Twitter Blocking a New York Post Article Was Dumb—but Not Illegal, Censorship, or Election Interference

https://reason.com/2020/10/15/twitter-blocking-a-new-york-post-article-was-dumb-but-not-illegal-censorship-or-election-interference/?utm_medium=email

By definition, Twitter can't violate the First Amendment rights of the president, members of Congress, or anyone else. First Amendment violations are things the government does to the people, not the other way around. There is nothing in the Constitution prohibiting Twitter from restricting speech on its platform, and it is certainly not "censorship" (which has denoted government suppression of information since the office of censor was created in Ancient Rome to impose public morality).

Need someone to talk to?

Betterhelp.com/gml

Interested in learning how to Day Trade?

Mastermytrades.com

Support the show and join the live group!

Patreon.com/goodmorningliberty

Protect your wealth, escape taxation, and live like a true Libertarian by going to:

Expatmoneyshow.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

DumbBleep of the Week! [Bernie vs. Ian vs. Dan Rather vs. More] || EP 342 58:25 Share

Good Morning Liberty

Shownotes Transcript

DumbBleep of the Week! [Bernie vs. Ian vs. Dan Rather vs. More] || EP 342