The Democratic Party has become more beholden to special-interest nonprofits, which reflect the interests of the donor class rather than the broader electorate.
The Obama era saw the rise of a national machine centered around urban political support, foundations, nonprofits, and mass media, which centralized power and influence.
Nonprofits have become influential in setting the Democratic agenda, often reflecting the interests of the donor class rather than the party's core voter base.
The coalition's strategies to solidify support from nonwhite and working-class voters failed, leading to their defection to the Republican Party.
The current party is more centralized and homogeneous, with power concentrated in urban machines and nonprofits, unlike the more decentralized and diverse pre-Obama structure.
The nonprofit complex has become a modern form of patronage, influencing policy and campaign strategies through campaign finance donations and grants.
Social media has empowered single-issue groups, allowing them to amplify their demands and exert pressure on Democratic politicians, often leading to more extreme positions.
Despite becoming more economically populist, the party's cultural positions alienated working-class voters who felt disconnected from the party's agenda.
The party's reliance on astroturf nonprofits, which do not represent the broader interests of nonwhite voters, has led to policy positions that do not resonate with these voters.
The party needs to reduce its dependence on mega-donor contributions and nonprofit staffers, and instead focus on policies and leaders that resonate with its core voter base.
The Democratic Party has been hemorrhaging nonwhite and working-class voters. There are a lot of theories about why that has been happening, blaming it on the party’s ideas or messaging or campaign tactics. But I think the problem might be deeper than that — rooted in the structure of the Democratic Party itself.
Michael Lind is a columnist at Tablet magazine, a co-founder of New America and the author of “The New Class War: Saving Democracy From the Managerial Elite).” He argues that the Democratic Party in recent years has become more beholden to special-interest nonprofits, which claim to represent large constituencies but actually reflect the interests of the donor class. In this conversation, we discuss why he thinks the nonprofit complex became so powerful, how that might have led to a disconnect between the Democratic Party and its core voter base and what he thinks Democrats could do to course correct.
Book Recommendations:
Where Have All the Democrats Gone?) by John B. Judis and Ruy Teixeira
Tyranny, Inc.) by Sohrab Ahmari
Mother Jones) by Elliot J. Gorn
Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at [email protected].
You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast). Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs).
This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Isaac Jones. Our supervising editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Pat McCusker. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts) or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.