cover of episode Pinky and the (lab-grown) Brain

Pinky and the (lab-grown) Brain

2024/11/20
logo of podcast Unexplainable

Unexplainable

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
L
Lisa Genzel
Topics
Rachel Nuwer: 动物实验结果难以转化为人类疗法,90%在动物模型中有效的药物在人体试验中失败。动物模型可能筛选掉对人体有效的药物,也可能通过实际上对人体有毒的药物。器官芯片技术在预测药物毒性方面比动物实验更准确,成本更低,尤其是在肝脏毒性方面。类器官技术利用患者自身的细胞培养出类器官,用于研究特定疾病,例如阿尔茨海默病,并进行个性化治疗。计算机模型在预测毒性方面比动物实验更有效,但其准确性依赖于输入数据的质量,而这些数据部分来源于动物实验。 Manning Nguyen: 器官芯片技术能更准确地预测药物毒性,尤其是在肝脏毒性方面,且成本更低。 Lisa Genzel: 动物实验对于研究基本的生物学问题和复杂的生理系统至关重要,例如研究大脑记忆巩固机制。目前类器官技术还不足以完全替代动物实验,尤其是在需要研究复杂行为和系统交互的研究中。计算机模型可以与动物实验结合使用,提高研究效率和精准度,但不能完全替代动物实验。没有完美的模型,选择合适的模型取决于研究问题。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why do many new drugs that work in animal models fail in human trials?

Animal models often do not accurately predict human responses, leading to a high failure rate in human trials. They may miss potential drugs that could work in people or pass drugs that are toxic to humans.

What are the potential benefits of using organ-on-a-chip technology in drug development?

Organ-on-a-chip technology can more accurately identify drug toxicity, especially liver toxicity, which is frequently missed in animal models. It is also cheaper and faster than using non-human primates.

How do organoids differ from organ-on-a-chip technology?

Organoids are 3D cell cultures grown in the lab that mimic specific human tissues, allowing for personalized treatment and study of rare diseases. They are more complex than organ-on-a-chip models but still have limitations in representing full organ functions.

Why might computer models be a good alternative for toxicity testing?

Computer models can predict toxicity more accurately than animals and are faster and cheaper. They rely on algorithms and AI, making them efficient for large-scale chemical testing.

What are the limitations of organoids and organ-on-a-chip technology?

Both organoids and organ-on-a-chip models have limitations in fully representing the complexity of human organs and interacting systems. They are useful for specific functions but cannot replace the need for studying full biological systems.

Why do some researchers still prefer using animals for certain types of research?

Animals are necessary for studying complex, interconnected biological systems and basic physiological functions that alternatives like organoids or computer models cannot fully replicate. They provide insights into how healthy systems work and the fundamental principles of diseases.

How can computer models complement animal research in neuroscience?

Computer models can predict brain activity and help researchers focus on specific brain areas, making experiments more targeted and potentially reducing the number of animals needed in research.

Chapters
The episode discusses the limitations of animal models in scientific research and the ethical concerns associated with animal testing.
  • 100 million animals are used annually for scientific research.
  • 90% of new drugs that work in animal models fail in human trials.
  • Animal models may weed out drugs that could work in humans and pass toxic ones.

Shownotes Transcript

It’s not great to be a lab rat. And it turns out, lab rats might not be that great for science either. Could the future be little lab-grown brain clumps?

Guest: Rachel Nuwer), science journalist; Lisa Genzel), professor of neuroscience at Radboud University

For show transcripts, go to vox.com/unxtranscripts)

For more, go to vox.com/unexplainable)

And please email us! [email protected])

We read every email.

Support Unexplainable by becoming a Vox Member today: vox.com/members)

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices)