They wanted to acknowledge the emotional impact of the election, even though it wasn't their primary content, to avoid feeling disorienting and to connect with listeners who might share similar feelings.
They described themselves as numb, surviving rather than thriving, and experiencing grief rather than anger.
Abortion initiatives passed in seven out of ten states, with strong support in states like Florida and Missouri, despite those states voting for Trump. This suggests a complex interplay of motivations among voters.
They worried about potential retirements of Justices Thomas and Alito, leading to more conservative replacements, and the possibility of the court being depicted as more moderate if it occasionally stands up to Trump, minimizing its radicalism.
The case involves whether it is unconstitutional for a state legislature to remedy a Voting Rights Act violation by drawing additional opportunity districts for minority voters, given the court's previous decisions on race-conscious laws.
They suggested seeking comfort and support from friends and family, engaging in activities that provide energy, and not succumbing to nihilism while continuing to resist and support marginalized groups.
After processing the election and thinking through what it means for the future of the Supreme Court, Kate and Leah dig into a Voting Rights Act case newly added to SCOTUS’s docket. They also tackle this week’s cases on the False Claims Act, compensation for hospitals that treat low-income people, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and federal securities law.