallout

2024/7/1
logo of podcast FiveThirtyEight Politics

FiveThirtyEight Politics
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
G
Galen Druke
J
Jessica Roth
N
Nathaniel Rakich
T
Tia Yang
Topics
Galen Druke: 本期播客讨论了美国最高法院关于总统豁免权的裁决。最高法院裁定，美国总统对其官方行为享有一定的法律豁免权，包括对核心宪法职责的绝对豁免权和对其他官方行为的推定豁免权，但对非官方行为则没有豁免权。这一裁决对前总统特朗普的刑事案件以及未来总统的执政方式都将产生重大影响。 Jessica Roth: 最高法院的裁决意义重大，它不仅影响对唐纳德·特朗普的起诉，也为未来总统设定了规则。多数意见的主要担忧是，未来总统可能会因为离职后可能面临刑事起诉而对其职责的履行产生顾虑，以及法院卷入对前任总统的起诉的可能性。少数意见则认为，该裁决可能会导致总统在任期间不受任何刑事责任约束。 Jessica Roth: 最高法院的裁决没有明确界定"官方行为"和"非官方行为"的界限，这将给下级法院带来很多工作。对于特朗普案，下级法院需要确定其行为哪些是官方行为，哪些是非官方行为，以及官方行为是否符合推定豁免权的要求。这将导致案件审理过程的延误，甚至可能导致案件在11月大选前无法开庭审理。

Deep Dive

Chapters

Shownotes Transcript

Since Thursday, the only story in American politics has been President Joe Biden's poor debate performance and what on earth Democrats are going to do about it. That was until today, when the Supreme Court ruled that American presidents have legal immunity for official acts. In this installment of the 538 Politics podcast, Galen Druke speaks with Jessica Roth, a law professor and former federal prosecutor, about the details of the Supreme Court's ruling. Then 538's Nathaniel Rakich and Tia Yang discuss the continued fallout from the presidential debate.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)