Home
cover of episode The Army of Election Officials Ready To Reject The Vote

The Army of Election Officials Ready To Reject The Vote

2024/11/1
logo of podcast The Daily

The Daily

Key Insights

Why are some local election officials prepared to reject election results?

Some local election officials are prepared to reject election results due to a belief that elections since 2020 have been fraudulent and that their certification legitimizes these elections. This belief is fueled by a movement that aims to deny elections and change how they are run, often driven by individuals who doubt past election results.

What was the significance of the Washoe County commission meeting on July 9, 2024?

The Washoe County commission meeting on July 9, 2024, was significant because it marked the first time a county failed to certify an election since Nevada became a state. This decision was influenced by a crowd of people who believed the election was fraudulent and pressured the board to reject certification.

How has the 'Stop the Steal' movement evolved since January 6, 2021?

Since January 6, 2021, the 'Stop the Steal' movement has evolved into a coordinated campaign focused on local levels, aiming to influence the certification process of elections. This includes organizing at the grassroots level, funding efforts, and recruiting local activists to question and potentially block election certifications.

What role did Robert Beetle play in the Washoe County election denial efforts?

Robert Beetle played a central organizing role in Washoe County by channeling community anger into more constructive or destructive directions, depending on perspective. He started Operation Sunlight, a local media hub, and helped conduct a takeover of the local Republican party to bring in more far-right candidates who were skeptical of past election results.

How do local citizens like James Homes and Susan Venus contribute to election denial efforts?

Local citizens like James Homes and Susan Venus contribute to election denial efforts by acting as citizen detectives, investigating what they perceive as fraud in the election system. They collect evidence of alleged irregularities and work with local organizers like Robert Beetle to push for changes in the election process and certification.

What is the 'pricing strategy' mentioned in the context of election denial?

The 'pricing strategy' is a template for local activists to start their own election integrity groups, focusing on taking back control of local election offices. It involves recruiting citizens to investigate fraud, organizing local political parties, and aiming to get like-minded individuals onto local boards that make decisions about voting and certification.

How does the certification process for elections work, and why is it being challenged?

The certification process involves local election boards stamping and sending along the results of elections. It is being challenged because some individuals and groups believe that certification legitimizes fraudulent elections. They argue for a change in the process to allow more discretion and investigation before certification, which goes against the established legal obligation of the boards.

What are the potential implications of local election boards failing to certify elections?

If local election boards fail to certify elections, it could lead to the invalidation of those elections, creating chaos and undermining public trust in the democratic process. This could escalate to higher-stakes elections, including the presidency, where a single county's failure to certify could have broader implications for the electoral college and the final vote count.

How do election officials view the increased scrutiny and challenges to the election process?

Election officials view the increased scrutiny and challenges as a strain on an already overworked and underpaid system. They feel that there is no amount of explaining that can satisfy those who believe in election fraud, and this constant questioning creates an extra burden on the system, which is designed to protect voters but is not made to easily remove individuals who may have made mistakes on their registrations.

What is the long-term impact of Donald Trump's 'Stop the Steal' movement on American democracy?

The long-term impact of Donald Trump's 'Stop the Steal' movement is the questioning of the machinery of democracy, which has been functioning well for over two centuries. This movement has introduced doubts about the certification process and the integrity of elections, potentially leading to more local challenges and a continued erosion of trust in the electoral system, regardless of Trump's political future.

Chapters

The 'Stop the Steal' movement, born out of the chaos of January 6, 2021, has evolved into a coordinated campaign to deny election results at the local level, as seen in Washoe County, Nevada.
  • The movement aims to block certification of elections.
  • Local election officials are being pressured to reject election results.
  • This strategy has been implemented in at least 20 counties across several states since 2020.

Shownotes Transcript

On Tuesday night, as the voting ends and the counting begins, the election system itself will be on trial.

Jim Rutenberg, a writer at large for The Times, explains how some local election officials entrusted with certifying ballots are preparing to reject the results  and create chaos in the weeks ahead.

Guest: Jim Rutenberg), a writer at large for The New York Times and The New York Times Magazine.

Background reading: 

For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily). Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts) or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.