The 600K plan was created by the Venezuelan opposition to ensure they could prove and demonstrate their victory in the presidential election. They anticipated that simply winning the election would not be enough, given the government's history of manipulation and repression. The plan involved collecting paper copies of vote totals from most voting centers in the country to create a verifiable public record.
The QR code on the ACTAs (voting tallies) contained all the results from the specific voting machine. The opposition created an app that scanned the QR code, sending the results to their national command. This allowed the opposition to quickly publish the election results on a website, making them accessible to the public in real time.
The Venezuelan government, led by President Nicolás Maduro, dismissed the opposition's efforts as a 'coup' and did not publish the voting machine totals to back their claim of victory. Instead, they relied on force, detaining over 1,500 people, including opposition leaders, journalists, and human rights defenders, according to a Venezuelan human rights group.
According to the opposition's data, the opposition candidate, Edmundo González Urrutia, won 7.3 million votes, while President Nicolás Maduro received 3.3 million votes. This represented a 2-to-1 victory for the opposition. Even if Maduro had won all the votes from the remaining 17% of ACTAs, he still could not have won the election.
The Electoral Council in Venezuela claimed that the transmission of election results was interrupted due to a hack, but they provided no credible evidence to support this claim. This led to widespread suspicion and protests, as many believed the government was attempting to manipulate the results.
The ACTAs were crucial in the Venezuelan election as they provided a verifiable record of vote totals from each voting machine. They were used by the opposition to prove their victory, as they contained unique identifiers tying them to specific voting centers and machines. The ACTAs were widely accepted as genuine and accurate by independent analysts and media outlets.
The Venezuelan opposition ensured the security of the ACTAs by using a relay system. Witnesses collected the ACTAs from voting machines and handed them off to others who scanned the QR codes and sent the data to the opposition's national command. The physical ACTAs were then taken to secret locations, scanned, and stored in boxes to preserve the evidence.
Venezuelans reacted with widespread disbelief and protests after the government announced that President Nicolás Maduro had won the election without providing specific vote totals. Many took to the streets demanding transparency and the release of the actual numbers, as they suspected the results were manipulated.
International observers, including The Washington Post and The Associated Press, analyzed the opposition's data and concluded that the ACTAs were genuine and accurate. Academics from Venezuela, Brazil, and the United States also verified the results, further confirming the opposition's claims of victory.
The Venezuelan government detained over 1,500 people after the election, including opposition leaders, journalists, and human rights defenders, as part of a crackdown on dissent. The detentions were aimed at suppressing protests and silencing critics who questioned the legitimacy of the election results.
How do you count almost 12 million votes if you’re not the government? This week, we bring you the extraordinary story of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans who created the only verifiable public record of votes in their presidential election — and other stories of people trying to correct the official record with their own versions.
Visit thisamericanlife.org/lifepartners) to sign up for our premium subscription.
Transcripts are available at thisamericanlife.org)
This American Life privacy policy.)Learn more about sponsor message choices.)