Conspiratorial thinking helps make sense of unexpected outcomes, providing explanations when reality doesn't align with expectations.
Theories include claims that the election was hacked by Elon Musk through Starlink or that Putin interfered, and concerns about missing votes.
Most polls predicted a tight race, which is what occurred, though some had a slightly more optimistic outlook for Kamala Harris.
Social media platforms like TikTok and Twitter allowed these theories to go viral, with some users leveraging them for engagement and monetization.
Initially used in 2016 to describe left-wing conspiracy theories about Trump, it has resurfaced to label similar thinking among Democrats. Critics argue it lacks precision.
It can lead to disillusionment and disenfranchisement, potentially dissuading people from voting and participating in civic life.
Many media outlets were prepared for conspiracy theories and lies to spread after the election. But many thought that it would be coming from Donald Trump or his supporters spreading the “Big Lie.” But since Donald Trump’s win, some social media posts from Kamala Harris supporters and people on the left have gone viral questioning the outcome of the election.
Host Micah Loewinger speaks with Anna Merlan), senior reporter at Mother Jones covering disinformation, technology, and extremism, about the viral post-election delusions and how conspiratorial thinking can be expected from any losing party.
Further reading:
“Election Conspiracy Theories Are for Everyone),” by Anna Merlan
“The 200-Year History of Using Voter Fraud Fears to Block Access to the Ballot),” by Pema Levy
On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm)). Follow our show on Instagram), Twitter) and Facebook) @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing [email protected].