Home
cover of episode 84. Quick Thinks: How Others Define Us

84. Quick Thinks: How Others Define Us

2023/4/4
logo of podcast Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques

Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques

Chapters

Brian Lowery discusses the concept of the 'self' as a social construction, created by relationships and social interactions, and how this understanding challenges traditional notions of freedom.

Shownotes Transcript

Hi, Matt here. I invite you to look into Stanford Continuing Studies. For over 20 years, I have taught in the program. Discover a diverse range of courses available both online and in person to anyone, anywhere in the world. Classes cover everything from fundamental business skills to the fascinating world of AI. This fall, join me for Communication Essentials for Work and Life, a new course designed to enhance and hone your communication skills in various situations.

Each week, guest speakers will join me for interactive lectures and Q&A sessions on topics like persuasion, storytelling, nonverbal presence, and reputation management. The course starts September 24th, and registration is now open. Learn more at continuingstudies.stanford.edu. Who am I?

I became curious about the self when I read Brian Lowry's new book, Selfless, The Social Creation of You. And the fascinating thing about the self is it's created by others and empowered through our relationships and communication. I'm Matt Abrahams, and I teach strategic communication at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Welcome to a Quick Thinks episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, The Podcast.

To learn more, we invited Brian Lowry back. Brian is a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and he also co-directs Stanford's Institute of Race.

Brian, it is fantastic to have you back. You certainly have been really, really busy. I'm excited to listen regularly to your new podcast. And today I got my copy of your book, Selfless, The Social Creation of You. I want to probe that idea in a second, but I'm tantalized and intrigued by what follows the colon of your title, The Social Creation of You. Can you share a little bit about what's behind that?

Of course. So in social science, people will say the self is a social construction. And what they really mean is who you are is coexisting.

created by the relationships and people around you. And what's amazing about that is very few people have that experience of themselves. Like most people, I assume you too, have this sense of like, I'm in my head, looking out of my eyes, making decisions, talking to people. Sometimes they make good ones, sometimes bad ones, but I'm in there somewhere. But when you examine it, you know, that can't be true. There's no little you in there.

And so the question becomes, what are you? What are you? And the answer now is something like, I'm my brain, but that's not quite right either. I'm this physical thing because...

Your physical thing changes all the time, but you don't have this sense that that's you, that you have now changed because there's been some physical change. The argument I make in the book is that the you you're talking about is the relationships you have, the social interactions you have, and the cultural context you exist in. That isn't affecting you. That is constituting who you are. That is who you are. And in that sense,

The self, and this is a really important part of the book, the self is incompatible with freedom the way most people understand it. Because the self...

is a constraint. The self is a definition in terms of the way other people see you. To be a man, to be black or white, to be Asian, or to be a doctor. All these things are about how people understand you and interact with you and limit what you can be. And in limiting what you can be, they make you who you are.

Wow, there's so much there to unpack. So if I heard you correctly, it's we are the sum of the relationships we have.

And by definition of those relationships, how people define us, that limits what we potentially could be. Are there things we can do to work to change how people see us or perhaps the people we associate with to give us a little bit more freedom? Is that possible? You know, this is a, you have to read the book. I will, I will. But I think fundamentally a self and ultimate freedom are incompatible.

And that for some people, that sounds bad because freedom has, at least in our culture, this kind of virtue associated with it. Like everybody wants freedom and more freedom is just better. But that's I'd argue that's not true. People don't really believe that, meaning that it feels good to have people know you. Like when you engage with someone and they engage with you in a way that feels right and you feel seen, people love that and need that.

But that requires limitations on what you are. That is an acceptance of an absence of a certain type of freedom. So I think people don't really want freedom in the way they imagine they do or not as much as they think they do. And the way you can expand, and I think the self is fundamentally a limiting idea, but that doesn't mean it can't be expanded. You can expand it by

engaging with more people with diverse perspectives. Because it turns out, and there's research on this, that we actually take other people's selves into our own. So you think about your closest relationships, you can think about how much overlap is there between you and that person, right? And the closer the relationship, the more people will say there's overlap in who we are. And so you can expand the self by deepening the relationships you have.

I certainly know in my closest relationships with my wife, my kids, my close friends, that there is the taking on of other characteristics. I'm curious. So in graduate school, when I was studying religion,

relationships and communication within relationships. There was this notion that you and the person you're in relationship with are your individual selves, but together you create a collective self. Is that something that resonates with your point of view? Or is that something that's archaic and back from the good old days when I was in school? Well, I guess what I would say is like, I don't know what that individual self is.

is in the way that's described. So I think people have this idea of I exist as an island and I bump into other islands and then we can create something together. What I would say is you are, in some sense, an amalgamation, a combination, a mixture of all those relationships. And whenever you interact with someone, there's an exchange of self in some way. So I can give you an example in terms of research. So if you meet someone, you have...

about what they believe, right? So you see someone, I don't know, they're driving a truck and they have an American flag. You have a belief about this person. That might be right, might not be right. If you want to have a relationship with that person, associations you have in your own head that you might not even be aware of, that you might not even know are there, will shift in the direction of your belief about that other person's attitudes. So in some sense, your self is changing constantly

to accommodate other people because you wanna have a relationship with them. That to have a relationship with someone

demands in some sense a shift in who you currently are. So in that way, there's an intermeshing of selves that happens at a level that you're not even aware of and probably aren't controlling. And that is what's happening all the time in our lives as we navigate the world. And in close relationships, it's more intense. So Brian, that's absolutely fascinating to me because part of what I heard you say is that we have this construction of ourselves that feels permanent, like I know who I am, but in fact, it's constantly changing.

And in some cases, I'm choosing to change it by choosing to engage with someone. Are there things I can do in the moment when I'm in that situation, meeting somebody new or deepening a relationship that I have that I could perhaps prepare myself better to expand that connection or relationship? Yeah. So one is put your phone down. He means in theory, I don't have my phone right now.

approach relationships with curiosity. That's actually really important. And three, here's maybe one that will be a bit surprising to people. We often are afraid to ask what we consider personal questions because we think it's going to upset other people. We imagine if we ask this question, they're going to be like, who are you to ask me that question? Whether they say it or not, they will be thinking that and we want to avoid that discomfort. It turns out that research suggests that

People actually are not put off by what most people think of as personal questions. And so you can ask more intimate questions than you imagine. So I'm not going to say go out and ask the most intimate question you can imagine. But I would say move towards asking more personal questions than you might imagine you could. Just a step further.

And that provides an opportunity to initiate a more meaningful interaction, even if it doesn't become a relationship. We don't take seriously enough some of the light interactions we have day to day. And those things turn out to affect us. Our mood is affected by the fleeting interactions we have that we don't take that seriously. So another thing to do is, in one, curiosity. Two, be willing to ask questions that may be a little bit more, a step more personal than you typically would. And three,

Take more seriously those fleeting interactions that you often just think of as a toss away. Those are very actionable. And in underlying, at least two of the three bits of advice are communication. And you know, that's something we focus a lot on here.

Brian, I'm really intrigued by this notion that we can benefit by probing a little deeper and getting a little more personal in conversations. I think you're right. Many of us feel awkward and uncomfortable, especially if we're not really close to the people we're talking to. Do you have advice or guidance that you've seen in your own life or you've recommended to people about

types of questions or ways to do that inquiry? I should just say, this is not my idea. So there's research on this and I'll send you the site. You can put it up on the website so people can read the academic paper. I want to make sure that people get credit for their ideas. One of the things that I think about is asking people, like when we interact with people like that, we don't know very well. We often ask very, very superficial questions. How's the weather? Where are you going to go? Have you been to this place? I think

One question that is easy to ask people that is not that personal, but it takes you a little bit deeper is, what are you most excited about in life right now? I mean, there's just easy questions you can ask that no one would be, I think, bothered by. And then once they answer, it's like follow-up questions become much easier.

You know, the way you form relationships is reciprocal escalating disclosure. So I don't know if you've talked about that, but if people haven't heard it, it's just like someone says something to you, they disclose a little bit. And then when you reciprocate, you disclose a little bit more and it escalates. That's the way that people basically form relationships. So you think about relationships in your life, that's often how they happen.

And what you want to do is initiate that with someone new. And so finding a way to sometimes ask for disclosure that people feel comfortable with and then reciprocating a step deeper is a way to kick off a relationship, a way to expand what you know about that person, what they know about you.

So you start by expressing curiosity at a slightly deeper level and then reciprocate when you get a response. The final question, I'm curious, how has your self changed in doing the work that you've done in terms of writing the book, the podcast, the teaching that you do? It seems to me that by your definition of self, it must have changed. Oh, it has to. Right, right. So I'm taking your advice for granted, asking a slightly more

personal question. I'm just curious. That's a good question. One thing that I, in writing a book,

I became something else. And I still don't know what that something else is. I'm like a baby in this new self. And it generates an appreciation for what it means for the self to constantly evolve and change. I think we often don't really pay enough attention to the ways we change. And maybe we're harder on ourselves than we should be. I'm brand new at this thing, but it's not just this thing. It's to some extent,

who I am and how people are engaging with me and how I'm engaging with them. And trying to figure all that out is not easy. And I think there's a degree of compassion I've learned in writing this book when people's identities are both challenged, their sense of self is challenged, and or it shifts or grows. There's a recognition of when we engage with people, we are asking something of them. And

I think I have a better appreciation for that, for the requests that my person makes of other people, right? Of the ones that I make of other people, right?

And what that demands from others. And also when people do it to me, it's an offer. I think of it as an opportunity and an offer that that person is making to me, an offer of expansion. And I can accept or reject that for whatever reasons, but it is an offer. I really appreciate that you've come to a realization or explored something that we talked about many, many times.

episodes ago in the terms of improvisation that life and encounters in life can be perceived as opportunities and offers and they allow you to expand. And I think that's really interesting. And the other thing that caught my mind is there are certain situations in our lives where

there's a gate that changes ourself. Like you published a book, you are now an author, your self has changed. And then there are other things that happen in our lives that are much more subtle that change us. I mean, those of us who have become parents when your child is born, that's a change in self.

I recall back when I graduated college and even graduate school, it felt like this big change I was working for and nothing really changed. You know, it was I have this thing on the wall, you know, so what you've made me think about is how our self changes constantly. And yet sometimes it's very significant and publicly noticed. And other times it's very subtle and not noticed. And sometimes things we think are big changes.

end up not being. You've made me think a lot, Brian, and that's what I appreciate so much about you. Your podcast, Know What You See, and your book, Selfless, The Social Creation of You, really do make us think. And I appreciate that and I appreciate your time today. Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was fun to talk to you again. Excellent.

Thanks for joining us for another episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, The Podcast from Stanford Graduate School of Business. This episode was produced by Jenny Luna, Ryan Campos, and me, Matt Abrahams. Our music was provided by Floyd Wonder. For more information and episodes, find us on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. Thank you, and please make sure to subscribe and follow us on LinkedIn.

Hi, Matt here. Before we jump in, I wanted to let you know about three unique executive education programs offered to senior-level business leaders by the Stanford Graduate School of Business. The Executive Program in Leadership, the Emerging CFO Program, and the Director's Consortium Program are

are all being hosted here on Stanford's beautiful campus in the next few months, crafted with proven strategies for success and filled with diverse leaders from around the globe, taught by many of the guests you've heard on Think Fast, Talk Smart. Apply today at grow.stanford.edu slash upcoming to join us.