cover of episode UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Scripted versus unscripted'

UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Scripted versus unscripted'

2025/1/21
logo of podcast UBS On-Air: Market Moves

UBS On-Air: Market Moves

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Paul Donovan
Topics
我分析了韩国1月份前20天的出口数据,数据显示出口下降,尽管芯片出口保持强劲,但对美国、欧盟和中国的出口却有所下降。我认为,随着经济民族主义在全球范围内的兴起,贸易数据将日益受到关注。韩国在复杂的全球供应链中扮演着关键角色,因此密切关注其贸易数据至关重要。 此外,我还关注了英国12月份的劳动力市场数据。虽然可靠的数据有限,但英国国家统计局正在尽力提供临时统计数据。英国企业对就业税的增加表示不满,这种担忧与美国企业对《平价医疗法案》的反应类似,当时也曾预测了可怕的劳动力市场后果,但实际上并没有发生。 英国12月份的零售额,特别是食品以外的商品销售额,创下疫情后新高,这与对失业的担忧并不相符。零售商的盈利数据也未显示出消费者信心不足。 特朗普总统的就职演说最初导致美元走弱,因为对贸易税的提及较少。然而,特朗普的立场在一天中变得更加激进,他承诺对来自墨西哥和加拿大的商品征收高额的美国消费者税。这导致美元上涨,股指期货下跌,因为投资者预计通货膨胀将导致美国利率保持高位。 直接来说,对来自加拿大和墨西哥的商品征收25%的进口税将使这些商品的美国消费者价格平均上涨约10个百分点。然而,还存在通货膨胀加剧的风险,因为竞争减少可能导致美国生产商提高价格,零售商也可能参与利润主导的通货膨胀。对来自加拿大和墨西哥的商品征税可能会尤其影响食品和燃料价格,而这些价格对美国公众的影响很大,并对通货膨胀预期产生不成比例的影响。 就职演说中提到的美国领土野心可能会引起投资者的担忧,但人们往往不会认真对待特朗普在这方面的言论。然而,就职演说中关于法治和偏见政治的观点更令人担忧,因为它们可能损害市场,并降低经济效率。法治对市场至关重要,暗示行政命令可以推翻宪法赋予的出生公民权,或行政命令可以阻止已由最高法院颁布和确认的法律的执行,如果这些观点得到大力推行,可能会令人担忧。同样,文化战争中的偏见政治也会损害经济效率,并浪费宝贵的人力资本。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's five o'clock in the morning London time on Tuesday the 21st of January. South Korean export data for the first 20 days of January showed a decline in exports, with fewer working days this year than was the case in 2024. There was some strength in the numbers led by export of chips. Exports to the US, the European Union and China all fell in year-on-year terms.

Trade data is likely to be increasingly in focus as economic nationalism continues to advance around the world. Korea plays an important role in complicated supply chains and it's therefore worth monitoring. UK labour market data is due for December. We know that the Office for National Statistics is at least honest in the absence of reliable labour market data and is doing its best to fill in with some provisional statistics.

There has been a lot of grouching by UK companies, horrified at being asked to pay marginally more tax on employment, and this has tended to focus on the impending apocalyptic consequences for the labour market in their view. The tone is actually rather similar to the US corporate responses to the US Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which projected similar dire labour market results, which never in fact transpired.

The UK's December retail sales showed exceptional strength in non-food sales, the strongest since the post-pandemic bounce indeed, and that doesn't really fit with a narrative of fear of unemployment. Retailers' earnings results are also not suggestive of cowering consumers. US President Trump's scripted inauguration remarks initially pushed the dollar weaker, as there was relatively little reference to trade taxes.

The references that were made tended to focus on the misplaced idea that trade taxes will be paid by foreigners rather than by US consumers. However, Trump's position seemed to become more radical as the day wore on. In what is euphemistically described as "wide-ranging" remarks in the Oval Office, Trump committed, in particular, to a series of aggressive US consumer taxes on goods from Mexico and Canada.

This then pushed the dollar up and equity futures down as investors expect the inflation consequences to keep US interest rates higher. Directly speaking, a 25% tax on imports from Canada and Mexico would raise US consumer prices of those goods by about 10 percentage points on average.

However, there is a risk of more inflation from second round effects, the drop in competition leading to US producers to raise prices and retailers engaging in a profit-led inflation episode. Taxes on imports from Canada and Mexico have been thought to be unlikely because these will hit food and fuel prices especially, and food and fuel prices are noticed by the US public and pay a disproportionate impact in forming inflation expectations.

References in the scripted remarks to the territorial ambitions of the US may have raised the odd concern amongst investors, but there's a tendency not to take Trump seriously on these points. The outlier concerns from the scripted remarks lie around the rule of law and prejudice politics.

Rule of law matters a lot to markets, and suggesting that an executive order could overturn the constitutional birthright citizenship, or that an executive order can stop the enforcement of a law enacted and confirmed by the Supreme Court, might be concerning if these points are pursued vigorously. Similarly, prejudiced politics from a culture war undermines economic efficiency and wastes valuable human capital. That's all for today. Have a good day.

UBS Chief Investment Office's investment views are prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS AG or its affiliate, UBS. This material has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific recipient and is published for informational purposes only.

As a firm providing wealth management services to clients globally, UBS AG and its subsidiaries offer both investment advisory services and brokerage services. Investment advisory services and brokerage services are separate and distinct, differ in material ways and are governed by different laws and separate arrangements.

In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. For information, please visit our website at ubs.com forward slash working with us. For a full legal disclaimer applicable to the independent investment views produced by UBS, please visit our website at ubs.com forward slash CIO dash disclaimer.