The Post-Mortem
40:00 Share

BP added more than $130 billion to the U.S. economy over the past two years by making investments from coast to coast. Investments like building EV charging hubs in Washington state and starting up new infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico. It's and, not or. See what doing both means for energy nationwide at BP.com slash investing in America. I think the state of democracy right now is very shaky. From the beginning.

These midterms were about democracy. I'm worried that democracy is being eroded. Our democratic system is under direct threat. I think democracy, I think it's much more fragile than I realize. But as I stand here tonight, equality and democracy are under assault. When President Biden made that his central message to voters. I'm asking our nation to come together.

The question was not whether Americans believed democracy was on the ballot.

It was how strong their commitment to democracy really was. And that's where I want to address something that's bugged me for a long time. Would voters care? We are a constitutional republic. We are not a democracy. Nor in the Constitution does it use the word democracy. Would they reject a growing anti-democratic sentiment taking hold at the state level?

For as our president says, we worship God, not government. God bless you. A hardened strain of Christianity gaining ground across the Republican base. We do not consent to kneecapping our governor before he even takes office. We do not consent to you silencing our votes. All of it enabled by elected officials who have been working to seize control of the structures of power.

And when I asked Democratic lawmakers how they plan to combat all this. Everybody who's listening to this podcast who cares about these issues needs to fight harder. I mean, make phone calls, go door to door. They said people would have to vote harder and keep the faith. America is not great because it is more enlightened than any other nation, but rather because it has always been able to

to repair its faults. But it wasn't clear from polling whether that message was really gaining any traction. And so as members of his own party, brace for defeat. In our bones, we know democracy is at risk. We also know this. It's within our power, each and every one of us, to preserve our democracy. President Biden made one final plea.

Turns out, it kind of worked. From the New York Times, I'm Astead Herndon. This is The Run-Up.

Shane, have you recovered from last week? I mean, it's like one week ago for the formal end of the 2022 campaign. We haven't even called the house at this exact moment, and yet we're about to have a 2024 campaign. So I would say no, I have not. I have not yet recovered. You know, I remember earlier this week, as the results from the midterms were still being processed, I called my colleague, Shane Goldmacher. Shane, I'm really excited to have you on and to be able to do this.

For maybe the unaware, you're a national political correspondent, which means that pretty much your job is to understand the parties and where they're at, what they're up to, what their message is, particularly at a high level. In that context, I want to think about the midterms that we all just experienced. How was the Democratic Party thinking about Joe Biden's message heading into the midterms? And

How was the party specifically thinking about his ask of voters to protect democracy over everything else?

I mean, I would say the weekend before the midterms, the party was largely freaking out. They were freaking out about what they expected to be significant losses in the House of Representatives. They were freaking out about the possibility of also losing the Senate. And when it came to the president, they were worried that he wasn't talking about the issue that in poll after poll was shown to be the top issue for voters in 2022, which was the economy and inflation issue.

And there was actually a moment just before the midterms that I think really captured this, which was Hillary Rosen, who is this longtime Democratic strategist, been around forever. And she did the Sunday shows and she was on CNN. And she sort of ripped into the Democrats and said, we have missed the message on this election. The voters keep telling us over and over, we care most about the economy. And all

All we are doing is talking about how democracy is at stake. And we're sort of, this is the catchphrase in politics is like meet people where they're at, right? So we were not meeting people where we're at. That was the concern that Democrats had over and over and over again, heading into the election. I mean, one of the nights that I was working, one of the many nights that I was working late this last few weeks, and I was in the office.

I stayed to cover Joe Biden's speech about democracy. And I was in the office late enough to decide I'm taking a taxi home. And I remember calling. I talked to several Democrats on my taxi ride home. And I was saying, hey, what did you think of the president's speech? And they said, look, this is...

I mean, it's fine. You know, they weren't against him giving a speech about democracy the week before the election, but it wasn't what their campaigns were about. They felt that it was him talking about an important moral cause, but not necessarily something that was helpful politically. Right. There was a feeling that Biden and other Democrats were overly focused on trying to convince voters to reject growing extremism. And that maybe that wasn't something that the majority of Americans were all that troubled by.

Yeah, I mean, there was a ton of criticism for Democrats for intervening a handful of these primaries to push these more extreme Republican candidates who were successful in a House race in Michigan, where the Democrats backed a more extreme Republican who ousted in a primary one of the 10 Republicans who had voted to impeach Donald Trump. There was pushback to that. There was pushback to Democrats pushing through candidates, for instance, in Illinois for governor.

And how the Democrats got a lot of, you know, can you say shit? Well, the Democrats got a lot of problems for doing that.

You can lose fact that they were, there's a supply and demand issue here, which is the Republican electorate. You know, there was demand for these kinds of candidates. So the Democrats helped supply the candidates, but the voters were looking for them. And so when Joe Biden was talking about this, he was talking about a real phenomenon that the Republican party was moving in this direction. That if you took the totality of the 2022 primaries, Donald Trump, for the most part, was winning in terms of getting candidates aligned with him through the Republican primaries.

And so when you look at how the results came out, his focus on democracy was part

of a broader message that he was pushing. It was part of a broader message that Democrats were pushing, which was, this is a Republican party that is so extreme that they will take away your democracy. They will take away your abortion rights. They'll take away your social security. They'll take away your X, Y, and Z and put it all together. And it seems like it had some success. Two things there. One, to highlight what you said, like, I think that is a core point. You know, what we often talk about is bad candidates

was really a reflection of what Republican voters wanted. The slate that Republicans had in this midterm, you know, as we've talked about on this show, was often driven by Republican voters who have wanted those grievances reflected in their candidates. But then the second thing here is like,

I mean, it wasn't fully out of left field for people to question that democracy messaging strategy, right? Like, to your point, polling did consistently show that Americans ranked economy as the top concern, concerns about inflation as a broader concern. How should we think about that type of issue-based polling that told us that consistently throughout the year and what we know to be true now, which is that voters were really concerned

about democracy and protecting the political system.

Yeah, I mean, I think the real question is about how do you ask people what are the issues you care most about? Because in poll after poll, including the New York Times poll that we did in October, overwhelmingly, inflation and the economy were the top issues. 44% of voters said those were the top issues for them. And democracy, you know, that was down at the 8%, 9% range. And so if you're going to say, well, what's the most important issue? You know,

I think the issue, the most important issue of the 2022 elections was probably the economy and inflation. But it doesn't mean that it was the decisive issue. And I think that that's where you get into what the Democratic messaging was, which was it was trying to take this election. And for voters say, look, you might not like the economy. You might not like Joe Biden.

But if you go to the voting booth, don't just think about the economy. Don't just think about Joe Biden. Think about the broader consequences for this country. Don't make it a referendum on Joe Biden. Don't say, I don't like Joe Biden, so we're going to vote for the Republicans. Say, I don't like Joe Biden, but I also really do value abortion rights. But I also really do value free and fair elections. But I also really do value X, Y, and Z priorities that the Democratic Party aligned with them on. And what you can see is

In totality, in many states, and we can get into this, but in many states, the results show that on balance, voters were choosing the suite of issues that were not just their feelings about Joe Biden and not just their feelings about the economy when they cast their ballots. I know it's just a week from election results. I know that we're going to get more and more info about the specifics of who came out on Tuesday. But to the extent that we know now, who responded specifically to that message?

about protecting democracy? - I think I'd answer that question a little bit differently by not exactly answering your question. But what I would say is that Joe Biden won in 2020 chiefly by motivating an anti-Trump, stop Trump coalition. And the same coalition was what delivered Democrats the House of Representatives in 2018.

And so for the Democrats, for the White House, this was the kind of messaging that could pull the party together and bring in progressives who might have been disaffected with some of the things that Joe Biden didn't push through, moderates who might have had misgivings about Joe Biden's leadership, that those are both voters who went with Joe Biden in 2020, and that this kind of messaging could bring them around in

in 2022. And while the exit polls will continue to get adjusted in the days and weeks ahead, you know, there's one really interesting finding in the exit polls that shows where this worked, which is voters rank their feelings about the president in four main categories. Do you approve strongly? Do you somewhat approve? Do you somewhat disapprove? Or do you strongly disapprove?

What happened this election that's really different is that voters who somewhat disapproved of Joe Biden actually voted for the Democrats. So a plurality, 49% of voters who said they somewhat disapproved of Joe Biden, they nonetheless went and voted for a Democrat for Congress. And that

That's very different than what has happened before in the 2018 midterms, during Trump's first term, during the 2010 midterms, during Barack Obama's first term. Those voters went overwhelmingly for the opposition party. So for months going into the election, Republicans said, oh, look at Joe Biden's approval rating. We're going to win. The environment is so bad. He's at 41%. He's at 40%. This is toxic. You can't run that far ahead of Joe Biden's political gravity.

And at the end of the day, that's what Democrats did because a chunk of voters who didn't like Joe Biden nonetheless went and voted for a Democrat. It somewhat feels like 2020 where you have this unlikely and frankly, relatively dissatisfied coalition turn up and vote for the Democrat anyway, even though it wasn't always clear that they would.

I mean, this is the dynamic typically in a midterm, right? The party out of power. And at this point, the Republicans were out of the House. They were out of the Senate and they're out of the White House.

they're usually the party that's most pissed off. They're the party that's aggrieved. They're the party that's getting policy stuff down their throat that they hate. And if you look back at 2018 and you think about how Democrats were feeling during those midterms, they were the ones having everything ripped away from them by Donald Trump. And you go back to 2010 and think about those midterms, it was the Republicans who were exclusively having everything ripped away from them by Democrats. They were angry about the spending. They were angry about the healthcare bill.

But this year it was different. The single most impactful change that happened, it was being stuffed down the throats of Democrats, right? The Dobbs decision by the Supreme Court. It's just hard to overlook. This took away a half century of federal abortion rights. And so what you had is a Democratic base, not just a Republican base, but a Democratic base that was having their policy priorities ripped away from them.

So the dynamics are different. And I think that the messaging around the Republican Party sort of tried to tie all those things together. And I do, I think it surprised most people. It surprised even Democrats, the degree to which it was successful.

The Republicans are still taking control of the House. And in the House, 218 votes is the only thing that matters. They'll have subpoena power. They'll have power to initiate investigations. But when it comes to setting the stakes of how the election unfolded, I do think it's hard to overlook that that inversion, that the party out of power is usually the ones that are getting screwed. And in this case, the people who are in power in Washington, their voters are the ones feeling most aggrieved.

We'll be right back.

of Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. National average 12-month savings of $744 by new customer surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations.

- Hello, this is Yuande Kamalafa from "New York Times Cooking," and I'm sitting on a blanket with Melissa Clark. - And we're having a picnic using recipes that feature some of our favorite summer produce. Yuande, what'd you bring? - So this is a cucumber agua fresca. It's made with fresh cucumbers, ginger, and lime.

How did you get it so green? I kept the cucumber skins on and pureed the entire thing. It's really easy to put together and it's something that you can do in advance. Oh, it is so refreshing. What'd you bring, Melissa?

Well, strawberries are extra delicious this time of year, so I brought my little strawberry almond cakes. Oh, yum. I roast the strawberries before I mix them into the batter. It helps condense the berries' juices and stops them from leaking all over and getting the crumb too soft. Mmm. You get little pockets of concentrated strawberry flavor. That tastes amazing. Oh, thanks. New York Times Cooking has so many easy recipes to fit your summer plans. Find them all at NYTCooking.com. I have sticky strawberry juice all over my fingers.

So Shane, Democrats were able to successfully make the case for democracy protection, especially in important battleground races. But let's square that, though, with results we saw in other parts of the country. I'm thinking of New York or Florida, where there was a significant shift in the Republican direction.

This is something our colleague Nate Cohn has been reporting on. The 2022 midterms unfolded in a way that recent midterms and recent elections haven't, frankly, which is to say they didn't unfold uniformly the same way all across the country. There wasn't so much a national trend at the House of Representatives. There was a series of state trends. In New York, the Republicans are going to pick up several seats in

even though this is one of the most democratic states in the country, but in many of the battlegrounds, the places where Trump-aligned candidates were talking about not certifying the last election.

States like Michigan and Pennsylvania, there wasn't a red wave. There was a blue wave that voters came out because they were motivated by the suite of issues we talked about already. They were motivated to protect democracy. They were motivated because abortion was quite literally on the ballot in Michigan this year where there was an abortion measure. And in

in Michigan, the Democrats are actually taking more power, taking over parts of the legislature. In Pennsylvania, there was a strong rejection of the Republican candidate for governor, Doug Mastriano, by really a landslide in a state that's that close. And along the way, John Fetterman won the Senate race. The only Senate seat to flip so far is for the Democrats, and it came in a battleground state. And so in these states...

where the issues of democracy and abortion were more viscerally there. They won statewide and they won locally. And so that was a very different election than the one you saw in New York. It was a very different election than you've seen in California, where they continue to count the votes.

You know, it wasn't that that there wasn't some red waves. It was that the red wave was true in New York, but it wasn't true next door in Pennsylvania. And again, that's different. We have not seen an election like that that was localized by state in many years.

I guess you're saying that to the extent that media and the Democratic Party missed the story, it was in seeing things going the way that you would expect or even worse in places like New York or Florida and thinking, oh, this is going to be what happens nationally. That voters are not going to respond to that kind of democracy on the ballot question. It won't be enough.

When, as it turned out, particularly in the most critical races, in the biggest battlegrounds, and when democracy and extremism felt really tangible to voters, when it didn't feel like a really ethereal academic concept, people did behave very differently. I mean, if you look at the win-loss record of the Republicans that Trump backed who were election deniers in these key swing states...

it's overwhelmingly a series of losses.

It's Kerry Lake in Arizona losing. It's Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania losing. It's Tim Michaels in Wisconsin losing. It's Tudor Dixon in Michigan losing. The lone win is in Nevada, where the Republican is winning the governorship and unseating the Democratic governor. That's just the governor's races. And if you go into Secretary of State's races, all of the Republican candidates who ran on Trump's denial of the last election, they all lost.

And you just don't often get that kind of uniform defeat in a midterm for the party out of power.

It's interesting because in the lead up to the election, abortion and democracy were sort of being talked about as two distinct and separate issues. Abortion as a tangible issue that might mobilize voters and help Democrats turn out specifically among the base. And democracy as this kind of existential threat that it wasn't clear if Americans would respond to.

But in the end, it seems like you're describing a midterms environment where they sort of work together as part of a larger message about unchecked extremism among Republicans. And that abortion and what has happened to Roe v. Wade was on some level an example of how Republicans have distorted democracy.

And that's how it resonated with swing voters to back Democrats. Intertwined issues rather than distinct ones. Is that fair? Yeah, I think you can go back to the messaging that was coming from the White House, some of which was mocked.

which is that Joe Biden, early in 2022, started using the word ultra-MAGA. Then this was not an accidental label. This is a label that had come through months of research by groups aligned with the White House saying, look, we made word clouds of what Democratic talkers said about

Republican Party, and it looks like a mess. Nothing pops out. You see all these different words, spineless, supremacist, democracy, cowardly, petrified, race, culture, wars, identity, politics, divisive, but they're all around the same size. There's no singular message. And what we need is a label, a label that we can put on the Republican Party that voters already associate with negative things. And

And the research came up that MAGA, which is a term that the Republican Party had embraced, that MAGA was actually an effective tool to lump these things together in the minds of voters because voters already were lumping them together. Voters already intuitively felt Republicans were changing. They felt that they were changing and they felt that this MAGA label, the Trump-embraced MAGA label, meant already in this research, it meant already radical and extreme and power-hungry. So...

the Dobbs decision leaks. And Joe Biden rolls out this ultra-MAGA label, and it told voters that a big change was coming, that a Supreme Court was, in the view of many Democrats, radically rewriting what was the law for 50 years around abortion. And so, yeah, it fit into that messaging frame. And I'm not saying that this was a brilliant plan that the White House had concocted to come up with this just before this happened, right? Some of this is happenstance.

But what is true is that Joe Biden went from that 2020 race where he was talking exclusively about Trump to a broader label. And some of the reporting I've done shows that it wasn't easy necessarily for him to come to using a label, right? He is a label-averse kind of a guy. He's a senator who reached across the aisle, who prizes his relationship with Republicans, who is proud of the fact that he got some Republicans to line up with him on an

infrastructure package, right? He is not the first person to go use words to label the party writ large. But he came to this in part from some conversations he'd had with historians. So Biden meets with historians at the White House occasionally. And they told him that, according to a person who's spoken with Biden about this, that

that this kind of labeling, that it's effective and it has been effective throughout history at sort of battling far-right factions. And so Biden did really come to embrace it. And interestingly, after Biden embraced this kind of label,

So did Trump, right? He slapped ultra MAGA on a t-shirt. He slapped it on wine glasses and pint glasses. And he says, I'm your MAGA king just days before the election. And so if you're trying to push out a message that this party is this thing and the other party wraps themselves up in it too, it helps promote the message, right? And the combination was that it's stuck. That I think for... Go on. No, no, no. I'm not sure you finished, but I'm saying I'm sure in the Trump...

Republican head, they thought that this was going to be another basket of deplorables moment to go back to 2016, that they could use a label that came from Democrats and actually use it as something that they can embrace branding-wise to drive energy among the base. I think the key difference here is while in 2016, independents, swing voters did not like the Democratic options,

and did not view the Republicans as radical. In this case, MAGA Republicans is in fact something that they ended up punishing Republicans for. I mean, I think the biggest challenge for Trump in 2022 and going into 2024 is the idea of Donald Trump was deeply appealing to the middle because

in 2016, the middle that was really unhappy with where the country was and was ready to break things, right? They were ready. When you talk to voters in 2016, voters were talking about upending the system, and he was the candidate who they thought would do it. And it was a risky bet, but you know what? Let's just do it. It's time. And they saw what that looked like. They had four years of it. And when it comes to denying the election, they saw a pretty ugly result at the end of those four years.

And I think it's, you know, this has not showed up in polling and it's really one of those things that's impossible to test. But I am really curious about how the assault on Nancy Pelosi's husband played at the very end of the cycle. I am too. I,

I really think this was a late break from those independent moderates. And something happened in the last couple weeks. And that was a real example of that extremism and violence. Yeah, it's hard not to overlook that this political cycle began with violence and ended with violence, right? Democrats took control of the Senate on January 5th, 2021. And on January 6th,

the capital riot happens right it is the first full day the democrats are now going to be control of washington now they hadn't taken formal control yet but the first full day and at the very end of the cycle you had another example of political violence and the break-in of nancy pelosi's husband which was not met with the kind of universal condemnation by the republican party that it might have once been it was met with some conspiracy theory spreading at the highest levels

It was met with jokes by some candidates on the ballot for Tuesday. It was met with jokes by some. It was met with mocking by others. There were memes that was pushed out by Donald Trump Jr. The idea that the country was moving toward a place where the octogenarian husband of the House Speaker could be in their own home, somebody could break in, a politically motivated assailant could break in, threatening to potentially kidnap the House Speaker and

and bludgeoned her husband with a hammer. You know, again, there's not polling to show the impact of this, but it's one of those moments that almost everyone in the country heard about. And it's hard not to imagine that it didn't have some impact on the psyche of voters as they went to the polls. Again, I don't have any way to show that yet. I'm not even sure how you would, but it just feels like the kind of moment

that matters. In 2016, people agreed with Trump that the system was broken and that the establishment was totally out of touch. But in 2022, there is not that same level of agreement, particularly when what has become of the Republican establishment now represents a openly, at least in this cycle, anti-democratic wing.

It seems like a key question here then is to what extent should we see this as a Democratic victory versus a Republican loss that the GOP just handed them this huge advantage in the form of Trumpism, in the form of extremist positions, in the form of out of touch candidates? Can you ask that again? To what extent did Democrats win this? And to what extent do Republicans lose this?

Yes. I mean, I don't know that there's a clear answer to that question. You know, there's never just one side of an election that just one side won and one side lost. I think that what is clear is that that embrace of Trump without Trump on the ballot was not helpful at

And I think that that's something worth looking at too, which is that for all the talk of the downsides of Trump this year, and there's a lot of talk among Republicans about the downsides of Trump this year, there is an argument from Trump allies that what they really needed was Trump himself. The problem wasn't- Everyone else is doing diet Trump. And what people want is the pure, unfiltered stuff. That there's no substitute for the real thing, right? And so-

By the way, this was a calculus that House Democrats made at the very beginning of the cycle. They did a big study of what went wrong in 2020. So House Democrats lost seats in 2020. They are likely to have lost more seats in 2020 than they lost in 2022, in a year where everyone is expecting them to lose a bunch of seats. So after that 2020 race, they set off on this big internal study. They called it the deep dive. And in this study, one of the findings they had was

We think that Trumpism minus Trump is a big political loser because Trump's base doesn't turn out. And so in this big PowerPoint presentation that they presented to their conference early in 2021, they had a few slides talking about this exact question and said, what's going to happen if he's not there? And one of the side questions they had, and I'll read it to you, is will this Trump toxicity work without Trump terminating?

turnout. These are negative things that Trump has brought about for his party, but he also had an upside. He brought out people who otherwise weren't voting. And so in the postmortem that's happening, I think it can get lost that there are people inside the Republican Party who don't see the lesson as less Trump. They see the lesson as more Trump. And that's playing out right now as House Republicans select their leadership team for the coming Congress.

That does feel like the core question facing the Republican Party right now, not just what to do about Donald Trump as an individual, but what are the defining features of Trumpism? And how much does that have a place among the Republican base? As Donald Trump makes his presidential announcement, this is what the party is asking itself.

Yeah, and it's going to ask itself in two key places simultaneously over the next two years. Place one is the campaign trail where the question will be, do people run against Trump and how many of them?

because he won again, the 2016 Republican primary through a fractured field, right? That was not a majority of the Republicans, but he still holds an almost exclusive hold on 35 to 40% of the Republican party. And so when I've talked to Republicans, question is how many want to run? Well, they're all afraid that too many of them would run and the chance of one strong one gets, and then many of them will get in. And then he

skates through a divided field. So it'll happen on the campaign trail, but it's also going to be happening on Capitol Hill, where I don't think we should forget that even if Republicans had a deeply disappointing night,

They are on track to have the House majority. And once they have the House majority, they have subpoena power. They have ability to pass legislation. They have an ability to set their own agenda separate from Donald Trump. To the extent that Kevin McCarthy as potential House speaker is able to muscle through legislation.

He can put out legislation that would define what a Republican party could stand for separate and in addition to Donald Trump. He could initiate investigations into the Biden administration that would define what the party stands for separate and in addition to Donald Trump. So the question of what does the party become, it's going to happen in two places at once. It feels like, to your point about the campaign trail and about Capitol Hill,

is really a question about Republican voters themselves. Donald Trump, from every indication I've ever had about the man, is going to say the things that he has always said. To me, what seems to be the open question is whether that 30 to 35 percent that has been so tied to him responds to those messages in the same way. And to your point about Capitol Hill,

whether they're pressuring the Republican House to really play out Trump's grievances. Because what we could be defining as Trumpism could be just what Republican Blaze believes in, whether Donald Trump is leading the charge or not. Well, I said, I think you know this better than almost any other political reporter, which is they call themselves political leaders, but in many cases, politicians are political followers.

They're following where the votes are. They're following where their base is. They're following the first election they face in every election, which is the primary. Their chief concern politically is their own base. And so where the base of the Democratic Party goes and where the base of the Republican Party goes, so goes the party itself in general.

As we said, there's an open question about that Republican base. But to your point about the Democratic base, what should they take from the results on this Tuesday? I mean, on one hand, there is a universal understanding of Democrats beating expectations, of overperforming, of really succeeding using, as we talked about,

that language of Republican extremism and protecting democracy and abortion rights. But at the same time, with all of those things kind of breaking the Democrats' way over the last couple weeks, they still will face a Republican house and they still face a Democratic base that has shown real signs of erosion and continue to show some of them in these midterms. If you are the Democratic Party,

after the glow of this midterms, what fades off? How should you view the state of where Democrats are right now? Well, I think that the best thing to do sometimes is actually to listen to the politicians. And Joe Biden had a press conference right after the election. He was asked, given the results, given some of the unhappiness in the country, what would you do differently? And one of the very first words he said was nothing. He said he didn't want to do anything differently.

And when you talk to people around the White House, they say the Republicans weren't actually running against our agenda. They didn't run against the specific policies that we pursued. So the White House doesn't feel like their agenda was rejected. But when we've talked about what did Democrats run on, we've talked about it almost as if they were the opposition party. They were running to stop a set of Republican priorities. And so I think it's a real open question what the agenda is for the second half of

of Joe Biden's first term. And beyond that, there are already questions about who the party standard bearer should be in the future. As much as there are nagging concerns about Joe Biden's age, there are deeper concerns among Democrats about the idea of running against Donald Trump again. And the same reason that Democrats came to Joe Biden in the first place might be the reason they rally around him again.

which is he is still the only Democrat to have beaten Donald Trump. And his candidacy is very much pitched on that he's the candidate who can do it again. Right, right. On one hand, you have an electorate who even while backing Democrats in this midterms in historic fashion, did so while reporting that they weren't that satisfied with the president and the party in power, that they were doing so in spite of President Biden, not because of him.

I've talked to so many Democratic voters who tell me they're sick of their party offering themselves as just not Republicans. But at the same time, the strongest bond between Democratic voters, the biggest motivator for Democratic voters, the biggest money driver for the voters Democrats need, seems to be pitching themselves as not Donald Trump and the Republicans.

If you think about what are the two successful political coalitions that Democrats have mobilized in the last 15 years, the first was Barack Obama's political coalition of hope and change. The second is a stop Trump coalition. And that came together first in the 2018 midterms. It came together again in 2020 with the election of Joe Biden. And it showed its strength

in an unlikely and unexpected way in these midterms, where Democrats are still expected to lose the House, but by such a small margin, that it wasn't really a repudiation, and to hold or even gain seats in the Senate. And so there's tension among Democrats for what the party should stand for. But there's broad agreement that stopping Trump is the recipe to unite the party.

Just days before Joe Biden secured the Democratic nomination, he described himself, I think for the first time, as a transitional figure. He was running to transition the Democrats to a new future. And right now we know what the present is. And the present is that he can lead a stop Trump coalition. But what we don't know is what that future looks like and who's leading it. Mm-hmm.

Thank you, Shane. I really appreciate your time. Thank you. So the midterms have left both parties in a moment of reflection. For Democrats, it's about how much of their future is inherently tied to Republicans. And for Republicans, it's a level of introspection similar to what they face after their loss in 2012, when they concluded that the country was changing and the party wasn't changing with it.

Donald Trump provided an unexpected solution to that problem. But in doing so, he transformed the party into a reflection of its grassroots base, a base that's grown increasingly extreme and anti-democratic.

And so these midterms are forcing the party to make a choice. But in the end... Well, thank you very much. And on behalf of Melania, myself, and our entire family, I want to thank you all for being here tonight. It's a very special occasion. The choice may not be theirs to make.

In order to make America great and glorious again, I am tonight announcing my candidacy for president of the United States. So while we started by asking how strong Americans' commitment to democracy really is, the midterms have only begun to offer an answer. And they've opened up a whole new set of questions. See you next year on The Run-Up.

When it comes to making plans, you are the best.

from those delicious barbecues to special birthdays and unforgettable family get-togethers. The same way you plan for those important moments, start planning to protect you and your loved ones from a natural disaster like a hurricane, flood, wildfire, or tornado. Sign up for local weather and emergency alerts, prepare an emergency kit, and make a family communications plan. Get started today at ready.gov slash plan. A public service message brought to you by FEMA and the Ad Council.

The Run-Up is reported by me, Astead Herndon, and produced by Elisa Gutierrez and Caitlin O'Keefe. It's edited by Franny Carr-Toth, Larissa Anderson, and Lisa Tobin, with original music by Dan Powell, Marion Lozano, and Alisha Ba'i-Tube. It was mixed by Corey Schreppel and fact-checked by Caitlin Love. Special thanks to Paula Schumann, Sam Dolnick,

David Halfinger, Julia Simon, Mahima Chablani, Shannon Busta, Nell Gologly, Jeffrey Miranda, and Maddie Maciela. And one last thanks to you, the listener. We are deeply appreciative that you've chosen to go on this journey with us. And we'll see you back here in a few months. Thanks again, y'all.

AI may be the most important new computer technology ever. But AI needs a lot of processing speed. And that gets expensive fast. Upgrade to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, or OCI. OCI is the single platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. Do more and spend less like Uber, 8x8, and Databricks Mosaic.

Take a free test drive of OCI at oracle.com slash nyt. oracle.com slash nyt.