cover of episode Panic Monday! (What Now?)

Panic Monday! (What Now?)

2024/8/5
logo of podcast The Macro Compass

The Macro Compass

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
主持人
专注于电动车和能源领域的播客主持人和内容创作者。
Topics
本次市场事件是近40年来最大的恐慌性事件之一,其特征是亚洲市场大幅下跌,日本银行指数创下历史新低。虽然宏观数据(如就业数据)并未完全证实市场恐慌的程度,但市场已经预期美联储将进行大幅降息,这反映出市场对经济衰退的担忧。这种恐慌情绪部分源于对经济衰退的预期,部分源于市场非理性行为。收益率曲线倒挂以及随后可能出现的陡峭化是经济衰退的先兆,但目前经济状况并未完全达到衰退的水平。在市场恐慌时期,投资者应记住三条重要规则:市场非理性持续时间可能超过我们维持偿付能力的时间;机会并存,但必须以能够让我们安心入睡的方式构建交易理念和投资;坚持自己的流程。文章最后,主持人提到了一些应对市场恐慌的宏观交易策略,但具体内容需要付费才能查看。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

We just witnessed one of the biggest market panic events ever seen in the last 4 decades.

At some point, Asian markets were down 10%+ in a single session and the Japanese bank index saw the largest daily loss since Black Monday in 1987.

During such panic events, it’s important to remember three crucial rules:

- Markets can remain irrational longer than we can stay solvent;

- Opportunities abound, but it’s crucial to structure trade ideas and investments in a way that can allow us to sleep at night;

- Keep following your process.

But first: let’s understand the nature of this gigantic liquidation event.Is it happening because a recession is now inevitable? ) If this time isn’t different, the recession playbook is unfolding correctly:

- The Central Bank raises rates aggressively;

- Markets signal conditions are too tight: the yield curve inverts

- The curve stays inverted for 12-27 months (!)

- The economy slows

- A late-cycle yield curve steepening (!) happens

- Finally, a recession occurs

The chart illustrates this sequence by setting the x-axis counter at 0 once the 2-10 year yield curve slope inverts, and marking in red the onset of a recession (private non-farm payrolls increasing by 25k or less on a 3-month moving average basis).

Notice how the ’89-90s, 2001 and 2008 recessions all followed a prolonged inversion, and all occurred only once the curve had disinverted (green vertical dotted line).

But the crucial point here is this.

Markets are pricing us close to step 6.Yet data shows we are still at step 4-5.

In other words: the move comes a bit from fundamentals, and a lot from panic. ) Private job creation in the US still averages ~150k/month today (left chart, blue) while in the months preceding the 2001 and 2008 recession we were creating only 0-50k jobs/month (right charts, red).And while it’s true that today the US population is bigger and the labor force is expanding rapidly, one can argue that macro data only justifies a portion of the panic move we saw recently.

Just to give you a sense of the panic: the bond market is now pricing 5+ cuts over the next 3 meetings, and some odds of the Fed being forced to deliver intra-meeting emergency cuts.For reference, as we walked into the 2001 recession and the 2008 Great Financial Crisis, the Fed did this: ) **Markets are now pricing 50 + 50 + 25: something of a middle ground between the 2001 recession and the late 2007 Fed cuts heading into the GFC.**To visualize the panic reaction in bond markets, this is the chart that shows the market-implied probabilities that the Fed will cut by 50 bps 3 times in a row = full recession mode: ) Ok, so we have:

- Asian indexes recording their worst 1-day loss since Black Monday in 1987;

- The Nasdaq down 16% in 16 trading sessions (<1% probability event);

- Bond markets pricing a full-fledged recessionary Fed cutting cycle in the next 3 months.

Yet macro data are not fully justifying this panic (yet).

So what’s going on? Why is this happening?

And also: here are** 2 macro trade ideas** to benefit from this market panic! READ NOW!)