Home
cover of episode Who took debait?

Who took debait?

2024/9/11
logo of podcast Today, Explained

Today, Explained

Chapters

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump's first debate saw Harris taking an offensive stance, focusing on Trump's past actions and perceived chaos. While some analysts deemed her the winner, Trump largely refrained from personal attacks, focusing on a defensive strategy. Harris used some of Trump's own language against him, highlighting criticisms from former officials.
  • Harris focused on portraying Trump's presidency as chaotic and damaging.
  • Trump avoided personal attacks, focusing on a defensive approach.
  • Harris used Trump's own words against him, citing criticism from former officials.

Shownotes Transcript

Kamala met Donald for the first time last night. Kamala Harris. Let's have a good debate. Yes, yes, have fun. Thank you. In a debate that many Americans said they wanted to be about policy and substance. It was frequently not that. People start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. People don't go to her rallies. There's no reason to go. Abdul is the head of the Taliban. He is still the head of the Taliban.

Early on...

VP Harris got under ex-pres Trump's skin, and he appeared to have a hard time refocusing. I have concepts of a plan. Leading many analysts to say she won. Coming up on Today Explained, concepts of a plan, a Democratic and a Republican strategist on what these candidates need to do for the next 54 days. Hey, everybody. I'm Ashley C. Ford, and I'm the host of Into the Mix, a Ben and Jerry's podcast about joy and justice produced with Vox Creative.

And in our new miniseries, we're talking about voter fraud.

For years now, former President Donald Trump has made it a key talking point despite there being no evidence of widespread fraud. But what impact do claims like these have on ordinary voters? People like Olivia Coley Pearson, a civil servant in Douglas, Georgia, who was arrested for voter fraud because she showed a first-time voter how the voting machines worked. Hear how she fought back on the latest episode of Into the Mix. Subscribe now, wherever you listen.

They're not writers, but they help their clients shape their businesses' financial stories. They're not an airline, but their network connects global businesses in nearly 180 local markets. They're not detectives, but they work across businesses to uncover new financial opportunities for their clients. They're not just any bank. They are Citi. Learn more at Citi.com slash WeAreCiti. That's C-I-T-I dot com slash WeAreCiti.

This is Today Explained. Today Explained.

My name is Trisha McLaughlin. I'm a Republican strategist. I head up Insurgent Strategies and formerly have worked for Vivek Ramaswamy, his 2024 presidential campaign as a senior advisor communications director, and also Mike DeWine, the Ohio governor. My name is Faz Shakir. I was Bernie Sanders' campaign manager in 2020, still remain his chief political advisor to this day. I also run

an advocacy journalism institution called More Perfect Union. Is it fair to say that neither of these candidates for president is necessarily your preferred choice? Well, at least in my case, I ran a primary campaign against both Biden and Harris. So initially, certainly wasn't my first choice. Okay, Trish, how about you? Donald Trump wasn't my primary choice,

Same as Faz, Vivek ran in a primary against Donald Trump. When this debate began, we know what Americans were telling polls about Kamala Harris, that they needed to know more about who she is, what she stands for, and what she wants to do. Faz, how do you think she did on that score? On the tactics of a presidential debate, which is in part theater, in some part substance, but a fair amount of theater,

She performed excellently, right? From the outset, she comes on and puts herself in the posture of compelling a handshake, being on the offense and stating the terms of the debate, what she wanted you to know about Donald Trump, having themes about him, the chaos of a presidency. Donald Trump left us the worst public health.

epidemic in a century. Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. Those were kind of themes that she can continue to hit back on. And as we heard moments of whatever it might be, immigrant eating pets, it was for her an opportunity to affirm this is not the kind of leadership we want. So I think in that way, you get across in her mind, I think had a persuasion

audience, which was critical to her. Even as you saw how she talked about abortion, she was thinking about it as, I want to address people of faith with this answer. And throughout the course of the debate, I think was really trying, you know, guns. Tim Walz and I are both gun owners. We're not taking anybody's guns away. So stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.

I thought her ability to continue to think about that persuasion audience throughout the course of the debate, the few people who have made up their choice, was particularly strong on her end. Trisha, you told Politico that you were praying that Donald Trump could stay disciplined in this debate last night. A lot of people felt the same. A lot of people have felt the same about Donald Trump for a lot of years now. Do you think you saw discipline last night? I think we saw him on the defense, but I didn't feel like he...

went into the personal attacks that I think that Harris often tried to goad him into. She even used some of his own language, right, when she was saying that the former generals, former staff were calling him a disgrace. His former chief of staff, a four star general, has said he has contempt for the Constitution of the United States. His former national security adviser has said he is dangerous and unfit.

His former Secretary of Defense has said the nation, the republic would never survive another Trump term. Of course, Donald Trump uses that word quite a bit. And I think that she was, of course, very much trying to bait him as far as when it came to the rallies, the rally sizes, people leaving early. And it was a little

bit of a hook, line, and sinker on that end, but he didn't attack her personally, or at least not to the extent that we've seen in the past. So I was actually pleased with that. He did no damage there. The consensus is, though, it seems that he did take the bait. Mm-hmm.

You're right. He didn't go after her personally. In fact, he seemed almost chagrined when the moderators asked him about Kamala Harris's racial identification, something that he's brought up in the past. I couldn't care less. Whatever she wants to be is okay with me. But at other times, I think the consensus is she got a rise out of him. Yeah, I think I...

I saw that differently. I felt like compared to what we've seen with Donald Trump when he gets backed into a corner, he's pretty pugnacious. I didn't think we saw the fighter that we typically do.

Do that being said, yeah, I think that, you know, she got him on the defensive. I think especially, you know, the identity question he should have been very much ready for. He didn't go for the jugular as he often does. Actually, we saw more personal attacks from Kamala Harris probably than we did from Donald Trump.

Trisha, Donald Trump's winning issues should be the economy and immigration. Americans have told pollsters they are deeply frustrated about the economy in particular. Did you hear a strong economic message from Donald Trump last night?

The very first question of the debate was, is the economy better off than it was four years ago? Right. That's the number one issue for Americans as well. And I'm sure a determining factor for a lot of these undecided voters. How are we going to get inflation under control? How are we going to stymie the cost of living? And Kamala Harris,

She really pivoted out of that answer. When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago? So I was raised as a middle class kid.

So I would like to see Donald Trump get into more specifics. I think he harkens back a lot to his record in the past and in 2016 to 2020. But I would like him to get into more specific specifically with health care, which I think that was a missed opportunity for him. Faz Kamala Harris really did pivot out of the answer. What did you make of that?

Yeah, well, I'm not usually one for criticizing moderators, and I thought they actually did a fine job last night, so I don't mean to harp on it. But it was the one question. It was the first question of the debate and the only question of the debate that really was the economic conversation, which is not commensurate with where people are. This is their number one issue. This is what should have taken up, you know, I think a good third of the debate at least.

What we know about Kamala Harris right now, she's running one of her top ads in all the battleground states is one that refers to price gouging of large corporations.

And she has addressed this as a serious concern. She's talked about it in a number of cases. She's had policy rollouts about it. Last night, obviously, it didn't get mentioned. We didn't have much of a conversation. And I say that because, to my mind, it is the only real missed opportunity of Kamala Harris and what we needed to do last night as Democrats.

Trisha, immigration should be another winning issue for Donald Trump. At least that's what the polls tell us, right? Yeah.

Moderator David Muir had to ding Donald Trump last night for repeating an unsubstantiated story about immigrants eating people's pets. ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there had been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community. And that is actually taking up a lot of the oxygen today with respect to immigration. Do you think Donald Trump...

had a clear message on immigration last night. And do you think he helped himself with that message? Yeah, I think that it's important for us to address that Springfield, Ohio issue. I'm from Ohio. I live there. Springfield's about 40 minutes from me. So what's going on with that township is that there's about 56,000 people who live there. And

Now there's 20,000 Haitians who have largely been dropped there. That is a huge problem, much less when there's cultural issues. I think he did that particularly articulately. No, but I think it underscores a real problem that's going on and I think has been left unanswered.

And I do think that he should have gone into a broader topic of the fact that there are 10 to 15 million people who illegally enter this country under Biden and Harris. What is she going to do about that? Because we have not heard what she'll actually do. Let me just say on that point, Patricia, as somebody who also has friends in Springfield, like the answer that I'm starting from is we need to make this work. There are people who are coming to this country, Haitians in this case.

who are working at that Dole factory, you know well, who are working at the Honda factory, who are doing a good job, who are responsible employees. And yes, because they've arrived as immigrants, they're going to be like immigrants of the past generations, wherever you came from. Yes, there will be cultural differences

mixing and learning from on both sides, that is what makes America great, is that the melting pot, the infusion of different perspectives and bringing that all together into one is positive. - My thing, number one, Foz, no matter what, you could drive in 20,000 people from California

That is poor policy and that is poor planning if you drop in 20,000 people for a community infrastructure that does not hold that. That doesn't make sense. It's not good. By the way, it is not good for these migrants at all.

This is a disservice to them as much as it is a disservice to the people of Springfield. There's more substance here between the two of you than I heard last night and nobody resorted to rumors about pets being eaten, which is interesting to me because, again, when we talk about what each candidate managed to do last night, I think what you're both illustrating maybe a little bit here is –

They came up short on some of the substance. Back on something of real substance that also caused some sparring last night. Kamala Harris has made abortion one of her signature issues. There was a lot of back and forth last night. Faz, how do you think Harris did last

On this issue that she has claimed as something deeply important to her and a potential Harris administration. Oh, I mean, she crushed it. I mean, it may be the issue that helps her win this entire election, quite frankly. And you could sense the high level of passion and the desire to change policy.

and holding Donald Trump accountable for leading us into really this completely unnecessary, painful experience for too many Americans that could have and should have been avoided. But the Trump abortion bans, the language, the contrast, it all worked. And it is one of her, if not the most powerful issue, working to her advantage in this election cycle. Okay. Big picture last night. Each candidate had an opportunity to present.

vision for the country. What vision, Faz, did you hear Kamala Harris present? And then, Trisha, I'm going to throw the same question to you about Donald Trump. The vision, certainly, that she's most effective at delivering is

is that this is a contrast. This is A versus B. And her and Biden before her are very comfortable telling you about Donald Trump's chaos, his inability to be an effective leader, and the dangerous and damaging results that would occur if he were back into office. And I think that comes across very plainly. And that way, the negative campaigning about Donald Trump

I think is one of her most effective areas. I think on the positive side, trying to tell the story about who she is, it's still a work in progress. And I think she's still got work to do though on the policy side. As we discussed early on, there are key issues around the economy that to my mind will be determinative in this election. And if you were thinking about the one thing she still got left to do in these closing days and weeks,

is to hammer home my economic story and how I want to improve your life. Trisha, Donald Trump and his vision for America, what did you hear? What stood out? What impressed you? I think that he was very much back to the 2016 change agent message. He knows, we have the data that

roughly 60% of Americans, they want some sort of change away from Joe Biden's policies. And I think that that's what he was trying to hearken back to. He even said, make America great again. He said that at least a couple of times. He suggested even giving Kamala Harris a MAGA hat. She's going to my philosophy now. In fact, I was going to send her a MAGA hat. So, I mean, when he's talking about

getting immigration back under control, reinvigorating the economy, reinvigorating energy, stopping these licensing restrictions when it comes to drilling. I think that those are things...

that resonate with Americans as well as foreign policy space, which I wish we would have dug into more. I thought that was more where Donald Trump shined. He showed strength. And I think that Americans want to see that, especially when there's such major wars and hostility going on across the world.

Trisha McLaughlin is a Republican strategist and Faz Shakir is a Democratic strategist. We're going to take a short break and then we'll be back with them to talk about what the next few weeks for these candidates should look like. This is Today Explained.

Support for Today Explained comes from Vanta. Data breaches and hacks are dominating the news. You heard that on the show. And it can feel almost impossible to maintain a high level of security for your company. When it comes to digital safety, anything less than rock solid, just don't cut it. Vanta may be able to help your company demonstrate that top-notch security you can rely on. Vanta automates compliance for SOC 2 ISO 27001 and more, which could save you more time and money and help you build customer trust.

Plus, you can streamline security reviews by automating your questionnaires and demonstrating your security posture with a customer-facing trust center all powered by Vanta AI. According to Vanta, over 7,000 global companies like Atlassian, Flow Health, and Quora use Vanta to manage their risk and do security in real time. You can get $1,000 off Vanta when you go to vanta.com slash explained. That's vanta.com slash explained for $1,000 off.

Support for Today Explained comes from Indeed for people who are seeking the very best. When it comes to hiring, that can be difficult. Searching for the perfect candidate takes time and energy. Matching with Indeed, says Indeed, can be a whole lot faster. When you post your job opening on Indeed, you don't just gain access to the site's 350 million global monthly visitors. You'll actually start getting suggested matches for qualified candidates. They say you can take care of the screening, the messaging, the scheduling without ever leaving the platform.

And listeners of this show can get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at Indeed.com slash Today Explained. You can go to Indeed.com slash Today Explained right now. And you can support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on our show. Indeed.com slash Today Explained. Terms and conditions do apply, guys. Need to hire? You need Indeed.

Canva presents a work love story like no other. Meet Productivity. She's all business. The Canva doc is done. Creativity is more of a free thinker. Whiteboard brainstorm. They're worlds apart, but sometimes opposites attract. Thanks to Canva.

The data is in the deck. And now it's an animated graph. Canva, where productivity meets creativity. Now showing on computer screens everywhere. Love your work at Canva.com. Wait a minute. I'm talking now. If you don't mind, please.

Does that sound familiar? Today Explained is back. I'm Noelle King with Republican strategist Tricia McLaughlin. She worked for Vivek Ramaswamy and Democratic strategist Faz Shakir. He works for Bernie Sanders. All right. So we have 54 days until the vote. The polls are unusually close. What do Kamala Harris and Donald Trump need to do to win? Faz, let's start with you. What is Kamala Harris's first assignment after last night's debate? Well,

It's an easy answer for me, at least, but it's obviously a difficult one to execute. She's got to convince working class Americans who are not high information consumers, who have not made a determination in this election. I would say we're talking roughly 5%, maybe less, in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Nevada. Make sure that these individuals...

feel that there is a real economic choice in this election, one in which she is a much more strong champion of their economic growth, their future, their jobs, their desires to have a more free and vibrant economy than one led by Donald Trump. If she can own that and land that, I think on all other scores, on abortion, on democracy, on foreign policy, on leadership qualities, on strength, she's going to be a great

She is well positioned at this time, and hopefully it stays that way. Trisha, what does Donald Trump need to do today and for the next 53 days? What Donald Trump needs to continue to do, not only on the airwaves, but in his earned media opportunities, he needs to hammer home those points that she was co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, that she was the tie-breaking vote, and that Inflation Reduction Act, which even her boss, Joe Biden, admitted was wrong.

The agenda really was not to lower inflation, but for the climate. These are things that the American people, you know, are not comfortable with. About 50 percent of Americans say she's too far to the left versus Donald Trump. A third of Americans say he's too far to the right. So he needs to continue to start looking like that change agent, but also like that centrist and hammer home defining Kamala Harris.

I want to ask you both about what the shape of a strategy for each candidate looks like in the next month and a bit. Tricia, Donald Trump last night telegraphed a few times that he is doubling down on his strongest supporters. Viktor Orban, one of the most respected men, they call him a strong man. He's a tough person. Smart. Prime Minister of Hungary. They said, why is the whole world blowing up? Three years ago, it wasn't. Why is it blowing up?

He said, because you need Trump back as president. When he mentioned the support, having the support of Victor Orban, I will admit I sat up a little straighter and thought, well, who, you know, who in the Midwest cares about Victor Orban? But young men online care about Victor Orban. They're impressed by him. This is sort of like the new right. Do you think Donald Trump should be speaking to a wider audience or do you think doubling down on his support

base is the best move at this point. Yeah, I mean, I don't have the exact internal numbers on that from what the scuttlebutt is, is that Donald Trump, you know, he didn't do as well with those white male working class voters in 2020. He lost a lot of those to Joe Biden and to really try and run up the score with those men. And I think particularly as well, younger men, that that's

part of the priority that there's maybe less of a focus on women or trying to, you know, create new voters. It's more running up that score. Yeah, but he can't win without women. Like, I'm wondering how wise you think this is. I mean, of course, this is a numbers game. You want numbers wherever you get them. But I don't know if talking about Viktor Orban really, you know, is going to isolate women. I wouldn't think it would. I just think

you know, how many people are talking about Victor Orban at their kitchen table? That's a question I'll leave to Donald Trump.

Faz, there were a couple of other moments where I sat up straight, two of them. Kamala Harris talked about getting the endorsement of the Cheney family, and she talked about her economic plan getting support from Goldman Sachs. What Goldman Sachs has said is that Donald Trump's plan would make the economy worse. Mine would strengthen the economy. And I thought, whoa.

Is she going a little too wide? You know, you're right to say who's the audience for that. And obviously he has a persuasion audience in her mind. We were talking about maybe I don't know what we'd call these Mitt Romney style voters. How many of them are there that are out there? Probably not a ton, but again, in a very tight election situation.

You know, we're talking handfuls of votes on the suburbs of you name your major urban area. She's trying to reach them. I'm hoping it doesn't come at cost, of course, with a, you know, a core Democratic constituency that...

doesn't much care for those names. I think she's doing a fine job of building upon it. I would just add on Victor Orban, obviously, we all know that the reason he mentions him, there's not much strategy going on in Donald Trump's orbit on this one. It's just that here's a guy who said something nice about me, right? That's fundamental. Again, it's just a reflection of somebody is kissing my butt and I like it. So I'll tell you all about it.

Debates sometimes do matter. The Biden-Trump debate in June mattered a lot. It effectively ended Biden's candidacy. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton, it was widely believed, won the debates against Donald Trump in 2016, and she did not win the election. Did this debate matter? And to what degree did it matter?

I think debates do matter. I think, of course, there's consternation over who actually won. It feels a little bit murky, especially on the Republican side. I think we'll see what the undecideds really have to say. The polling that will come out this weekend will be very telling. That all being said, I think Harris missed an opportunity, and that opportunity was to really define herself. She took up a lot of the time that she had to attack Donald Trump. Many of these attacks we've already heard before.

and have been relitigated. So I think that what she's going to really have to do is define herself in these coming weeks in order for this debate to have really meant something and to have given her momentum.

Yeah, it did certainly matter. I think we'll see, you know, in the next day or two what the numbers will hold. I suspect it will be a very, very high viewing number across not only the debate, but also the clips of it and all that. It'll be for Harris. I think there were so many people who just wanted to see her in an unscripted setting because we haven't seen too many of those. And this was the highest profile platform one maybe that we get up the cycle. I hope I'm hoping actually that there's another one.

So I suspect it will have had a major impact. And when we look back at the outcome on November 5th, I think a lot of people will be drawing conclusions from what happened at this debate and what transpired in the weeks following it in terms of how each candidate seized or didn't seize on the momentum.

Faz Shakir, he's a Democratic strategist and Tricia McLaughlin, Republican strategist. Earlier in the show, you heard Tricia say that 20,000 Haitians have been dropped in Springfield, Ohio. Springfield says it estimates the total number of immigrants is 12,000 to 15,000. Avishai Artsy and Amanda Llewellyn produced, Amina El-Sadi edited, Laura Bullard led fact-checking, Andrea Christen's daughter and Patrick Boyd engineered. I'm Noelle King. It's Today Explained.

Support for this show comes from Amazon Business. We could all use more time. Amazon Business offers smart business buying solutions so you can spend more time growing your business and less time doing the admin. I can see why they call it smart.

Learn more about smart business buying at AmazonBusiness.com.