cover of episode Urs Gerber: Why inter-Korean relations are back to square one

Urs Gerber: Why inter-Korean relations are back to square one

2024/11/28
logo of podcast North Korea News Podcast by NK News

North Korea News Podcast by NK News

People
U
Urs Gerber
Topics
Urs Gerber将军认为,当前的朝韩关系已经回到了2017年“烈火与怒火”时期之前的状态,紧张局势显著加剧。他指出,朝韩之间的铁路和公路连接已经被切断,朝鲜似乎正在沿着与韩国接壤的边界筑起新的隔离带。这表明,尽管曾经有过缓和的迹象,但朝韩关系并没有取得实质性进展,反而倒退到了冲突的边缘。他回顾了2017年朴槿惠弹劾案期间的政治动荡,以及美国总统特朗普上任初期带来的不确定性,这些因素都加剧了当时的紧张局势。他认为,如今的局势与2017年相似,甚至更加严峻。 在谈到瑞士中立国监督委员会(NNSC)时,Gerber将军描述了该委员会的工作以及与瑞典代表团的合作。他指出,与过去相比,瑞士和瑞典之间的合作更加密切,这在一定程度上是由于任务范围的扩大以及在板门店的共同驻扎。尽管瑞士和瑞典在许多方面具有相似性,但在教育体系、社会保障等方面仍然存在差异,这可能会影响到双方在处理具体问题时的立场。他强调,在NNSC内部,瑞士和瑞典代表团之间的合作关系已经得到了显著改善,这对于有效履行监督职责至关重要。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Major General Urs Gerber reflects on the state of inter-Korean relations, comparing the current situation to the heightened tensions of 2017. He notes a significant deterioration, highlighting the destruction of inter-Korean railroads and roads as a symbol of the current strained relationship. The armistice agreement is considered to be at a critical point.
  • Deterioration of inter-Korean relations since 2017
  • Destruction of inter-Korean railroads and roads
  • Heightened tensions due to North Korea's actions

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

you

In the intricate world of Korean affairs, Tailored Intelligence makes all the difference. Korea Risk Group's consulting services offer specialized, actionable intelligence designed to guide your career-related decisions. We provide bespoke consulting services that cater to your unique challenges and goals. From policy analysis to market entry strategies, we bring clarity to complexity.

Transform uncertainty into opportunity and visit CareerPro.com solutions today.

Hello listeners and welcome to the NK News Podcast. I'm your host, Jack O'Swedslut, and this episode was recorded in the studio on the 11th of October 2024. And joining me in the studio today is Urs Gerber, who is a retired Major General of the Swiss Army. He's also a historian who has worked in strategic intelligence from February 2012 to August 2017. He was head of

of the Swiss Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission delegation in Panmunjom. Urs, thanks for joining me on the show today. Thanks, Jack Cole, for having me.

Now Urs, you left Korea seven years ago and since then you've retired from your military career but you keep coming back to Korea and you keep being involved in Korea. What brings you back and what makes you stay involved? Well, I remember back in August 2017 when I had and I stressed when I had to leave Korea. So I went back home to Switzerland.

But for me, Korea was sort of, was then and is still to a certain extent my second home.

Wow, okay. So you say you had to leave in 2017 against your will because your time had run out and that's it? No, no, no, no. I was absolutely happy to leave the job because after a certain period of time, you have to quit. But to go back sort of from a highly developed, technologically very advanced country back to in that area almost to...

Middle Ages was not a sort of a favored option. But when you are then back, it's fine. But whenever I land at Incheon Airport aboard the bus or the metro, I immediately feel at home.

Now, how do you assess the state of the Korean War armistice today compared to when you left it in August 2017 during the summer of fire and fury? Well, I have to say, unfortunately, we are back to square one. What do you mean by that? You were mentioning when I left, it was fire and fury. I have the bigger butter than you have. You get a bloody nose. So the tensions in 17 were extremely high. I remember particularly...

The time when Park Geun-hye was in the impeachment process, South Korea had no elected president in charge. And as we all know, the prime minister who is then a caretaker has not all rights to go into decisions. So my feeling when I spoke to the military but also political leadership, there was a certain anxiety.

that the Americans, particularly the newly elected president in these days... President Trump back then, yeah. Yes, that was Donald J. Trump, that he would sort of do the same thing as he did in Syria and Afghanistan just in the early stages of his presidency. So people were a little bit afraid and the armistice, if I compare it,

Tensions were high because Kim Jong-un was still threatening the South towards the end of 17. And now I'm back.

And when I left, there was no CMA. Comprehensive Military Agreement between North and South. Indeed. And I come back and I take note. Okay, I knew it. But it's even worse. We were with the group yesterday up in Panmunjom. And then you hear explosions. And you are told these are explosions where the North Koreans are severing

railroads, and what else? So I think... The inter-Korean railroads and roads that had been built back in the early 2000s. Yeah, so basically, what apparently seems to be now...

be in place is North Korea implements what their leader has said, meaning to build a border towards South Korea. I think that's certainly in terms of tensions and of, and you asked me the state of the military armistice agreement, it's one step

Further up or down, you can see it as you want. Urs, what did you understand about your mission when you first came to serve at the United Nations Supervisory Commission, Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission in Korea? Well, I had the luck that in my previous position as Deputy Director International Relations, I was responsible in the Ministry of Defense in Switzerland

for the NNSC back home, not in operational terms, but rather in political terms. So I was in close contact with our foreign ministry, who actually is running the commission in terms of guidance, or not the commission, the Swiss delegation. The Swiss half of the commission. Yeah, indeed. Because it's the Swiss and the Swedes. Absolutely, yes. So I was aware, let's say, on the political level,

But then I had to get to know, and that was a coincidence to a certain extent, but then I had the chance really to implement it on the ground and to see what would that mean in military terms. So in terms of the environment, the context, I was very well prepared. But then when you come here and you have to interact with all your partners on different levels, then you start in certain areas, you start from the scratch.

And so how quickly did you learn the rest of your role after arriving? I have to say very quickly. First of all, the interaction with our Swedish colleagues and particularly the head of the Swedish delegation was very close. Has it always been that way? I mean, you're a historian. Yes.

Good question. No. The answer is no. I think both sides would acknowledge that. There had been in the past, there had, I would not say real tensions, but the interactions were much less close as they are today. That's interesting, yeah, because, you know, as a

for me as a neutral, neutral outsider, to a certain extent, I and maybe some other people look at Sweden and Switzerland as almost being two sides of the same coin, that you're neutral, you're European, you weren't involved in the conflict. And so we just assumed that it would always be smooth sailing with the two of you. Well, it was...

Plus minus a smooth sailing for sure. But even if you look the same, okay, they have more blonde hair, maybe are two centimeters taller than us. But there are, we have many, in many areas, the same attitudes, but the educational system or

People are educated differently. Sweden is much more, there you feel, for instance, that Sweden, the education and the environment is slightly different.

For instance, social security is different. There are minor things where if people come to Korea as a member of the delegation and they are not aware of that, they always think, okay, the Swedes, they look like us. Okay, we speak in English. So everything is exactly the same. And it's very close, but in certain areas and countries,

in certain reactions to events and to whatever situations they're behaving or they are taking a slightly different stand. But I have to say that particularly with our expanded tasks, you might come to that later on, we had, and it was really a pleasure for both sides, I would stress that, we had the opportunity and pleasure

to work together much more closely than in old days where basically the interaction was restricted to the official meetings of the different officers or the commission as a whole. And maybe from time to time that you would have a common meal when you have major delegations. And already in my time, we were working separately.

but meals were taken at the same place, even at the same table. And the interaction was really very close. And just I heard yesterday from Panmunjom that this has remained so also today. Because you're physically...

sharing one camp together, but you have different separate buildings, right? Yeah, actually the camp, and as you have been up there, you might remember, there are sort of two small hills. There is the Swiss hill when you come up on the left-hand side. So the Swiss are closer to the MDL. And then on the right-hand side, there is the Swedish hill. Right.

And in between the buildings, in between, those are the common used buildings like the DFAC, where you eat together, where the briefing rooms are and the storages are. So in the old days, the hills were the hills and there was less interaction. And nowadays, it's really close cooperation. ♪

Curious to hear the rest? Become an NK News member today for access to the full episode. Head to nknews.org slash join for more information about how you can hear the entire conversation, along with in-depth analysis and insights on North Korea and the region.