cover of episode From Thesis to Meme to Fund: Building American Dynamism

From Thesis to Meme to Fund: Building American Dynamism

2025/3/11
logo of podcast a16z Podcast

a16z Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
(
(旁白)
德国基督教民主联盟主席,2025年德国总理候选人,长期从事金融政策和法律工作。
D
David Ulevitch
K
Katherine Boyle
Topics
@Katherine Boyle : 我始终乐观,作为早期投资者,我看到了巨大的机遇。三年前提出的"建设美国活力"的理念,如今已发展成为一个拥有6亿美元资金的基金,这超出了所有人的预期。这一运动的快速发展,反映了创始人建设实体世界的热情,以及乌克兰战争等外部因素的影响。我们从论文到梗图再到产品,这个过程比预期的快得多。"美国活力"并非仅仅局限于国防和航空航天,还涵盖教育、农业、制造业、材料科学、能源等多个领域。它代表着一种积极的、建设性的力量,旨在改善美国的各个方面。我们使用"美国"这个词,在当时是具有争议性的,因为科技行业通常是全球化的。但如今,这一理念已得到广泛认可。我们投资的公司运营模式与其他公司不同,他们需要与政府客户进行特殊合作,并理解政府事务。 我们今年的"美国活力50强"榜单重点关注印太地区,特别是台湾,因为该地区是美国公司关注和准备应对的焦点。许多公司关注的是未来五到十年的潜在冲突,而不是当前正在发生的冲突。中国对台湾无人机制造商的制裁,凸显了印太地区冲突对美国供应链的影响。印太地区潜在冲突可能对美国供应链、物流和能源产生重大影响,需要重新思考军事战略和技术需求。 国防领域的关键在于快速、低成本地生产可消耗系统,例如自主水面舰艇和卫星总线。太空领域将成为未来冲突的目标,因此需要能够快速部署不同有效载荷的卫星总线。硅谷需要改变其对制造业的看法,并与传统国防公司合作。政府应该承诺资助研发,并简化法规,以支持"美国活力"公司的发展。国防部需要改变其文化,以更好地支持新技术的采用,并通过竞争来选择最佳产品。吸引人才参与"美国活力"的关键在于政府的采购政策,需要选择最佳产品,而不是依赖于传统的供应商。城市应该积极吸引"美国活力"公司,并提供相应的激励措施和支持。我对人工智能在各个行业中的应用感到兴奋,并认为其发展速度将超乎想象。 @David Ulevitch : 我们需要立即开始为未来的太空竞争做准备,而不是等到20年后。"美国活力"运动的快速发展,既有市场需求的推动,也有工程师和创始人渴望参与更有意义工作的因素。SpaceX 和 Tesla 的成功,激励了工程师和创始人参与更有意义的项目。"美国活力"运动的兴起,部分源于2018年谷歌退出Maven项目后,硅谷科技人员对国家利益支持态度的转变。对"美国活力"的批评,往往忽略了其积极的内涵和对国家建设的促进作用。"美国活力"的内涵是积极的,它关乎改善教育、住房、国防和能源等各个方面。"美国活力"在硅谷引起震惊,但在华盛顿却得到迅速接受,这反映了两个地区对创新的不同看法。 为了最佳防御,美国需要在导弹、高超音速武器、电子战、空间态势感知和网络安全等领域拥有压倒性优势。美国需要加强工业供应链,特别是在机器人和人工智能驱动的制造业领域。美国需要简化法规,以促进新工厂和制造设施的建设。国防部需要改变其文化,以更好地支持新技术的采用,并通过竞争来选择最佳产品。我对"美国活力"领域的快速创新和变化感到兴奋,并认为人工智能将对各个行业产生巨大的积极影响。未来十年,奥斯汀和德克萨斯州将成为重要的制造中心。

Deep Dive

Chapters
American Dynamism, initially a thesis by Katherine Boyle, challenges the apathy towards American progress. Its controversial nature stemmed from explicitly focusing on building for the national interest, a concept viewed as taboo in the globalized tech world. The term itself and its focus on America were initially shocking to Silicon Valley but not Washington.
  • American Dynamism initially met with controversy due to its focus on national interest.
  • The term's explicit mention of 'America' was initially shocking.
  • Washington embraced the concept more readily than Silicon Valley.

Shownotes Transcript

For over a century, the United States has been the birthplace of world-changing innovation – from the Wright brothers’ first flight to the invention of the transistor, the moon landing, and the birth of the internet. But in recent years, belief in American progress has wavered.

Three years ago, a16z General Partner Katherine Boyle wrote a bold thesis called Building American Dynamism, challenging this apathy and calling for startups to tackle the country’s biggest problems. The idea spread fast – first as a meme, then as a movement, and today as a $600M dedicated fund.

In this episode, Katherine and fellow a16z General Partner David Ulevitch discuss:

  • The origins of American Dynamism—and why it was controversial at first
  • How Washington and Silicon Valley can come together
  • America’s competitiveness in today’s great power competition
  • The latest American Dynamism 50 list focused on the Indo-Pacific, showcasing the top startups building for the national interest

If you’re curious about the future of America, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.

Check out this year’s full AD50 list at a16z.com/AD50.

Resources: 

Find David on X: https://x.com/davidu

Find Katherine on X: https://x.com/KTmBoyle

Find last year’s’ American Dynamism 50 AI Addition’ here: https://a16z.com/american-dynamism-50-ai/

Read Katherine’s article ‘Building American Dynamism’: https://a16z.com/building-american-dynamism/

Stay Updated: 

Let us know what you think: https://ratethispodcast.com/a16z

Find a16z on Twitter: https://twitter.com/a16z

Find a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16z

Subscribe on your favorite podcast app: https://a16z.simplecast.com/

Follow our host: https://twitter.com/stephsmithio

Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.