Sarojini Naidu and her followers believed that India's fate depended on a non-violent path to resistance. They aimed to expose the injustices of British rule without resorting to violence, which they felt would only lead to more repression. Naidu, inspired by Gandhi's philosophy of Satyagraha (holding firmly to truth), sought to rectify unjust laws through peaceful civil disobedience, making the injustice clear to everyone without creating new injustices.
The 1930 salt march, led by Sarojini Naidu, was a pivotal moment in India's independence movement. It aimed to reclaim salt production, which had been monopolized and taxed by the British. The march exposed the unfairness of British policies and demonstrated the power of non-violent resistance. Despite brutal police violence against the marchers, the event drew global attention, particularly through the reporting of an American journalist, which helped shift international opinion against British rule in India.
Sarojini Naidu's experiences in Cambridge, particularly witnessing the violent and humiliating riots against women seeking degrees, shattered her idealization of British culture. She realized that the British, who claimed moral and intellectual superiority, were capable of deep injustice and hypocrisy. This revelation led her to question the legitimacy of British rule in India and inspired her to fight for Indian independence upon her return.
Gandhi played a crucial role in shaping Sarojini Naidu's approach to resistance. After the failure of both violent and political methods, Naidu turned to Gandhi's philosophy of Satyagraha, which emphasized non-violent civil disobedience. Gandhi and Naidu collaborated closely, with Naidu becoming a key leader in the Indian National Congress and a prominent advocate for non-violent resistance, culminating in events like the 1930 salt march.
The non-violent resistance movement led by Sarojini Naidu and Gandhi had a profound global impact. It inspired similar movements worldwide, including Martin Luther King Jr.'s civil rights movement in the United States and Nelson Mandela's fight against apartheid in South Africa. The success of their approach demonstrated that non-violent resistance could achieve significant political change, influencing struggles for women's rights, disability rights, and other social justice movements.
The British government initially downplayed the significance of the 1930 salt march, with Viceroy Irwin dismissing it as a minor incident. However, the brutal police violence against the marchers, witnessed by an American journalist, led to widespread international condemnation. This shift in public opinion, combined with growing unrest in India, eventually pressured the British government to reconsider its policies, contributing to India's eventual independence in 1947.
India, 1930. Sarojini Naidu is marching towards a British-controlled saltwork; behind her is a long column of protestors all dressed in white. The great campaigner for India's Independence, Gandhi, is now in jail. In his place, he's chosen Naidu to lead this movement against the hard and fearsome British Empire.
Naidu and her marchers want change, and they want to achieve it peacefully. India's fate, they believe, depends on a non-violent path to resistance.
Today, there will be violence. But it won't come from them.
This is the final episode in a four-part series about how to succeed without being a jerk. This episode is based on David Bodanis' forthcoming book How To Change The World, which is scheduled to be published in late 2025.
See omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.