Very Bad Wizards is a podcast featuring a philosopher (Tamler Sommers) and a psychologist (David Piz
David and Tamler stumble their way through talking about the election results, how Trump got elected
Why do we call Mozart a creative genius? He created his music, but do we also think that he created
David and Tamler have their 100th episode hijacked briefly before taking it back like Wesley Snipes
David and Tamler tackle three topics on their last double digit episode. First, should a middle scho
David and Tamler break down the biggest question in moral philosophy -- can we derive value judgment
Do you have strong views on climate change, taxes, health care, or gun control? Do you think the evi
So where are you? You’re in some house. What am I listening to? Sounds like the radio. Is it the rad
Hello friend, did you come from the Berenstein with an 'E' universe? Or have you lived in the Berens
We all remember the famous iTunes review calling David and Tamler "repugnant." (And the T-shirt/mugs
Dave and Tamler don’t agree about much, but one thing they do share is an affinity for character-bas
Scandinavian film scholar Yoel Inbar joins the podcast for a deep dive on the Swedish film Force Maj
David and Tamler continue their intermittent “classic paper series” with an episode on Jonathan Benn
Inspired by a recent ProPublica report on racial bias in an algorithm used to predict future crimina
David and Tamler have their first real fight in a while over an article defending "social mixing"--d
David and Tamler welcome author and environmental science professor Jennifer Jacquet to the podcast
David and Tamler celebrate Passover with a high-spirited episode on guns, revenge, liberals, being o
We hit the jackpot with this one! Economist Robert Frank (you may remember him from such episodes as
We know that criminal punishment has consequences, both good and bad, and that many people think tha
Philosophers can be funny and funny movies can be philosophical. David and Tamler welcome frequent V
David and Tamler talk about the perils of trying to step outside of your own perspective in ethics,
