Dehumanization is a psychological tactic used to justify violence or disregard for others. When people are dehumanized, they are seen as less than human, making it easier to engage in harmful actions against them. This is often seen in history during wars and genocides, where groups are labeled as animals or vermin to remove their moral standing.
Social media amplifies political differences by creating echo chambers where users are only exposed to viewpoints that align with their own. This reinforcement of existing beliefs can lead to increased animosity and dehumanization of those with opposing views, as seen in studies where people rate opposing political parties as less than fully human.
Education is a significant predictor of political affiliation, particularly for white voters. Those with college degrees are more likely to vote Democrat, while those without are more likely to vote Republican. However, this effect is more about the socioeconomic status and cultural environment associated with higher education rather than the education itself changing political views.
Income inequality psychologically triggers similar thought processes as poverty, leading to health problems, impulsive behavior, and less psychological well-being. The proximity to extreme wealth in highly unequal cities like LA and New York exacerbates these effects, making people more sensitive to relative differences in status.
People have a natural tendency to assume they are better than average on traits they care about, a phenomenon known as the better-than-average effect. This is part of the psychological immune system that helps maintain self-esteem and mental health. It allows people to cope with information that might otherwise damage their self-worth.
The psychological immune system ensures that people rationalize information to align with their self-image as good and reasonable. This means people will find ways to justify their political beliefs, even in the face of contradictory evidence, to maintain a positive self-view. This can lead to entrenched positions and difficulty in changing beliefs.
The Civil War and the expansion of slavery in the 19th century set the stage for modern political divisions. Counties with higher rates of slavery in the 1860 census are more racially segregated and politically polarized today, showing how historical events can have long-lasting effects on societal structures.
Recognizing that both sides are using reasons to justify their positions as part of being good and reasonable people can foster empathy and civil conversation. It shifts the focus from debating facts to understanding the personal and social motivations behind beliefs, making it easier to have respectful dialogues.
Keith Payne (Good Reasonable People, The Broken Ladder) is a professor and author. Keith joins the Armchair Expert to discuss the effects of economic segregation, the roots of our current divisions, and how some people feel about dating others with opposite political views. Keith and Dax talk about the psychological immune system, the better-than-average effect, and how tribalism plays a role in people’s politics. Keith explains the geopolitical effects of the Mason-Dixon Line, how education levels can predict someone’s political affiliation, and the misconceptions of how income is effecting our politics.
Follow Armchair Expert on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. Watch new content on YouTube or listen to Armchair Expert early and ad-free by joining Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify. Start your free trial by visiting wondery.com/links/armchair-expert-with-dax-shepard/ now.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy) and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info).