The Kamalamentum Drop is Real - What Will the Regime Do Next?
48:56 Share

I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the post. So daily brief, it is completely free. It'll be one email that's sent to you every day. You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world. We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free. Go to human events.com slash post. So sign up today. It's called the post. So daily brief read what I read for show prep. You will not regret it. Human events.com slash post. So totally free. The post. So daily brief.

This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.

A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran. This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec. Christ is... A high school in Borough County, Georgia, is right outside of Athens, and they are on a hard lockdown after reports of gunfire. Since when does the vice president have what sounds like a southern accent? You better. All helped us win in 2020.

I wasn't previously such a political person. Now I'm a single policy voter. Israel straight through and through. Isn't Kamala is the one who said she sympathizes with the human emotion of these protesters? What are you sympathizing with terrorism?

Why not? Because it's two games. No one gets to go out. We are outside of that apartment complex, allegedly overrun by Tren de Agua. The East Colfax Community Collective, which is a communist-aligned group, was saying that actually this area is completely safe after the city is calling to evict people out of this building and shut it down because of the violence. A lot of people listening to this, myself included,

that doesn't think that Kamala is a communist. Well, she's a Marxist. She's advocating for some policies that are towards the direction of democratic socialism, let's say. There's a lot of people that kind of know the way government works and they say, well, none of those policies are going to actually come to reality. It could come to reality. Look, I mean, she came out with price control. It's been tried like 121 different times at different places over the years.

And it's never worked once. It leads to communism. It leads to socialism. -A former top aide to New York Governor Kathy Hochul is set to be arraigned in just a matter of minutes for allegedly acting on behalf of the Chinese government. The FBI arrested Linda Sun and her husband, Chris Hu. -Federal prosecutors say Linda Sun was working as an agent for the Chinese government. They say, in exchange, Sun and her husband laundered millions of dollars out of China.

All right, Jack Posobiec back live here, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily. Today is September 4th, 2024. Anno Domini. The complementum drop.

The common momentum, did it ever actually exist? Well, it certainly existed in the media. And it existed in the sense that the media was using the ramp up to try to claim that common momentum was sweeping the nation. But is that true? Well, what you really saw was base Democrats

so when she was nominated when bill biden dropped out and she was nominated what you saw were base democrats that got on board people who were who are the hardcore base of the left saying that they weren't for biden because they saw him basically pull his skeletor act up at the debate and then they came in saying all right we're going to support kamala harris we're going to get back on board

that's not the same thing as her getting ramped up momentum in swing states and and or ramped up momentum with independence so i want to go through the maps a little bit quicker there's a lot of noise out there a lot of noise but we need the signal not the noise the signal not the noise so let's put up real clear politics because

The current state of play, all of the swing states as they stand where they are. Let's show it without. So this is showing the toss-ups. These are the swing states right now.

Go and look at the various swing states. Go and look at what we've got. So you're talking Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia. These are the state of play. And by the way, Kamala Harris is going to New Hampshire this week. Why would Kamala Harris be going to New Hampshire if it wasn't potentially a state that was awful?

on the bubble by the way states like New Hampshire Virginia and even Minnesota where the Harris Waltz campaign has activity this week are states that President Trump was talking about putting into play before Biden dropped out now I want to put up map break again the rcp map without the toss-ups now this is where it gets important folks if you look at the rcp averages as the way they are

As currently stands, Harris Walls, 273, Trump Vance, 265. This is the current polling average. Now, I got a lot, I have some problems with this, but I do see Georgia down there, Georgia as Democrat,

I think that Georgia is going to be closer. I think that it's winnable for Trump, but I think it's going to be very, very close, a lot closer than it was when Joe Biden was the nominee. This highlights the importance of three states, Nevada, Georgia, and then also look which state you see in red in the Rust Belt up there.

What can I say, folks? It's my home state of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is the key. And even CNN had a poll out this morning that says Pennsylvania is tied up. Mark Halprin is saying that he's been talking to Democrat insiders that say Pennsylvania is a loss for Democrats. This is huge. This is massive. We need to look into this, folks. 50-50, we're in a knife fight. 273-265-2500.

The future of the Republic, the future of our children, the future of our families is all at stake. Stay tuned. Be right back. Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel. Make sure you're subscribed. You hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip. You'll never miss a new live episode. And we're putting them out every single day of the week. You talk about influencers. These are influencers.

And they're friends of mine, Jack Posobiec. Where's Jack? Jack? He's done a great job.

All right folks we're back live human events daily here Washington DC folks how do you survive a communist apocalypse well you watch human events daily every day check you follow poso on x check you order a copy of unhumans on Amazon check and there's one thing you're forgetting and it can make the biggest difference in your future and your family's financial future and that is checking out today's show sponsor Allegiance Gold

Since 2020, Bidenomics has obliterated the American economy. Kamala Harris will do even worse. Imagine what four years of socialist policy will do to interest rates, debt, and labor disputes. You need something stable so that you can take a breath and know that the money you earned and the retirement you worked for is stable.

safe. You have to proactively protect your assets when the supply chains get rocked and Biden decides to print a few more trillion dollar bills, it won't impact your family's bottom line. And the only way to do that is with the one true beacon of stability that so many patriots use to preserve their wealth. And that, my friends, is

Over the last five years, it's almost doubled in value with the way things are looking. The sky is the limit. Allegiance Gold has done things the right way from the beginning, so it's no coincidence they've earned the highest trust ratings in the precious metals industry. Five stars at TrustLink and A-plus with the Better Business Bureau.

Allegiance Gold can help protect your IRA or 401k with physical gold and silver, or you can have it delivered securely to your doorstep. Get up to $5,000 in free silver on a qualifying investment when you go to protectwithposo.com or call 844-577-POSO. Don't risk your financial future betting against these forces. Act today. Protectwithposo.com. That's protectwithposo.com or call 844-577-POSO.

So we're still waiting to see whether or not the SAVE Act will be passed through the House, put into the CR. By the way, I keep saying this, SAVE Act or shut it down, SAVE Act or shut it down. The SAVE Act is the forcing function. The forcing function is the September 30th CR.

You put that in and then it becomes the shaping operation to block illegals from voting in the 2024 election. So you do this in September and it will set your conditions for victory in November. Speaker Johnson has said that he wants to put this forward. Senator Mike Lee is out there. Elon is out there. This is absolutely critical.

It's absolutely critical to securing victory come November. And for all the reasons that we talked about, this is going to come down to a knife fight. So the pressure on Elon now is critical. And the pressure from the regime is also critical. Darren Beattie, someone who understands indelibly the importance of regime politics, joins us now from Revolver News. Darren, with all these things going on, and we just went through

We just went around the horn in terms of the map, how the swing states are at this sort of 50-50 status. It's really coming down to the wire in so many of these states, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada. It really seems as though just a couple of thousand votes one way or another in any of these states could swing the entire direction of our system. And given that it's so close,

what do you expect the regime to do in such a situation as we find ourselves? Well, you know, it's really hard to say. We're in a home stretch, but the home stretch is quite a long ways in political terms. You know, we're just barely into September, let alone October. And, you know, that's essentially an eternity in terms of a, you know, campaign strategy.

a span given how accelerated things are. And, you know, I think things have largely reset. You know, we were talking earlier, you mentioned, you think Kamala's sort of momentum, the, the brat summer that she enjoyed such that it was, that's kind of over. And, um,

things are just sort of steady. They're neck and neck, they're steady, and it feels almost like the quiet before the storm. And obviously the next major event, which, you know, could anything could happen, the next major event is probably going to be the upcoming debate. So I think that will really set the momentum for this next stage of the election.

One of the things that we talked about the other day on the show is that one of the things that one of the reasons that the debates have become so important isn't necessarily the content of the debate, but the fact that because people live in so many information silos now, particularly people that are only ever exposed to the mainstream media, that

because they won't go on X. A lot of the left have left X and flooded this bevy of competitors like Blue Sky and Mastodon and all this nonsense, that the debate is the only time where they ever actually are forced to view the other candidate outside of their echo chamber and outside of that silo. And so it's the only time where all of the various...

echo chambers and silos and ghettos and whatever you want to call them actually all commence at one and congeal into one spot. And that's in watching the debate. And of course, it'll be here in just about six days time in Philadelphia. So that being said, though, if you were the regime, wouldn't it be incumbent on you then to perhaps censor anyone who was trying to show negative information about your preferred candidate?

Yes. I mean, censorship has always been an objective from the regime standpoint. Just about the debate, I think you're right that there is a kind of sense in which these debates are a rare instance of something that's part of the consensus reality, I guess, the overlap of everyone, one of those rare moments that everyone's watching the same thing. And

That's special not only for that, but in the case of Kamala is that her presentations are so curated and scripted that it's a rare moment of potential volatility for her. It's a rare moment in which she's not necessarily scripted, or at least there's a possibility that in

an interaction Trump could put her off guard, or, you know, there's, there's just more that could happen in that context. And I think just the strategic lay of the land is such that, you know, it's to Trump's benefit, I've said maximum exposure, he should be exposed, he should be out there doing interviews all the time, doing rallies all the time and

Well, but Darren, hold on, though. Hold on, Darren. Donald Trump just did a fantastic interview on your favorite podcast after human events just yesterday. I'm sure you watched it with rapt attention on the Lex Fridman show. I wouldn't want the algorithmic cops to arrest me for not watching the Lex Fridman thing. But the maximum I watch every minute as soon as it drops.

Absolutely. The maximum exposure is the best approach. And Kamala's strategy is really kind of the opposite. It's limited exposure because the more exposure she has, the more downside there is. People don't particularly like her the more that they see her. And she's just fine and she's strongest really as the generic Democrat. So she benefits from this carefully curated approach

presentation, whereas Trump benefits from maximum exposure. And I think that the debate, the volatility of a debate in a kind of unscripted way or the possibility of unscripted moments, I think allows for Trump to take more of an advantage if things go the right way.

Well, and I think you're right on that. And so I suppose this is why you might start to see escalation on other fronts. You know, obviously, we saw what happened on J13. We saw the complete drop of security in this outdoor rally. So I would certainly...

look to any potential future outdoor rally for another similar instance such as that. We're also working on a book on that. We're calling it Bulletproof, and it's going to be coming out very soon before the election. In addition to that, we're talking about, I think, I've said this a number of times, and some people disagree, but I think that Biden will drop out

make Kamala the president. This gives you another boost of sort of an artificial, you know, an artificial boost, an artificial, you know, brat goes to the Oval Office and just think of the clips of her stepping behind and sitting down at the Resolute desk. I'm the first one here snapping your fingers up in the air. You better thank a union member. You better thank a union member. Even though, of course, she was raised by Indians on Montreal Island in Canada.

That, you know, this, this would be another way for her to give her the bully pulpit to give her the full power of the infrastructure, the full power of the incumbency at the same time. Of course, you would sort of run the risk of saying, well, does that mean she owns all of the conditions as they are right now? And then, of course, overseas look, it's, it's been completely overlooked, but the.

The killing of the hostages after the family spoke at her DNC. I mean, this is something we're coming up on a break in a minute. But Darren, that's something that in a previous era, in addition to everything with the Gold Star mothers and families, this is something in a different era that would have ended a campaign. Absolutely. I mean, look at look at the situation with Carter. And that's not even what's happening here. So, no, it's.

There are a lot of problems and I think she does benefit from this sort of ambiguity. She benefits from the abstraction of generic Democrat, but she also benefits from the ambiguity of kind of being able to take credit for what she thinks is popular with Biden and distance herself from what's not.

that kind of, you know, she is the vice president. She is part of this regime. She should have to own everything that's been going on. But the posture that she's taken has been one of just kind of being a shapeshifter, being able to take credit where she wants and distance where she wants. I think it's a very interesting idea that maybe at the very last minute, Biden would step down, would have to be some kind of

emergency where she would kind of emerge as a heroic person and there would be a massive media surge. And that would help, if not for name recognition, just to get her in the media more after the last push. I don't think it's an outlandish idea at all. Jaron, we've got a we've got a quick break, but no, I think it's something that and it's it's sort of free money that they can do to give their own candidate a boost. We'll be right back. Darren B, Human Events Daily continues.

I grew up in the hood. I rolled with bloods. And them boys had a saying. You can't be listening to all that slappy, whack, trim out his ala-tabam ship, nippy-bam-bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.

Jack Posobiec back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Americans are tired and they're frustrated by a stalling economy. They're tired and frustrated by the inflation, the endless wars, the relentless assault on our values. They are the ones.

who are sick of what's going on but thankfully let me tell you something thankfully there's companies like patriot mobile and still believe in america and our constitution i'm proud to partner with patriot mobile because patriot mobile is on the front lines they fight for the first and second amendments and our military and first responder heroes

Take a stand for conservative causes. Put America first by switching to Patriot Mobile today. You'll get the same nationwide coverage as the big providers because Patriot Mobile operates across all three major networks. Plus, they back their service with a coverage guarantee. Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team will find the best plan for your needs. Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.

Go to patreonmobile.com/poso or call 972-PATRIOT right now. Get a free month when you use promo code POSO. Don't get fooled by other providers pretending to share your values or have the same coverage. They don't and they can't. Join me, switch to America's only Christian conservative mobile provider.

It's called Patriot Mobile. Again, patriotmobile.com slash post or call 972-PATRIOT for your free month of service today. All right, folks, this is signal, not noise. Signal, not noise. People want to run around and they want to complain about, oh, Donald Trump, oh, oh, he said something. And, you know, and Tucker Carlson is getting into controversy again. And guys, guys.

Focus. Nine weeks away from an election. Put the map back up, folks. Put the map back up, DC. Put the map back up. All right? Take a look at this, ladies and gentlemen. This is the fight. Right here, these states. Focus on the signal. If you want to affect victory, this is what you have to focus on every single day. All right? Now...

Politico, and this is what I want to ask Darren about, Jonathan Martin, the politics bureau chief over at Politico, has a huge article up this morning, this great big piece that says, to dominate the country once more, Republicans need to hasten the move to a post-Trump party. What a sentence. What a phrase. To dominate the country once more,

Republicans need to hasten the move to a post-Trump party. Dominate the country? Were Republicans dominating pre-Trump? Were Republicans the ones in the driver's seat? Were they the ones that were running the country? I mean, this is incredible. And he goes, oh, look at the great governor's bench, Glenn Youngkin and Brian Kemp and Chris Sununu and, you know, basically the sort of run-of-the-mill vanilla Republicans that we had before.

before and they talk about how Republicans used to be the leaders, social conservatism and national security and low taxes, big business. This is the Republican Party that we can bring back. Darren Beatty, what's going on here? Why is Politico saying that this is what Republicans need to do to dominate the country once more? Just listen to Politico magazine. They've got your best interests at heart, Republicans.

So they're saying in order for Republicans to dominate, the Republican nominee has to lose.

Which is, it's an interesting argument along, you know, we've seen the never Trump phenomenon for a long time. It was much more of a thing in 2016. And then basically it dissipated and got absorbed into the Democrat Party. And of course, and unfortunately, there were a lot of never Trumpers that sort of rebranded themselves as pro-Trump and they

basically presented a view of Trump in America first that was basically a repackaged version of a lot of the Never Trump policy. So there are sort of amorphous and a variety of different groups here. Now Never Trump is almost nothing but a footnote, but there are many senses in which this argument is wrong. These people are so desperate to get rid of Trump. The irony is,

if Trump were to lose, that's not going to be the end. I think, you know, he could run in another four years. You know, that's the thing. They assume. Oh, my gosh. Darren throwing it out there.

They're assuming that if he loses, it's over, when actually, ironically, the best thing for these guys, we have very different, I think, I'd love for Trump to be president in perpetuity, but the best thing for these guys, if Trump would win, because that would mean it would just be another four years. But if there's a loss, then Trump is going, as long as he's around, he's going to be the leader of the Republican Party. There's no question.

question about that. And so even on its own terms, the argument is stupid.

Well, and Darren, by the way, not only that, but let's see, you know, we've got plenty of other Trumps around, too. You know, we've got we've got Donald Trump. We've got a lot of generation. We've got Eric Trump. We've got Laura Trump herself. She's currently the co-chair of the party. She is she hails from North Carolina, a great state with a huge name like that would be. There's been a ton of talk, by the way, grassroots campaign to potentially try to draft her for Senate.

A couple of years back, Barron Trump just started over at NYU today. Many of these guys, by the way, are, I believe, currently...

I guess the residents would be in Florida. So, you know, I don't know for all those Florida governors and senators and the Rick Scott's and the Marco Rubio's and whoever the current governor of Florida is, I would just say, you know, keep in mind, keep in mind that there's a plot of other people that could be eyeing up those seats. And so this idea that,

Darren, it goes back to what they've been trying to do since 2016. They want to have either Trumpism without Trump. Well, first it was never Trump. So first it was never Trump. That completely failed. Then they tried to do Trumpism without Trump with DeSantis. And now they're going to attempt to do this third act. Well, they will get, I guarantee you, by the way, this will happen, that you will have people from the establishment, establishment Republican types coming up saying, I'm a Donald Trump Republican, and that's why we have to invade Syria.

I'm a Donald Trump Republican. That's why we have to open them to just a couple of guest workers. I'm a Donald Trump Republican. And that's why war with Iran is the most important thing. Nikki Haley is going to try to rebrand herself. And by the way, we were very close to a potential Nikki Haley nomination. Producer Fahs has this whole scenario. God forbid if that bullet had connected, there is a...

Very real chance that Nikki, because I always point out the timing there was critical. The assassination attempt occurred before he named his VP choice. So it was a total blank slate at that moment.

So it was perfectly set up for a Nikki Haley coronation. We probably narrowly escaped that. The country narrowly escaped that. And so now, unfortunately for the regime, unless, you know, God forbid, it's still very possible they could attempt another thing. I think it's less likely because a second attempt is going to look

a thousand times more suspicious than a first attempt that could be presented as a one-off, but you never know. You can't rule anything out. So they may very well get very desperate in the home stretch.

well and by the way it's it's interesting you mentioned that so in we are releasing the new book bulletproof and we go through an excruciating detail the publicly known story about what happened during those nine days between the assassination attempt itself and in fact the

that JD Vance and president Trump had had breakfast that morning at a meeting down at Mar-a-Lago. Then he flies to Pennsylvania. The assassination attempt takes place. And then after that is when the, he, he goes back to Bedminster. Then he flies to, um,

He flies to Milwaukee for the RNC and this and who is sitting next to him on the plane. It's Lindsey Graham. And what does Lindsey Graham and I knew this at the time, but Tucker Carlson came out and, you know, really exposed it. And we go through the entire thing in the book where Lindsey Graham spent that entire flight. Remember, Donald Trump has been shot just hours before.

And Lindsey Graham spends the entire time telling him to not pick J.D. Vance as his vice president of all the things, right, of all the things to focus on. Why was it that in those critical moments that the push was on to remove J.D. Vance from the ticket? And by the way, this question of when exactly was Nikki Haley added to the speaker lineup? Because we know that she and Ron DeSantis were not on the original list.

then suddenly she appears on the list and there's that viral clip of course of of Trump sitting with JD Vance and saying because she's on stage saying Trump wanted me to be here and he turns to JD and they can do the sort of the lip reading and he says I she asked to be here it wasn't me and and and that went super viral and you know JD laughs but so

The theory, though, is actually starts to get a couple of legs when you question when exactly was she added to this lineup and was it potentially or were there potentially people and whispers in the background that she would either be put on as a VP or potentially even a higher position?

Yeah. I mean, it's so dark to think, but that really was the most elegant solution from the regime standpoint. There had been no VP named. They take Trump out and they would happily allow Nikki Haley running as this kind of moderate, but pro-Trump person.

they would happily allow her to defeat the then, you know, just senile Biden. They would have been very happy for that to happen. And a lot of, you know, they would count on a lot of the American electorate to say, oh, well, you know, Nikki Haley won, so I guess it's not rigged after all. So it's, you know, I'm not, who knows what really, you know, took place, but

there is a certain elegance into how that scenario would solve all of the regime's problems at once.

And by the way, we're also told, of course, that partially one of the things that galvanized Trump's support for J.D. Vance was the assassination attempt. Why? Because J.D. Vance as president is something that would anger the regime even more than Trump as president. Darren, schedule opened up here for us. Are you able to hang on? Yes.

uh that's fantastic because this is a really important conversation we have to understand the true nature of the system under which we live stay tuned right back darren beattie more revolver news human events daily continues signal not the noise jack where's jack where is he jack i want to see you

Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies. All right, Jack Sobik, back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Darren.

there's a shadow over our republic and actually let me let me go into this next part of my thesis too because when we talk about in the book bulletproof the nine days in july we we also you know we have to step back and say we were one inch away from a lot of these things potential civil war i talked about that on tucker

potential, as we talked about just now, Nikki Haley candidacy. I'm sure Don Jr. obviously would have been also a name bandied around. It's like, Don, you almost had to run for president this year, buddy. And then third, of course, though, that Joe Biden, I argue, would not have had to drop out had that shot been one inch, I guess, to the right.

Because they happily would have left their puppet up there and they would have let him lose to a Nikki Haley type or potentially keep him in office. To understand the true nature of our system, you have to understand that Joe Biden never would have dropped out had that shot hit. What do you think about this thesis?

Yeah, I think 100%. I mean, again, that gets to the timing of what happened at Butler. It was at that critical point. Biden was still in there. The Democrats were in a really tight bind. There was no obvious solution to it. There was tremendous resistance to Kamala.

And of course, Biden didn't want to step down either. So it was while Biden was still there, after his disastrous debate performance, it seemed like it was too late for the Democrats to do anything about it. It was before Trump named a VP. So there was a blank slate. It was the perfect solution. Then you get someone like Nikki Haley in there.

The regime, they're totally fine with Nikki Haley. And all the better that she can present herself as Trump-aligned because she worked for Trump. All the better that she's Republican, so if they let her win, they could say, see, the system isn't rigged after all. The most elegant solution in the world. And they came within millimeters of effectuating that solution.

And, you know, it's hard not to seriously entertain this when you see how everything lined up and when you see just the concatenation of utterly implausible things that happened at Butler that really defy, you know, defy my best efforts to present an alternative innocent explanation for how that all could have transpired.

So I'm actually going to pull something up to you. And I said this on Alex Stein last night, and I haven't said it here on human events, but I'll say it anyway. So we took the what we call the 12 for the book. We took the 12 independent security failures at home.

of the secret service and law enforcement that day and we actually inputted the entire thing into basically a probability matrix and then we put that into chat gpt4 omni so gpt4 omni is the latest iteration of gpt from open ai and we input the entire thing in there and we said what what do you think of this is it possible that all of this happened just by chance and i will read for you this is not me this is not my co-author joshua lysek this is gpt4 omni

The response that came out the summary in summary, almost any event you can imagine, no matter how rare is far more likely than the occurrence of 12 independent security failures on the same day as an armed man with malicious intent with a combined probability of 1 in 1.

This extreme rarity emphasizes how statistically improbable such an event is, suggesting that if it occurs, it might not be due to mere chance.

that's not me it's not joshua lysek that's open ai ai's gpt4 omni the latest iteration so darren again just from a probability standpoint to your to what you say the computer gave us the same analysis to the imagine when you go through this again and again and again and

I understand that the Senate offices have been putting out and Senator Hawley's out there saying, well, it turns out that there were inefficient officers and agents from the DHS that were augmenting and all of these questions about why wasn't there better liaison between the local law enforcement and the senior secret service who obviously run such events.

But the bigger question I think is why, it's just simple. Why wasn't President Trump given a full presidential detail for an open outdoor rally? That's the salient question. The details are interesting, but Darren, shouldn't the salient question be why wasn't he given a full detail that day from the start? - That's certainly one of the questions. To me, it's like even more than that, do you even need a full detail? Let's say that you're short on security.

Like you're short on security, so maybe you overlook some things that are, you know, less likely. You know, you cover the most important places first. Just like, you know, you're up at Everest, you start to get lost.

Cross-bitten, your body sacrifices the extremities first because they're least important. They protect the vital organ. So even if all of these bizarre coincidences happen such that he doesn't have the full protection that you would expect him to have,

Like, you would think if they just had one guy, the one guy would be exactly where the shooter ended up. If they had only one Secret Service agent, that agent would be standing guard over that building where the shooter managed to get himself without a scratch, without a problem.

So even that, like the limited security like that, is certainly interesting. It's certainly suspicious. But that doesn't even plumb the depths of how bizarre it is. Even if you had only one person, you would expect that one person to be guarding the very place where the shooter was able to access with no difficulty. And in fact...

And in fact, we actually – and we have the full schematic breakdown, the after-action report from the local police officers, from the local SWAT teams that were there, who we were told were in that very – so the way it works – and I traveled out there to do research for this book –

uh there are actually two buildings okay so the agr building is a complex of buildings and this is what he utilized not to by the way surreptitiously crawl over these buildings because we could I'd laugh but it's it's just so ridiculous that that we're supposed to accept the the official narrative on its face he could see him in body cam footage and even cell phone footage of people who are just sitting in the bleachers

watching him jump from rooftop to rooftop in broad daylight with an AR-15 while the Secret Service and the law enforcement are apparently just watching him there. But we're told that in the second building, so the second building is actually overlooking. So it's overlooking the building where it had this sloped roof that...

That the female director Kimberly Cheadle, who was who had resigned over. So they were overlooking that building. This wasn't in the vicinity. The window where the counter sniper teams from the local SWAT teams were was directly overlooking the building. On which he used as the platform. So if they were looking for someone who was suspicious, all they had to do was.

turn their head and look out the window because he was right there. And yet if you go all the way back to something, this discrepancy that between the local, I believe it was the local DA, as well as the commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police stated, the commissioner of the police in the state of Pennsylvania, the PA State Troopers, Smokies we used to call them, that

He said that the SWAT officers dropped coverage. Excuse me, they dropped coverage? Yes. We're told that they left their post at the exact moment that he jumped onto that roof, and that is why he was not seen.

Are we really supposed to believe that it's just mere incompetence and happenstance that they left their post when they heard that there was a suspicious guy seen in and around the vicinity of their building? And Darren, quite frankly, shouldn't we be looking into the officers who were involved with that? I mean, I would think you should be looking into everybody who's remotely associated with that.

And, you know, there are all of these, you know, I call them and it's interesting, the parallels to the pipe bomb story, because there's a similar kind of concatenation of infinitesimal probabilities that all have to come together in order for the official story to be to be plausible. But here, like.

We have all of these improbabilities in relation to the Butler event, but then you add on top of that the fact that this was the one time when there was an event like this.

And of all times it could have happened, it happened precisely at the time where the regime stood most to benefit. Again, VP wasn't named. It was after they were in trouble with the Biden debate. Nothing until this point. And this is when all this stuff happens. It's hard to believe. It suddenly happens. Folks, quick break. Right back. Bulletproof. Darren B. Revolver News. Join us.

I hear about the boring people at your office. I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec. Jack Posobiec back live here, Human Events Daily. So we're talking to Darren Beattie, and there's a specific point in the Trump assassination attempt. We've got the new book, Bulletproof, myself, Joshua Lysak. Darren, can you name, just off the top of your head, any of the officers or Secret Service agents who were involved in the Trump assassination attempt? I cannot. I cannot.

Okay. Now how about January 6th? Can you name any of the officers that were involved in January 6th? I could, but that's just because I've been researching this, but if I were just- But this is my point. This is exactly my point. Those officers from January 6th were turned into heroes. They were turned into martyrs. One of them ran for Congress. One of them got a book deal. One of them is now, I think, a CNN commentator. They were paraded

all over media they were turned into these massive towering figures but when it comes to another i thought you were i thought you were referring to political violence secret service guys who who were who were around the pipe bomb but yeah no they the media made a huge which is gen 6 in general just january 6 in general no absolutely very different story

Right. And so so why is that, Darren? Why is it that we were just told to sort of I mean, I get why the media doesn't want that. But don't you find that quite interesting that for January 6th, you can we can all probably name a few officers off the top of our heads. But with with the J-13, July 13th, that it's it's just become this complete black hole of information.

Yeah. I mean, it seems to me that the vibes and the approach is very much like the Las Vegas shooting. Almost seems like stay away. Nobody can name it. Who can name the names of the guards who fell asleep in the Epstein prison? I guess in some sense they're publicly available if you really dig in. But these are the kinds of things that very few people really have an interest in digging into.

precisely so the media knows how to turn a and this is something by the way that i've said and one of the reasons that we're even doing the book project at all is so that we can keep the story going and by the way i can't wait for the media to write hit to write hit pieces about the book because when they write hit pieces about the book they will then be forced to have to discuss the trump assassination story and so for the last book we put out with um we had jd vance as an endorser so that became a whole um

media firestorm that of course I think we were the only book with on humans that ever had a New York Times hit piece on the same day that we appeared on the New York Times bestseller list I have to track that down to see whether or not we're the only people who've ever been able to accomplish such a feat but this is this is the new plan keep the narrative going because you've noticed that even a lot of conservative media even a lot of Republicans have just kind of stopped talking about this yeah

That's true. I think that's also kind of strange. And, you know, I almost think that's something that I maybe would have done differently with the Trump campaign. I would have made it even a more prominent part of the discussion. I feel like it sort of disappeared and that disappeared.

It's not altogether a good thing. I think it needs to be front and center, not just to get to the bottom of it, because it underscores the difference of Trump. There's a reason that the regime goes to such extraordinary lengths in his case and his case alone. And that speaks to what I think the people want in somebody for a leader. They're willing to do things for the people that will sometimes irritate

and infuriate the stakeholders in the regime to the point of them going this drastic. It shows what he's doing is real. So for a variety of reasons, I think it's disappointing how that major event, and also I think people just don't want to contemplate how dark it is. People have a certain kind of aversion to really digesting the truth behind all of that or what it seems to point toward.

It's very uncomfortable, and I understand people wouldn't want to really dwell on that. But I think it's critically important that we keep this in mind, that it's front and center.

It's not an accident that the Secret Service is run under the DHS, which is the most corrupt and politicized organization across the entire deep state, across the entire bureaucratic security apparatus. And that's saying a lot. It's controlled by none other than Mayorkas.

the guy keeping our borders open, the guy responsible for the borders other than obviously Kamala herself and Biden herself. So it's just a remarkable thing in an ordinary political contest, the kind of politics that the regime would prefer, the old

Bush-Gore or Bush-Kerry kind of contest or a Hillary-Jeb, which would have been their dream. In that context, it doesn't really matter that the incumbent controls the security for his opponent. But here we're seeing that it matters that the incumbent controls the Justice Department that can prosecute his opponent. And it also matters that the incumbent party controls

controls the security tasked with protecting the life of the opponent. And these things have never really been relevant because our politics have mostly been fake until Trump. But now we see just how relevant these things are.

folks we have to we have to look at the grim reality that we face and we're not here we're not here to sell you sunshine we're not here to sell you rainbows by the way if you go to netflix junior and find plenty of those folk guys put up the map again put up the map again this is signal not noise signal not noise you live under a system that would be willing to let or

or even potentially set the conditions for taking out one of the main political opponents in order to achieve total victory. This is how close we are. It's going to come down to a handful of votes across a handful of states. Darren Beattie, where can people get you? Where can they get access to Revolver? Revolver.news, Revolver.news, we're at the cutting edge of this. I've got very interesting leads, so we're going to have a major piece probably next week.

So stay tuned. I'm on Twitter at Darren J. Beattie. So Darren J. Beattie and Revolver.News. Check us out. Darren J. Beattie, Revolver.News. Folks, bookmark them right next to humanevents.com. Look, we understand.

that what we are going into, folks, is the end game. Do not get distracted by noise. Oh, Trump said something on a podcast or someone else said, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Are you banking ballots? What did you do to help win? What did you do to help get the SAVE Act across the line? SAVE Act or shut it down. SAVE Act or shut it down. SAVE Act or shut it down. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay short.