The villagers of Eyam, led by the rector William Mompesson and Puritan preacher Thomas Stanley, chose to isolate themselves to prevent the spread of the plague to neighboring villages and towns. This decision was partly influenced by the belief that their sacrifice would save others from the disease.
The plague spread through Eyam after a bundle of cloth from London, infested with fleas carrying the disease, was delivered to the tailor Alexander Hadfield. His apprentice, George Vickers, died first, followed by Hadfield's wife and children, marking the beginning of the outbreak.
William Mompesson, the village rector, played a crucial role in persuading the villagers to isolate themselves and in organizing the community's response to the plague. He also preached to the villagers from a natural amphitheater called Cucklet Delph, encouraging them to persevere through the crisis.
The isolation of Eyam led to the collapse of the village's economy. The villagers, who were mostly laborers working in fields and tending animals, were unable to work due to the plague. This resulted in a lack of supplies and food, exacerbating the hardship they faced.
Physical evidence of Eyam's isolation includes boundary stones placed around the village, some of which still have hollows where vinegar was used to sterilize coins. These stones mark the perimeter of the quarantine area and are a reminder of the village's history.
The plague broke down the social structure of Eyam by affecting people from all walks of life, regardless of wealth or status. This led to a breakdown in the established order, as the disease did not discriminate between rich and poor, master and servant.
The final death toll in Eyam is estimated to be between 250 and 300 people, out of a population that likely ranged from 350 to 700. This high mortality rate significantly changed the face of the village, with whole families disappearing.
The story of Eyam's isolation became known in the 18th and 19th centuries, when local historians and antiquaries began to write about it. The village's sacrifice was romanticized and became a symbol of pre-industrial simplicity and heroism, capturing the imagination of later generations.
The survivors of Eyam faced a profound emotional and psychological impact, having lived through the horrors of the plague and the loss of family and community members. The aftermath saw the village's population and social structure drastically altered, with survivors having to rebuild their lives from the devastation.
Eyam is considered the last great plague village in England because the Black Death did not return to the country on such a large scale after 1666. The village's story serves as a reminder of the long centuries of plague pandemics that preceded it and the courage of those who endured them.
Hi, we're your hosts, Anthony Delaney and Maddy Pelling. And if you would like After Dark, Myths, Misdeeds and the Paranormal ad-free and get early access, sign up to History Hit. With a History Hit subscription, you can also watch hundreds of hours of original documentaries with top history presenters and enjoy a new release every week. Sign up now by visiting historyhit.com forward slash subscribe.
This is an ad by BetterHelp. What's your perfect night? Is it curling up on the couch for a cozy, peaceful night in? Therapy can feel a bit like that. Your comfort place where you replenish your energy. With BetterHelp, get matched with a therapist based on your needs, entirely online. It's convenient and suited to your schedule. Find comfort this season with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com to learn more and save 10% off your first month. That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P dot com.
This podcast is brought to you by Aura. 2024 has seen a surge in high-profile data breaches, raising serious concerns about the security of personal information. This past summer, national public data reported a breach potentially affecting every American. That's why we're thrilled to partner with Aura. Aura is a complete...
online safety toolkit, which includes a variety of other features to keep you safe online, including a VPN for secure browsing, data broker opt-out to stop companies from selling your personal information, a password manager to help you create and store strong passwords, and
and more. For a limited time, Aura is offering our listeners a 14-day trial plus a check of your data to see if your personal information has been leaked online, all for free when you visit aura.com slash safety. That's aura.com slash safety to sign up for a 14-day free trial and start protecting you and your loved ones. That's A-U-R-A dot com slash safety. Certain terms apply, so be sure to check the site for details.
ACAST powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend. Hey, everybody. I'm Naomi Ackparigan. And I'm Andy Beckerman. We're a real-life couple and a real-life couple of comedians. And we're the hosts of the podcast Couples Therapy. We're the only comedy relationship podcast ever. Yeah, I said it. And we're so good, we've been written up in both the New York Times and we made Grindr's list of top podcasts.
Yes, we're giving you that high-low appeal. Trust. On the show, we talk to guests like Bob the Drag Queen, Angelica Ross, Bowen Yang, Janelle James, Danny Pudi, Darcy Carden, Paul F. Tompkins, and more. All about love, mental health, and everything in between. And we answer your
relationship questions. We are two unlicensed comedians just trying to help you out. So open your hearts, loosen your butts, because we got a lot of laughs and a lot of real talk just for you. Download Couples Therapy wherever you get your podcasts. Acast helps creators launch, grow, and monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com. A mist rolls past the mouth of one of the dark caves of the Peak District.
Pouring down rugged, stony slopes towards the boundary stones of the village of Eem, it passes over fields that are marked by silence. The few solitary figures in them swallowed by its clouds like spectres. The mist swamps up the village street, banking up against the cottages to peer in at the horror inside.
There, people lie dying of plague. We're back in 1665 and it was only one month ago in September that the first victim, George Vickers, died and was quickly buried. But now the atmosphere in the village of Eam is tense. A doleful air hangs around the houses where the plague has hold. Neighbours shuffle by, afraid the air is contaminated.
Looking out of his own window onto this brooding autumnal scene is William Momperson, the village priest. He's at his desk and has paused for a moment from updating the parish records with the names and dates of all those who have perished so far. In this month alone, 23 have died.
Nearby, the cemetery bulges with hastily dug and hastily covered graves. Remember this name, Momperson, for it will be him who helps persuade the village to make the sacrifice they will become famous for. For now, all stand on the threshold of death. Welcome to After Dark. Welcome to the second part of our story of the Plague Village of Eam.
Hello and welcome to After Dark, I'm Anthony.
I'm Maddy, and I, as you can probably hear, am still dying of the plague. I think it's so fitting for these episodes, but we are back this time for the second part of our plague miniseries. Last episode, we began at the heart of the capital city in London.
where by the end of the summer in 1665, people were already fleeing for their lives in the wake of a terrible, highly contagious disease. And we detail that in episode one. So if you haven't heard episode one, go back and listen to that before we continue with the story here. The death toll was by then horrendous, as you can imagine, and would only continue to grow. But...
As you might remember, our story then took us north to the small Derbyshire village of Eame, now nestled in the Peak District National Park, but which at the time, in autumn 1665, would become a hotbed for the plague that travelled from the south on the back of a cart. It would, as we're about to find out, go on to devastate this rural community and force all living there to make a difficult, even heroic,
decision. So Maddy, we've talked a little bit about there in that recap what exactly we were talking about in episode one, but just give us a very brief recap to get us back up to speed. Sure. So we're in 1665 going into 1666, as you've said. We are in England in the second half of the 17th century, and we're
In the decades prior to this, there has been the execution of Charles I. There's been civil war. There has been the restoration of the monarchy with Charles II.
And with it, an anxiety that God is looking to punish the people of England. People fall on either side of this idea. Some people think that God is punishing the people of England because they executed Charles I, God's appointed monarch on earth, and the other camp is
think God is punishing them because they've put a monarch back on the throne, having enjoyed years of what some would see as chaos and what others saw as freedom and liberty. So it's a moment of terrible anxiety. And in the midst of all this, plague comes to London. In episode one, we heard from Samuel Peep's diary about the beginning of the plague, how quickly it spread and how quickly the city of
fled in the face of this unfolding horror. And it was horror. There were whole houses of plague sufferers blocked up by neighbours to keep them in their homes. Bells were tolling multiple times a day, telling people to bring their dead out into the street for collection and burial. This is a really grim time. And then we get this bundle of cloth that
covered in fleas, the same fleas that have been spreading the disease in London on the backs of rats, coming up the road from the south into the north of England to the tiny village of Eam. And at the end of the last episode, we heard about those devastating early deaths in the house of Alexander Hadfield, who was the tailor who'd ordered the cloth from London to his home.
and we heard about how his apprentice George Vickers died very quickly within a couple of days of the cloth arriving. And then we have Hadfield's wife Mary, her two children, Jonathan and Edward. Edward is four, Jonathan is 12, dying really suddenly, following Vickers into the grave with the same symptoms. And Mary and Alexander are the sole survivors in the house.
But at that point, and the point where we left the episode off, the plague has begun to jump from home to home. And in this episode, we're going to hear about that spread, the people who were affected, and how that community really came together and dealt with what was happening amidst their lives and the place that they lived.
So take us from the Hadfield's house then, where we know the plague has taken root. I don't know this history, as I said in episode one, but I'm imagining by the very fact that we're concentrating this entire two episodes on one small village that this isn't the end of the spread. So where does it go to next? Where does the plague rear its head next?
So one of the fascinating things about Eam, if you go there today, and I said this in episode one, is that you can go and stand in front of the cottages where a lot of the plague victims lived and died. And there are these plaques that tell you
who died, in what house, the dates that they died, how quickly it spread. And it's a very immersive and strange experience to stand there. And it gives you a sense of just how quickly the plague did spread and how close everyone was living in proximity. So here's a rundown of the initial early stages of the spread taking place and expanding out.
First of all, we have Peter Hawksworth. He lives next door to the Hadfields and he dies on the 23rd of September 1665. Also in his house, we've got Humphrey. Humphrey is
Peter's 15-month-old son, he will die the following month of the plague. We've also got Humphrey's mother, Peter's wife, Jane. She will go on to be the sole survivor of their family. But I think this gives such a sense of
in the community and how these rural communities knew each other and indeed were related to each other. Jane, by the time the plague is done with Eam, will have lost 25 relatives. Wow, yeah. It's a lot. It's hard to imagine. It's really, really hard. That is your...
community, your support system, your workforce, your economy, and that's just one person and her relatives. Next, after Peter Hawksworth though.
and before Humphrey, his 15-month-old, dies the next month, we've got Thomas Thorpe. Thomas lives in Rose Cottage, which is just nearby, and he dies on the 26th of September. So we've got the 23rd Peter's dying, Peter Hawksworth. On the 26th, we've got Thomas Thorpe. You can see how rapidly this is happening. This is wiping out not just
infants and small children, but the breadwinners of the family, the men who are labourers in the village, who have skills, who are protecting and supporting their family units. This is absolutely devastating. Next, on the 30th of September, Thomas Thorpe's daughter, Mary, follows him to the grave. And then...
the plague crosses the road and the people in those houses start to get sick, and the people behind them start to get sick, and it starts to branch out on a really unmanageable scale. By the time that winter comes in 1665, the cold weather does, it seems, slow down the spread of this. Huge numbers of people have already died.
But by Christmas time, there is a sense that this is slowing down and the village starts to breathe a sigh of relief. You know, they've been through this terrible thing. It's begun in the early autumn that's haunted this period up until Christmas. And the cold weather seems to have put a halt to it. But...
When the spring breaks and the weather starts to heat up again, the plague comes back renewed, and it is now even worse than ever. It's at this moment that William Mopperson, who we've heard at the beginning was the village rector, he teams up with another man, a Puritan preacher called Thomas Stanley, living in the village. Together,
They come up with what I think is a very interesting decision, or a proposition at least, to put to the people of the village. And I think it's something that, you know, we talked in our last episode about COVID and our collective and individual experiences of the lockdowns. And I think it's something that we can all relate to on a certain level.
I'm Matt Lewis, host of the Echoes of History podcast, where every week we'll be delving into the real life history that inspires the locations, characters and storylines of the legendary Assassin's Creed franchise.
Join us as we explore the narrow streets of Medici-ruled Florence, cross sand dunes in the shadow of ancient pyramids, climb the rigging of 18th century brigs sailing across the Caribbean, and come face to face with some of history's most significant individuals.
Whether you're a history fan, a gamer, or just someone who loves a good story, Echoes of History is the podcast for you. Make sure to catch every episode by following Echoes of History, a Ubisoft podcast brought to you by History Hit, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is an ad by BetterHelp. What's your perfect night? Is it curling up on the couch for a cozy, peaceful night in? Therapy can feel a bit like that. Your comfort place where you replenish your energy. With BetterHelp, get matched with a therapist based on your needs entirely online. It's convenient and suited to your schedule. Find comfort this season with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com today to get 10% off your first month.
That's BetterHelpHELP.com. The boundaries of the quarantine circle were about half a mile from the village, and they were marked by large stones.
There, people from neighbouring villages would leave food and supplies which the villagers of Eam paid for by leaving coins in running water or pools of vinegar carved into the rocks, hoping to sterilise them and prevent the spread of the pestilence. By now, conditions inside the invisible prison Eam had made for itself were grim. The graveyard was full.
and villagers were left to bury their own dead as best they could. Mrs Hancock, for example, buried her husband and six children by herself, heaving their bodies out and into shallow graves. Yet if stone marked the outlines of this prison of despair, it also symbolised the strength of the inmates in the face of death.
On Sundays, those who could would traipse out across the fields to a place called Cucklet Delph, a natural amphitheatre carved in a limestone cliff. Here, in the open air where families could keep their distance from each other, the rector, William Moppison, would climb up to a hole in the rock and preach.
We know from his letters that by now Moppison felt sadness and death everywhere, and believed that he himself was a dead man. His young wife, Catherine, died of plague in August after spending months tending to the sick. As he looked out at the faces gathered round him in his craggy pulpit, he knew they were all spinning in a whirlpool of destruction.
Yet he and they had the stony strength to persevere. And his voice boomed out, commending his congregation, his comrades, on standing firm in the midst of this terror. So here we are. This is why those remarkable details that you have just described...
This is why we're concentrating on this particular village and why we're spreading this topic over two episodes, because up until now, we've been talking about, you know, plague in London. We've been talking about rats, we've been talking about fleas, we've been talking about even, you know, those details about cloth spreading the disease. These are things that are very familiar and that it's not necessarily new information.
This is what I don't know about. This is what I hadn't heard of not coming from England. We don't learn about this in primary school, obviously enough.
But it is remarkable. And it's two things at once. It's haunting and it is quite stoic as well, isn't it? Where you're describing this congregation coming together, but not quite coming together in this naturally occurring amphitheater. And they're preaching about staying the course. But at the same time, there's these rocks walling them in and keeping them away from other nearby villages and towns.
It is something I've never encountered before. I'm sure there's probably similar histories, but not ones that I'm very familiar with. So this image, and this is why I can see a history like this might endure, but this image that it conjures up is very, it's very dramatic, actually. And it's very, it lends itself to,
imagination and to visualisation and to then, I suppose, given our own experiences in relatively recent times, again, not to draw too many close parallels because things are very different, but we have an insight into how that isolation might feel to a certain extent because of our own experiences. But Maddy, tell us how this
cordoning off happens. You spoke there about people coming from maybe higher up in that particular village coming in to say, right, this is something that we might need to do. And there's talk of religion and there's talk of Puritan ministers. Give us a sense of how this all came together in the end. Well, I think we have two versions of this story. We've got the romantic version,
And we have the historic reality, which is very difficult for us to access. I thought this was coming up, you know. I nearly said it in what I was saying there. It's very easy to ascribe heroism to this. And at the same time, there's something underneath it that's making me uncomfortable. So I don't know. I don't know what's coming. But it's interesting to hear you say those two things. Yeah. And I don't necessarily think we're going to get to the bottom of it. And I don't necessarily think we can say there was anything sinister or unheroic about this. But...
I think we need to look more closely at it. The romanticised version, and this is the villagers, incredibly brave, incredibly selfless, come up with this system of isolation. They put out these stones, these massive great boulders in the Peak District. It's a very rocky place. There's no shortage of rocks.
They put them out in the fields in this rough circle at an equal distance from the centre of the village, all the way around, to mark this boundary that they've all agreed on. Supposedly, it's the rector, William Moppison, and this Puritan preacher, Thomas Stanley, who come up with the idea. They put it to the people of the village and everyone says, yes, that's a fantastic idea. We don't want to give anyone else the plague. We're all going to stay.
It'll be terrible for us, but at least this isn't going to spread out to the neighbouring villages, to the neighbouring towns, to the cities in the north. This is the version that I grew up with. I'm pretty sure at school that we did, in primary school, a school play about Eam, which, on reflection, slightly odd topic.
for primary school children to enact. We did one about Babushka, so I'm not going to judge your play about Eam. It not explains a lot.
But yeah, there's this vision. And the other thing about this story that I distinctly remember from the various school trips that I went on to this village as a child was there was a story always told by tour guides. It was probably told in the local museum when I was little. That's certainly my memory, was that there was a romance, an actual romance to this.
And the details are hazy in my mind. And I've not been able to find it. I've really searched for it because I wanted to write... As soon as we said we were doing this episode, I was like, yes, I know the story I want to tell. Could I find any evidence of it? No, I couldn't. The story is that there was either a young woman in the village in love with a young man in another village, or maybe it was the other way around. And it's the young man in Eam and it's the young girl outside Eam.
And they agree to meet at the border stones and it's all very tragic and they don't touch each other and they just look at each other across the stone and he brings her food and all of that. And then one day she never returns and she's died.
And he's so heartbroken. So whilst, of course, the reality is everyone in that village would probably know, be related to, be friends with, be in love with someone from another village nearby,
I couldn't find any evidence of that particular story. So that's the romantic version that we have, that they all take it upon themselves, they do this heroic thing, and they therefore save the people of Derbyshire and the north of England. I'm going to say it wasn't that black and white. Okay, it's potentially not that black and white. You are correct. Now, the thing that we need to think about here is that plague affects everybody, no matter how wealthy you are, no matter how poor you are. And sure, you could say everybody
In London, for example, the king is able to escape to Oxford because he's the king. The wealthier people gather up their possessions and they can afford to leave the city. So there is some disparity in terms of how people experience the plague, but the biological fact is anyone can catch it and it can kill anyone.
And with that, we see a breakdown in social structure. The fact that it can affect rich and poor, servant and master, the parish priest and the most naughty sinner in the community makes everything else a little bit meaningless. And it breaks down established world order. And you've got to remember, we are in 1665-1666.
This is an era absolutely shaped by the chaos that's come before it in the preceding decades. It's been shaped by civil war. It's been shaped by groups during that period like the Levellers, starting essentially cults or communities in different places, trying to take over country houses to set up ideal new societies that are based on equality. We've got discussion of the equality of women in this period.
The Civil War brought an absolute reversal of hierarchy and order, and then they all had to put it back together again with the new monarch, Charles II. And so there's great unrest and anxiety in people's minds. And in this small village, of course, the danger is the plague will spread and that it will bring that same kind of chaos back to society. And
And what we find is that several rich landowners, including the Earl of Devonshire, who I believe would have been at that period connected with Chatsworth. Of course, Chatsworth House would not have looked as it does now. That's a later iteration. But I think I'm right in saying that the Earl of Devonshire would have been based at nearby Chatsworth. Now, do they agree to help the village on the request of William Moppison? Or do they suggest this in the first place? They suggest...
If you isolate yourselves and therefore save the rest of us, we will provide you with all the supplies that you need. Now, Eam is a village of labourers. It's a village of people who know hard work, who live these very physical lives, who are out in the fields tending animals, tending some crops. I don't know
how successful crop growing is up on these rocky parts of Derbyshire, but certainly today it's full of sheep. So these are people who live and work outside predominantly.
And if you're poorly and you can't do that work, you have no hope whether you are dying of plague or whether you're a survivor of it and you're just having to tend to the sick in your community and your family. And my question is, the offer made by these landowners and the villages around, whether that really was a generous offer or whether there's a level of enforcement here that
that we simply don't have the archival evidence for. Did the people of Eam accept this offer or were they forced into isolation? What do you think? You need to look, I think, or we need to factor in
The idea and the history of compliance and our own, of course, experiences of compliance in the face of COVID-19 informs some of that. It's very difficult for me. And look, we would be wrong to think that the 17th century was a more compliant place than the 21st century is. I think that would be very naive of us, particularly as you've been describing throughout both of these episodes. We've been talking about what essentially amounts to
revolution in thinking, at the very least, where a republic can be instated violently and then overturned less violently. And these are not people who just go along with things. These are people who are thinking, who are investigating, who are asking questions, and they are acting on some of those thoughts that they have. So it strikes me
That compliance is not something that could possibly be guaranteed just voluntarily in this situation. And when people become desperate, compliance becomes less and less likely. And...
It strikes me that these people would have become very, very desperate. Now, you factor in that thing of, you know, there's this story element, let's say, of because there's already disparity there, right? One is going, oh, and the nearby villages and towns came and left food outside. And then there was offerings of coins that were put in water and vinegar. And I was thinking to myself, wow, that's insane.
Unlikely, but obviously this is what's drawing the history. But then you talk about the Earl of Devonshire. It strikes me that he would probably not very much care about the people of Eam to a certain extent. I mean, he might care to not allow the plague to spread, fair enough.
Something doesn't feel very 17th century about this where you go, OK, now you guys go and isolate yourselves. We'll bring everything to your door. You don't even need to worry about us. That's that doesn't feel very 17th century. So I know I can be very kind of sceptical and crabby at times about some of these things. But you do shock me. Yeah, yeah.
It doesn't feel right. Historically, my instincts are going, that doesn't feel right. That doesn't feel right. I don't know. What do you think? I think we've inherited this 18th and 19th century version. The Victorians and the Georgians were obsessed with this history. And we'll talk a little bit in a minute about what appealed to those groups of people in those time periods about this story, because it served different purposes. But I think this idea of...
this village cooperating and happily consenting to being managed by the people around them. As you say, the 17th century is characterised by the little people stepping up and saying, "Hold on a second, what's going on here?" And pushing back to a certain extent. That's a massive simplification, of course.
I don't think we can necessarily assume that these people were happy to be put in this situation and to be isolated. And as you say, Anthony, people become desperate in the face of a disease that is seemingly invisible and you want to get as far away from as possible, in the face of horrific scenes of death and massive loss, in the face of war,
the disappearance and quietening of the workforce and therefore a lack of supplies and food and everything that comes with that, you know, the total collapse of that village economy. In the face of that, people are going to become desperate and they're going to start to ask questions and try and push the boundaries, literally in this case.
It seems to me that that, and from what we saw of people's response to the lockdown and COVID, we know that people don't willingly accept that often. And that there is pushback and it is controversial and that people don't want to be told what to do, even if it's for some sort of greater good, especially if you're the person being put in harm's way for the greater good. And I think for my money, there
there was a level of control. The Earl of Devonshire and the other landowners nearby, of course they don't want the plague to spread. Not because they are benevolent overlords who care about the little people in the village, but because those little people go out into the fields, they tend the sheep, they sell the fleeces at market, and they pay their tax to the landowner. They pay what's due. And that whole economy that these landowners are on the top of...
relies on the little people being well and doing what they're supposed to do in life. And I think they couldn't possibly risk that in their own positions and their own health and safety as well. They also don't want to catch plague. They are not immune to it.
For my money, I think it could have been that Eames started that way. Maybe the idea was floated that everyone needs to stay in their own homes or in the village to try to stem the spread. I'm not saying that's impossible. Did they stick to that collectively and happily into the summer of 1666 when the plague is at its absolute height? I doubt it.
I'm Matt Lewis, host of the Echoes of History podcast, where every week we'll be delving into the real life history that inspires the locations, characters and storylines of the legendary Assassin's Creed franchise.
Join us as we explore the narrow streets of Medici-ruled Florence, cross sand dunes in the shadow of ancient pyramids, climb the rigging of 18th century brigs sailing across the Caribbean, and come face to face with some of history's most significant individuals.
Whether you're a history fan, a gamer, or just someone who loves a good story, Echoes of History is the podcast for you. Make sure to catch every episode by following Echoes of History, a Ubisoft podcast brought to you by History Hit, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is an ad by BetterHelp. What's your perfect night? Is it curling up on the couch for a cozy, peaceful night in? Therapy can feel a bit like that. Your comfort place where you replenish your energy. With BetterHelp, get matched with a therapist based on your needs entirely online. It's convenient and suited to your schedule. Find comfort this season with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com today to get 10% off your first month.
That's BetterHelpHELP.com. So in the secondary sources, is there any...
that that comes up in research? Or has this been so mythologised that it's difficult to get to that? I think the established story is simply that they isolated and were fine with that. I don't buy it. I don't buy it. The interesting debate that has taken place in recent years is whether or not this quarantine worked rather than whether it was consensual or not. And that's actually going to tell us something about the consent of it as well, the
a cooperation level in it. So did it work? I don't know. I mean, surely there would still be a plague. There was still a plague. And it can be argued both ways and has been. So on the one hand, there's a suggestion that actually, because the village isolated, they lived more intensely in each other's pockets. They had no time to escape. They were packed in with all this death and disease. So actually, it spread more
more easily and more people died amongst them amongst them amongst that community yeah
Don't forget, families were instructed towards the end of the time that the plague was in Eam to bury their own dead. So usually people from the church would come and help you to bury your dead, and that would be a service that was offered - the gravediggers in the graveyard. But by the end, that's not happening, and whoever is left in each family is having to go and dig those graves themselves, often digging their own grave at the same time, of course.
So you've got a lot more contact with death and disease than maybe would otherwise have happened if they had escaped to neighbouring villages. On the other hand, of course, it is successfully restricted to Eam and it doesn't spread. And that is remarkable, actually, that there's this intense pocket of it and then nothing. The exact number of people who died in Eam is really hard to pinpoint though. So we're talking here, of course, about the period from 65 into 66.
they put the number somewhere between 250 and 300 people. Remember in the last episode, we talked about how the number of people in the village may have been anywhere from 350 to 700 people. And it's very difficult to pinpoint that because the records just don't really exist anymore. So, I mean, even if it is, if we take the villages being full of 700 people, the highest figure that we've got, 300 of them being dead, that's...
remarkable and horrifying. In London, just as a comparison, it's thought that 100,000 Londoners died of plague. But again, that comes with a caveat because the records used for that are parish records or bills of mortality that didn't record the deaths of Jews or Quakers or any other religious dissenter. So of course, the number must be much higher. That's
So the other thing I think that's so remarkable about Eam compared to London is because of the high mortality percentage, because so much of the population died, the face of it completely changed. Whole families disappeared. Families who had been in that village, I mean, realistically for centuries in that rural place. And how, I mean, there are no records really that you would be able to use to do this, but it would be so fascinating to
To look at the psychological and emotional effect of that, if only we could go back and speak to those villagers who survived and to ask them what it felt to live through that, but also what the aftermath was like, what rebuilding Eam looked like after that much devastation. It's absolutely fascinating and completely...
Really unfathomable. The other thing to say, so we talked about Alexander Hadfield in episode one, the tailor who originally orders the cloth from London. And we know, obviously, George Vickers, his assistant, dies. He's the first person in Eamon to die. Hadfield does die of plague, but he dies on the 3rd of August, 1666, almost a year after Vickers does. So how must he have felt?
Presumably, he worked out, I guess, that it was the cloth that did it. Just looking at the spread of the disease, how it begins in his household, it begins with George Vickers, who opens the cloth. They must have known or heard at some point during their own trauma and ordeal that the plague was rife in London as well. That news must have reached Eam.
Because the villagers around it knew that it needed to be isolated because they didn't want to end up in the same way as London. So how did it feel for Hadfield possibly knowing that that cloth, those fleas on the cloth, had brought the plague to his village? It's, again, hard to fathom. One question that I have, Eam is the only village in England...
And I say England specifically because this plague didn't reach Scotland, which might say something about this kind of cordoning off up in the north of England. But, well, I guess it's just the... I was going to say, why has Eam captured the imagination so much? And it's because of this idea of...
self-isolation or community forcing isolation on themselves. But because, you know, there are Privy Council acts that are being passed at this time to say you can't trade with different countries that have the plague. So England was one of them. I think the other one was the Netherlands. Initially, at least, there was no stopping of trade between
other villages and other towns. So like the plague spread elsewhere as well. So if it is the case that Eam was self-isolating by choice, surely you would imagine that you'd see that pattern spread in other places around England too. And you don't, right? It's a really interesting question. And
I don't know the answer to it. I would love to hear if there are other villages that are isolated in this way. I think the fact that Eam gets picked up, this story gets picked up, as we've said, in the 18th and 19th centuries, means that it survives and it's become this almost mythological example set on a pedestal. It's this unique case, or so it's given to us as being.
The plague in general is really romanticised in the centuries afterwards. You get it in Daniel Defoe's A Journal of the Plague Year, which was published in 1722. You get it in William Harrison Ainsworth's Old St Paul's Novel, which comes out in 1847. And if anyone hasn't read any William Harrison Ainsworth...
I'd really recommend that you do. She's a liar. It's Maddie. That's just don't trust her on these things. It's really boring. It's really boring. Oh my God. He's one of my favourites. He's a sort of late Georgian, early Victorian historical fiction writer. And he writes novels about all kinds of amazing figures in the past. I love him. I love him so much. You're wrong, Anthony. Anyway, we'll continue this debate because I will fight you on this. Okay, so we've established...
Ainsworth is fantastic. Good. Go forward. But, you know, the idea of the plague and of Eme in particular is really taken up in popular culture. And that's the version that we've got today. I think, I mean, I really think that we should go. One of the things that you can still do there today is, as I said, walk between the cottages and see these plaques of the people who died. And that in and of itself is a really interesting performance of
and horror, right? It's a living village. People still live there. You can walk around as a tourist and you have to sidestep the actual residents taking their shopping into the house and their dog in their garden. It's all very mundane and normal. But there's a sign saying seven people died horribly in this cottage next to that bucolic scene. So that's an interesting way that we live with history anyway. But one thing that you can do, and I think this is fascinating, is that you can walk through
the circumference of the village and there are still what look like boundary stones. Some of them still have the scooped out hollows where vinegar was put for the coins. So there is evidence, there is physical archaeological evidence of this moment in history, this moment in the village's story
and evidence of that isolation, whatever the truth behind it was. You know what I'm going to say though, right? Go on. Do we archaeologically know that those stones were placed there in the 17th century? She literally just, you won't be able to see this, but I'm looking at Maddie. She literally just tilted her head at me as if to go, stop asking questions. Just close out the episode, get it done. Don't ask me that. Well, I mean, you know, that is a very interesting question. Because it seems to me like
such a 19th century thing as well. This is way later, but it's almost Cottingley fairies type world that I'm entering into there. Yeah, and you know, that as well raises the question of historic tourism. When did this tourism to Eam begin? If it was the 19th century, what's to stop people placing large stones in fields? The other thing to say, of course, is that if you're a
a farmer, particularly if you're growing crops. And again, the defence of that is I think it's mostly sheep farming in this area. But you don't want giant big stones in your fields. It's an inconvenience. You move them. And so if they are still there, are they left as a respectful...
piece of evidence, a memorial to that time? Or have they been placed there as part of a sort of tourism trap in the 19th century, for example, or the end of the 18th century? It's really hard to know. And if there are any archaeologists out there who have done a survey of the Boundary Stones' Eam
I do want to hear from you so that I don't have to shrug at Anthony and I do know the answer to that. Because it is fascinating, you know, and it's those layers of history telling as well. The whole thing about Eam is that it's all about appearance and storytelling, how this story is presented in the moment when it's happening, when the plague is there in 1665 and 1666, but also in the centuries since. And it shapeshifts so much and I think
To get back to that original history and the truth of it, I think even for those people trapped in that village...
the truth probably wasn't visible to them. They were probably telling themselves a version of what was happening and telling each other stories in order to survive that. Well, after two episodes, I think the only place left to go now is to talk and think about legacy. And just as a way of seeing us out, Maddy, I know you have a little something that gives us
a clue to the impact that the plague in Eam had. The last burial of the plague dead in Eam took place on the 1st of November 1666. Abraham Morton, a farm worker in his 20s, was laid to rest, the last of an 18-strong Morton family, all having succumbed to the disease. Later that month,
The quarantine was lifted, and the survivors of EME emerged back into the world, blinking as though they had risen from hell itself. What they went through was passed on from generation to generation until it became lore. It's hard now to get at the truth of what happened at EME. Each version of the story is a little different after all.
The history of Eames' plague isolation was barely known until the 18th century when local historians and antiquaries began to write it down. Did they inflate the drama to make their region seem more historically important? Or were they looking for a jingoistic hero in Rector Momperson?
In the 19th century, a time when Derbyshire had become a burning centre for the Industrial Revolution, the village became a symbol of pre-industrial simplicity and a better lost world. It was the perfect canvas for ideas of the Gothic and the Victorian fascination with the macabre to play out. We're left with that story today.
The village is now a living monument to this one horrifying moment in its history, with information boards outside the cottages of those who died and survived. All the while though, real people continue to live there, sidestepping tourists as they go about their daily lives.
Perhaps the story is enough, and it's okay not to know exactly what happened at Eam, because this much is certain. Plague did come to London and to this village and others like it across England in 1665 and 1666, but this was to be the last great plague in England. No more after this did the Black Death return.
Eam is a way of remembering what people lived through during the long centuries of plague pandemics that preceded it. You can be sure that the sacrifice and the suffering of the people of Eam was echoed by the courage of people all across Europe in those dark times. So it feels good that Eam is there, hidden among the hills in the North Country, a reminder written across the stony landscape
of who we are and who we can be, a human story for us to hold on to and not quite let go of.
Well, this has been a real learning episode, a couple of episodes for me. And thank you to the rest of you for listening to this two-parter on the plague village of Eam. And a big extra thanks, of course, to our listener, Megan, for suggesting the topic. We do listen to your suggestions. They are being read. So do email them in to afterdarkathistoryhit.com. That's afterdarkathistoryhit.com. And we always talk amongst ourselves and amongst the team about which of your ideas we'll be able to take forward to episodes later.
If you've enjoyed this episode, please give us a five-star review wherever you listen to your podcasts. It helps other people to discover us. And until next time, happy listening. More than 125,000 podcasts trust Acast to connect them with their audience. Your brand can speak to your perfect audience too by advertising with Acast. We're home to the biggest names in podcasting, reaching millions of engaged listeners who can only be accessed through Acast.
From true crime to comedy, finance to fitness, your next customer's favorite podcast is an ACAST show. Your audience is already here. Speak to them with ACAST. Visit go.acast.com slash ads to get started today.