Home
cover of episode Josh Shapiro on How Kamala Harris Can Win Pennsylvania

Josh Shapiro on How Kamala Harris Can Win Pennsylvania

2024/9/16
logo of podcast The Political Scene | The New Yorker

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

Chapters

Pennsylvania's 19 electoral votes make it a key swing state in the 2024 election. Governor Josh Shapiro discusses the state's political landscape, highlighting Kamala Harris's strategies and challenges in winning over voters, including addressing concerns about fracking.
  • Pennsylvania is a crucial swing state with 19 electoral votes.
  • Kamala Harris needs to appeal to Independents and Republicans to win.
  • Fracking is a key issue in Pennsylvania, and Harris has shifted her stance.
  • Shapiro emphasizes the importance of retail politics and connecting with voters directly.

Shownotes Transcript

This is The Political Scene, and I'm David Remnick. In years past, we grew accustomed to the state of Florida playing a decisive role in presidential elections. Then for a while, Ohio was one of the bellwethers. But by 2024, all eyes have become focused on Pennsylvania. With 19 electoral votes, which ranks fifth in the nation, Pennsylvania is going to be critical for winning the White House. For decades, Pennsylvania trended slightly blue.

But it's now deeply purple, with a divided statehouse and a history of razor-thin margins in general elections. A notable exception here, though, was the governor's race. Democrat Josh Shapiro won in 2022 by nearly 15 points, a landslide by any accounting, as Governor Shapiro's approval ratings in Pennsylvania remain sky-high. I want you to know, every single day, I go to work for you.

I put my shoulder to the wheel and I focus on three simple letters in our alphabet: G.S.D. I focus on getting shit done for all of you. Perhaps that's why Donald Trump has chosen to single out Shapiro for attack, calling him, quote, "an overrated Jewish governor." Lovely. I sat down with Shapiro the other day to talk about how a Democrat can win Pennsylvania.

I've been looking at the Pennsylvania vote over the course of time. And right now, you are governor with a very big margin of victory. You did spectacularly well in that state. As we sit here, the margin between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump is negligible. It's essentially even. Maybe it's one point in her favor, but we all know about the margin of error. Why is it so tight?

Every presidential race in Pennsylvania is tight. I mean, go back and look at 2016 when Trump was first on the ballot. That race came down to 44,000 votes. Trump won that race.

And then four years later, Joe Biden beat him, but beat him by 80,000 votes. I mean, we're a commonwealth of 13 million people, about 9 million registered voters. So you're talking about a percentage point or less. So it's not shocking to me that the race is, as you say, you know, effectively tied at this point. Now, what Kamala Harris has done, I think, really effectively is put her coalition back together because we were struggling there for a number of months. But to win in Pennsylvania, you're not winning with only Democrats.

You've got to get like-minded independents and Republicans. I feel real confident we'll get there, but we have a lot of work to do. What are her biggest challenges in convincing Pennsylvania voters? Is fracking an issue where she has—

In the words of the Trump campaign, flip. She's changed them on. I'm happy to speak about fracking, but if I can answer your question maybe a little bit more broadly. Please. And you can certainly push me on a particular issue or not. I think a big part of it is folks want to get to know her. You know, we're a big state, but we're still a retail state, meaning you got to show up. You got to let folks kick the tires. You got to let them ask you some questions. The thing that I have seen that offers great encouragement from the Harris-Walls campaign is –

They're not just showing up in Philly and Pittsburgh, and I love Philly and Pittsburgh. But, you know, before they went to the convention, they were in Beaver County, Pennsylvania. That's a rural corner of our state over by like Ohio and West Virginia. I think Tim Walls, you know, within the last few days has been in rural Lancaster County, rural Fayette County, in Erie County, showing up in communities that oftentimes –

are forgotten. You know, I camped out in those areas when I was running for governor and many of those areas. Was that rough campaigning for you at first? No, I mean, look, Pennsylvanians are really, really kind and generous and decent folks. Even if they're not going to vote for you, they want to hear from you. They want to know what you're going to do for them. And I pledged throughout my campaign and obviously have done this as governor to be a governor for all Pennsylvanians. And so you got to show up in these areas.

Just two days ago, I was in rural Tioga County. That's the northern part of our state along the New York State border. They suffered horrible flooding. We lost one person in that flooding. I mean, this is a community that certainly a majority of voters did not vote for me.

But I made clear I'm their governor and I'm there to help, there to make sure they've got the resources that they need, get them back up on their feet. Pennsylvanians appreciate that. Go to the fracking issue. The fracking issue is where she's vulnerable in Pennsylvania. She was anti-fracking before. She's now pro-fracking. Sometimes political audiences are forgiving when you change your mind. Sometimes not. I think you may have used the word or the sort of word flip-flops been thrown around.

Or people try and spin it that when you change your position in politics, that that is a sign of weakness. I actually think in her case, it's a sign of strength. And let me explain why. She listened to a lot of people across this country and in Pennsylvania since she made the comment about fracking back in 2019. And I think she can speak for herself, but this is my assessment. She learned just how important fracking

Energy is the economy of this country and certainly to Pennsylvania. We are a net energy exporter. I think listening is a sign of strength. Listen, I'll tell you about my own journey on an issue. When I ran for attorney general in 2016 and even again in 2021, I ran for reelection. I ran as a pro-death penalty candidate. But I'll tell you what, as attorney general, every time a case would cross my desk, I could never pursue the death penalty. And then as governor,

When the first death warrant came across my desk, I couldn't sign it. And I stood up and I spoke from my heart to the people of Pennsylvania to say, I've changed my mind on this. And here is why. So why are the Democrats attacking Donald Trump? You can doubt his sincerity from here to kingdom come and you'll get no argument from me on this.

but now is changing his mind on all kinds of things of political convenience for him. He sees that abortion is a terrible issue for him, and suddenly he's for reversing field. Donald Trump is a pathological liar, and he will say something on Monday, say a different thing Tuesday, and a third thing on Wednesday. When you carefully consider an issue and evolve on it, and you have reasons for that, and you're able to articulate that as well—

I think that shows strength. But, I mean, Dave, when you go into one room and say you're pro-choice and the other room you're anti-choice, I mean, really, you're just speaking to the crowd. And that is what Donald Trump has made a lifetime doing, lying to different audiences to curry a little bit of favor. That's really different, I think, than what the vice president has said about energy. Governor, Donald Trump calls you an overrated journalist.

Jewish governor. When he says something like that, who's he talking to? And what does it mean? What Donald Trump is really doing when he says something like that is

is trying to divide us and create others in our system. Try and make clear that if you look a certain way, you worship a certain way, you come from a certain place, you love a certain person, then you don't count here in Pennsylvania or in the country. But we've talked on this program a lot about Donald Trump and race. We've talked about Donald Trump and any number of otherings or racisms, as it were,

If he were sitting here, he would say, you know, I have my daughter converted to Judaism. I have a Jewish son-in-law. He might even say he has a Jewish lawyer or God knows. He probably would say something like that. He would say something like that. But what I'm asking is Donald Trump anti-Semitic. What I would say to Donald Trump if he were sitting here and gave me –

That answer is that, you know, Donald, you have failed the basic test that I set for my four kids. And I think parents all across this country set for their kids, which is to love thy neighbor. You know, you want to be the leader of the free world. You want to be the president of the United States. You should at least meet that standard we set for our kids. I get that. You have failed miserably. But is he anti-Semitic? And you allow your words –

to be used by others, misappropriated by others, to foment hate in our society. You know, I don't get upset when he attacks me for being an American Jew. And by the way, I am a proud American Jew and proud of my faith. But what breaks my heart is when an American Jew comes over, and particularly a kid, and says, you know, I'm scared. If Donald Trump can say that about you,

and not be punished for it, not face consequences for it. I feel less safe here. And I think what he is doing is making some Americans feel less safe repeatedly. I don't mean to harp on this, but I'm asking you, do you think Donald Trump is an anti-Semite? I think he peddles anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic tropes on a routine, regular basis. And I'm not the only target of that. Why do you think he does it? I think he is cynical about it.

I think he's a bad human being. And I think he is someone who does this to divide people in a way to benefit himself. I don't think it's going to work this time. I think we're seeing clear political signs every single day that it's not working. But it is dangerous and it is cynical. Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania will continue in a moment.

WNYC Studios is supported by the New York Phil. Experience the movies like never before. Watch a film on a towering screen as the New York Phil performs the legendary score live. Films this season include Jaws, Elf, Back to the Future, and Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back. Every note and every emotion brought to life by the New York Phil at David Geffen Hall Lincoln Center. For more information and tickets, visit nyphil.org slash thedaily.

WNYC Studios is supported by On Set With from HGTV and Max, taking you behind the scenes of the most iconic sets from the shows that changed television history. Step inside The Sopranos, The White Lotus, Friends, and more with the people who designed these worlds. The production designers, set decorators, and visual collaborators who brought our favorite locations to life.

Listen to On Set With on Max or wherever you get your podcasts. WNYC Studios is supported by Mohonk Mountain House. For 155 years, Mohonk Mountain House has provided guests with recreation and renewal of the mind, body, and spirit in a unique natural setting. Their newest addition to this legacy is the Via Ferrata and Pinnacle Ledge experiences, a unique blend of rock climbing and aerial staircases with stunning views.

Experience fall at Hudson Valley's iconic resort and create memories of a lifetime. The last thing you want to hear when you need your auto insurance most is a robot with countless irrelevant menu options, which is why with USA Auto Insurance, you'll get great service that is easy and reliable all at the touch of a button. Get a quote today. Restrictions apply. Governor, you've been through, I would say, a complicated experience in recent months.

You were all set to support Joe Biden for president. And the world got turned upside down. And the vice president suddenly became the nominee. And then the vice president had to consider who she would nominate as her vice presidential running mate. And it was very clear to everybody that there were two or three people in consideration. And you certainly were one of them.

And in the end, you didn't get it. So you had to go through the whole process of being vetted. I hope you can be honest with us and tell us that story. Sure. I'll certainly be honest with you. I don't think I'm going to share the details of my private conversations with the vice president. I don't think that that is appropriate. Why not? I received a call from the vice president. But why isn't that appropriate? We know you're forthright supporting the nominee. Yeah.

Why should that remain a secret? I think when you are invited into certain rooms, particularly a room like that with the vice president, and you're having an honest dialogue both ways, I think that there is an implied responsibility toward confidentiality in both directions, the vice president to me and me to the vice president. And I'm going to honor that. I said throughout that process that the vice president had a deeply personal decision to make.

who she wanted to campaign with, who she wanted to govern with. And in the end, I had a deeply personal decision to make too about the direction of service I want to go in.

And I think she made a great pick in Tim Walz. Tim has been my friend for a while. Gwen, his wife, and my wife, Lori, are good friends. We've all worked together on a number of issues. We socialized together. And I think for what the vice president wants in that role, he's an outstanding pick. A lot of the conjecture was that you are not only a Jewish-American candidate but

but had a rich background where that's concerned, whether when you were in college, right after college, working at the Israeli embassy. You made certain statements of support about Israel after October 7th, all kinds of things. And that in certain camps, mainly on the left of the Democratic Party, this was considered a liability.

Let's unpack what you said there. Please do. First off, I'm very proud of my faith. My faith calls me to serve. I don't consult with my faith on whether to sign a bill or my views on a policy, but my faith is what has led me to a life of service. We're speaking here on a Friday, and I'm going to end my Friday the way I end pretty much every Friday, which is back home with my family celebrating our Sabbath.

I will never back down on my commitment to my faith or my pride in my faith, period. Hard stop. I can tell you that while there were many people on the outside who wanted to make an issue of my faith in a negative way. Not an issue of your faith, the issue of your politics on Israel. There's a difference. I want to get to that. I'm not ducking your question at all. I can tell you that the vice president –

for the vice president and I in our dialogue, anti-Semitism, and really, you know, the issue of faith played absolutely no role in that dialogue. If anything, I think, you know, she was concerned about the attacks on me because of my faith. I think it is important to separate out faith from your policy views, in this case on the Middle East. I think it is really important in this nation that there be no nuance between

When it comes to standing up and speaking out and condemning any forms of hate based on faith, whether it's anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, you name it, that issue should be black and white and clear and

Where there is a lot of nuance is on policy matters, particularly in Israel. I've been pretty outspoken on these issues for a while. I realize that some people may have not wanted to hear the nuance of my views on policy or some people assumed certain things about my views because of what I look like or how I worship. But these are my views. Unpack that.

These are my views. No, no, no. But what were they assuming and what was reality? I think sometimes in our politics, when someone who looks like me and worships like me, maybe versus someone who looks and worships like, I don't want to bring the vice president into this, but someone who doesn't look like me, people presume certain things about you. My views on the Middle East, particularly post-October 7th,

have been clearly stated. Number one, Hamas is a terrorist organization that blew across the Israeli border, murdered 1,200 people at a music festival at a kibbutz on the streets of Israel, took over 200 people hostage, including Americans. They are a terrorist group, and there is absolutely no excuse or justification for that conduct, period. It is also, and I grieve,

For those who have died and those families who have an empty seat at the table because their loved one is in a tunnel or somewhere in Gaza being held by this terrorist group, Hamas. I grieve for them. I also grieve for the people of Gaza who have faced destruction and despair and death. I think it is possible to hold both of those emotions at the same time. I believe those hostages need to be brought home and the war needs to end.

And as I have believed for many, many, many years, we need to get back into a situation where we can have a real dialogue with all the players in the Middle East to create a viable two-state solution. Palestinians and Israelis living peacefully side by side. You are in Pennsylvania. The University of Pennsylvania was one of many universities that had big protests. And you had things to say about those protests. How do you break down –

protests in retrospect or that they may return to the college campuses come this fall. Who were you okay with? What were you angry about? Look, whether it's a student on campus or a community leader in a town square, people have a right to peacefully protest in this country and on our campuses.

And I am someone who's a former attorney general, someone who's dedicated to the Constitution, the First Amendment, and now is governor for all Pennsylvanians. I'm someone who works very hard to protect that right. I want people to be able to speak freely. By the way, whether I agree with them or not is not the point. Speak freely? Can they say anything? Whether – when you are protesting –

You do have a responsibility to the broader society. And you got to follow the rules of that community. When you asked me this specific question about Penn, those students certainly have a right to peacefully protest. Penn establishes what those rules are. You got to have a permit. You can't block traffic. You can't block other students. You can't make students, you know, unable to get to their classes, their dorms, you name it.

universities, not just in Pennsylvania, but all across the country, have both a moral and a legal responsibility to keep all students safe on campus. And so what I think is important is just always maintaining that balance, that ability to give people their First Amendment right to protest. And I think college campuses are an important place for that type of dialogue to take place. But it can't make students feel unsafe. It can't literally block a student who is

you know, self-identifies as a Zionist from being able to go to the dining hall or being able to go to their classes or back to their dorm room. That's unacceptable. And I think it is important that those students continue to have their voices in protest should that, you know, continue this fall.

and that the rules of the campus or the city or the community be followed at the same time. And I do not think they are mutually exclusive. I want to ask you about the business of being a public person. And that has magnified immensely in the recent months for you. And I want to know what's...

pleasing about it. And when you take some guff or even kidding, when people look at your speaking style and say, that sounds to me like karaoke Barack Obama or something like that, how do you react to that? How does that change your life? It hasn't changed my life. I'll be honest. I don't get- And by the way, did you cop Barack Obama's speaking style? No, not at all. I actually found that to be so interesting that in the last several weeks, people started saying that.

And I guess J.D. Vance tried to attack me with it. I mean, first off, Barack Obama is like the greatest orator of my lifetime. It's like a weird way to insult someone by invoking Barack Obama. So that was like a little strange for people to say that. People are entitled to their opinions. What I was going to say before is, notwithstanding the attention, I really, I don't feel changed by it at all. Like, I don't get too high from the folks who say, well, you're great. I definitely don't get too low from the

folks who criticize me or attack me. I believe in what I do. I'm also big enough to realize if I make a mistake that I should own it and acknowledge it and change course, change position, you know, you name it. And I'm going to continue to act that way. There's now less than two months between now and Election Day.

And Pennsylvania is the pivot. Yeah. By the way, that may be the only thing Kamala Harris and Donald Trump agree on. It seems to be. So you're going to be seeing a lot of both of them in the next few weeks. What has to happen? What has to happen for Kamala Harris to have a decisive lead? I think she needs to just keep doing what she's doing. Talk about...

her economic policies, how it's going to reduce cost. Is she being specific enough? I think she's been doing that across Pennsylvania. So has Tim, Governor Walz. It's been really important, I think, for Pennsylvanians to hear what their plans are. I mean, look at the contrast with Donald Trump on an issue that is really important to Pennsylvanians, and that is the cost of child care.

Kamala Harris laid out some very specific bills that she's going to try and get to her desk that would reduce the cost of child care. Donald Trump was asked about it a few days ago, and his answer was, child care is—

Child care. And you need it. You didn't find that satisfying? No. And then when his idiot sidekick said, you know, maybe grandma can watch the kids extra. Like, yeah. I mean, it would be wonderful if everybody had a grandma who could do that. But that's not an answer for reducing the cost of child care.

I think when you speak to issues like that that are on people's minds, particularly the economic anxieties that are very real, and you're showing a clear contrast with Donald Trump who does not have a plan to address these things, I think that that's a really compelling way to campaign at the end of the day. I think that's where we are in the Harris-Wallace campaign. We have a better hand. We have a better candidate. We have, I think, a clearer vision.

I would rather be us than them in Pennsylvania. Thank you very much, Governor. Thank you. Josh Shapiro was elected governor of Pennsylvania in 2022. I'm David Remnick. Thanks for joining us. See you next time. The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell.

This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer. With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, and Alejandra Deckett. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund.

WNYC Studios is supported by the New York Phil. Experience the movies like never before. Watch a film on a towering screen as the New York Phil performs the legendary score live. Films this season include Jaws, Elf, Back to the Future, and Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back. Every note and every emotion brought to life by the New York Phil at David Geffen Hall Lincoln Center. For more information and tickets, visit nyphil.org slash thedaily.

The last thing you want to hear when you need your auto insurance most is a robot with countless irrelevant menu options. Which is why with USAA auto insurance, you'll get great service that is easy and reliable all at the touch of a button. Get a quote today. Restrictions apply. My name is Madeline Barron. I'm a journalist for The New Yorker. I...

focus on stories where powerful people or institutions are doing something that's harming people or harming someone or something in some way. And so my job is to report that so exhaustively that we can reveal what's actually going on and present it to the public.

You know, for us at In the Dark, we're paying equal attention to the reporting and the storytelling. And we felt a real kinship with The New Yorker, like the combination of the deeply reported stories that The New Yorker is known for, but also the quality of those stories, the attention to narrative. If I could give you only one reason to subscribe to The New Yorker, it would be... Maybe this is not the answer you're looking for, but...

I just don't think that there is any other magazine in America that combines so many different types of things into a single issue as a New Yorker. You know, like you have poetry, you have theater reviews, you have restaurant recommendations, which for some reason I read even though I don't live in New York City. And all of those things are great, but I haven't even mentioned like

the other half of the magazine, which is deeply reported stories that honestly are the first things that I read. You know, I'm a big fan of gymnastics and people will say, oh, we're so lucky to live in the era of Simone Biles, which I agree. We're also so lucky to live in the era of Lawrence Wright, Jane Mayer, Ronan Farrow, Patrick Radden Keefe. And so to me, it's like, I can't imagine not reading these writers. ♪

You can have all the journalism, the fiction, the film, book, and TV reviews, all the cartoons, just by going right now to newyorker.com slash dark. Plus, there's an incredible archive, a century's worth of award-winning work just waiting for you. That's newyorker.com slash dark. And thanks. From PR.