The lies are pervasive due to the fusion of old lying techniques with new technology like AI, the influence of figures like Elon Musk, and the strategic use of disinformation by political actors.
Elon Musk, with his massive following on Twitter, actively spreads false information and conspiracy theories, significantly influencing public perception.
Social media has evolved from a platform where disinformation was somewhat controlled to a wild west where tech leaders like Musk actively promote falsehoods and evade accountability.
Trump's lies about the 2020 election serve as a foundational narrative to undermine faith in the electoral system and prepare for potential denial of the 2024 election results.
The lies create an environment where people prefer their version of truth over verified facts, undermining the foundation of democracy and public trust in institutions.
Yes, individuals like Rudy Giuliani have faced legal consequences for defamation, but the broader platforms and leaders spreading disinformation remain largely unaccountable.
Fox News consistently spreads false information and provides a platform for lies to be repeated and amplified, creating a dangerous echo chamber effect.
Trump's lies about Tim Walz are part of a broader strategy to demean and emasculate a political opponent, reinforcing his own image as the strong, masculine leader.
The rejection of truth by Trump's supporters erodes the societal foundation of verifiable facts, leading to a culture where lies are normalized and accepted.
These rulings show that there are legal avenues to hold individuals accountable for spreading false information, but broader systemic changes are needed to address the issue comprehensively.
The Washington Roundtable discusses the avalanche of disinformation that has taken over the 2024 election cycle, including an A.I. video meant to slander Tim Walz and claims that the votes are rigged before they’re even counted. Will this torrent of lies tip the election in favor of Donald Trump? Is there a way out of this morass of untruth? “I think the lies are clearly winning,” the staff writer Evan Osnos says. “But I would also say that that doesn’t mean that we should abandon the tools that are available.” Osnos notes recent defamation rulings against Rudy Giuliani and Fox News over false statements about the 2020 election as cases in point.
This week’s reading:
“Donald Trump and the F-Word),” by Susan B. Glasser
“Can Older Americans Swing the Election for Harris?),” by Bill McKibben
“What’s the Matter with Young Male Voters?),” by Jay Caspian Kang
“Door-Knocking in Door County),” by Emily Witt
“What Would Donald Trump Do to the Economy?),” by John Cassidy
“The Tight-Knit World of Kamala Harris’s Sorority),” by Jazmine Hughes
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to [email protected] with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.