cover of episode  Elon Musk’s $1 million-a-day voter sweepstakes can proceed, a Pennsylvania judge says

Elon Musk’s $1 million-a-day voter sweepstakes can proceed, a Pennsylvania judge says

2024/11/5
logo of podcast Elon Musk Podcast

Elon Musk Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
主持人
专注于电动车和能源领域的播客主持人和内容创作者。
Topics
主持人: 本期节目讨论了马斯克每日百万美元投票赠送活动在宾夕法尼亚州法官裁决后持续到选举日的争议,包括该活动的合法性、是否试图影响选举以及资格认定等问题。该活动由马斯克创立的亲特朗普组织America PAC负责,自10月19日以来,每天向关键摇摆州的选民赠送一百万美元,总计已赠送1700万美元,资金主要来自Musk的1.2亿美元捐款。America PAC声称百万美元奖金的获得者是根据其作为该组织代言人的合适性预先选定的,并非随机选择,他们需要支持第一和第二修正案的请愿书。获奖者会经过背景调查、社交媒体审查和面对面会面,以确保他们的价值观与PAC的政治信息一致。 Larry Krasner: 费城地区检察官Larry Krasner认为马斯克的赠送活动是旨在影响选举的计划,试图误导选民,是非法彩票。他认为该计划的真实性质被保密协议掩盖了,并指控马斯克团队编造了一个具有误导性的说法。 Elon Musk: 马斯克的律师团队认为该计划不符合彩票的标准,因为缺乏偶然性因素;他们认为获奖者是基于其宣传America PAC价值观的潜力而预先选定的,因此宾夕法尼亚州的法律不适用。他们强调参与者在获得资格前签署了支持第一和第二修正案的请愿书,这是一种言论自由的表达,阻止这项活动将侵犯宾夕法尼亚州居民自由表达政治观点的权利。 Chris Young: America PAC主管Chris Young作证说,获奖者会经过背景调查、社交媒体审查和面对面会面,以确保他们的价值观与PAC的政治信息一致。他承认,在集会上马斯克将赠送活动描述为随机选择让他感到意外。 其他参与者: 其他参与者,例如Chris Gober, John Summer, Matt Haverstock等,也分别从法律角度对该事件发表了评论,他们的观点或多或少地支持了上述各方的论点。 主持人: 本期节目讨论了马斯克每日百万美元投票赠送活动在宾夕法尼亚州法官裁决后持续到选举日的争议,包括该活动的合法性、是否试图影响选举以及资格认定等问题。该活动由马斯克创立的亲特朗普组织America PAC负责,自10月19日以来,每天向关键摇摆州的选民赠送一百万美元,总计已赠送1700万美元,资金主要来自Musk的1.2亿美元捐款。America PAC声称百万美元奖金的获得者是根据其作为该组织代言人的合适性预先选定的,并非随机选择,他们需要支持第一和第二修正案的请愿书。获奖者会经过背景调查、社交媒体审查和面对面会面,以确保他们的价值观与PAC的政治信息一致。 Larry Krasner: 费城地区检察官Larry Krasner认为马斯克的赠送活动是旨在影响选举的计划,试图误导选民,是非法彩票。他认为该计划的真实性质被保密协议掩盖了,并指控马斯克团队编造了一个具有误导性的说法。 Elon Musk: 马斯克的律师团队认为该计划不符合彩票的标准,因为缺乏偶然性因素;他们认为获奖者是基于其宣传America PAC价值观的潜力而预先选定的,因此宾夕法尼亚州的法律不适用。他们强调参与者在获得资格前签署了支持第一和第二修正案的请愿书,这是一种言论自由的表达,阻止这项活动将侵犯宾夕法尼亚州居民自由表达政治观点的权利。 Chris Young: America PAC主管Chris Young作证说,获奖者会经过背景调查、社交媒体审查和面对面会面,以确保他们的价值观与PAC的政治信息一致。他承认,在集会上马斯克将赠送活动描述为随机选择让他感到意外。 其他参与者: 其他参与者,例如Chris Gober, John Summer, Matt Haverstock等,也分别从法律角度对该事件发表了评论,他们的观点或多或少地支持了上述各方的论点。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The episode delves into the legal challenges surrounding Elon Musk's $1 million-a-day giveaway to voters in swing states, focusing on the Pennsylvania judge's ruling allowing it to proceed.
  • The giveaway is run by Musk's pro-Trump political action committee, America PAC.
  • Critics argue it is an illegal lottery designed to influence voters.
  • America PAC claims recipients are selected based on their suitability as spokespeople, not randomly.

Shownotes Transcript

In today’s episode, we dive deep into the recent ruling allowing Elon Musk’s $1 million-a-day voter giveaway to continue through Election Day. This unprecedented promotion, run by Musk’s pro-Trump political action committee, America PAC, is offering daily million-dollar payouts to selected voters in key battleground states. But with allegations of election interference, accusations of illegal lotteries, and a race against Election Day, Musk’s program faces serious scrutiny. Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner has taken a firm stand against the giveaway, calling it a “scam” to sway the election, but a Pennsylvania judge ruled to let it proceed. We'll unpack the legal arguments, hear from key players, and explore the potential fallout as Election Day approaches.

Questions We’ll Answer in This Episode:

  • What makes Elon Musk’s $1 million-a-day giveaway so controversial, and why is it drawing legal challenges?

  • How does America PAC choose its recipients, and are they truly “random,” as Musk initially claimed?

  • What are the implications of this giveaway in the final days of a highly contested election?

Key Topics Discussed:

- Background on the Giveaway: America PAC, founded by Musk, has awarded $1 million daily to registered voters in swing states who sign a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. This initiative launched on October 19 and is set to conclude on Election Day.

- Legal Battle in Pennsylvania: Philadelphia’s District Attorney, Larry Krasner, argues the giveaway is an illegal lottery designed to influence voters. Krasner’s lawsuit sought an emergency halt to the program, but Judge Angelo Foglietta allowed it to continue, stating he would explain his reasoning in a forthcoming order.

- America PAC’s Defense: America PAC claims its $1 million recipients are not randomly chosen, as Musk initially stated, but are selected based on their suitability as spokespeople for the PAC’s pro-Trump values. Musk’s legal team argues this makes the payments “salaries” rather than lottery prizes, sidestepping Pennsylvania’s lottery laws.

- How Recipients are Selected: Chris Young, America PAC’s director, testified that recipients are vetted through background checks, social media reviews, and in-person meetings. He emphasized the organization’s intention to recruit individuals whose values align with the PAC’s political message.

- Conflicting Messages: Musk’s previous comments suggested a random selection process, a claim that sparked further scrutiny. A video from an October rally captured Musk describing the giveaway as a random drawing, despite America PAC’s assertion that winners are carefully chosen.

- Federal Concerns: The U.S. Department of Justice issued a warning to Musk’s PAC, noting that the program may violate federal laws against paying voters. Although federal prosecutors have not taken action, the warning has raised questions about the giveaway’s legality under election law.

- America PAC’s Impact on Swing States: Musk’s financial backing has elevated America PAC’s influence in critical battlegrounds where the race between Vice President Kamala Harris and Donald Trump remains close. With $120 million from Musk, America PAC has awarded $17 million to swing-state voters.

- Closing Argument from Krasner’s Office: Prosecutors argue the giveaway is a sophisticated scheme to sway the election by misleading voters about the nature of the payments. Krasner described the defense’s explanations as “amazingly disingenuous,” arguing the PAC is skirting the law.

- Conclusion of the Program: As Election Day marks the final day of the contest, no additional payments will be made in Pennsylvania. The judge confirmed with both parties that the promotion would end as scheduled.

Key Quotes:

  • “The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance.” – Chris Gober, attorney for Musk

  • “It’s about the most amazingly disingenuous defense I’ve heard in recent times.” – Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner