The polling averages indicate a close race due to small margins separating the candidates in key swing states. However, these averages suggest a probabilistic close race rather than a definitive one, meaning the outcome could still swing significantly in either direction.
Herding concerns arise when pollsters intentionally align their results with existing averages to avoid being outliers. This practice can distort the true picture of voter sentiment and reduce the variability that is crucial for understanding shifts in the electorate.
The Seltzer Iowa poll shows Harris leading Trump by three points, which is an outlier compared to other polls showing Trump ahead. This discrepancy could indicate a significant shift in Iowa or suggest methodological differences in how pollsters are adjusting their models post-2020.
The Seltzer poll suggests potential shifts among white voters and older demographics towards Harris, indicating a closer race in Iowa than in 2020. It also highlights a significant gender gap and strong support among independent women, which could be indicative of broader trends.
The final New York Times polls show a slight shift towards Harris in the Sun Belt states and a tightening in the Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania. This contrasts with earlier polls that indicated a stark divide between these regions, suggesting a more competitive race overall.
Early voting data indicates a higher turnout among women, which could benefit Harris, especially given the increased salience of the abortion issue. However, caution is needed as this trend may not be sufficient to overcome other motivating factors for Trump supporters.
Mary Radcliffe is keen to see if trends observed in 2022, such as shifts in traditionally reliable states like New York and California, continue into 2024. These trends could reshape the electoral landscape in future elections.
Polls were coming in hot and heavy over the weekend! In fact, 164 surveys were entered into the 538 database since Friday. In this Election Day eve episode of the 538 Politics podcast, Galen Druke speaks with senior researcher Mary Radcliffe and New York Times polling editor Ruth Igielnik about what we are seeing in those final polls.
They discuss the famed Iowa Poll from Ann Selzer, which showed a rosy picture for Harris, and the battleground polling from the New York Times, which showed results that frustrate some of the trends we've come to expect this cycle. They also share some final thoughts on the election in the run up to the big day.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices)