The Hubble constant, which measures the current rate of expansion of the universe, is crucial because it allows scientists to trace the universe's expansion backward in time to estimate its age. Different values of the Hubble constant lead to different ages of the universe, creating a significant discrepancy known as the Hubble tension.
Measurements from the late universe, using stars, galaxies, and supernovae, give a Hubble constant of about 72 km/s/Mpc, while measurements from the early universe, using the cosmic microwave background, give a value of about 67 km/s/Mpc. This discrepancy, known as the Hubble tension, suggests either a problem with the measurements or a flaw in our model of the universe.
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was expected to help resolve the Hubble tension by providing clearer, dust-free observations of standard candles like Cepheid stars. However, JWST's results have confirmed the Hubble Space Telescope's measurements, indicating that the discrepancy likely lies in our theoretical understanding of the universe rather than in the measurements themselves.
The early dark energy model proposes an additional component of dark energy that was active very early in the universe, giving it an initial 'kick' that could explain the discrepancy between the predicted and observed expansion rates. This model also helps explain the formation of massive galaxies much earlier than current models predict.
The Hubble tension is concerning because it suggests that our current model of the universe, which includes dark matter and dark energy, might be incomplete or incorrect. This uncertainty impacts our understanding of the universe's age and the processes that govern its expansion and structure formation.
For the past 10 years cosmologists have been left scratching their heads over why two methods for measuring the universe’s rate of expansion provide totally different results. There are two possible solutions to the puzzle, known as the Hubble tension: either something is wrong with the measurements or something is wrong with our model of the universe. It was hoped that observations from the James Webb space telescope might shed some light on the problem, but instead results published last week have continued to muddy the waters. To understand why the expansion rate of the universe remains a mystery, and what might be needed to finally pin it down, Madeleine Finlay speaks to Catherine Heymans, the astronomer royal for Scotland and a professor of astrophysics at the University of Edinburgh. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/sciencepod)