Home
cover of episode Biden Antitrust Officials Plan Final Salvo at Big Tech

Biden Antitrust Officials Plan Final Salvo at Big Tech

2024/11/19
logo of podcast WSJ What’s News

WSJ What’s News

Key Insights

Why are U.S. antitrust officials targeting big tech firms in the final days of the Biden administration?

To push forward an aggressive tech antitrust agenda, involving more merger scrutiny and potential investigations into companies like Microsoft.

What potential remedies are being considered for Google in the antitrust case?

Google might have to divest its Chrome browser or Android mobile operating system and stop paying Apple to make Google the default search engine on Safari.

How do Mexican officials view the potential for increased U.S. protectionism under a second Trump presidency?

They are concerned but believe that creating a competitive trade bloc against China could involve stricter regional content rules for USMCA countries.

What is Canada's strategy to mitigate the impact of potential U.S. tariffs?

Canada is using a 'Team Canada' approach, sending officials to meet with U.S. counterparts to emphasize the importance of the trade relationship and the potential harm to U.S. consumers.

How is Mexico preparing for potential changes in U.S. border security policies under a second Trump presidency?

Mexico is concerned about the Trump administration removing Biden-era policies that could incentivize more migrants to rush to the border, and may face increased pressure to enforce tougher policies at its southern border.

What are Canadian immigration lawyers reporting in the wake of Trump's election victory?

They are receiving more calls from Americans seeking to move to Canada, though it's unclear if this will result in a significant influx of migrants.

Chapters

U.S. antitrust officials are preparing a final push against tech giants, including potential investigations into Microsoft's cloud business and possible divestments by Google.
  • Justice Department considering divesting Google's Chrome browser or Android mobile operating system.
  • Google might be forced to stop paying Apple to be the default search engine on Safari.
  • Federal Trade Commission laying groundwork for an investigation into Microsoft's cloud business.

Shownotes Transcript

This podcast is brought to you by Eaton Vance ETFs. What's inside your fixed income ETF? Is it built for today's bond market? Can it adapt to changing markets? Inside Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF, EVTR, you'll find a disciplined investment process, broad fixed income diversification, and an active, nimble approach for pursuing potential opportunities as markets evolve. Get to know actively managed EVTR, the symbol of core plus more, at eatonvance.com slash symbols.

Top Biden officials ready a final antitrust salvo targeting big tech.

Plus, a court in Hong Kong hands down strict sentences in a case that crushed the city's pro-democracy camp. And we'll speak with journal reporters in Canada and Mexico about the likely changes coming to those countries' trade relations with the U.S.

What the Trump administration wants to do is ensure that Canada and Mexico are not used as a backdoor to get tariffed goods, particularly from China, into the U.S. It's Tuesday, November 19th. I'm Luke Vargas for The Wall Street Journal, and here is the AM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories moving your world.

With the clock ticking down before Inauguration Day, U.S. antitrust officials are preparing a final blitz against the tech industry involving more merger scrutiny alongside a potential investigation into Microsoft. We report the Justice Department's next move in the antitrust case it won, challenging Google's efforts to maintain a monopoly in search, is also due tomorrow.

Journal tech reporter Sam Schechner joins me now with more. Sam, what are we seeing here? What we're seeing is that in the closing days of the Biden administration, they're pushing forward on what's been a pretty aggressive tech antitrust agenda. You mentioned the case against Google that the DOJ won back in August. That's about

how Google has allegedly kept a monopoly in search, its cash cow. And we're still waiting for the judge to decide what remedies it might order Google to undertake in order to fix the anti-competitive practices they were found guilty of engaging in. According to a document that was seen by my colleague Dave Michaels, the DOJ is arguing that Google might have to divest its Chrome browser or Android mobile operating system in some circumstances.

It would also be forced to stop paying Apple billions of dollars a year to make Google, the search engine, default on its Safari web browsers. But as you mentioned, there are other cases that the government is preparing to make. Indeed, and we should add, Sam, that Google has said that spinning off Chrome and Android would harm the free products, and its VP of regulatory affairs said the government was putting its thumb on the scale in ways that could harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership,

Separately, Microsoft declined to comment on the Federal Trade Commission laying the groundwork to open an investigation into Microsoft's cloud business. Suffice it to say, Sam, this is a lot of potential antitrust action coming in the waning days of an administration and with little clarity about whether that action would continue beyond January. Well, what we have is a Biden administration that has put in place some pretty strident figures in

when it comes to using the government's antitrust powers against big tech companies, the FTC chair, Lena Kahn, the DOJ antitrust chief, Jonathan Cantor, pretty clearly they're going to be replaced under a new administration, or at least that seems highly likely. Whether or not their crusade will change is another thing. On one hand, you have...

saying that he's going to undo a lot of what the Biden administration has put in place. That being said, the first Trump administration was no friend necessarily to big tech. Indeed, the case that Google lost to the government back in August was one that the first Trump administration brought. Another wrinkle is that you have to distinguish between cases brought like the one the government is considering against Microsoft for its cloud business and merger control, whether or not they approve mergers.

Republicans have generally been more open to allowing big mergers. And so will that free up more dealmaking in the tech industry? Only time will tell. That was journal tech reporter Sam Schechner. Sam, thanks. Always a pleasure, Luke.

Meanwhile, President-elect Trump plans to nominate former Wisconsin Representative Sean Duffy as Transportation Secretary. Posting on Truth Social, Trump suggested that Duffy's tenure would include a push to rebuild highways, tunnels, and other infrastructure, and to end the diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts for pilots and air traffic controllers.

A House Ethics Committee panel investigating former Florida Representative Matt Gaetz, Trump's pick for attorney general, is expected to meet tomorrow to discuss its next steps.

That's as new details emerge about testimony given to the panel, including that a witness described seeing Gaetz have sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2017 when he was serving in Congress. That's according to the woman's lawyer, who said the woman and another witness also told the House panel that Gaetz had paid them for sex.

Gates has long denied both allegations, and a Trump transition spokesman said he remains the right man for the job and that the allegations against Gates were baseless and intended to derail the second Trump administration.

The House panel investigating Gates had expected to release a report on its findings last week, but didn't do so after Gates resigned from Congress to pursue the attorney general nomination. However, the report could still be released through a floor vote by the full House.

And in Hong Kong, 45 ex-lawmakers and activists have been sentenced to between four and ten years in prison in the biggest national security case in the city under a Beijing-imposed law that crushed Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement. The defendants were tried for their roles in an unofficial primary election that prosecutors said was aimed at paralyzing Hong Kong's government.

One of the organizers, college professor Benny Tai, was handed the longest sentence of 10 years. Amelia Wong, the girlfriend of another defendant, spoke to reporters after the verdicts. Of course it will silence more people because you see how a primary can be illegal and lead to 10 years of sentencing. So of course it will silence more people.

Coming up, we'll unpack how Canada and Mexico are preparing for a more protectionist America and how the countries could navigate potential trade roadblocks laid down by Washington. That's after the break. ♪

So

Learn more at IBM.com slash WatsonX. IBM, let's create. As countries around the world ready themselves for what a second Trump presidency means for trade, security, and international relations, America's two immediate neighbors are bracing for a more protectionist president.

Our Daniel Bach spoke with Santiago Perez, the journal's deputy Latin America editor in Mexico City, and Journal Canada reporter Vipal Manga to see how the countries are preparing for four more years of Trump.

Santiago, I want to start with you. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement is up for review in 2026, and Trump has said he'll look for more protections for America. He's also threatened to slap steep tariffs on Mexican imports. How worried are Mexican officials? Well, there's a significant degree of concern, of course, but they believe that China will be at the center of concerns for both the U.S. and Canada.

And they also believe that if the U.S. is to create a competitive trade bloc against China, the option would be to have a competitive USMCA.

So essentially, we could see more regional content rules, which are the rules that determine how manufacturing is done in the US, Mexico, and Canada, and how much North American content these goods must have. The thinking that I'm hearing is that

What the Trump administration wants to do is ensure that Canada and Mexico are not used as a backdoor to get tariffed goods, particularly from China, into the U.S. So it seems that any agreement that would be signed with those USMCA countries

would require them to impose tariffs on all non-signatory countries, which could include European companies, which would almost certainly include China, to close those back doors. That is a risk to a country like Canada, which is a major trading nation and depends on trade relationships with Europe and Asian countries as well.

So that might be a bitter pill that they would have to swallow if they want to make a deal with the U.S. But the alternative would also be painful, right, Vipal? Do you have a sense of how officials in Ottawa are bracing for this? So about 78% of Canada's exports go directly to the U.S. A 10% tariff across the board on all those would send Canada into a recession. Clearly, the auto sector is a major problem.

part of the exports that Canada sends, but it's not the only thing. There's also things like oil and gas, and Canada is hoping for some exemptions. The other thing that Canada is doing to prepare is they have this thing that they call the Team Canada approach, where they send their U.S. ambassador, premiers from the provinces, cabinet ministers to meet with governors and people in Washington and the Trump team to sort of reiterate how important Canada is and sort of send the message that tariffs would also hurt U.S. consumers.

Santiago, border security, a major element of the U.S.-Mexico relationship. Will they be able to put pressure on Mexico to stem the flow of immigrants? And what is the concern there for the Scheinbaum administration? Yes, for sure they will. Mexican officials now say that the border enforcement policies implemented by Scheinbaum's predecessor, Nationalist President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, is working now to

Illegal border crossings have dropped by 74% so far this year at the U.S.-Mexico border. The problem is that the Trump administration is also likely to remove some of the and eliminate some of the policies implemented by the Biden government. And that may create more incentives, actually, for migrants to rush to the border, especially before he takes office. He will likely increase the

pressure, possibly through tariffs, to have the Mexican government implement tougher policies at its own southern border with Guatemala to prevent the migrants from crossing in. Lastly, Vipal, a story that always gets played in Canada around elections, as it did following Trump's victory in 2016, is

is people who don't like his vision of America saying they're going to migrate north of the border. How do Canadians see this? And is that actually a thing? So I've talked to a few immigration lawyers in the past week or so, and they are reporting more calls from Americans trying to move to Canada than they've ever had before. It's not that easy to get into Canada. And I think that the expectation is that it's a wave of concern that might ebb.

in the next few weeks. Of more concern to them is a potential flood of migrants leaving the U.S. and going north to Canada.

The Canadian law enforcement forces, the RCMP, and the Canadian Border Patrol are preparing for what they expect to be a major rush to Canadian borders in the next weeks and months. It's unclear that the Canadian system can handle the influx, so it is a major worry. I've been speaking to Santiago Perez, the Journal's Deputy Latin America Editor in Mexico City, and Vipal Monga, the Journal's Reporter in Toronto. Santiago, Vipal, thank you so much both. Thank you. Thanks. Thanks.

And turning quickly to markets now, shares of Supermicrocomputer have jumped more than 30% in off-hours trading after it submitted a plan to allow it to keep trading on the Nasdaq. The AI server maker had missed deadlines for providing financial reports to investors.

And shares of private equity company Blackstone will also be in focus following a journal report that it's nearing a deal for Jersey Mike Subs that would value the closely held sandwich chain at around $8 billion. The deal could be announced soon, assuming talks don't fall apart.

And if you're wondering what to make of this earnings season as it draws to a close, we'll be releasing a special bonus episode of the pod tomorrow, looking at some of the big themes from the latest round of financial results. Check it out tomorrow afternoon between our usual a.m. and p.m. editions and let us know what you think.

And that's it for What's News for Tuesday morning. Today's show was produced by Kate Boulivant. Our supervising producer was Daniel Bach. And I'm Luke Vargas for The Wall Street Journal. We will be back tonight with a new show. Until then, thanks for listening.