cover of episode UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Threats and freezes'

UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Threats and freezes'

2025/1/22
logo of podcast UBS On-Air: Market Moves

UBS On-Air: Market Moves

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Paul Donovan
Topics
我观察到英国12月份公共部门借款增加,主要原因是零售物价指数上涨,推高了与通胀挂钩的政府债券成本。能源成本上涨,作为英国政府政策的结果,进一步增加了政府借款成本。 欧洲央行目前的政策可能过于严格,市场对1月和3月降息的预期与欧洲央行官员的表态存在矛盾。 特朗普对进口商品的关税威胁可能不会完全兑现,但其影响值得关注。对进口商品征收10%的关税,最终会导致消费者价格上涨4%以上,主要通胀威胁并非直接税收,而是后续效应,例如企业利用关税减少竞争,提高价格,以及零售商的利润导向型通货膨胀。选择性关税可以通过供应链重定向来规避,但对加拿大和墨西哥来说,这将更加困难。 特朗普冻结基础设施投资的合同付款和贷款担保,短期内会对经济增长造成适度负面影响,长期影响可能是导致经济增长重新分配,而非简单地停止增长。支付律师费用打官司也是一种经济活动,但其生产力是否与建设基础设施相当是另一个问题。对美国预算赤字的整体影响可能相当有限。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at GBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Wednesday the 22nd of January. UK public sector borrowing increased in the month of December. The big driver behind the increase was an increase in the retail price inflation measure, which is vaguely tied to the rate of inflation. This raises the cost of inflation-linked gilts.

Inflation-linked gilts will stop being linked to the retail price inflation measure at the end of the decade, as statisticians do not regard this number as being reliable. Increases in things like energy costs, which are themselves a function of government policy in the UK, thus pass through to higher government borrowing costs, raising public sector borrowing. The World Economic Forum gathering in Davos always allows for a certain amount of chatter from policymakers.

It also allows for economists to pontificate in blogs. Yesterday, ECB governing council member Nott essentially endorsed market expectations for January and March rate cuts, but also was suggesting that a monetary policy stimulus was not needed. Many investors would dispute that, and there is a sense that the ECB's current policy is too restrictive.

US President Trump has suggested imposing a 10% tax on US consumers of imports from China on the 1st of February. That would be in addition to the threats of a 25% tax on consumers of Canadian and of Mexican goods. At this point, it's probably not worth tracking every single threat, as Trump has not necessarily followed through on their threats in the past. In general terms, therefore, there are three key points to make.

For every 10% tariff applied at the point of import, US consumers should expect to see a 4% increase in the price of that imported good in their stores. The main inflation threat is less the direct tax and more the second round effects. US companies raise prices as they face less competition, hiding behind import taxes, and retailers indulge in profit-led inflation.

Finally, selective tariffs against a specific country can be avoided through supply chain rerouting. And up to a third of China's exports to the US do this, though that would be a lot harder to achieve for Canada and Mexico. These points mean that the full effect of Trump's tax threats may be more than a simplistic model on imports would suggest, but it may take longer for the inflation effects to be felt.

Trump has also frozen something over $300 billion in contracted payments and loan guarantees for infrastructure investment. This, in the short term, is probably a very modest negative for economic growth, as economic activity will presumably slow, or indeed halt, in the face of uncertainty about funding and loan guarantees.

In the longer term, the effect is more likely to be redistributing growth than simply stopping it. Paying lawyers to argue contracts in the courts is a form of economic activity. Whether it's a form of economic activity that is as productive as building infrastructure is a different issue. The overall effect on the US budget deficit is likely to be quite limited. That's all for today. Have a good day.

UBS Chief Investment Office's investment views are prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS AG or its affiliate, UBS. This material has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific recipient and is published for informational purposes only.

As a firm providing wealth management services to clients globally, UBS AG and its subsidiaries offer both investment advisory services and brokerage services. Investment advisory services and brokerage services are separate and distinct, differ in material ways and are governed by different laws and separate arrangements.

In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. For information, please visit our website at ubs.com forward slash working with us. For a full legal disclaimer applicable to the independent investment views produced by UBS, please visit our website at ubs.com forward slash CIO dash disclaimer.