The H-1B visa debate centers on whether the U.S. should allow more skilled foreign workers into the country. The 'MAGA right' argues that there are enough American workers to fill high-skill jobs and that H-1B visas depress wages. The 'tech right,' led by figures like Elon Musk, argues that the U.S. needs skilled immigrants to fill labor shortages, especially in tech, to support economic growth.
The current cap on H-1B visas is 65,000, with an additional 20,000 for those with advanced degrees. This cap is seen as insufficient by many in the tech industry, who argue that the U.S. faces a labor shortage in skilled industries, particularly given the country's demographic trends and the need for workers to support programs like Social Security and Medicare.
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) aims to reduce government spending and increase efficiency through regulatory rescissions, administrative reductions, and cost savings. It focuses on using executive actions based on existing legislation rather than creating new laws. The goal is to streamline government operations and reduce costs, particularly in non-defense discretionary spending.
Reducing government regulation could theoretically lower operating costs for businesses by reducing compliance burdens, potentially leading to increased productivity and economic growth. However, the immediate macroeconomic impact is likely to be minimal, as regulatory changes often take years to manifest in broader economic performance. Additionally, some regulations provide significant benefits, such as environmental protections, which must be weighed against the costs.
Bitcoin's price has dropped by 15.5% since its post-election peak in December 2023, highlighting its volatility. The debate on cryptocurrency regulation centers on whether increased regulation could stabilize the market or stifle innovation. The Trump administration is expected to take a more deregulatory approach, which could lead to further volatility but also potentially greater growth in the crypto sector.
The estimated cost of federal regulations in 2024 is $1.4 trillion, according to the American Action Forum. This figure is calculated by aggregating the cost estimates of various regulations published in the Federal Register. However, this calculation only considers the costs and does not account for the potential benefits of regulations, such as environmental or health improvements.
Antitrust policy aims to prevent anti-competitive practices by large companies, which can stifle innovation, raise prices, and reduce wages. Under the Biden administration, antitrust enforcement has been more aggressive, particularly in tech and banking. A new administration might take a more lenient approach, allowing more mergers and acquisitions, which could lead to increased concentration in certain industries but may also support global competitiveness.
Federal government employment currently stands at around 3 million, which is about 2% of total U.S. employment. This share has been steadily declining over the past 50 years, even as compensation for federal employees has increased by about 40% since 2000. Efforts to reduce federal payrolls, such as through remote work policies, are unlikely to significantly impact overall government spending or economic growth.
Deregulation in the energy sector could theoretically encourage more investment in oil production, particularly in the long term. However, current U.S. oil production is already at record highs, with frackers producing 13.5 million barrels per day. The primary driver of investment in oil production is price, not regulation, so significant changes in oil output are unlikely without a corresponding shift in market conditions.
Only 8% of small businesses currently cite regulation as their top concern, according to a survey by the National Federation of Independent Business. This is down from a peak of nearly 25% during the Clinton administration. The primary concerns for small businesses now are labor costs, labor quality, and inflation, suggesting that regulation is less of a pressing issue for most businesses today.
In the last Inside Economics podcast of the year, the team is joined by our colleague Justin Begley to discuss the incoming Trump administration’s seeming view that smaller government means stronger economic growth. Will the new government agency DOGE, a more relaxed anti-trust policy, and lighter regulation successfully lift the economy’s prospects? A potentially politically charged question the team works to tackle analytically. How did we do? And Happy New Year!
Hosts: Mark Zandi – Chief Economist, Moody’s Analytics, Cris deRitis – Deputy Chief Economist, Moody’s Analytics, and Marisa DiNatale – Senior Director - Head of Global Forecasting, Moody’s Analytics
Follow Mark Zandi on 'X' and BlueSky @MarkZandi, Cris deRitis on LinkedIn, and Marisa DiNatale on LinkedIn