Trump's campaign successfully appealed to non-white voters by addressing economic concerns and emphasizing shared American identity, rather than focusing solely on identity politics.
The Democratic Party is currently not the party of working people in America, as evidenced by their loss among various demographic groups, including Hispanics, African-Americans, and young voters.
Trump's campaign leveraged social media and podcasts extensively, reaching large, loyal audiences through platforms with high engagement rates, which contributed to his ability to connect with and mobilize voters.
The proposed mass deportation policy could lead to significant social and economic disruptions, including higher grocery prices and strained relations with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
Susie Wiles, as a more mainstream Republican, signals a move towards competence and risk management, while Stephen Miller's appointment indicates a hardline stance on immigration and other MAGA policies.
Inflation was a major factor in the election, as it is a highly toxic issue that affects all voters and typically harms incumbent parties. The global context of inflation further exacerbated this trend.
The Democratic Party often approached working class voters with an attitude of helping them become more like the party, rather than listening and honoring cultural differences, which contrasted with the Republican Party's big idea campaigns like MAGA.
Trump significantly improved his performance among young voters, winning them by 13 points, which was a reversal from Biden's 24-point lead among young voters in 2020.
The Democratic Party may benefit from appointing savvy, strategic leaders like Rahm Emanuel, who can provide aggressive and skillful leadership to counter Trump's influence and rebuild the party's position.
This week, the Hacks report from the esteemed Institute of Politics at the University of Chicago. They sift through the aftermath of the election to analyze the strategies of both the Trump and Harris campaigns, Trump’s proposed appointments, the battle for leadership, and what these developments mean for the next four years and beyond.