Iran launched the missile attack as a direct response to the assassination of Hezbollah's Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, by Israel on September 27th. The attack was intended to demonstrate Iran's ability to penetrate Israeli air defenses and show that it could strike back if further attacks were made on its allies or vital infrastructure.
The effectiveness of Iran's missile strikes is disputed. While Israel and the U.S. claim the attack was a failure, there are numerous videos and reports showing that many missiles hit their military targets, including the Nevatim Air Base. The attack succeeded in breaking through Israel's air defenses, which was a significant political and psychological blow to both Israel and its allies.
Iran's ballistic missile program was developed following the 1979 revolution and the Iran-Iraq War, during which Iran felt isolated and under siege. The program serves as a deterrent against attacks from powers like the U.S. and Israel, aiming to prevent unilateral military actions against Iran. Iran has invested heavily in this technology to achieve strategic parity at a lower cost compared to conventional military forces.
Lebanon is facing a severe humanitarian crisis. Over 2,000 people have been killed, and nearly 10,000 have been injured since the attacks began. About 1.2 million Lebanese, or 20% of the population, have been displaced. The attacks have destroyed critical infrastructure, including a major public hospital, and are exacerbating an already dire economic and political situation that has been ongoing for years.
Hassan Nasrallah's assassination is a major blow to Hezbollah because he was a charismatic and strategic leader who had led the organization for 32 years. Nasrallah was known for his intelligence, restraint, and commitment to the resistance against Israel. Despite his importance, Hezbollah has shown resilience in continuing its operations and holding the line against Israeli ground invasions.
The Israeli invasion has emboldened support for Hezbollah, even among those who do not share its politics. Israeli attacks on civilians and critical infrastructure have rallied many Lebanese against the Israeli aggression. The group's cautious and strategic approach, including its offer to cease attacks if a ceasefire is agreed in Gaza, has also helped maintain its credibility as a rational actor in the conflict.
The U.S. position has shifted over time. Initially, the Biden administration opposed escalation in Lebanon, but it now appears to support a limited ground offensive. This shift is partly due to the assassination of Nasrallah, which has created an opportunity for the U.S. and Israel to strike at their adversaries. The U.S. is influenced by its own propaganda and the election cycle, which makes it difficult to oppose Israeli actions without facing domestic political backlash.
A prolonged conflict with Iran could lead to a significant rise in oil prices and instability in the Gulf region. Iran has threatened to target oil installations of American allies, which could have global economic repercussions. Additionally, the conflict could draw in other regional and international powers, leading to a wider and more catastrophic war that neither the U.S. nor Israel can sustain over the long term.
Lebanon was already in a deep economic and political crisis before the recent Israeli aggression. The crisis has made daily life extremely difficult, with shortages of electricity and water, and a collapsed currency. The current Israeli attacks have worsened the situation, causing widespread displacement and destruction. Despite these challenges, Hezbollah and other resistance groups have managed to maintain their operations and resist Israeli advances.
The U.S. has an exceptional relationship with Israel, rooted in shared strategic interests and cultural perceptions. However, this relationship is becoming increasingly difficult to justify due to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Lebanon. Public opinion in the U.S., especially among Democratic voters, is shifting against Israel, questioning the rationale behind the unqualified support. The Biden administration is moving from one crisis to another without a clear plan to de-escalate the conflict.
On the 27th of September Israel dramatically escalated its war on Hezbollah, by assassinating its Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. Four days later Iran responded to the killing of its long-standing ally by launching a missile attack on Israel - targeting military and intelligence facilities. In today's episode Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi and Nathaniel George join PTO to talk about whether the killing of Nasrallah - and the wider leadership - represents an existential threat to Hezbollah, and about the group's prospects in combating Israel's ground invasion. We also talked about the effectiveness of Iran's missile strikes and the degree to which Iran has been able to restore any measure of deterrence. We also touched on the dire humanitarian situation in Lebanon, which comes on top of years of grinding economic and political crisis. Finally, we discussed the position of the United States and the apparent appetite in Washington for settling accounts with the America's regional adversaries.