Musk endorsed Trump, formed a pro-Trump PAC, and spent millions on campaign efforts, including personal appearances and a voter lottery.
Tech leaders typically avoid direct political involvement to not alienate customers or risk favoring the losing candidate.
Federal laws prohibit paying for votes or voter registration, and experts said the lottery likely crossed legal lines.
Zuckerberg's actions were nonpartisan, while Musk's were explicitly partisan, aligning with Republican interests.
Musk could influence the regulation of his companies, potentially leading to deregulation or favorable treatment.
Other billionaires might emulate Musk's direct, aggressive approach, using their platforms and wealth to sway elections.
Under Trump, X might become state media; under Harris, it could face backlash from the left for promoting Trump.
He found the chatbot, mimicking Daenerys Targaryen, more empathetic and less judgmental than real-world interactions.
The platform lacked safeguards for young users, including age-appropriate content filters and suicide prevention prompts.
They revised warning messages, added self-harm filters, and implemented time monitoring features for users.
Note: This episode contains mentions of suicide.
This week, how Elon Musk became a main character in this year’s election, and what that means for the future of tech and of the country. Plus, the journalist Laurie Segall joins us to discuss the tragic case of a teenager who became obsessed with an A.I. companion bot and later died by suicide. We discuss what A.I. companies could do to make their apps safer for children.
If you are having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources) for a list of additional resources.
Guest:
Additional Reading:
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts) or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.