hello there you're awakening wonders thanks for joining me today for stay free with russell brand me and bear just enjoying ourselves yeah went off for a moment and then turn it back off that what that that's it you've done it thanks man just turning the lights off wow i mean it's a pretty insane day isn't every day an insane day we're going to be talking about everything
Diddy. Was Diddy a Fed? Was Kanye ahead of the curve? We'll be talking about that. We'll be talking about some of Diddy's sort of friendships and powerful friends that he had there. We're going to be talking a lot about Crowder. Fellow Rumble creator Stephen Crowder has done a sting on the former New York City COVID czar, Jay Varma, who...
you know the whole way through covid i mean it's weird actually because this is where we started doing this show in this little room and i remember as you will remember you lot i'm talking to everyone on the rumble chat like gibrit and say hub and dean snj and ready ntx and the nerd far away and some of our members on their locals chat like affection and sensitive hearts and razelle i'm talking to all you guys right um
But at the height of the pandemic, when restrictions were increasing, when, for example, in New York City, 34,000 medical workers and key workers lost their jobs for refusing to take vaccines and refusing to comply, many of us already were thinking this pandemic is being used to legitimize further authoritarianism. We live in a time of great duplicity.
I suppose it may have begun with events like, well not events, with the introduction of miraculous technology like Google, where we assume that what Google was, was, "Oh, this is a search engine." Now you know that Google is a data capture and data rendering instrument that is a search engine merely as an interstitial phase for its acquisition of your data.
And it seems that similar to that is 23andMe. That genetic testing kit that appears also to be something of a big tech enigma. We'll be talking about that for the first 15 minutes will be on YouTube. But remember, this is no longer the YouTube of yesteryear. Giddy young kids with baseball hats on backwards
as innocent and as adorable as Justin Bieber. This is not the PewDiePie era. This is the era of YouTube where if you're not making innocuous tutorials, you are at risk of being demonetized and de-amplified, precisely so the information that is beneficial to the interests of the powerful can be proliferated
it to an extraordinary degree almost to the cost of any other ever almost to the cost of any other narrative all right right you did you did make a movie with diddy i did make a movie with diddy and it was an interesting time it was an interesting time but i must say i never saw any
nocturnal intrigue but I wrote about it in my book actually so you can have a little look about what I wrote about it at the time what I think is fascinating are these institutionalized aspects of what shall we call it
Abuse, I suppose. We'll get into that. We'll get into it. But first, let's start off with Joe Biden, still nominally the president of the United States, introducing Prime Minister Modi of India, something that he should have been reminded of immediately prior to it. So I want to thank you all for being here. And now who am I introducing next? Who's next?
Distinguished guests, the prime prime. He's actually stopped caring, isn't he? He's moved to the point of like, fuck it, man. I'm wearing a MAGA hat. I'm not memorizing the name of world leaders. Fuck it. Who's on next? Give me a damn MAGA hat. The Minister of the Republic of India. Oh.
Oh dear. Okay. Now, we've touched upon the subject of censorship already. Let's look at it a little more deeply because one of the great figureheads of the socialist aspect of the Democratic Party, AOC, is saying that there will be serious ways to rein in the media environment. I find it very interesting when people talk about the issue of censorship as if it's not significant.
you will notice that what is used to legitimize censorship is protecting people from hurtful or even hateful speech. But the practical application of censorship is to control communication around issues that will affect the interests of the powerful. Geopolitical issues, most notably war, the ability of the pharmaceutical industry to make huge profits, the ability to control reporting on significant global conflicts. Let me know if you agree with me in the Rumble Chat.
Okay, and you, Wake and Wonders, let me know as well. So here's AOC, once an incredible light for the possibility of democracy that was truly representative, a new class of person emerging into the political space, working people smashing through the doors, breaking through the glass ceiling, now advocating for censorship. Let's have a look. You know, I do think that several members of Congress
and some of my discussions have brought up media literacy because that is a part of what happened here. And we're going to have to figure out
how we reign in our media environment so that you can't just spew disinformation and misinformation. It's one thing to have differing opinions, but it's another thing entirely to just say things that are false. And so that's something that we're looking into. We live in an environment absolutely now without principle.
If you had the principle of punishment for misinformation or control of misinformation or to be or to more directly quote AOC to prevent people spewing out misinformation, you would have to have a reckoning, particularly for the beginning, but for the majority of the pandemic period where legacy media channels said things like I have the mech.
is a horse paste, these vaccines are effective, we just need to have lockdowns for a couple of weeks to flatten the curve. When you had people like Jay Varma, the czar of coronavirus in New York City saying, "Everybody stay in your homes
Everyone, it's absolutely vital that we keep a safe social distance while apparently attending orgies. We'll be getting into that story in a minute. But Gavin Newsom, that other darling of the liberal establishment who went so far as preventing people paddle boarding at the height of the pandemic, when common sense would inform you surely that paddle boarding is a relatively remote activity. I mean, you're sort of on your own, surrounded by water on a paddle board.
This is another person who is claiming that there is a necessity to take further action in this case against Elon Musk to face the threat and control the threat of deepfakes. Let's have a look. I think Mr. Musk has missed the punchline.
Parity is still alive and well in California, but deep fakes and manipulation of elections, that hurts democracy and the integrity of the system and trust. And we believe in truth and trust, and we think this law is sound and will be upheld in the courts.
So do you intend to seek legal action whether on Elon Musk or any of the proliferating well? It's a lot the law the law asserts that many can seek injunction relief And I just signed the law and just signed 32 other bills on housing and I haven't had a chance to review this specific lawsuit around a conservative conservative blogger That seems offended by our law truth and trust
Truth and trust. It's difficult to trust people when you are beginning to recognize that in place of the only principle that's present is the assertion of control. Try to track a principle. Sometimes it will be we have to protect vulnerable people. Sometimes it will be we have to, whether those vulnerable people are being protected from hate speech or from a
virus the principle is always we have to protect people but you will know what what is consistent beneath the veneer of protection is control have you noticed that let me know in the comments and chat if you have noticed that and in order to keep our show running we now have a message from our sponsors and partners at the usa tax network we'll be back right after this
We can't continue to bring you this awakening and hopefully enjoyable content without the support of our partners. That's why I've got to ask you, and I'm glad to ask you, are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns? The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with, like wallets.
wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure. In these challenging times, your best defense is Tax Network USA. Don't let the IRS take advantage of you. With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1
billion in back taxes no matter the size of your tax issue their expertise is your advantage they specialize in negotiating with the irs aiming to significantly reduce your debt tax network usa doesn't just negotiate they also protect your assets from irs seizures and manage your yearly returns for
ongoing compliance. Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues, regardless of where you live in the United States. The clock is ticking. Don't wait as the IRS steps up its game. Seize control of your financial future now. Contact Tax Network USA for immediate relief and expert guidance. Visit taxnetworkusa.com forward slash
brand don't let tax issues overpower you turn to tax network usa and find your path to financial peace of mind right let's get back to this content here is elon musk's response to gavin newsom's threat notice that always through the expression of concern and care we end up at a point of control it's one of the themes that i've really started to understand lately here's elon musk
Simply amazing. A one word response to that. We spoke to Vivek Ramaswamy. The interview's up now for our Awakened Wonders on Locals. Consider becoming a member. About the power of big tech. Note this curious point that I made. You'll like this, I think. When this is sort of a brilliant piece of censorship technology or at least strategy. If
For example, when there's an assassination attempt on Trump, the legacy media report it in a very favourable way. Like, you know, Donald Trump is safe and well after a person with no political views and who doubtlessly has not been inspired by their peculiar relationships with the deep state or the constant negative reporting on the subject of Trump and the constant portrayal of Trump as someone who should be killed almost by a baby Adolf Hitler time traveller type hero. You'll notice that
The media around Trump that's condemnatory will be promoted on YouTube, but anything that's reflective or analytical, not even promotional, because you know my position, for example, on that subject, will be, if not demonetized, de-amplified, or to use the common colloquial, shadow banned.
That means in the end content creators will stop making content about those subjects because of course if you're an independent media creator you have to have videos that succeed. Many people require the programmatic ad revenue. We don't need that anymore because we had demonetized on YouTube after events in September last year. You'll be well familiar with those events I'm sure.
So, it's another way of censoring. So you have on one hand AOC saying we'll have to rein in media. On the other hand you have Gavin Newsom saying Elon Musk has to be taken down over deepfakes and in general not towing the line on X.
And then you have big tech platforms continually shadow banning content that is not favorable to the narrative they're pushing. Here's Vivek Ramaswamy on his interview that's up now on Locals talking about exactly that. One of the things the tech companies learn, let me just walk through the cascade here. In the last several years, they've learned that actually outright censoring, outright banning, outright locking accounts is
isn't a good thing for them to do. It's a bad idea for them because it creates a level of public ire, potential headlines that later follow. The way they do it now is almost exclusively through amplification or suppression of the desired forms of content being amplified, whereas the undesired forms are de-amplified, if not outright censored. It is a form of censorship, but this allows them to call it something other than censorship.
Listen, if you're watching us on YouTube right now, you're going to have to click the link in the description. We are leaving YouTube right now and you're going to want to join us for our coverage of the 23andMe story. Is something going on with a big tech company that wants your DNA data? Didn't we initially think that Google was there to help us search for useful information? We'll also be looking at the pandemic period in the light of the revelations about the New York City Czar who Crowder's Sting revealed was attending. I think
actual sex parties during the height of the pandemic period. Click the link in the description. Join us on Rumble where we can speak freely.
23andMe, do you want to know about your past, your lineage and your heritage? Don't you want to unlock the mysteries of your DNA? Oh, Genghis Khan's back there in my heritage timeline. I was a little bit Icelandic. Hey, we're all one human family after all. Shouldn't we be loving one another, unified yet decentralized against oppressive, tyrannical global power backed by a big tech and authoritarian statism that...
pretends that it cares for you while incrementally protecting you ultimately from freedom. Shouldn't we be returning to that ancestral plane where once we waged in tribal warfare against the environment and now what is the one true oppressor? What is the one true opponent of our progression and of our freedom? It is globalism.
Let's have a look at 23andMe, a story that came to my attention when I saw Alex Jones reporting on it and the fact that all of the board members had simultaneously resigned. Now obviously this is initially being reported on from the perspective of, you know, economics and finance. It's one of the most important aspects of the way that news is generally reported at least these days. Let's have a look at what Jones posted initially.
He said the word is they sold the DNA data to China. China? Would they ever do such a thing? Is it even possible? Let's have a look at some legacy media coverage of this story and unpack together 23andMe whether or not there was some forbidden and not so clear upside to the acquisition of all of our DNA in this biometric nightmare where it seems that anything to manage citizens is on the table.
23andMe on the verge of getting delisted now from the NASDAQ due to a shortfall in the number of independent directors on its board. Deirdre Bosa has more on that story for today's Tech Check. Morning, Dee. Hey, good morning, Carl. So drama has been unfolding this week. It's only set to ramp up. It began with the entire board, all seven independent directors resigning earlier this week.
After rejecting founder and CEO Ann Wojcicki's buyout offer, filling new seats will not be easy. The DNA testing company went public vice back in 2021. It has since lost 99.9% of its value from its $6 billion market cap.
peak, which makes it all the more surprising perhaps to note just who was on the board in the first place. It's really a who's who of titans in tech and healthcare. Sequoia Capital's managing partner, Roloff Botha, YouTube CEO Neil Mohan, renowned obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Valerie Montgomery Rice. There was also the CEO of California Healthcare Foundation, Dr. Sandra Hernandez. These are very big figures. Now it was Wojcicki's status in Silicon Valley that
helped attract them in the first place. 23andMe was once seen as a pioneer in direct-to-consumer genomics. Her late sister Susan, she was one of the earliest Google employees. She ran YouTube for nearly a decade and was also married to Google co-founder Sergey Brin. Isn't it interesting?
that new alliances and relationships appear to be forming backing products that are always presented as somehow expediting convenience or safety. Isn't it convenient to use Facebook? Isn't it convenient to use Google? The way that we utilize these commodities is we feel like we're making connections or we're searching out vital and valuable information and of course to a degree superficially on the veneer of reality that we're invited to skate upon
like some poor giddy juvenile. Tonya Harding, is that the one in your country? In our country, it would be Torval and Dean, that reference. But beneath the ice, there are great tech titans likely in alliance with the state, accumulating data, doing extraordinary billion dollar deals elsewhere that likely mean that back
channels exist to provide the state with the data in question. I'm not suggesting that 23andMe are providing DNA data to China. I saw that Alex Jones post and I thought what an interesting idea, like many of Alex Jones's ideas. But what I do know now is that Google, when they provided us Google Maps, of course were using technology that previously belonged to the American military. What I do know now is that the CIA
was sponsoring Sergey Brin and Larry Page's PhD way back when they were at Stanford University. What I do know now is that big tech corporations are so powerful that unless they have alliances with the state, they will become enemies of the state. And whatever's going on with Elon Musk,
Plainly, there are areas where the state are not happy with him. Do you remember the crazy story where Elon Musk was able to facilitate the usage of Starlink for Ukrainian military bombings within Russia? And he says, I'm not like comfortable with that. And that was further condemnation for him.
You know, I know many of you, I watch the chats, have got some questions and about Elon Musk or questions about everybody. I'm not surprised that there's this kind of perpetual state of paranoia where you think anybody could be controlled opposition. I'm not surprised because everything's so weird. You find out like, oh, did he? He's a hip hop mogul. No, I don't look like that. Oh, this Jeffrey Epstein's got a lot of friends.
you know somehow we can be killed in a prison cell no wonder no one trusts anybody anymore no wonder because we've been sold for a long time the idea that Google is for your convenience Facebook is for your convenience but of course it's for their convenience and whatever you say about Elon Musk
plainly what he's doing in particular on X is not convenient to the globalist establishment. That's not to say that the MAGA movement is perfect or any nationalist movement is perfect, but it's pretty easy to see why people might turn to nativist and America first or France first or UK first movements when they feel overwhelmed by migration and unable to have a reasonable conversation on the subject
and perhaps, and in my view more significantly, globalism, a top-down ideology, is choking out and smoking out our cultures, controlling us financially, doing favorable deals with globalist corporations, homogenizing every high street, homogenizing every mind,
controlling all information. This is what we must oppose. Yes, it is ironic that a company that claims to give you ancestral information might be yet another way of claiming data, claiming control. Yes, it's amazing that a man like Bobby Kennedy who once
opposed Monsanto, a company that wants to patent and control nature herself through seed management, is now vilified by the establishment. Yes, it is extraordinary the big tech platforms that control information or proliferate information like YouTube, etc., clearly strangle and choke data, why wouldn't they, that's favorable to independent thinkers like you. That's why it's vital that you join us on Rumble.
that's why is vital that you become an awakened one then support our work if it's within your means obviously we're making a lot of good content over there we're doing a lot of good stuff but more important than any of that is vital that you remain awake and aware that these tools that are laying at our feet are likely to be our shackles that we must awaken together spiritually and we must awaken individually right now which i'm afraid i'm beginning to understand on some level means
enormous suffering, enormous, inevitable, unavoidable suffering. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. We've got so many fantastic stories coming up over the next 40 minutes. We're going to be talking about the New York City Covid Czar. This Covid has gone out of control. Why don't we appoint a New York City Covid Czar? Why don't we have a flu Rasputin?
Why don't we have a Stalin for headaches? Why don't we usher in new tyrannies under the auspices of protection? The only thing that could make it more ridiculous if we were to later discover that the very people responsible for imposing controls on you, preventing you attending births and funerals, claiming that your children ought to take particular medications that in retrospect do not seem advisable, were themselves attending not
only parties like the UK government were, both sides baby, the ones that were in government then and the ones that are in government now. But in the case of New York City Governor Jay Varma, actual sex parties. If you want to up the anti-honour party, why not try a sex party? What's next? They were doing all this stuff with Diddy that they were
having COVID freak-offs. How much more are we to learn about our authorities for Fauci freak-off? Let's get into this excellent piece of journalism by Rumble creator Steven Crowder, which has exposed that Jay Varma, who was charged with your protection, was more interested in his own.
erection you can have that for nothing let's have a look at this story first of all here's greenwald talking about it the number of western elites who demanded and even forced ordinary people to lock themselves at home during covid while those same elites enjoyed mashed pies restaurants hair salons etc etc etc look at this amazing jk varma jk varma boasts about flouting the public health as he insisted others followed let's get into this i mean isn't this fantastic i mean i'm not taking any joy from it except for
I feel that I personally was attacked as a result of the way we reported on matters during COVID. That's why I feel. Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat. Let me know if you think there's a connection. We've had some extraordinary information from various government agencies in my country, various government agencies that seem to be particularly interested in de-amplification, shadow banning, surveillance and controlling information. We're going to be bringing you more information about that soon. It's very, very interesting.
exciting was also exciting is to know that you can rely on your instincts a little bit you can rely on your instincts that you should not trust authority that you cannot trust the media that now might be the time to end all state-funded media if you find that your for example paying for the media through some covert tax maybe that should end maybe it should end immediately if you find that there is a judiciary in a legal system that cannot be relied upon and trusted
then maybe this is the time for us to oppose it en masse. Let's have a look at these quaking institutions. Let's look at how they fall apart. Let's look at their decadence, their deceit and their treachery together and let us awaken in unity that we may oppose them. The city's COVID czar, former COVID czar, Dr. Jay Varma, is not denying that he partied during the pandemic, but he says his shocking comments caught on hidden camera are taken out of context.
Let's get right to Good Day's Briella Tomasetti. She is live at City Hall this morning with the latest. Briella, good morning. You took my sex parties out of context. I'm just trying to have a little COVID sex party. A person goes and takes it out of context. Tashani, yeah, good morning to you. And if you're just catching up, Dr. Jay Varma was caught on camera, secretly recorded, talking about how he hosted drug-fueled sex parties, went to...
Now there's no way I can have these sex parties unless they're fueled somehow. How about simple enthusiasm? A love of life? The spirit of Eros? I hear ya, but how about drugs? Underground raves and had to quote be kind of sneaky about it because he was running the entire COVID response in the city. Former Mayor de Blasio praised him for his handling of the pandemic. Stay in your homes. Put on a mask. Stay six feet apart. Okay, come around my house.
Get a little closer, not six feet apart, and it's going to be a very different kind of mess. There ain't no party like a COVID sex party. Which included a highly controversial vaccine mandate that got some people fired and forced others to quit their jobs.
Well, they're not 34,000 key workers in New York City. Well, is there no outrage through the union movement? Did we not all quake in fear and horror as we were told that we were killing our grandparents, your grandparents, as we were that we were being selfish, that we were being racist, that we were being MAGA. Meanwhile, Jay Farmer, no Jay Farmer, he was having the absolute time of his life
Hey, Jay, you're aware that spores can get through those masks, ain't you? I hope spores can get through this mask. Or the current mayor, Eric Adams, commented on the scandal, but this certainly isn't the last we'll be hearing about it. Have gotten like a hard time. It's like the popular like New York City found out that you're having sex partings during COVID. Yeah.
In a scathing video released by conservative podcaster Steven Crowder, Dr. Jay Varma, New York City's former COVID czar, boasts about throwing sex parties during the height of the pandemic. The clips posted to Crowder's YouTube channel seem to have been compiled from several different recordings where Varma is caught on camera speaking to a woman about hosting drug-fueled orgies with his wife.
and attending look at that he's got a mask on his actual desk bring that up can you bring that still up in the pip for me so that i can comment on it there look at that there is the mask on his desk can you do split screen on it look at it he's got it on that's it well done he's got a mask on his desk
during a time is telling us we have to be safe and what you have to now recognize is that entire period was a kind of spectacle a piece of theater that doesn't mean that every single person involved knew that it was a centrally organized opportunity to impose authoritarianism and legitimize citizen management to a degree that would have been unthinkable prior to it that doesn't mean that all of the pharmaceutical companies were communicating it may not mean
that there are nanotechnologies within some of those mRNA treatments. It may not mean that event 209 or event plan 19, what was the name of that thing? Event 219, 2019, 201. Event 201, well done guys, that's it. That does not necessarily mean that event 201 was the blueprint for what took place. But it does now mean that we can say everything they told you then
has to be interrogated and questioned and everything we told you then and that's as a result of a discourse and an ongoing dialogue between us i'm looking at the comments right now i'm looking at the chat right now i'm receiving information continually we are in a discourse this is the
biggest fear they have the inability to control information so when they maneuver their next scam or their next war or their next botched operation or their next crisis or their next smearing or their next takedown of an opponent of their narratives people will be able to say hang on
This person they're attacking, is this person for or against the establishment? This story that they're pushing, does this legitimize them having more authority and power? Will that authority and power translate into profit? Will it translate into people being further...
cuckolded, castrated, diminished and reduced. When the answer is yes, then you have to be at least circumspect, probably sceptical, even downright cynical. Do not trust the establishment because the Covid Tsar of New York City was breaking his own rules to attend sex parties, presumably because on some level he either intuited or knew that he was under no risk by attending them.
So what was going on when Gavin Newsom was getting paddle boarders arrested? What was going on when you couldn't attend funerals? What was that? Let's revisit it. Let's not succumb to the incessant cyclone and blizzard of information. Oh, that's...
That was way, way back in 2022. I can't think back that far. Wait a minute. That might be vital information. The same people are still in control. You can never trust them. You must oppose them. This is our time to begin fighting back. Underground dance parties with more than 200 people.
In a statement released to the New York Times, Varma said he was targeted by an operative for an extremist right-wing organization determined to malign public health officials and take down the public health system in America.
He added, "I stand by my efforts to get New Yorkers vaccinated against COVID-19." And I stand by my efforts to vaccinate other people using my very special syringe that's attached to my body and my very special medicine that I grow in my ball bags. Why? Why won't you people trust me? It's not that I like I've been a participant in a global lie. Why won't you let me vaccinate you? Let me vaccinate you.
I've got the special medicine! Varma didn't deny the recordings were real, but said they'd been spliced, diced, and taken out of context.
He also admitted to attending three gatherings between August 2020 and June of 2021. Everything that we do to prevent infection, keeping distance, wearing masks and washing our hands, we need to be even more rigorous about. During that same exact time period, Varma regularly appeared on Fox 5, encouraging New Yorkers to mask up, stay home and practice social distancing as public health officials sought to contain the deadly virus. These new variants account for 51.1%.
You can't keep calling it a deadly virus when people that were in charge of controlling its spread were so confident in their ability to withstand infection that they were attending sex parties at the height of it.
British footballers being condemned for not observing lockdown measures. Footballers, kids in their 20s, rich working class kids living their best life. That's very irresponsible. You're irresponsible. We've let the whole country down. Then you've got medical professionals that are like, oh, yeah, you guys better wear a mask.
They are nominating targets for our ire and condemnation that are not worthy of that emotion, but there is no shortage of candidates that will be condemned. Lord alone knows forgiveness ultimately is the role that we, or the position that we must reach. Of course, of course. But forgiveness does not mean ongoing foolishness, and we would be fools to trust them again, wouldn't we?
percent of all cases that we have in the city right now. He also sat next to former Mayor Bill de Blasio, who tapped him for the job during daily news briefings, updating New Yorkers about the city's progress in stopping the spread.
Elected officials on both sides of the aisle are now speaking out. Joe Borelli, the city council's Republican minority leader, told the Times, I recall being treated like a pariah for pointing out the obvious at that time, that many of our so-called leaders were just making up illogical rules as they went along. Still, I couldn't have predicted how full of it they actually were.
Democratic City Councilman Robert Holden called on the current mayor, Eric Adams, to investigate, telling the paper in part, it's alarming, especially with so many first responders, city workers and everyday New Yorkers losing their jobs.
After working for the city, Varma went on to become medical director at Weill Cornell Medical College's Center for Pandemic Prevention and Response. Now he is the executive vice president and chief medical officer at pharmaceutical company Sega Technologies. No word yet on how this news may impact his current job. For now, we're live here outside City Hall. Dana Tishani, back to you. All right, and Brielle, and Brielle,
What will happen is he'll lose his job, he'll be condemned and people will consider that that's the matter close. He's just an individual just trying to live life temporarily in a position of power because it suited the system to use him for a whole bunch of reasons, I'm sure. Now he is being condemned.
cast aside because like many people he knew in his heart of hearts the pandemic didn't warrant such strict lockdown measures certainly didn't warrant the sacking of thousands of key workers the persecution of thousands of members of the us military in particular didn't warrant all the personal tragedies that each of us endured and for which we will never be compensated because there will never be a full reckoning because to have a full reckoning would expose this simple fact
there are unelected global powers i'm not being uh opaque i mean for example the who that are able to exert power that seems sort of ridiculous they receive their funding again i'm not being a pike from groups like the bill and melinda gates foundation who also invest in vaccine technology and i hear your point that this was a gene therapy and from the beginning of the pandemic many expert voices to name but a few jay bacharia robert malone peter mcculloch
was saying something strange is going on right now. And then because of the extraordinary abilities and reach of new media, someone like Joe Rogan could say, well, I got COVID and I just took ivermectin. I've not had any vaccines. And he was assaulted and attacked by what looked from the outside to be a concerted media takedown. Are you beginning to understand how this works?
For I am. I am beginning to understand how it works. This is not due to any epiphany, but only the slow education of reading this information. Let us not become hysterical. Let us not become condemnatory or hateful. Let us recognize that we can no longer trust these institutions. In fact, it's probably fair to say that the opposite of everything they tell us is closer to the truth than what they're saying. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments.
the chat remember to like and subscribe our content wherever you are watching in if you are still a youtube viewer remember to turn on the notifications and get on over to rumble and indeed consider purchasing rumble premium it really helps our organization here's a message from some of our partners
I use this relief band. Now, relief band is the number one anti-nausea wristband that quickly relieves and prevents nausea associated with motion sickness, anxiety, migraines, and so much more. Relief band is natural, fast-acting. The nausea is melting away. It's non-drowsy. Sometimes I like a bit of drowsy. It's drug-free, and it has zero side effects. I love it.
If you want to cure your nausea problem fast, check out Relief Band right now. Go to reliefband.com. They've got an exclusive offer just for you. Go to reliefband.com and use the promo code RUSSELL, two S's, two L's, and you'll get 25% off this relief band that will cure you of the kind of nausea that you doubtless feel while consuming the likes of The View. Yes, independent media is a good way of settling the stomach and keeping the kind of mental acuity and clarity you require.
But ReliefBand is also good for traveling to new dimensions and even different places on this dimension without the concomitant nausea that sometimes accompanies it. Go to ReliefBand.com and use my promo code RUSSELL for 25% off and free shipping. I'm feeling pretty nausea free. There's a link in the description for you right now.
The only thing, I suppose, that could be more startling than finding out that numerous powerful political figures were attending parties of...
varying degrees of filthiness throughout the pandemic period will be to discover that the CDC have been holding secret meetings about the efficacy, concerns and potential danger of children's vaccines. A subject that when mentioned even by bright lights of Hollywood like Jim Carrey was enough to shackle and slow you down a little bit.
What is going on when it comes to the subject of mass proliferation medications? Why is it that anyone that talks about it is treated as a threat and a pariah and likely subject to some sort of takedown? Well, thankfully,
Bobby Kennedy, a man whose alliance with Trump gives me deep hope that we could be on the edge of disrupting something very significant when it comes to globalism and the real threat that we all face, had an interesting interview where he addressed the issue of children's vaccines, and in particular, what he claims was a CDC meeting about the rise of autism. Now, saying that...
On some social media platforms, I mean, I don't know, you'd have to, there are only emblems that could conjure so much condemnation, reappropriated Hindu emblems, I would say.
Let's have a look at Bobby Kennedy and the extraordinary claim that there have been secret CDC meetings about the rise of autism from vaccinations. I'm not making that claim, of course, but autism has risen and so have vaccinations. Maybe there's a connection. I mean, I'm not a scientist. So, you know, there's a number of things that happened in 1989. But it's those diseases, all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared. I never knew anybody with juvenile diabetes when I was a kid.
A typical pediatrician would see one case of juvenile diabetes in his career. Today, one out of every three kids who walks through his office door has it. Something happened. Why isn't anybody talking about this? Rheumatoid arthritis suddenly exploded, lupus, all these autoimmune diseases, Crohn's disease, these exotic diseases nobody ever heard of when I was a kid. Now they're everywhere. And so you have
Allergic diseases, you have neurological disease and autoimmune diseases and obesity suddenly appear around 1989. And there's a number of things that could be blamed for it. Well, the CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule. Let's check. So they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine.
They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at kids who had not gotten it in 30 days. In other words, kids who got it later or didn't get it at all. And they compared these two groups. And among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was a, I think it was a 10,000% increased risk factor.
for um for a later subsequent audit uh autism diagnosis if you got the first 30 days wow they immediately
Remember, before he started talking about vaccinations, and I'm talking about childhood vaccinations, Bobby Kennedy was like a kind of political celebrity. He was an environmental lawyer. He went up against companies like Monsanto. That was in the days when people thought that globalism was bad.
when people could come together on a subject like loving and respecting the environment and recognize that someone that put their reputation on the line and that was willing to work for such a course was likely a good man. When Bobby Kennedy began to be outspoken on this subject, immediately, almost overnight, the entire media suddenly agreed. This guy's really bad. He's awful. What
kind of things could we say about someone that would legitimize hating and condemning them here's a list of things almost as if there's a playbook when any outspoken person rises up how do we take them down no one's perfect we'll have to find something and with all these extraordinary networks out there that appear to operate on the basis of
ensnaring people into the peculiar world of dark erotica, it's very likely that people in the public eye could be ensnared. Extraordinary really. Bobby Kennedy condemned as a whack job. Donald Trump condemned as a racist. That's not what people used to say about him by the way when he was a celebrity. People used to love Donald Trump. Donald Trump was like a great guy. We're looking at that elsewhere in our content a little later.
Bobby Kennedy became hated because he spoke out against powerful interest. It's as simple as that. That doesn't mean everything Bobby Kennedy says is true, but it does mean that you should probably scrutinize what he does say and
calibrate it with other sources of information and look at who's opposing him and who likely pays those people, institutions and organisations. And also when it comes to something like childhood vaccinations, maybe consider, well, what kind of tests are being done to demonstrate whether or not there is indeed a link between autism and the vaccine programme in the United States of America? Who's going to pay for that? Is the government going to pay for it when they receive all that lobbying money and all those donations?
Maybe not. Is the pharmaceutical industry going to pay for those clinical trials? Maybe not, because they're the direct beneficiaries of it. Is the world of academia going to pay for it? Does academia receive massive donations? You know,
you know that the Nobel Prize, like the people that, you know that, right? Like the Nobel Prize, the family that came up with the Nobel Prize invented dynamite. That's why they had to go, you know the people are associating the name Nobel with people having their limbs blown off. Well, it should be associated with excellence. Have a look at the people that fund galleries. Have a look at the people that fund colleges. Have a look at the institutions that back what you consider to be credible. Have a look at stardom and
and Hollywood itself. Peel back the veneer and have a look what's there because it ain't pretty, baby. And Bobby Kennedy had it all. He's got that surname. He has those opportunities. You think that he needs this shit? So that, for me, that's a person you can rely on. I knew what was causing it. Oh, I know what it was. It was 11.35. So it's 1135% increased risk. And I'm...
And so they knew immediately, it's called a relative risk of 11.35. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed. This was 11.35. The link between cigarettes, smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35. - Oh my God, oh shit. - So they knew what it was and then,
They had an emergency meeting that they called. Think how long there was between knowing that smoking caused cancer and
and saying smoking caused cancer. And now what we have is the nightmare of an information mail strong where good information can get out, bad information can get out, biased, bigoted information can get out, very particular subjective information can get out. And who is most likely to be able to control information? It's the people with the most money, it's the people with the most state authorities, nexus of power, or nexi, I suppose, of
power that form globally, bureaucracies that have the same general interest in mind. Look out for these kind of things. Anti-protest law, anti-free speech, pro-censorship law, for hate speech, for hate speech. Look out for...
general measures that negatively impact people that are able to, for example, grow food like farmers. Look at anything that legitimizes the condemnation or even criminalization of whole classes and whole groups of people. Note it. Note it well. Learn from it. Learn about your enemy. Wear their skin.
live in their world and understand them that we may oppose them and eventually vanquish them i want to do it on cdc campus because they thought it would be susceptible to freedom of information requests so they they did it in a very in this remote um retreat center called simpsonwood which is a methodist retreat center on the on the wooded banks of the chattahoochee river um in a remote part of georgia
and they had all of the big pan germs from the vaccine industry from the pharmaceutical industry from the universities who are the ones who test the vaccines from nih cdc fda the world health organization the european medicals agency and they all got together for two days to talk about this study the first day they're all and somebody made a transcript of it and that transcript was given to me
And I published excerpts from it. But the first day, they're all talking about, oh my God, you know, the lawyers are going to come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof. You know, there's no way to argue with this. This is real science. We can't, you know, what are we going to do? The second day, they spend talking about how to hide it from the American public. And I published these things. Oh,
And how did that go for you Bobby? Turn you into something of a hero? Did it people celebrate you and love you? Did it mean that the Democratic Party under the auspices and stewardship of great and moral people like Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris and Joe Biden and AOC and Gavin Newsom and the Clintons and the Obamas went whoa this is a guy that's willing to go up against Big Pharma
This is a person that's not afraid to say dangerous things. This is what the Democratic Party is all about. Let's bring this guy right into government. Hey, he seems to have an appetite for leadership. Let's get him as the candidate. Joe Biden don't seem to be too well if by an unwell you mean getting jobs for your kids in foreign countries.
companies in dubious nations or not being able to remember the name of Indian prime ministers or hardly being able to debate to a standard that would seem necessary for a man in his position. How about we back Bobby Kennedy? Or did they say, oh no, this person is anti-corporate. This person is anti-authority. This person appears to be opposing massive organisations, whether that was Monsanto when he was a lawyer or whether it's the big
farmer industry now at the height of what would seem to some to be at least a crisis opportunely exploited in order to further legitimize authoritarianism and facilitate profit. He's the last person in the world you want out there front and center. And what does the Trump campaign do? They bring him on in for make America healthy again. For a person like me who culturally belongs to the left, a
former denizen of that dark world of Hollywood, a former employee of mainstream media, a person like Bobby Kennedy. It's the sort of Democrat party I thought we all believed in. Now I've had the scales fall from my eyes since then and I start to see what interests are truly represented there. But Bobby Kennedy is exactly the kind of political leader that should be backed
listened to empowered and trusted but that's just what i think why don't you let me know what you think in the comments in the chat if you're watching this on youtube and you ain't turned on the notification bell then hell you ain't gonna get the information that we're trying to put your way join us every day on rumble where we can speak freely at a time where free speech is being curtailed considerably more important than that though please stay free if you can baby now
Now, for the peculiar story of Sean Puff Daddy Diddy Coombs, a man with many names and an extraordinary array of hobbies. At this point, of course, these are just allegations that are being made. And part of me is, of course, sympathetic as I'm a person that's had allegations made against me. Certainly not allegations that appear to involve extremely powerful people. Isn't that a fascinating component of the Sean story?
Puff Daddy case, that he appears to be almost like a music industry Epstein. I don't know if that's just spin, but I, like you, am looking at social media, and I'm seeing the photographs of him with Hillary and Obama and all those hookups, and I'm gaining access to the sort of information that you're probably looking at. So let's try and understand for a moment, did
did he have a kind of relationship with music industry higher ups did it even go beyond that and when kanye said all those years ago that diddy is a fed was he onto something let's have a look at this story together and see if we can understand
what might pass for truth in this crazy, crazy world of ours. The sex trafficking case against Sean Diddy Combs moving full speed ahead. Lawyers for Combs and prosecutors set to hold a status conference to determine the next phase following the sweeping indictment alleging the music mogul leveraged his business empire, power and prestige to abuse his alleged victims.
He used his business and employees of that business and other close associates to get his way. Those individuals allegedly included high ranking supervisors in the business,
personal assistance, security staff, and household staff. As the disgraced rapper faces racketeering, conspiracies, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution charges, investigators now working to determine who his alleged co-conspirators were and whether they too should be charged. 54-year-old Combs...
When a story about a very powerful person having access to a lot of hedonistic pleasure breaks, and it seems that it goes beyond the kind of hedonism and epicureanism that we know the culture promotes, a culture that tells you you're supposed to express yourself and, hey, within a consensual context,
a consensual relationship, why not have an orgy? Why not have orgies at the height of the COVID pandemic like the New York City COVID czar did? It seems extraordinary when it appears that a front man is emerging, someone that might have connections to higher up executives in the music industry, maybe people in government, great big celebrities. They're spending loads and loads of time with him. It's fascinating and
intriguing. What many people believe is that this could be an Epstein style situation where you have a facilitator that maybe even has connections to the deep state. Many people believe that the reason that Epstein is either dead or disappeared under such
Let's face it, extraordinary circumstances is in some way connected to the many flights he took with powerful figures like Bill Gates, like Bill Clinton and what was required is for that story to disappear.
Notice how the news cycle can really focus down on stories that it wants you to look at. And at the right moment, extract key individuals. I wonder how this Diddy case or Sean Coombs, whatever you feel is the appropriate term or name for him, given the seriousness of these allegations, will play out.
Because when someone like that is involved in trafficking, potentially with a lot of other powerful people, questions, big questions are asked. Like, is there something institutional going on?
There's something going on in Hollywood and the music industry that's not just about the kind of playboy recklessness that we came to expect. Remember with a wink and a smile we talk about Warren Beatty or rock stars having their way. Oh Mick Jagger what a cool guy. Or the advantages of being famous and women throwing themselves at you. No this is a very different thing. This appears to be institutional
Deep state connected, peculiar trafficking. What a fascinating story. At this point, you know, because of personal experience, I'm very mindful. These are allegations. But it seems to me that that world of Hollywood has got some insidious stuff going on in it. It seems to me that many, many powerful people are getting into situations that go beyond
the exploitation and amorality that anyone that's ever been wealthy and famous will recognize the odd and peculiar advantages that are afforded to you, the magnetism that comes with that space and into something, well, allegedly criminal.
We'll have a look at how it plays out. Let's have a look at the rest of this. ...not guilty to charges that he led a racketeering conspiracy that abused women. I'm gonna fight like hell to get him released and he should be released. The indictment alleged some of Combs' employees helped set off so-called "freak-offs" in which women were forced into sex acts with male prostitutes. He used the embarrassing and sensitive recordings he made of the freak-offs as collateral.
against the victims. Prosecutors said authorities seized records along with firearms, drugs and more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant during raids last March on Diddy's homes in Miami and Los Angeles.
What is going on now? The idea that people had compromising material on very famous people used to be a conspiracy theory, didn't it? People used to say, "Oh, the reason certain political figures are in office is because somewhere there's a tape of them doing something they would rather didn't get out there."
These kind of rumors, if you go online, they exist about some of the most powerful people in the world. And it seems now that there's this increasing creeping awareness of the truth and legitimacy to some of those claims. Deep state agencies from the Middle East, deep state agencies from America, from my country, collaborating and conspiring to have massive control over high profile politicians.
At the moment we're still in an investigative phase when it comes to Diddy, but with Epstein, you know, we still don't have the lists, do we? We still don't have the files. We still don't know what powerful political figures were there on that island.
apparently enjoying, it seems on the basis of his conviction, illegal criminal exploitative activity. And I hope that the truth will come out and I hope we will get to see that part of the fuel of power is corruption and exploitation. And occasionally cases appear that seem to demonstrate that corruption very clearly. Well, that's it.
that's just what i think let me know what you think in the comments and the chat remember if you're watching this anywhere other than rumble like subscribe turn on the notification bell because we can only speak freely here on this platform and if you want to come a little deeper with us consider becoming an awakened wonder where we do stuff like answer your questions directly they can sometimes be just personal questions i'm happy to answer
or they could be a little more philosophical like this question that was asked by don't have the name there but I'll let you know in fact guys on locals I'm talking to you sensitive hearts blessed old bird Ellen Sophia we will be coming on right now in a few seconds to stream a Q&A session with you all my question is on
Carl Jung, because I used to, you know, read a lot of him before I also recently converted back to Christianity, Catholicism, and I have, you know, different arguments with him now. I love Carl Jung, but I've got a mate who's, um, he's a teacher more than a friend, I suppose, who always said he'd done some real dodgy stuff around the Nazis. Although I like this stuff you're saying about the Luciferian false light, but I see that as more connected to materialism and rationalism, not that
the enlightenment and rationalism aren't extraordinarily fruitful. I would say they sort of direct us back to individualism.
Hey, remember, I will be appearing at the Rescue the Republic event in Washington. That's on the 9th of September. That's actually, no, hold on, it's the 29th of September. Sorry, we do the dates differently in my country, the country that actually George Washington was crossing the Delaware to throw off the tyrannical shackles of representation. No taxation without representation.
That was it, wasn't it? So that's some of the lineup. You'll see Bobby Kennedy's there, Brett Weinstein himself, Tulsi Gabbard, Robin Malone, a whole host of others. Matt Taibbi, I see him there, Pierre Corrie, Jimmy Dore. It's going to be pretty exciting and interesting. Remember, if you are an Awaken Wonder, you can email us. I mean, you guys watching this on Locals, email us tickets at Russell Brand and you can...
have a special meet up with me on that day if that's something that interests you and appeals to you okay guys well we will be back tomorrow with a whole new live stream show just for you let me know what topics you want me to cover because it's all about you guys all right thanks very much for joining us see you tomorrow not for more of the same but for more of the different until then if you can stay free we'll be on locals right now see you in a second on local stay free