cover of episode 610. Who Wins and Who Loses Once the U.S. Legalizes Weed?

610. Who Wins and Who Loses Once the U.S. Legalizes Weed?

2024/11/7
logo of podcast Freakonomics Radio

Freakonomics Radio

Key Insights

Why is there a growing public support for cannabis legalization in the U.S.?

Cannabis is popular, with 64% public support, and some public health officials see it as a way to reduce alcohol-related harms. Politicians avoid taking strong positions on popular issues.

What are the economic benefits of legalizing recreational marijuana in states?

States see rises in per capita income, housing prices, and population. Legalization shifts revenue from drug dealers to legitimate businesses, generating state tax revenue and creating jobs.

Why has the cannabis market in Colorado softened in recent years?

The novelty of cannabis tourism has diminished as more states legalize it. Overbuilding of capacity and normalization of supply to meet demand have also contributed.

How does Governor Jared Polis view the public health impact of cannabis compared to alcohol?

Polis believes cannabis is less chemically addictive and less destructive to the body than alcohol. He also notes that alcohol is linked to more crimes like domestic violence.

What are the potential benefits of rescheduling cannabis from a Schedule 1 to a Schedule 3 drug?

Rescheduling could reduce stigma, allow cannabis companies to deduct business expenses, and open up new research pathways, providing public health and safety benefits.

Why does Yasmin Hurd advocate for more research on cannabis?

Hurd wants an 'army of researchers' to study high-concentrated cannabis products, their effects on the developing brain, and the impact of flavorings and chemicals used in production.

What does Ryan Stoa propose for the future cannabis market?

Stoa advocates for a decentralized market similar to the craft beer industry, supporting family farms and local producers, and implementing cannabis appellations to create transparency and choice.

Why does John Calkins prefer a government-run monopoly for cannabis?

Calkins believes a government monopoly would reduce marketing incentives, capture the gap between consumer value and production cost, and prevent over-consumption by not pushing people to use more.

What long-term effects does John Calkins predict from increasing cannabis legalization?

Calkins expects minimal impact on prisons and mental health, viewing cannabis as a temptation good that people will adapt to, similar to how society navigates risks with alcohol and smoking.

Chapters

The podcast explores the potential winners and losers in the U.S. cannabis market once federal legalization occurs, highlighting the economic and social impacts observed in states that have already legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Cannabis remains illegal federally and classified as a Schedule I drug.
  • Economic indicators tend to rise after state legalization, but social costs like increased arrests and homelessness also emerge.
  • Economic benefits diminish for states that legalize later, attributed to a decline in cannabis tourism.

Shownotes Transcript

Some people want the new cannabis economy to look like the craft-beer movement. Others are hoping to build the Amazon of pot. And one expert would prefer a government-run monopoly. We listen in as they fight it out. (Part four of a four-part series).)