I Subscribed To Disney+ - WAN Show August 16, 2024
2024/8/17
The WAN Show
L
Linus
创立并主持著名YouTube频道《林纳斯技术提示》，在技术领域具有重大影响。
Linus认为迪士尼利用用户2019年签署的Disney+强制仲裁协议，试图逃避因迪士尼世界餐厅食物过敏致死事件的责任。迪士尼将用户协议链接隐藏在Disney+注册页面的另一个链接中，试图规避责任。用户协议中有些条款是合理的，例如保护知识产权和公共利益，但有些条款则不合理，例如强制仲裁。迪士尼将强制仲裁条款应用于与Disney+服务无关的事件是不合理的。即使是同一个组织，如果未签署针对特定事件的责任豁免协议，也不应承担责任。迪士尼将品牌授权给餐厅，就应该对餐厅的运营承担一定责任。出于对食品安全风险的考虑，LTT避免涉足食品行业。
Deep Dive
A woman died after an allergic reaction at a Disney restaurant, and her husband sued. Disney claims the husband agreed to forced arbitration when he signed up for Disney+ years earlier. Is this a valid legal defense, and what are the implications for consumers?
- A woman with allergies died after eating at a Disney restaurant.
- Disney claims her husband waived his right to sue by agreeing to forced arbitration in the Disney+ terms of service.
- The husband's legal team argues the terms were hidden and not necessary to eat at the restaurant.
- The restaurant may not be directly operated by Disney, raising questions about liability.
- This case highlights concerns about the enforceability and fairness of terms of service agreements.
Shownotes Transcript