Home
cover of episode MASSIVE VOTING SCANDAL IN ARIZONA 218,000 Voters Non-Proof Of Citizenship - ELECTION FRAUD SF466

MASSIVE VOTING SCANDAL IN ARIZONA 218,000 Voters Non-Proof Of Citizenship - ELECTION FRAUD SF466

2024/10/4
logo of podcast Stay Free with Russell Brand

Stay Free with Russell Brand

Shownotes Transcript

Hello you Awaken Wonders and thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand as we talk about freedom, electoral and representative democracy. Hey Sherry back in the local chat. Yes you did hear Manny doing the countdown. Trucker Hershey, yes. Hot mic, hot mic, hot mic.

Hello Awaken Wonders, Blessed Old Bird, True Chimera. Hello 95 Audrey in the Rumble chat. I am in the United States, still in Atlanta. Hope you are having a beautiful and glorious day as we continue to recognise that there's some odd games being played currently.

When there's a domestic crisis in the USA, what support is available through FEMA to support the victims of those crises? When there is a war in Europe, who is the war being fought for? Is it a humanitarian war or is it a corporate war? These are some of the questions we'll be addressing over the course of the next hour. If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for about

15 minutes then we'll be exclusively available on that sweet stream of freedom that we call rumble we'll have a couple of messages from our partners remember of course that's got to keep the lights on baby but we make this show for you if you're an awakened wonder stay tuned for some exciting changes that we'll be making from the week of october the 11th a brand

new take and I can tell you I can't tell you what it is but I can tell you that our first guest is going to be Tucker Carlson in conversation like you have never ever seen him before talking about subjects you've never seen Tucker Carlson talking about before so become an awake and wonder now to enjoy your final week of Bible study meditations questions and answers and

Russell Brand's stand-up breakdown. We just talked about Lenny Bruce. That was complicated. The man was pretty profligate with the use of the N-word, which I must say, even through the filter of Dustin Hoffman, was difficult. So remember, become an awakened wonder now. Why don't you post it in the comments in the chat, how you become an awakened wonder. Let's have a look at that. And from next week, we'll be preparing for that great transition, as they say. I sometimes look at my own face and say, is it a cross?

Fire of aggression. And with my mic stopped still, yeah, we're cool with that. Vance is the first White House wannabe to wear facial hair in 80 years. Research indicates that voters see beards as aggressive. Surely not. What about Father Christmas? What about old St. Nick's? Think of... Next job is saying you don't like Fidel Castro's beard. And for extra points and for one free Awakened Wonder membership, tell me.

Has he got a secret son, that Fidel Castro? Let me know in the chat. Okay, so it's a sacred day in many respects. Yes, I'm not talking about the liturgical or ecclesiastical calendar. I'm letting you know that today is three years since this wonderful moment of television. Thank you to all of our partners. Oh my God, it's just such an unbelievable moment. Brandon, you also told me...

as you can hear the chance from the the crowd let's go brandon brandon you told me you were gonna kind of hang back that's what they're saying let's go finger that might as well be a million years ago now mind it that might as well be

sepia footage from the French connection. And that might as well be Harvey Milk. That might as well be Martin Luther King addressing the Million Man March. Mind it. That's three years ago. Joe Biden, do you remember him? No. Well, neither does he. It's extraordinary to...

Let's look at the priorities of the current administration. Here's CNN questioning the pronunciation of Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris. I do like to say people's names correctly, just as a matter of politeness, actually. But...

Is it as important as the other subject that is being discussed? Let's have a look. You know what I can say, Jim? I can say that 13,099 murders were led into this country, 16,000 rapists, 425,000 people in the last four years.

And a partridge in a pear tree. People in the last four years have been led into this country by Kamala Harris and Joe Biden's own Customs and Border Protection that are running around this country. And the other thing too is Kamala Harris. I don't know. Why do you guys say Kamala? That is, it's Kamala Harris. I just... Jim, we know that they're committing crimes against America. That is pretty funny. Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris.

I'd be... Kamala Harris was it? 500 rapists, 2000 murderers. Kamala Harris. Focus on what's important in the world. I suppose, yeah, the reason that's enjoyable is because it shows what the priorities are. And priorities is going to be a big theme of today's stream. All of you watching us in Rumble, all of you watching us in locals, those of you that are still with us on YouTube, remember to turn on the notification bell if you're watching this on YouTube because...

Because the algorithm will direct you towards corporate media. Of course, it has to do that. They believe they're doing the right thing. They believe they're doing the right thing when they're protecting you from hate speech, as they would call it. They believe they're doing the right thing when they paste over your mind and shellac your consciousness with false narratives. They believe they're helping you. That's what's extraordinary about it.

okay let's uh have a look at um again this is a story that's ultimately about branding chris cuomo and again i'm not sure i'm saying his name right he's talking about commoner harris's husband doug emhoff and what seemed like rumors that he assaulted his partner i don't know if the rumors or i don't know if it's been proven because i've not watched this yet and aren't there rumors as well that he may be

impregnated a nanny. Is that true? I'm not making the claim that that is true. It's simply something that I think people have been discussing. And also what's going on in my country with Keir Starmer. All these kind of like odd puritanical moral arbiters have got

jangle in closets baby dem bones dem bones dem let's have a look at what chris cuomo cuomo is saying about carmen harris's husband doug emhoff if the name were trump instead of emhoff it would be all over the news

Daily Mail, echoed by the New York Post, has a story. Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband, accused of striking a woman he was on a date with at the Cannes Film Festival back in 2012. They had been drinking and he didn't like how she talked to the valet. He smacked her, she smacked him back. You do not get very often. You do not talk to a valet in Cannes like that.

Very often people coming forward named. And the reason is they are worried about retaliation. These are very powerful people we're talking about. Three friends all saying they were told the same thing.

Two of them contemporaneously. This woman, Jane, we're calling her. She called one of the friends immediately after the incident. That's what this friend told me. Ordinarily, I don't care about these stories. You could say, well, there may have been an assault. Well, she didn't go to the police. He's not really running. But again, if it were Trump or anyone related to him, it would be on every TV show that is on right now.

Media branding and media bias. Which stories are you told and which stories are you not told? What happens when you have vague laws about subjects like hate speech and free speech? If you have vague laws, you can decide which cases you want to prosecute and persecute. That is the nature of lawfare. You would have seen Julian Assange the other day saying that laws were reliable things, almost...

instantiations of a universal principle but what assange said he realized is that they're just pieces of paper that can be used to control the reality in the manner that you want to control reality media controls the information sphere law controls who can be curtailed contained incarcerated or even killed let me know in the comments and chat graphic let me know in the comments and chat

if you agree with that baby. Okay, this is interesting because Jen Psaki has been using Doug Emhoff as a kind of avatar for new masculinity. Before we have a look at that,

Here's a message from one of our partners. Have a look. It feels like the world's on edge right now, doesn't it? It's crazy. There's tensions over the upcoming election. How will it go? Economic insanity and instability, health threats popping up all over the gaff. With talk of a new pandemic on the horizon, you've got to take action for your family and be prepared. The wellness company's contagion emergency kit is exactly the way to do it. It's a lifesaver. It's put together by real experts like guests on the show, Dr.

to Peter McCulloch. He's one of the first people to speak out during the pandemic. You can trust him. This kid's got medicines in it like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine. He's got budesonide in it and a nebulizer critical to treat respiratory illnesses, especially now that we're heading into flu season.

Don't let anyone play the gatekeeper with your health. Take responsibility for it. Within a few clicks, a kit can be delivered to your door. Peace of mind for the family in the event that something does happen. I've got my kit. I'm in America. I'm fully kitted up. You can get yours. Go to twc.health forward slash brand and use the code brand to get $30 off right now and free shipping. That's twc.health forward slash brand. Use the code brand for $30 off and free shipping. Don't wait for the next crisis to hit.

be prepared get your kit today and take control and you are sophisticated enough to understand what the relationship is between a platform and a paid and monetized partner and of course that is the relationship between us and all of our partners we do try our best to endorse products that i believe would be

of some value in your life and having access to those kind of effective medicines I believe is an advantage. We're posting in the chat right now links to those products be sure and use our code to take advantage of them. Now one of the things that's very important and I believe worth contemplating further is the aspects of reality that are highlighted and the aspects of reality that are concealed.

Now, Doug Emhoff, as Chris Cuomo just said then, he's only someone's boyfriend or husband or whatever it is. I don't know what his relationship to Kamala Harris is. I'm frankly struggle to care less. But what's interesting is to see the legacy media put forward the idea that he's an example of new and emergent masculinity. Firstly, by their own character.

rubric there oughtn't be a restrictive idea of what a man is because they would say that you're a man if you say you are one so that should be a spectrum that includes incredibly masculine men think of a cliched truck driver snarling and covered in stubble or a man like me potent

powerful, glorious, but hey look at me I've got long hair and I'm wearing what you'd have to ultimately call a blouse. Then by their analysis it should include all types of men but surely there's a certain moral standard no matter of how you present that we all

be held to the way we treat others what our conduct is like when we don't believe we're being looked at with all of these stories about the corruption and cruelty within Hollywood and all of the exploitation there that doesn't seem to be

based on a lapse of morals, but the institution of immoral behaviour, I think it's significant that Jen Psaki said this. Let's have a look at Jen Psaki's claim that "Dark Emhoff is reshaping the perception of masculinity", which is sort of an incredible claim to actually make about anyone. I mean, who would just say that about actually? Jesus! You've reshaped my perception of what it is to be a man.

That's a really, that's an incredible claim. An interesting part of how people have talked about your role here is how your role has reshaped the perception of masculinity. And I'm not sure you planned on that, but you are an incredibly supportive spouse. Yep, you've reshaped masculinity. Before I met Doug Emhoff, I'd...

all these images of a man, especially when they're like weird questions about moral conduct and now the story that we just see Chris Cuomo produce. So you see how that shows a lack of virtue and morality at the heart of their argument. If Doug M. Hoff

went out with, you know, Ivanka Trump instead of Kamala Harris, they'd say, this guy is a wife-beaten, nanny-impregnating, weird, weak, milk-sop, spineless, hiding, cowering behind his woman, intimidated by her saying, oh, well, he's going to have Kamala Harris now.

He is reshaping our perception of what a penis even is. I used to think it was just for ejacular and urine. But now I use it to stir my coffee. And it's all through, doggy, I'm

Incredibly supportive spouse. Has that been an evolution for you and do you think that's part of the role you might play as first gentleman? It's funny, I've started to think a lot about this. I've always been like this, my dad was like this and to me it's...

Silly, innit? That's a ridiculous burden to place on Doug Emhoff. I'd say, just based on looking at him then, he's like a normal sort of bloke. It's not reshaping my concepts of masculinity at all. My concepts of masculinity must be derived from a higher source than Doug Emhoff or I might find myself in terrible, terrible, terrible trouble.

Now to a rather more important story. We're going to be talking now about Hurricane Helena and the impact that it has wrought across the south of your nation.

And we're going to be talking about the lack of availability of aid and the fact that the hurricane season doesn't appear to have been correctly budgeted for. And contrasting that with this extraordinary reality. $250, $750, is that million dollars? What's this $750? Victims, they're getting $750 per victim. Whereas Biden has announced last week a $2.4 billion.

billion dollar age package to Ukraine. Now we're leaving YouTube now guys, so let's click that. If you're watching us on YouTube, come on over. Click the link because we're going to be talking about that story in addition to what seems to be a certainty that corporations have taken more territory in Ukraine than Russia. So who should we be at war with? So stay with us for that story. We're also going to be talking about

citizenship and voter ID as well as discussing First Amendment free speech. Click the link in the description. Okay.

Hurricane Helena has wrought havoc. Let's have a look at the priorities of your nation as war continues to be significantly funded. And the federal relief and assistance that we have been providing has included FEMA providing $750 for folks who need immediate needs being met, such as food, baby formula, and the like. And you can apply now for anyone who is watching this who has been affected.

Just so you know, I'm from a normal middle-class background and we were always having middle-class hurricanes when I was working at McDonald's. The reason that that kind of odd, folky, hokey, biographical claptrap has to be continually rendered is because when you hear Kamala Harris there talking about the $750 aid package, it's

impossible not to know is that you're listening to someone who doesn't understand the reality of someone living through a hurricane crisis or doesn't know what it's like to be poor doesn't know what it's like to live not only paycheck to paycheck but welfare check to well for welfare check know what it's like to hustle in order to hit your next pipe so yeah no wonder they have to sort of go I grew up in a normal family because it's to mask the fact that

That's even a PR exercise, isn't it? It looks like FEMA don't have sufficient budgets to get America through the hurricane season, which happens at the same time of year every single year without fail. What doesn't always happen in the exact same way, although maybe it is a kind of season, is war aid being continually required. What season is more important, hurricane season or military industrial complex profit bonanza season? With 2.4%,

billion in aid having just been granted to Ukraine. Do you imagine that if a referendum was held in America and said where would you like this 2.4 billion dollars to go? Would you like it to help the victims of the fires of Maui? Would you like it to help the victims of Hurricane Helena? Would you like it to go towards supporting infrastructure in the United States of America wherever required? Would you like it to be spent on securing the border? Would you like

there to be new clinical trials ensuring that the medications and drugs that are used are fit for purpose? Would you like an inquiry into COVID? All of these questions have to be brought to the forefront of American political life and international political life. Quiet, please, darling. Have a get some water. Because without that,

Without that conversation, you don't have a democracy. You have an oligarchy. Do you need water? Here you go, mate. You're all right. Thank you. Thank you. Keep nice and still and quiet over there, Manny, if you could, old bean. I'd appreciate that. Thank you. Thank you. Manny is actually doing great and amazing work. I'm happy to be a person that's very easily distracted because I operate on very fine threads of focus because guess what? I'm making this stuff up as I go along. Now, let

with some the information comes from an expert the reaction comes from you know so okay let's have a look at this let's have a look at this this is joe biden last week announcing a 2.4 billion dollar aid package to ukraine just last week so just you might want to question if the role of government is a kind of contract between the government the people to take care of the people are we taking care of the right people and

And do you even believe the premise that the Ukraine war is motivated by humanitarianism rather than the support of corporations? Let me know in the comments and chat what you think. Let me know, Jeshua7853. Let me know, Sharon Radness. Let me know what you think. I see two key pieces. First, right now we have to strengthen Ukraine's position on the battlefield.

And that's why today I'm proud to announce a new $2.4 billion package of security assistance. I've also directed the Pentagon to allocate all the remaining security... Sorry, I've got to take your first answer. You said allocate. Allocate all the remaining security assistance funding that has been appropriated for Ukraine, period, by the end of this, my term, which is January 20th.

Well, what are you doing right now then? That's the end of your term, is it? Astonishing business, really. Okay, so we've just heard $750 for hurricane victims, $2.4 billion aid package to Ukraine. Now that would be...

Okay, I suppose, if you were able to hold in your mind the image of an innocent Ukrainian child being protected from a Russian onslaught entirely unprovoked by NATO actions and the breach of previous treaties or near treaties between the US and former Soviet Union. But by now you know why that war is happening, you know what the conditions of that war are,

you know that much of that aid will end up in the wrong hands don't you you know that by now you know that it's not all going to like sort of food packages for people in rubble because you know that 14 trillion dollars has been given to the to the pentagon since the iraq war 50 or maybe even 55

percent of that has ended up in the hands of the military-industrial complex. Now, to give the devil their due, you might argue that Boeing and Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman make things beyond missiles and weapons of war, but even the other things that they manufacture there

are of a higher premium and are more required when there is an ongoing conflict. So with Julian Assange having just been released, what do you think is motivating the conflict? I mean, I'm looking at the comments. Do you think that the conflict is motivated by humanitarianism, helping people, serving people, or do you think it's being motivated by

Mammon, materialism, profit. Let me know. And if you're looking for a reference to, I suppose, better educate us, what were the causes and conditions of the Vietnam War, Korea War, Afghanistan conflict, Iraq Wars 1 and 2, what do we know about these conflicts now?

What would we do differently? What were we told then? Were we told that we were protecting the Vietnamese people from the Vietcong? We were, weren't we? Were we told that we were protecting the Afghan people from the sexist Taliban?

We were told that, weren't we? So, can we trust the people that are talking? This is a lovely piece of footage. You are going to enjoy this. This is an extraordinary claim made by Mick Wallace, who's a member of the European Parliament for Ireland. He's being kicked out now, you know, as if you're a half-decent politician, you're on your way out the door.

He's a brilliant Irish politician and an anti-war advocate. He's against all wars and that's a position I suppose I share, who among us doesn't really, other than self-defence I suppose. So Mick Wallace points out that corporations have bought more land in western Ukraine than Russians have taken on the east side. If that's true, that corporations now own more of Ukraine than Russia have taken, who is this war for?

Who is the aid for? Now bear in mind all the things you know about your government and all the things you know about globalism and think, why is it that there's no money available to help hurricane victims? Why is it there's no money available to fix the border? Why is it there's no money available to make America a better place?

better country. I didn't use the slogan. Why is there no money available in my country, the United Kingdom, to support people? Why are fuel allowance for the elderly being cut? Why is it? Where do you think the money's going? We're still funding Ukraine-Russia war because of humanitarianism. Do you believe Keir Starmer that is motivated by humanitarianism? Do you believe Keir Starmer when you know where he gets his pyjamas? Do you trust Keir Starmer when you know where he gets his funds

in? Do you? Do you think there's things we don't know about these people behind the scenes? Let me know in the comments in the chat. Can you trust them? Let's have a look at Mick Wallace's analysis now. But I said, giving them two thirds of it in debt is another debt trap. I said, they

And before you go like Mick Wallace, he looks all mad and everything, because he's got like long hair, just think, who coached you to believe that a politician has to look sort of like, you know, hello, I'm here from the government, I'm here to help you, maybe you need a few long-haired, wise Irish wizard folks in the mix once in a while. After all, we've been told that it doesn't matter how people identify, what their culture is, what their religion is, and broadly actually,

I believe that and I agree with that. I believe that is who we are in our very human, flawed and failing hearts that's important. So let's listen to what Mick Wallace is saying about corporations acquiring land in Ukraine and whether or not this $2.4 billion funding that Biden's just granted somehow facilitates the actualization

of that land. And then in your own mind, in a democracy or an electoral republic, you would decide, wouldn't you? Do you think it's impossible to decide using the technology that is available these days through referenda at the most local level or even at the national level how

your money, not theirs, is spent. ...debt trap. I said they can't pay back the money they already owe. They're never going to pay this back. So what yous are doing is you're colonising the place. Yous are going to own it here. And now, as if that's not bad enough, when the IMF gave them a loan in 2021...

One of the conditions of the loan was that Ukraine changed its land purchase arrangement. At that time, foreigners couldn't buy land, so that was dropped. So then large corporations from Europe and America could buy lots of 25,000 acres at a time, 10,000 hectares.

At this stage, European corporations have bought more land in western Ukraine than the Russians have taken on the east side. We're saddling with a debt. It's a debt trap that they're never going to be able to pay back. We're going to own the place. What the Russians don't own, we'll own. And Ukraine's sovereignty is...

a long long piece away right and still and still we don't mind continuing to throw throw working-class ukrainians into the meat grinder do they care about them and all the all the politicians that voted to keep the war going did any of them go over there and fight did i then send their kids over they didn't

So, Ukrainians aren't benefiting, they're dying. You aren't benefiting, you're funding it. Russians aren't benefiting, they're engaged in a terrible war. But...

Corporations are acquiring land in Ukraine. So when there is a $2.4 billion aid package granted to Ukraine to perpetuate an unwinnable conflict that could lead to nuclear war, and the United States of America don't have the revenue or resources to support victims, not only from Hurricane Helena, but looking back just a year or whenever it was, the fires in Maui, it makes you wonder what the

priorities are it makes you wonder whether you can trust them it makes you wonder what are the stories they highlight and why and what are the stories they de-amplify of course they want you to believe that the ukraine conflict is about from an american perspective humanitarian goals rather than corporate goals but listen to what mick wallace said corporations are a

acquiring land. You already saw our videos about BlackRock and State Street and Vanguard, etc. participating in projects to make Ukraine the first digital democracy. What will ultimately happen? One

can conject is that ukraine will become a piloting ground for digital schemes of citizen management in the same way that during the pandemic period australia canada and even my country to a degree piloted various techniques when it came to the issuing of certain medications as they were known then or what was permissible when it came to social controls we must remain alert we must remain alert when jen saki tells us that

Doug M. Hoff is the new archetype of what a man ought be. We must remain alert to the ulterior stories that come forth with the scandals when it comes to sexuality, sex exploitation and trafficking within Hollywood. We are being

shown something very significant. This is a moment for real change. This is an opportunity for great awakening. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. Let me know right now. If you're watching this on YouTube, turn on the notification bell because the algorithm will direct you towards corporatized news that will keep you ignorant, distracted, dull, and...

Let's go swiftly to our next story or should we do a little bit of promo? Good time for a promo. We can't make this content without the support of our partners. Let's have a look at a little message. Now, this couldn't be more important to me because this is Rumble Premium. If you use Rumble Premium, it's a frictionless way to navigate Rumble. It'll help me as a content creator.

It will help you as a content user to enjoy Rumble in the slickest, smoothest way. Consider becoming a participant and have a look at this message.

- Is in full swing. We are the Vanguard, bravely fighting back. Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech. They've joined X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspire to block ad revenue from going to the platforms. Recently, they've launched Rumble Premium.

This I think is going to be a game changer for all of us It's an ad free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators Rumble premium will give you the ability to dive into your favorite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV and savor every uninterrupted second of my content Why don't you upgrade to rumble premium today support my free speech and the free speech of other?

other content creators on this platform. Please go to Rumble now, rumble.com forward slash premium. And if you use the code brand, you'll save $10 and Rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts. So that's rumble.com forward slash premium and do use the code brand to save $10. Anyway, there's a link there at the bottom of the screen. Now we're posting it in the chat. Join up. And unreliable.

A little while ago, if you talked about replacement theory, it meant you were a nailed down racist. But now everywhere people are concerned about demographics and election integrity. People are concerned about the issue of voter ID.

Let's have a look at a few stories that might help us to understand the small margins in the forthcoming election and the motivations when it comes to a subject like migration and the issue of voter ID. It seems in some states voter ID is a requirement and in others it's not.

The idea is that it's racist to ask for voter ID. It was Joe Rogan himself who said that is a racist assertion and I kind of agree with that. Why would you assume that certain races or cultural groups would be unable to attain identification? It's an interesting assumption. We'll start

We'll start off with the story that 218,000 voters in Arizona have been wrongly marked as having proof of citizenship because Arizona is a state where voter ID is required. And then we'll look at Elon Musk's response to California banning voter ID requirements before

looking at the FBI's relationship with elections in your country and indeed whether or not we can trust them. Let's start off looking at these, the 218,000 voters in Arizona that have been wrongly categorized. Now this new data set, as they're calling it, brings the total number of people impacted to 218,000.

instead of the 98,000 we first reported. These people were mistakenly marked as having provided documentary proof of citizenship

And Arizona voter registration database now has correctly flagged the impacted individuals. Election officials say they will contact the affected Arizonans with information regarding their status after the general election. That means for now the Arizona Supreme Court's ruling is going to stay that impacted voters, that includes all of them, will still be able to vote.

i suppose the reason that is so significant is because arizona is one of the contested states that will likely determine the outcome of the election overall i.e a swing state now to a degree i've been participating in

the campaign through my relationship with Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard and I'd love to talk to you about some of the things that have taken place particularly at Rescue the Republic where I was with Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard. But first before we get to that let's have a look at Elon Musk's reaction to California introducing a law that bans the requirements for voter ID.

Okay, they're preventing voter fraud. Hmm, hmm, hmm. The Joker is in charge. Oh, he would make a good Joker, Gavin Newsom. Okay, so that's... I'm sorry, I should read out Elon Musk's post in its entirety. Wow. It's now illegal to require voter ID in California. They just made preventing voter fraud against the law. The Joker is in charge.

And this is based on an Alex J Torville post. Again, based on what I know,

But back to full screen mate. Based on what I know about the way that government operates and the motivations of the powerful, I find it difficult to believe that the undergirding principle would be compassion rather than expedience. In fact, the way that I used to...

always be able to understand. I used to say, "I don't know why that, why did that, why do you have to do that? Why do you have to fill in that form?" I worked out, you know, some years ago, "Oh, it will be money." I don't know how yet, but someone is making money from me having to do this. Now I have learned a new thing. With centralized authoritarians that mask their desire for power behind talk of protecting the vulnerable,

The aim is always control. The aim is always control. Then you just have to work out how do they get control by doing what they're doing. So I suppose in this instance the electoral fraud argument is the one to contemplate because if voters do not require ID it is probably easier to manage

elections because you now have a little more fluidity around who can vote, obviously. So let's have a look at the FBI Director Christopher Wray talking about protecting elections and note the use of the word 'protecting' because protection is always what these agencies are offering us but how infrequently do they deliver protection? Hi everybody, I'm Chris Wray, the FBI Director.

America's elections are the foundation of our democracy, so protecting them is a priority, both for the FBI and our partners. For years, foreign adversaries have attempted to undermine confidence in our processes and institutions through sophisticated malign influence operations and to meddle in our elections with targeted cyber operations.

When it comes to protecting elections against these threats, partnerships and preparation are key. And that's why each of our field offices has election crimes coordinators, special agents and intelligence analysts who stand ready to field threats if they arise and help coordinate a response. Protecting elections is a team sport.

So our election crimes coordinators work closely with our intelligence partners, state and local election officials, and local law enforcement who often play a lead role in responding to threats. At the FBI, we're also helping build resilience by sharing threat information, trends, and best practices based on our nationwide perspective. As part of our efforts to raise public awareness, we launched the Protected Voices Initiative

Working with our partners at the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to give individuals and campaigns tools to help protect their voices throughout the election process. We created a series of Protected Voices resources to showcase methods our adversaries might use, to share tips for campaigns and individuals on how to keep sensitive data and systems safe,

and to provide guidance for sharing information and reporting concerns. We hope political campaigns, our state and local partners, and other election security stakeholders will find... Look at all of their sigils of power adorning the set where our man stands. And note that in 2016, when the Russiagate claims were made, the FBI had no

evidence other than the Clinton campaign funded Steele dossier since proven to be false. Note in 2020 the FBI pre-bunked the Hunter Biden laptop story alongside other deep state agencies and that's before we get to the events of January 6th and the way it's reported on so let me know in the comments and chat do you trust the FBI when it comes to elections?

Should, in the event of a victory for Trump, Tulsi and Bobby, ought there be a reckoning for the FBI and the CIA, in addition to the agencies that interface with the military-industrial complex? Is your government in requirement of nothing less than a full inventory process?

where it's acknowledged explicitly that something has gone wrong with the deep state. Something has happened to bureaucracy that has tethered and glommed it to globalism as opposed to the electorate. Isn't that what's being masked by traditional bipartisan politics? Isn't that what we mean when we talk of a uniparty? Whoever you vote for, you get the government. Whoever you vote for, globalism advances.

Bill Gates grins regardless of the outcome, having spent hundreds of millions in donations to media outlets. George Soros is fine with any result. Isn't that the kind of analysis that will allow us to come together? Not just the people of your country, but the people of my country and the people of the world. Not in some centralized new order, but abstractly.

absolutely decentralized, maximum diversity, maximum democracy in each community, maximum sovereignty for the individual as long as individual sovereignty is understood in the correct terms, that all of us bow before universal principles that are very difficult to determine if you don't believe in a God that himself represents humility,

Service, kindness, love, by their fruit shall you know them. That applies to me as an individual and it applies to the authoritarian state. How do you end up with $750 handouts to the victims of Hurricane Helena while $2.4 billion is afforded in expenditure for war? Well, because you can see what master is being served.

Mammon, war, fire, the four horsemen maraud while true values are neglected and forgotten. It would appear that electoral fraud, whether it's actual or fancied, would only be of value if it was to further enforce the disempowerment of the electorate, that's you,

the great empowerment of the institutions and instruments of war so that whoever's voted in they can continue with their campaigns but that's just what I think why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat nice well done thank you very much and if you're watching us on YouTube remember turn on the notification bell because the algorithm will direct you towards news sources that tell you that war is

is a good thing surely they will because they benefit from it now if you're not an awakened wonder yet consider becoming one we've got a great interview that's up already it's with dr. AC malhotra he's talking about the commodification

of health. Let's have a little look at the conversation there. Hey, you lot in local, is that camera up? Can we cut for that these days? Yeah, we're hardly using it. We've not been using it much. You lot in locals like Orange Tosh, make sure that this makes it into our note for our friends in Miami. I want to talk to the likes of you, True Chimera and Jobs Dog and all of you guys, Blessed Old Bird etc. Yeah, like there, huh? I want to let you know that this AC Malhotra interview is up

for you right now, as well as letting you know some great new things are coming to local. In your film, First Do No Farm, how do you demonstrate that health has been commodified and exploited in the last 20 years? We have a pandemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients and unwittingly harm patients based upon a number of factors that are the roots of why patients are getting information

and doctors are getting information from biased and corrupted research. So research that's funded because it's likely to be profitable, not beneficial to patients, biased reporting in the media, biased reporting in medical journals, commercial conflicts of interest, an inability of doctors to really engage in informed consent because they don't understand and then communicate health statistics. You add it all up, it is an absolute mess.

That is available for you to watch now along with our Bible studies as well as our Russell Brand stand-up breakdown. Just did a really good one on Lenny Bruce and my god the profanity and the use of the n-word's pretty shocking even to someone who believes in free speech. Okay, so

We've just seen Christopher Wray talking about protecting elections. Now, let's have a look at Marcus Allen, former FBI employee turned whistleblower, telling Americans that you have to vote, arm yourselves and pray. Eat, pray, love, vote, arm yourselves.

yourselves and pray what direction are we heading in as we approach the apocalyptic november events he's talking about the weaponization of the fbi and i want you to let me know in the comments and chat what do you think is the purpose of deep state agencies is it to protect you

Is it to enable you to live freely and safely or does it operate on behalf of globalist interests? Is it a mechanism of control as opposed to service? Let's have a look at Marcus Allen who used to work for the FBI. Then he saw stuff during the January 6th investigations that made him realise, uh-oh, something crazy is going on around here. I believe that's what he thought in his mind. Let's have a look at it now.

and everybody in the minority party, they're fearing what Donald Trump would do in the next administration while they sit here and they look at the guy who's been persecuted by the FBI. And everybody in the room understands it. Mr. Allen, do you have comments you wish to make? I give you about a minute, minute and a half, and then I want to turn the rest of my time to Mr. Jordan. Yes, sir. I would just say that I consider the hearing today my last act of service as a public servant for the United States of America.

And I'll give you my professional opinion. I was an intel professional for our country for many years. And I would give recommendations and I'd also look at indications and warnings. So I would offer this to the American people as my warning to them. Since this is a warning to the American people, I say, I personally have no confidence that the FBI will rein in its own conduct.

I've been persecuted along with Garrett, Steve and Kyle and countless other whistleblowers. It is my opinion that the Bureau used reprisal and fear to control the workforce. It has been a seemingly effective tactic. I personally believe that there are no current effective checks and balances against them conducting lawless action with any type of correction in a legitimate time frame. I welcome the work of the IG, but I think

any type of lawless action, there's no legitimate timeframe to rein them back in. Their ability to over classify information can allow them to stonewall forever. To the American people, you have a duty as a citizen to vote, and I strongly urge you to do so. It's how you participate in the American experience. I know people have doubts about election integrity, but you must vote. It is your claim. State your claim and don't forfeit it willingly. Have your voice heard.

My other recommendations are in the natural order. First, vote. The second is the Second Amendment. Arm yourself and know how to defend yourself.

Make three to four friends in your neighborhood and promise to come to each other's mutual aid in times of hardship. And during the Great Depression, people stocked up a pantry. So I think that's a good practice, especially in our economic times, and make sure you have three to four months of food. As a person of faith, I'd say pray the rosary, go to the First Friday devotions. That's for everybody, all my brothers and sisters of all faiths, and I know I'm Catholic.

and read the gospel of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and live it every day.

And that's all I have to say. Thank you for the time. You know, Mr. Allen, he does sound pretty terrified, doesn't he? Sounds like someone who's seen a little too much. The initial fears that caused these whistleblowers to speak out were that there were confidential informants and FBI operatives in the crowd on January 6th.

and I suppose what their concern was and maybe what the ulterior claim is, is that the events of January 6th were somewhat orchestrated as part of a plan to introduce whatever favourable legislation and impressions emerged from that event. For example, various law enforcement agencies connected with the capital received additional budget,

employed more officers were granted additional powers and you've seen the advantage that the media has played when it comes to these events they were able to say that the presidency of Trump was illegitimate that he was advocating for violence that it was not a peaceful transfer of power that Trump is a uniquely tyrannical figure and a danger that in order to protect

democracy you can only vote for one party and i reckon that what we all have to learn now is that the game of centralized despotism has become a little more sophisticated than we'd once imagined once imagined it's no longer men in leathery boots marching down boulevards

saluting at bright colored sigils telling you that they're taking control it's i believe now calm kind gentle people that offer you avatars of new masculinity and emerging femininity telling you that in order to be safe from those kind of tyrants of yester century you have to vote for globalism and bureaucracy you have to vote to yield your freedom of speech and

all of your freedoms will, I imagine, flow out of that principle. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. If you're watching this on YouTube, remember, turn on the notification bell as well as subscribing and liking. We also want you to like.

and subscribe over here on rumble and consider using rumble premium will post a link to that in the chat you get a discount if you use our code this is an interesting story that we're pivoting to now because for

Most of our history, we revered and worshipped our ancestors. That might be simple respect for your parents, and I hope you're in a familial condition that affords you that respect, or maybe a beloved grandparent, but stretch him right back

to the origin of our kind. We have loved and revered our ancestors. In a post-secular world, the mythic transference is to those that we accredit with the foundation of our nation. In your case, of course, the founding fathers have, for as long as there has been in America, been revered as its architects. But now, of course, it is customary to condemn and attack

founding fathers as kind of old fuddy-dusty, fuddy-daddy-dusty old slave owners without accrediting them for the obvious ingenuity of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the numerous other foundational documents of America of which we are all beneficiaries even if we're simply visitors to your nation. Let's have a look at Bill Maher.

talking about the Constitution and Gen Z because I suppose the idea is that there's a kind of nihilism within Gen Z, a kind of sense that you want to tear down everything and institutions, traditions, statues. If it's there, tear it down. And there's something I would

once been sympathetic towards because I suppose I saw institutions as broadly corrupt and look at what we've just said about the FBI it's corrupt CIA is corrupt NIH it's corrupt CDC it's corrupt all of the globalist free letter agencies who we F NATO for letters they're corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt so the iconoclasm and desire to tear things down is to a degree legitimate and understandable but

Without heroes, both in terms of individual men and women, or even heroic ideals, where do we come from? And if our ancestors are disgusting and corrupt, how do we look inside ourselves, whether that's as materialists looking at our own DNA and biochemical legacy, or as spiritual beings looking at what we come from, what we are conduits for, what values we espouse and convey?

So let's have a look at this interesting conversation between Bill Maher and I'm not sure who he's chatting to actually, but he makes some interesting observations about the founding fathers and how they weren't 90 years old when they were writing that stuff in all powdered wigs and stuff. They were the Gen Z of their time. Let's have a look at that. And then we'll talk about the First Amendment, one of the great creations of your founders. And

the threat that it is now under as people attempt continually to curtail free speech. Let's start with Bill Maher. - Constitution Day was last week. It's an actual federal holiday, but no one noticed despite the fact that it's probably the greatest legal document ever. Is it flawed? Of course. It was written by humans and they were all white men as depicted in this illustration from Google AI. But how about looking at the actual ideas in it?

I won't hold my breath for that because only 14% of 8th graders are proficient in history now and only 22% in civics, which may be why 4 in 10 Gen Zers say the authors of the Constitution are best described as villains. Wow.

It's amazing since in 1970s, in 1776, James Monroe was 18. Alexander Hamilton was 21 and James Madison 25. Joe Biden was only 30. America's founders, they were the Gen Z of their day. And when they were your age, they started a country.

What the fuck have you done? So no, the Constitution isn't perfect because it wasn't written by Taylor Swift, but... And yes, the founders made excruciating compromises. Obviously slavery.

But slavery was a deal breaker for the southern states. So there would have been two countries. And then to end slavery in North America, it would have involved invading a sovereign nation instead of having the moral high ground of keeping a union together. Would that have been better? History's complicated, and Gen Z reasoning is not. They think they're pure, but they're really just simplistic. They know two things: white people did some very bad things, and

No, that's it. That's all they do. That's what they do.

So, when that's all you know, I suppose you don't revere your country, you don't revere the Constitution, you don't revere and recognise rights. It's interesting, isn't it, to try to marry together the idea of progressivism, inclusivity, the fact that embedded within tradition is the tendency towards stagnation and consolidation of power. But

But within the kind of untempered progressivism that's being used to disempower people, i.e. with free speech, is a deracinated rootlessness, an unawareness that these ideas are taking us into a place that we don't really understand without the good leadership to cope when we get there. One of the key principles that's being questioned, almost to illustrate this point,

is free speech it's really interesting that through iconoclasm you can kind of destroy heroes and heroic documents and leave this kind of nihilistic wasteland where nothing is of real value like well free speech is a dangerous thing that i reckon was for me let me know in the comments and chat if you agree that's the bill ma that i'm well into a bill ma that's kind of reasoned and sensible rather than i'd rather vote for a dead joe biden than a living donald trump although you know

pivot into a living Kamala Harris does seem to have benefited the Democratic Party to a degree. Let's have a look then. So the first thing I'd like to show you is that the law infringing on freedom of speech has been blocked by

...Court. California's unconstitutional law infringing on your freedom of speech has been blocked by the court. And that's from Marion Nelfal. A federal judge has blocked a California law that would have restricted materially deceptive free speech. Let's have a look then at Joe Rogan discussing the First Amendment in the event of a Harris-Waltz win and whether or not free speech would be at risk. The more we have platforms where that stuff is just free, where you can just...

Say whatever you want. Say whatever you think about anything. Which really, X and Rumble are the only places that I know of that you could really do that right now. Have you had any problem on audio at all? No. Good. No. Good. I haven't either.

it's uh yeah audio is like they're leaving that alone for now i think it's probably because it's not as easily shared right that's what's coming next yeah probably i mean all they would have to do is just put images of you and images of me and then have our audio and upload that as a video and then maybe they would start coming after audio yeah yeah i mean i i hope you know i just i just hope this starts to turn around

I do too, but I don't think it turns around if Kamala Harris gets into office. I think they clamp down more. I think the same stuff that they were trying to do with Twitter, they'll try to do with something else, with other things. They've already openly discussed it. You know, she's openly discussed that the same rules have to apply to Facebook, they have to apply to Twitter, and that Elon Musk could lose his privileges, and like, there's so many wild things that they're saying. Tim Walz said that the First Amendment doesn't apply to misinformation or hate speech, and

Okay, well it certainly does. It does. You know, sometimes people say things wrong and the goal of the First Amendment is you say something wrong and then this guy who's an expert says the right thing. Yeah. You know, and then you correct them. Yeah, I mean, the misinformation, it's all opinion. Right. Well, so much of it turns out to be true. How about masks don't work? You would get screamed at for masks don't work. Well, guess what? They don't fucking work. They don't work.

Fauci said masks don't work. Remember that interview before the pandemic, before they knew how big it was going to be? Yes. He was like, you don't have to wear a mask. Then it was wear two. Then it was wear doubles. Put two face diapers on. It's bananas how easily people fell in line. That scared me the most. I know. Free speech.

as a principle is vital because the authority of those that determine what can be said and what can't be said is absolute. They're in fact rallying for absolute authority to censor.

problem is even if you make a good faith argument the information might change as in the example there by joe rogan anthony fauci one minute said masks aren't necessary but then vehemently asserted that masks were necessary so what you're free to say would change all the time based on what the requirements of the authority were

all of us can see how dangerous that could become there's no question that AI and social media means that there's an availability of information much of which will be false that difficult to conceive of for even for someone my age

age and that it is going to present challenges but nothing like the challenge presented to us by further allowing centralized authority to coalesce around ideals that are both corporate and globalist ie we are told the Ukraine war is humanitarian but any of us that have access to even a reasonable amount of

information would likely conclude that the goals are corporate and financial wouldn't we? Once you know how the military industrial complex have behaved in previous conflicts, once you know what Julian Assange has told you about the conduct of the military in previous conflicts, once you know how the deep state operates you would think

Oh yeah, probably this is about dominion and profit rather than humanitarianism. And if it is about humanitarianism, then you could afford transparency from the government, privacy for the population. Not the reverse, which is always what's being advocated for. Total transparency for us, total secrecy for them. What does that tell you? It tells you you can't trust them. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments.

the chat remember if you watch this on YouTube turn on the notification bell they will not let you asset access our content otherwise if you're watching us on rumble remember become a subscriber and consider becoming an awakened one does you get the advantage of participating with us in the many exciting and extraordinary events we're participating in particularly in this election cycle did you know for example that

But during the Rescue the Republic event, as well as my onstage appearance with Jordan Peterson, our coming soon, it's tomorrow, isn't it? Our interview with Bobby Kennedy. Is that tomorrow's show? It's a scene tomorrow. It's a scene tomorrow. And is it available for locals, Bobby Kennedy, tomorrow? No.

Let me know Luke, when's the Bobby Kennedy? And while we work out when Bobby Kennedy is available, my interview with Bobby Kennedy, have a look at this conversation between me, Tulsi Gabbard, and

and Jordan Peterson, I think. - Welcome our first contributor this evening, Tulsi Gabbard. - I made the decision to leave the Democratic Party a few years ago, and fundamentally, the reasons why I left the Democratic Party are some of the same reasons why I chose to endorse President Trump. How could I continue to be aligned with a political party that in almost every way rejects the Constitution? - Robert F. Kennedy.

Please welcome Jordan Peterson.

These are all people who've staked themselves out on the free speech domain at a substantial professional risk and reputational risk and not only staked themselves out in that regard but did it very successfully and despite the risk gripped the opportunity that was associated with being persecuted.

on the basis of their outspokenness. It's a perpetual blizzard of information. The news cycle skates by. Assassination attempts come and go. And it's all happening so fast, so giddy, almost like we need to be tethered and anchored to a reality where virtue and principles, service and faith need to be brought to the forefront once more.

Tomorrow on the show, we will be joined by Asim Malhotra. We'll be talking about his film First Do No Farm, a brilliant endeavor that shows the longstanding endemic corruption of the pharmaceutical industry. Those of you that are awakened wonders, our Bobby Kennedy interview that we did in Washington last week will be up.

from tomorrow. That's why it's worth becoming an Awakened Wonder. If you're watching this in Rumble right now, there's a link in the description telling you how you can become an Awakened Wonder. And remember, from October the 11th, we will be showing you a fantastic new project and our first guest will be Tucker Carlson. You're going to love that. Tucker

Carlson as you've never seen before not naked as some of you people were saying extraordinary thing to have said okay see you tomorrow not for more of the same but for more of the different until then if you can stay free