cover of episode Israel's violent escalation w/ Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi and Nathaniel George

Israel's violent escalation w/ Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi and Nathaniel George

2024/10/5
logo of podcast Politics Theory Other

Politics Theory Other

People
I
Iskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi
N
Nathaniel George
Topics
Iskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi: 伊朗对以色列的导弹袭击效果难以评估,既有夸大和淡化之说。袭击确实命中了一些重要的军事目标,表明伊朗导弹突破了以色列的防御系统。伊朗此次导弹袭击的目标是军事目标,而非平民,意在回应以色列侵犯伊朗主权和暗杀行动,避免冲突进一步升级。伊朗的弹道导弹计划是为了威慑,而非侵略,其发展与伊朗革命、两伊战争以及美国制裁有关。伊朗导弹技术的生存能力取决于以色列和美国是否会对伊朗的导弹设施发动大规模空袭,以及伊朗与俄罗斯的军事合作。伊朗的军事工业能力不如以色列,但其导弹储备量巨大,且部署地点隐蔽。如果发生大规模冲突,伊朗可能难以补充武器,但其与俄罗斯的军事合作可能提供一定支持。美国攻击伊朗能源基础设施的可能性不能排除。 Nathaniel George: 伊朗的导弹袭击在黎巴嫩和阿拉伯世界被视为成功的政治行动,提升了抵抗轴的士气,并驳斥了伊朗放弃黎巴嫩的说法。此次袭击并非旨在造成平民伤亡,而是针对军事目标,以展示伊朗的反击能力。黎巴嫩南部和贝鲁特面临严重的人道主义危机,以色列的空袭和入侵导致大量人员伤亡和财产损失,大量民众流离失所,医疗设施遭到破坏,以色列的行为构成战争罪。2019年以来,黎巴嫩经历了严重的经济和政治危机,包括货币崩溃、银行倒闭和港口爆炸等事件,这些危机加剧了当前的人道主义灾难。纳斯鲁拉的遇刺对真主党及其支持者来说是重大打击,但他长期领导真主党,确立了该组织的政策和方向,真主党作为一个组织,其韧性超出了其领导人的个人魅力。以色列对真主党的袭击可能增强真主党在黎巴嫩的支持率,即使在其反对者中也是如此,这取决于以色列的行动以及冲突的走向。伊朗及其盟友的导弹计划具有成本效益,可以实现与以色列等先进军事力量之间的战略均势。廉价导弹的广泛使用,以及其易于出口的特性,削弱了昂贵军事力量的优势。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did Iran launch a missile attack on Israel on October 1st?

Iran launched the missile attack as a direct response to the assassination of Hezbollah's Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, by Israel on September 27th. The attack was intended to demonstrate Iran's ability to penetrate Israeli air defenses and show that it could strike back if further attacks were made on its allies or vital infrastructure.

How effective were Iran's missile strikes against Israel?

The effectiveness of Iran's missile strikes is disputed. While Israel and the U.S. claim the attack was a failure, there are numerous videos and reports showing that many missiles hit their military targets, including the Nevatim Air Base. The attack succeeded in breaking through Israel's air defenses, which was a significant political and psychological blow to both Israel and its allies.

What is the history and purpose of Iran's ballistic missile program?

Iran's ballistic missile program was developed following the 1979 revolution and the Iran-Iraq War, during which Iran felt isolated and under siege. The program serves as a deterrent against attacks from powers like the U.S. and Israel, aiming to prevent unilateral military actions against Iran. Iran has invested heavily in this technology to achieve strategic parity at a lower cost compared to conventional military forces.

What is the scale of the humanitarian crisis in Lebanon following recent Israeli attacks?

Lebanon is facing a severe humanitarian crisis. Over 2,000 people have been killed, and nearly 10,000 have been injured since the attacks began. About 1.2 million Lebanese, or 20% of the population, have been displaced. The attacks have destroyed critical infrastructure, including a major public hospital, and are exacerbating an already dire economic and political situation that has been ongoing for years.

Why is the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah considered a significant blow to Hezbollah?

Hassan Nasrallah's assassination is a major blow to Hezbollah because he was a charismatic and strategic leader who had led the organization for 32 years. Nasrallah was known for his intelligence, restraint, and commitment to the resistance against Israel. Despite his importance, Hezbollah has shown resilience in continuing its operations and holding the line against Israeli ground invasions.

How has the Israeli invasion of Lebanon affected Hezbollah's support within the country?

The Israeli invasion has emboldened support for Hezbollah, even among those who do not share its politics. Israeli attacks on civilians and critical infrastructure have rallied many Lebanese against the Israeli aggression. The group's cautious and strategic approach, including its offer to cease attacks if a ceasefire is agreed in Gaza, has also helped maintain its credibility as a rational actor in the conflict.

What is the U.S. position on Israel's aggression in Lebanon and Iran?

The U.S. position has shifted over time. Initially, the Biden administration opposed escalation in Lebanon, but it now appears to support a limited ground offensive. This shift is partly due to the assassination of Nasrallah, which has created an opportunity for the U.S. and Israel to strike at their adversaries. The U.S. is influenced by its own propaganda and the election cycle, which makes it difficult to oppose Israeli actions without facing domestic political backlash.

What are the potential long-term consequences of a prolonged conflict with Iran for the region?

A prolonged conflict with Iran could lead to a significant rise in oil prices and instability in the Gulf region. Iran has threatened to target oil installations of American allies, which could have global economic repercussions. Additionally, the conflict could draw in other regional and international powers, leading to a wider and more catastrophic war that neither the U.S. nor Israel can sustain over the long term.

How does the current economic and political crisis in Lebanon affect the response to Israeli aggression?

Lebanon was already in a deep economic and political crisis before the recent Israeli aggression. The crisis has made daily life extremely difficult, with shortages of electricity and water, and a collapsed currency. The current Israeli attacks have worsened the situation, causing widespread displacement and destruction. Despite these challenges, Hezbollah and other resistance groups have managed to maintain their operations and resist Israeli advances.

Why does the U.S. have an anomalous relationship with Israel, and how is this affecting public opinion?

The U.S. has an exceptional relationship with Israel, rooted in shared strategic interests and cultural perceptions. However, this relationship is becoming increasingly difficult to justify due to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Lebanon. Public opinion in the U.S., especially among Democratic voters, is shifting against Israel, questioning the rationale behind the unqualified support. The Biden administration is moving from one crisis to another without a clear plan to de-escalate the conflict.

Chapters
Analysis of the October 1st Iranian missile attack on Israel, focusing on its effectiveness, Iran's intentions, and the contrasting narratives from Israel, the US, and Iran itself. The discussion also touches upon the significance of the targeted military sites and the context of previous attacks.
  • Conflicting opinions on the effectiveness of Iran's missile attack.
  • Iran hit some military targets, demonstrating the ability to break through Israel's missile defense.
  • Iran's intentions were likely to restore deterrence and respond to the assassination of Iranian officials.
  • The attack was a calculated show of force, not aiming to kill civilians.

Shownotes Transcript

On the 27th of September Israel dramatically escalated its war on Hezbollah, by assassinating its Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. Four days later Iran responded to the killing of its long-standing ally by launching a missile attack on Israel - targeting military and intelligence facilities. In today's episode Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi and Nathaniel George join PTO to talk about whether the killing of Nasrallah - and the wider leadership - represents an existential threat to Hezbollah, and about the group's prospects in combating Israel's ground invasion. We also talked about the effectiveness of Iran's missile strikes and the degree to which Iran has been able to restore any measure of deterrence. We also touched on the dire humanitarian situation in Lebanon, which comes on top of years of grinding economic and political crisis. Finally, we discussed the position of the United States and the apparent appetite in Washington for settling accounts with the America's regional adversaries.