cover of episode The Sunday Read: ‘How Everyone Got Lost in Netflix’s Endless Library’

The Sunday Read: ‘How Everyone Got Lost in Netflix’s Endless Library’

2024/10/27
logo of podcast The Daily

The Daily

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
W
Willie Staley
Topics
Willie Staley 认为,流媒体平台内容的泛滥导致电视节目质量下降,难以辨别优秀作品;长期以来,由于流媒体平台数据保密性强,人们难以评估节目收视率,从而难以理解当前电视文化现状;Netflix公开数据后,人们可以开始分析流媒体电视的爆炸式增长及其对文化的影响。他通过分析 Netflix 剧集《Richie Rich》以及 Netflix 的债务驱动增长模式,指出 Netflix 通过大量借贷投资原创节目,迅速发展成为全球最重要的内容平台,但庞大的内容库也导致观众难以理解和选择节目,内容过剩反而让人迷失方向。他认为 Netflix 的成功与风险投资的闪电式扩张模式有关,这种模式鼓励公司不计成本地追求增长,导致文化领域出现类似现象。他分析了 Netflix 与其他流媒体平台的差异,指出 Netflix 更纯粹地体现了流媒体模式,并改变了电视的本质。他还指出,Netflix 数据显示,内容数量庞大,导致节目受欢迎程度与实际观看量之间存在脱节,偶然性在内容消费习惯中变得更加重要;Netflix 平台内容过剩,导致单个节目的重要性降低,即使是热门节目也可能被认为是失败的。Netflix 的债务驱动增长模式及其对好莱坞的影响,导致市场信号失效,娱乐与市场脱节。流媒体平台内容过剩导致中等水平电视节目(mid-TV)的兴起,节目质量下降。Netflix 数据显示,人们观看的节目与人们认为应该观看的节目之间存在脱节,高质量电视节目并非流媒体模式的必然结果。Netflix 数据显示,媒体关注度与节目受欢迎程度之间存在不匹配,人们对流媒体平台内容的认知存在偏差。流媒体平台的扩张与风险投资的零利率政策有关,这种模式创造了一种僵尸式话语,最终走向衰落。流媒体平台的扩张模式导致精英文化与大众文化脱节,但随着经济形势变化,这种模式也走向终结。 Ron Butler 主要负责朗读 Willie Staley 的文章,文章内容涵盖了 Netflix 流媒体平台内容过剩及其对电视行业、文化以及市场的影响。文章通过分析 Netflix 的数据、商业模式以及与其他流媒体平台的比较,深入探讨了流媒体时代电视节目的演变、观众的观看习惯以及文化话语的转变。文章还提及了风险投资、零利率政策等因素对流媒体平台发展的影响,并对未来电视娱乐的走向进行了展望。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did Netflix start releasing its viewership data?

To provide transparency and understanding of its content's popularity.

How did Netflix's vast library impact the television industry?

It changed the business model and the nature of television by offering endless content.

What was the impact of Netflix's debt-financed growth on the industry?

It led to rapid expansion and transformation of the television landscape.

Why did Netflix borrow large amounts of money?

To expand its original programming and dominate the content market.

How did the zero interest rate policy (ZERP) affect venture capital investments?

It encouraged risk-taking and increased venture capital deals.

What is the significance of Netflix's viewer data spreadsheet?

It reveals the popularity of content and the randomness of viewer habits.

Why did some shows on Netflix feel like failures despite being hits?

High production costs made it hard to justify their value in a vast library.

How did the streaming model change the traditional TV business?

It shifted focus from building audiences to catering to individual viewer preferences.

What challenges did the abundance of content on Netflix create?

It led to information poverty and disconnects between viewer habits and critical discourse.

How did the tech world's influence on culture create a zombie discourse?

By enabling businesses to survive on cheap capital, leading to superficial growth and media changes.

Chapters
The podcast explores the origins of the article and the degradation in TV show quality, leading to the question of how we got lost in Netflix's vast library.
  • The author's fixation on the degradation of TV show quality.
  • The shift from prestige series to an abundance of content.
  • Netflix's release of viewership data, providing insights into the explosion of streaming television.

Shownotes Transcript

If you take a journey deep within Netflix’s furthest recesses — burrow past Binge-worthy TV Dramas and 1980s Action Thrillers, take a left at Because You Watched the Lego Batman Movie, keep going past Fright Night — you will eventually find your way to the platform’s core, the forgotten layers of content fossilized by the pressure from the accreted layers above.

Netflix’s vast library changed the business of television — in part by making a better product and showing the rest of the industry that it had to follow suit — but it also changed the very nature of television*.*

Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts) or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.