cover of episode UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Tariffs start to show up'

UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Tariffs start to show up'

2025/3/21
logo of podcast UBS On-Air: Market Moves

UBS On-Air: Market Moves

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Paul Donovan
Topics
@Paul Donovan : 我是瑞银全球财富管理的首席经济学家Paul Donovan。韩国三月份前20天的出口数据显示,在2月份因农历新年假期导致数据扭曲后有所反弹。船舶和芯片是主要的增长动力。尽管如此,对美国和中国的出口增长相对缓慢,这表明全球贸易的整体状况可能并不乐观。 美国媒体开始报道一些直接归因于特朗普总统关税政策造成的失业案例,例如明尼苏达州的钢铁工人。虽然在当前美国政治环境下,我们不应轻信所有说法,但关税确实可能成为其他因素导致失业的借口。然而,如果这种失业风险的论调持续下去,经济后果将是严重的。 过去四年来,美国消费者对失业的恐惧较低,这使得他们能够消费而不是储蓄。如果这种不确定性导致对失业的恐惧加剧,那么消费支出可能会放缓,转而储蓄以应对不可预测的未来。对失业的恐惧程度是美国经济预期放缓与美国经济可能出现更严重收缩之间的区别。 日本2月份的通货膨胀数据有所放缓,但食品和燃料价格上涨意味着通货膨胀略高于预期。核心通货膨胀率稳定在同比1.5%。私人服务业价格有所放缓,而政府服务业通货膨胀一直在上升。这与我们在其他发达经济体中看到的情况并没有太大不同。市场供求力量导致通货膨胀相对温和,而人为操纵的价格是导致通货膨胀上升的主要因素。 英国央行行长贝利表示存在很多不确定性,利率方向可能仍将以每个季度下降0.25个百分点的稳定速度下降。英国国家统计局宣布暂停发布生产者价格数据,这可能会影响进出口价格数据,并在当前环境下具有重要意义。这与劳动力市场数据的问题一起,提醒我们,当经济学家的预测与报告的数据不符时,很可能是数据错了,而不是经济学家错了。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Friday the 21st of March. South Korean export data for the first 20 days of March showed a recovery from the February figures, which was of course distorted by the movable Lunar New Year holiday. Key drivers in March were ships and chips.

Ships are, of course, a rather lumpy category, and ships are somewhat independent of the anxiety over economic nationalism and rising trade taxes. Exports to the United States did grow, but relatively slowly. Exports to China, which has a role as a late-stage link in global supply chains, were also slower.

The numbers are relatively positive, seen from a Korean perspective alone, but the composition is not perhaps sending quite such positive signals about the general state of global trade. In the United States, we're starting to get media reports of job losses that are being directly attributed to US President Trump's trade taxes.

steel workers in Minnesota being the latest high profile case as tariffs threaten the auto sector's demand for steel. In the politically partisan environment of the United States, it is wise not to take everything at face value. Whatever the circumstances in the Minnesota case, tariffs can be a convenient excuse for job losses that would be driven by other reasons.

Nonetheless, if the narrative takes hold that jobs are at risk, the economic consequences are significant. It is the low fear of unemployment over the past four years that allowed US consumers the security to spend rather than save.

If uncertainty breeds more fear of unemployment, then the risk is that consumer spending slows in favour of saving as an insurance against an unpredictable future. The level of fear of unemployment is the difference between the expected slowdown of the US economy and the risk case of a much more severe contraction in the US economy.

Japan's February inflation figures slowed on the headline rate, but higher food and fuel prices did mean that inflation was slightly more than had been expected. The international standard measure of core inflation was stable at 1.5% on the year. Private sector service prices, which are assumed to be more sensitive to labour market costs, have been slowing somewhat. Government service sector inflation has been rising,

This is not terribly different to what we've been seeing in other advanced economies. The market forces of supply and demand are producing relatively benign inflation, and it is controlled, manipulated and invented prices that are the key forces pushing inflation higher. Yesterday's Bank of England meeting was accompanied by some statements of the obvious from Bank of England Governor Bailey, who noted that there was a lot of uncertainty at the moment.

For the benefit of international listeners, that should be taken as polite British understatement. The economic equivalent of saying it would be unfortunate if you ignored the national tea time alarm. The direction of rates is still likely to be down at a steady pace of a quarter point a quarter. Meanwhile, His Majesty's Office for National Statistics has announced that it will stop publishing producer price data for a while because there seems to be a problem with the methods used.

This will probably affect import and export price data too, of some relevance in the current climate. And this is all in addition to problems with labour market data. Overall, it's your regular reminder that when economists' forecasts disagree with the reported data, there is now a good chance that it's the data that is wrong, and not the economists'. That's all for today. Have a good day.

This material has been prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS Switzerland AG, regulated by FINMA in Switzerland. Its subsidiaries, or affiliates, collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC.

The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.

The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS.

please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.