Culture chat: ‘Anora’, the unlikely film leading the Oscar race
29:23 Share

Welcome to Life and Art from FT Weekend. I'm Lila Raptopoulos, and this is our Friday chat show.

Today we are talking about Anora, the new comedy drama from director Sean Baker, about a savvy Brooklyn stripper named Anora who meets a very rich young man at her Manhattan club one night. When he asks her to be his escort for the week while he's visiting from Russia, she agrees, and the whirlwind that ensues ends in a Vegas wedding. There's a problem, though. His parents are Russian oligarchs, will not accept this marriage, and send their Armenian lackeys out to annul it.

What? This is not a real marriage. We're getting in on old and you have no say in it.

Anur has received glowing reviews from critics. It received the Palme d'Or at Cannes Film Festival and is being tipped as a frontrunner for the Oscars. And because it's not the usual type of film to do that, today we're going to talk about it. I'm Laila in New York, and I'm a weary Armenian henchman scared of my Russian boss. Right.

Joining me from London, we've been driving around Coney Island and smashing up candy shops looking for him. It's the FT's film critic and a very special guest, Danny Lee. Hi, Danny. Welcome. Hello, Lola. I wish my Russian was better. I feel like I'm letting the side down now. It's good. It's good. Also in London, they're on a private jet from Russia to squash your marriage. And yes, their suit is from the new collection. It's the FT's deputy news editor and friend of the show, India Ross. Welcome, India. Hello. Hello.

Thank you both for being here. Why don't we start with just what we thought of the film Top Line. Danny, you wrote a very positive review. You also interviewed Sean Baker for the FT just recently. Let's start with you. What did you think? Yeah, I mean, it's interesting. So since both of those things happened, I actually went and saw the movie again, having...

been pretty smitten with the film the first time, you know, and I was smitten the second time too. Spoiler alert, I still really like it. But I watched it the first time and, you know, I took it very much as a comedy and I just got very swept away with the kind of propulsive, giddy,

crazy comic energy that the film has, particularly in the kind of middle section. And then the second time, I just felt deeply, deeply saddened watching it. And it felt much more melancholy. I think a lot of the film, I think really highly of it. But I did find it quite a chastening experience the second time around. Yeah. Oh, that's interesting. India, what about you? Yeah, I absolutely loved it. I was blown away by it.

I've seen it once. I actually had planned to see it again next week. And that's really interesting what you say, Danny, about the second experience, because it is such a kind of heady sort of visceral experience watching this film. It really is just like thrilling. And I can see that once the kind of dust settles on your experience of it, it might be quite different. I've been a fan of Sean Baker since Tangerine, which was his sort of breakout film in 2015. And it's just one of those films

I think it's so satisfying to see someone who's so gifted finally get the money to fulfill their creative vision. And sort of looking back, you can see like he did amazing things with small budgets. He shot Tangerine on an iPhone.

You can see in hindsight how his sort of wings were slightly clipped by financial constraints. And now this film is so lavish and it's so kind of like bombastic. And it's just like really satisfying to see him be able to like fulfill the extent of his creative ability. Yeah. Okay. Now I'm excited to see it a second time. Yeah.

You should. You should. Yeah. Because I really, I loved how fun it was to watch and how well it moved. Like it was one of the few movies that I've seen recently that just never felt slow. I never felt like, oh no, another plot point. Like, oh, we're going somewhere else. It just,

It just kept moving. I thought the actors were really great. Mikey Madison played a Nora and she was just like somehow funny and tragic and strong and weak. But I also really liked that like there were all these little practicalities in it. And I'm curious what you think. Like they're sort of out looking for this guy at some point in the movie in Brighton Beach and Coney Island and they're

All the things happen. You know, it's grand and bombastic. Yeah, India. But also like when you're out looking for a guy, you have to eat. So they go to a diner and like they you have to park and you have to argue about parking. And I don't know. I don't know where to place that. But it felt sort of.

strangely real and refreshing in that way, I guess, because I expected it to be some sort of like a crime thriller at that point. And it wasn't. It's real life screwball, right? I mean, that energy, you know, as you say, I mean, that just propels the film along that sense of two things at once, that we're seeing something which is at once kind of gritty and verite and feels almost documentary-ish in places, you know, and is also just completely off the charts outlandish. I mean,

I mean, that's where all the energy comes from. I think it's also worth noting this film is really, really funny. It's one of the funniest films I've seen in this, certainly this year and in the last couple of years. It's absolutely kind of laugh out loud hilarious. And I think that's been a theme throughout Baker's work is he finds these extraordinary people that you just would never come across in real life. And it just makes them hilarious. And I think that a lot of the propulsion of the film is how funny it is, even though it's obviously very sad as well.

Part of what I think was compelling about this film, at least the first time, is that like it's not really what you expect. I guess I thought it was going to be like stressful, like uncut gems, or I thought it was going to be larger than life. Like what's that one with J-Lo as a stripper, the head of the strip club? Oh,

Oh, Hustlers? Hustlers, yeah, something. I guess like there are tropes that this movie could have been because it's about the stripper who lives in like the depths of sort of Russian Brooklyn and is trying to make it and there's a Russian oligarch and all this stuff. But then like,

it never really got stressful the way I expected or the bad guys were really not as bad as I really expected. And that's part of what I really liked about it. I think it definitely avoids the kind of trappings of movies we've seen before that feature these kind of characters. Like I, you know, we've talked previously about Pretty Woman as a sort of analog for this. And like,

I think what I really like about Baker's films is that, so there's this kind of premise in like American society that A, a person can like pull themselves up by their bootstraps if they want to and B, that you should. And if you don't, you're essentially like invisible. And, you know, the premise of Pretty Woman is that she, you know, the guy's life is basically superior to hers. And this is kind of this aspiration that she has. And in order to achieve happiness, she has to kind of get there.

Whereas this totally subverts that. And in fact, the kind of like aspirational life that her husband has turns out to be a not even really his life. It's his parents life. But also the parents are in an even dirtier business than she is. It's strongly implied. And so this idea of like she needs to elevate herself in some way societally to achieve happiness is totally subverted. And in fact, like,

I mean, it does a really good job of... It's not patronising, it doesn't sort of glamorise poverty or the work that she's doing, but it certainly doesn't say, you know, you need to be on this kind of aspirational path in order to achieve happiness. Yeah, because I definitely... Yeah, I mean, India's right. It's... Again, again, it's a particularly Sean Baker way of doing things. You have this real sympathy for characters who are completely on the margins, but without him...

feeling like he needs to show you the squalor, you know, which can so often, I mean, almost always tip into being condescending and being exploitative, you know, and you always have that vision of...

even when it's well-intentioned, you know, a filmmaker and a film crew descending on someone's life, you know, and spotlighting the squalor, you know, and putting the camera into the most harrowing corners of somebody's life. And Sean Baker doesn't do that. And he trusts, you know, I think he has enough affection for the characters and also enough respect for us as an audience to trust that we get it without needing to tip into that sense of being exploitative. And that's what I was interested in with Enora was how you tell a story which...

you know, it tells the truth about sex work, which is kind of menial and unglamorous and dreadful. But also that the people within that, you know, can also be really smart and, you know, entirely valid and, you know, characters that we do and should want to spend two and a half hours with. So it's like respect for the characters and it's respect for us as an audience. Yeah, absolutely.

Okay, I would love to get a little deeper into the film and talk about what it's about theme-wise. You know, it covers all this ground. It covers Russian oligarchs and sex work and money and power and Coney Island immigrants and the American dream and all that stuff. And I think we're alluding to something interesting, which is that it's not really trying to be capital A about any themes in particular. And that's what makes it kind of

good. But what are some of the things that you think the film is trying to say? Danny? I mean, yeah, I'm just, I've got this sort of Sean Baker in my head, I guess, having talked to him about the film. And I mean, I think most filmmakers would say, you know, back away from that question because they, you know, their response would be, they're not trying to say anything. They're just, it's, you know, a set of characters in a scenario in a place, you know, but the

I mean, I think money is the huge engine for the film and it's not quite as straightforward, you know, as a Nora needing to wanting to be rich, you know, lusting after money. But money and the way that America runs on money and all this stuff is artfully handled in the film. I think that's very much the engine behind it, you know, and there are these really interesting little connections that are made visually and sometimes, you know, out loud. Yeah.

between the different levels of like service workers, you know, who dominate the film. I mean, that's kind of what the film breaks down into is wealthy people and service workers. And the middle class has like completely evaporated and disappeared from this picture. So you have, you know, sex workers and you have sort of bodyguards and goons and then you have kind of just, you know, the Armenian handlers. And there's just layer on layer on layer of people

people having to work for other people and with this unanswered question didn't know the person at the top of this food chain uh what did they do for their money um and it's never actually addressed out loud because again it's one of those things that i think we can probably answer that you know reasonably accurately ourselves without sean baker telling us but it's like everybody is there in this in this food chain leading up to this kind of apex predator

So I think it is. I mean, I think it's about love and money and power. Yeah, I completely agree with that. And I think, though I'm sure Baker would say he's not a political filmmaker, there is a kind of political...

element implicit in the fact that he always seeks out these marginalized communities who tend to live in poverty to a greater or lesser extent. And I think that if there is a political message, it is to say these people should not be invisible. And I

I'm sure he would sort of hate this reading a bit, but it is interesting to watch it in light of the election. And there has arguably been an element of liberal elites not seeing people who are from different backgrounds and disenfranchised as

And, you know, I'd love to know what proportion of Bryson Beach voted for Trump, but I would say it's pretty red. And you could probably say the same for the other places where he's, you know, he's done the Florida project and he did the Red Rocket, which is in rural Texas. He is drawn to these communities which are very underserved in cinema and in life. And there's a kind of inescapable politics to that. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah, it is interesting. I also like, I think that it wasn't, there are a lot of things in these themes that it wasn't coming down hard necessarily on a side about, which I found interesting. Like, for example, Nora, um,

She's scrappy and she kind of knows when she does and doesn't have power. And the message isn't like, you know, if you're a Russian oligarch, you have more power. The message seems more kind of like there are times when she does have power. She takes the power she can get. When she knows she has no power, she concedes. Like those power plays are...

They're not just cut and dry. I mean, of course, at the end of the day, she does have no power, but all of them are unempowered in a way, like the Armenian henchmen is unempowered and even the oligarchs are sort of in a weird way.

I mean, I know they have power, but their lives are, they're unempowered in their own way, stuck in there. Totally. I thought it was really fun when they, there's a part of the scene in the movie where they drag the couple to the courthouse to try and annul their marriage and they learn that they can't do it in New York. And it's just so funny to see the kind of frustration. They can't believe that they've run up against a kind of bureaucratic hurdle to their, to what they want to do. It's amazing. Yeah.

Yeah, it's so funny. I do want to ask relatedly, you know, there's been some discussion more from bloggers than from critics about whether this is a feminist film or a kind of male gazey fantasy. There's this one pivotal scene. It's about a third of the way through the film where

these Armenian mafia guys have found out about this Vegas wedding and they show up at the son's mansion in Queens to try to solve the problem for their bosses. And once they get in, you know, Anora's new husband goes off running. He takes off and it becomes their job to keep Anora from getting away. And the scene was really something like it was hilarious. I was laughing out loud through it.

It was sort of fun to watch her use, again, whatever power she has to, like, protect herself and get out of the situation. She's demeaning them. She's, like, biting them. But there's also this undertone of violence and threat. And I felt really quite worried for her. Like, you just don't know what these men are going to do. And I found myself fluctuating between those two things pretty intensely. And I think that's a really good point.

And I don't, I mean, it could easily maybe come off as a pretty fun scene. Like if you're not a woman, I wonder if you could miss that undertone of danger entirely. And I was wondering what you both thought. So full disclosure, I mean, that scene actually was definitely one where seeing it the second time, I seem to be watching a slightly different film. You know, the first time around, you know, that scene is so...

outlandish and it's a long scene. I think it took them a long time to film. And it turns on the fact that she is like five foot nothing, you know, with these three, these three dudes, you know, and actually very kind of beating the shit out of it, right? She's giving every bit as good as she gets, you know, and it's kind of amazing to see. And there is this amazing Tom and Jerry kind of energy to it. That, yeah, first time around, I just went with that. And then the second time around, I mean, I was really struck by, yeah, how, how,

clearly and obviously vulnerable she was and the fact that actually you do have these like not one not two but three male characters who are all much physically bigger than her and although you know I mean personally

It's open to interpretation, but, you know, I don't see any contradiction between there being a huge sense of physical threat and vulnerability to Enora and the film being, in its own way, I think, a piece of feminist filmmaking. Because, you know, I mean, that's not... The more unnerving that scene becomes, I think the stronger that statement is. I think that scene worked in the sense of she's sort of, like, understanding the limits of her own kind of

belief in her power and safety she's so used to sort of navigating this pretty dodgy club yeah with such kind of aplomb and like she's not remotely sort of scared by all these sort of gruesome men who are paying her every night and it's interesting to see I think she's wrestling in that scene with

am I scared or are these just another bunch of kind of bozos that I'm going to dispatch? And there are moments of real jeopardy, but then I think it's, I like the sort of complicated kind of murkiness of the fact that the men are also wrestling with what are we doing here? Like clearly none of them wants to hurt her or assault her or anything. And they're obviously there.

under the employ of these oligarchs and so they don't want to sort of piss off their boss. And it's like everyone is sort of simultaneously wrestling with the kind of

psychosexual dynamics of what's happening and I think the sort of messiness and the length of the scene kind of speaks to that quite well and I like that it's really messy because it is messy these things are messy like it's not clear yeah uh Danny you said that it was a feminist film to you um India I'm curious if it was a feminist film felt like a feminist film to you I think if I was to pick a side between feminist and not feminist I would say feminist uh

In the sense that I don't think it's male gaze-y or exploitative at all. And I think that the character of Enora is fascinating and very kind of richly realized. And I think everything we've talked about, about sort of subverting kind of power dynamics...

Yeah, I mean, this all kind of speaks to like a feminist bent, but I would I don't think it's a kind of capital F feminist film. I don't think that is its intention. Yeah, I want to answer this question, but I actually don't know the answer. I mean, it's like not Barbie. Oh, my God. Wash your mouth out.

I wish no one's mad about it. Isn't that crazy that those two films came out in the same year? Like, it's just wild. And what's crazy as well is the same people will have watched those two movies. It's like the same demographic.

Which two movies, Barbie and this movie? Barbie is the exact opposite of this film. It's like the tail wagging the dog. It's like, how can we construct this extremely didactic, heavily engineered social commentary and then plug in all the rest of the stuff afterwards? LAUGHTER

That kind of leads me to my last question, which is just, you know, this film is an award winner and contender. Sean Baker said to you, Danny, that he never thought of this as an Academy film. We were asking this question about poor things. Is it a feminist film and what is it? I guess my question is basically like,

What does it mean that this film is the one that's an award winner and contender? What is it doing that people are attaching to? Well, I think some of the answer to that is really prosaic. And it's that, you know, the Oscars, which had befuddled me for my entire working life, my entire adult life, made much more sense to me when I finally looked at the demographic of the voters and you realize that actually they are

overwhelmingly actors. And I suddenly thought, oh, of course, so many previously baffling decisions that the Academy had made made perfect sense to me as the collective decision-making of a large group of actors. And Nora, some of the... In amongst all of the...

The quite radical things that Onora does, it also does this very, very old-fashioned thing, which is, you know, it births a star. And everybody's going to want to...

uh for any number of reasons everybody's going to want to get behind that story yeah it's a great hollywood story so so mikey madison is the you know she is the most obvious oscar winner i've seen in some time and kind of deservedly i mean and amongst that story the performance is also great uh i think there are other things going on again i think that the way that sean baker looks at class and the way that he foregrounds uh characters who are you know uh

on the receiving end of the class dynamic. I think everything else which has happened in the world since and is happening now unavoidably means that Anora is going to be taken a bit more seriously for being, I suppose, on a very fundamental level, being a film about people with not much money. Yeah, I think it's encouraging in the sense of, you know, I think people are more receptive to more challenging movies. A film that I think is quite...

is quite analogous to this was American Honey. I don't know if you guys saw that in 2016, which I was just looking, you know, it wasn't nominated for any kind of big, certainly not the Oscars. And I think these kind of real kind of indie sort of

I mean, Anora is fun, but it's a tough movie in some ways. And I think it's great that people are more open to sort of being challenged. You know, those sort of schmaltzy Oscars of 20 years ago seem to be somewhat in the past. And I think that's great. Yeah. I guess my question is critics love it and awards love it. And I guess what about it feels fresh and appealing now? Like, why are we embracing this now? I think that's right that, like...

you know, in 2020, this movie would have been a little, maybe not too nuanced or something. Like there's something about now that audiences are ready for, for a movie that doesn't have a bunch of obvious morals. I think this is, I sort of feel a bit sort of dirty saying this, but I think this film is kind of edgy and I think edginess is really popular right now. And I hate the idea that it sort of would be devalued in that way because it's so much more than that. But I think

Yeah, like, you know, among, like, my friends, like, a really surprising number of people have seen this film, people who would not have watched a kind of movie like this before. And I think the time is just right. People just want to see, yeah, like, a story about a sex worker in a Russian community in New York. Like, people just want that. Like, I don't know what it is about now, but I think...

Yeah, the more edgy, the better. Yeah, I don't want this to sound cynical, but I wonder if 2023 was the year of Barbie. It kind of makes sense that then Enora takes over. Because Barbie, and I like Barbie, you know, I don't want to do Barbie down. But Barbie is this huge moment and this huge celebration, this huge...

to use a quite loaded word at this moment, it was an explosion of joy. And then what happened? And it's over. It's kind of done. And it feels Anora might be this slight kind of,

hangover from that it feels like the evil twin of Barbie yeah right Barbie we want joy Kamala Harris runs on joy Trump gets overwhelmingly elected and maybe we don't want joy Mikey Madison kicks someone in the face and breaks their nose yeah right exactly maybe yeah exactly maybe we want someone to say fuck you motherfucker yeah and kick someone in the face yeah it's like a palate cleanser and she does

India and Dani, thank you so much. We will be back in just a moment for More or Less. Welcome back for More or Less, where each guest says one thing they want to see more of or less of culturally. India, what do you have? I would like more use of newcomers on screen. I know that Mikey Madison is not quite a newcomer, but she's relatively new. And Mark Adelstein, who plays

even, Yvonne, I just felt was really wonderful. And it just made me think how lazy it is to cast big stars and how boring they are often. No, I love, you know, I love them occasionally. But I, yeah, it's just so fun to see a new person and the kind of energy that that brings. And it's so worth the effort of trying to cast them. And I would like to see more of that. Yeah.

Totally agree. Danny, what about you? So I'm going to sound like I'm just riffing on something India said earlier, which I am, but only by accident. I was going to say that I want more mess and complication, things that I always want more of generally. And it feels like

now is a very good time for those. And some of that is to do with Enora, actually, which is a messy and complicated film. But I also saw the director, Andrew Arnold, whose new film, Bird, has just come out, which is also messy and ragged. And the raggedness and the mess is part of the beauty of it, I think. And then I saw a documentary just last night called Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat, which is sort of about the Blue Note

jazz musicians of the 50s and 60s and also about the CIA and the assassination of the leader of the newly independent Congo in the 60s and about...

A million and one things that sometimes kind of coalesce into this incredibly stunning moment of clarity and sometimes don't. And I think both of those approaches are really valid. And so all of those things, you know, they all lead me to think that, you know, now possibly more than ever, we need to embrace complexity. Yeah, that's good. We do live in mess and it's sort of, yeah, it feels relieving to see it on screen. It's a great one.

Okay, I have a less this week. It is less censoring ourselves out of making art. And I'm saying that it's not movie related. I'm saying that because I've spent a lot of time over the past couple weeks at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for this piece that I'm writing for the magazine that's coming out this weekend about its employee art show. This is a show in which anyone who works for the Met can submit to it.

It's been happening for almost 90 years, but this is only the second year that it's been public and people can see it. And basically like anyone, if you're a security guard or you do conservation or you're a tour guide or a cleaner or a gardener, you can submit your art and it hangs in a wall in a gallery at the Met.

and it's just incredible how many of these employees are actively making art and are actively making very cool art. And, you know, they're around art all day, and so it just kind of seeps into them and comes out as this incredible stuff. But I just was inspired by how many of them just, like, considered themselves artists and were making good stuff there.

and it inspired me to censor myself less and just make more stuff too. Because why not? I feel uplifted now that you've said that. Good! Not cynical at all. Dani and India, thank you both so much. This was so much fun. Thank you. Pleasure.

That's the show. Thank you for listening to Life and Art from FT Weekend. Take a look through the show notes. I've put links to everything we've discussed in there. Also, I've included a link to a kind of a call out, a survey that the FT Weekend magazine has out now. They are requesting nominations from readers worldwide.

for who you think are the most influential women of 2024. They have an annual Women of the Year special, and they want to know from you who you think are the most influential women. The people that you recommend will influence who's chosen. So I put a link to that call out in the show notes too. Also, there are ways to stay in touch with me on email and on Instagram, or I am at Lila Rapp chatting with all of you about culture.

I'm Lila Raptopoulos, and here's my incredible team. Katya Kamkova is our senior producer. Lulu Smith is our producer. Our sound engineers are Joe Salcedo, Breen Turner, and Sam Jovinko with Original Music by Metaphor Music. Topher Forges is our executive producer, and our global head of audio is Cheryl Rumley. Have a lovely weekend, and we'll find each other again on Monday.

Presented by BlackRock. Want to know what's happening in the markets? On The Bid, a podcast from BlackRock, we break down what's happening in the world of investing. We see in so many of the developed economies, people just don't have the adequacy of savings to live in retirement and dignity, specifically in the United States. And explore the forces changing the economy and finance. We've never had such fantastic alignment around public policy and technological innovation that we see in infrastructure right now.

Subscribe to The Bid wherever you get your podcasts. This podcast is brought to you by Aura. 2024 has seen a surge in high-profile data breaches, raising serious concerns about the security of personal information. This past summer, national public data reported a breach potentially affecting every American. That's why we're thrilled to partner with Aura. Aura is a complete organization

online safety toolkit, which includes a variety of other features to keep you safe online, including a VPN for secure browsing, data broker opt-out to stop companies from selling your personal information, a password manager to help you create and store strong passwords, and

and more. For a limited time, Aura is offering our listeners a 14-day trial plus a check of your data to see if your personal information has been leaked online. All for free when you visit aura.com slash safety. That's aura.com slash safety to sign up for a 14-day free trial and start protecting you and your loved ones. That's A-U-R-A dot com slash safety. Certain terms apply, so be sure to check the site for details.