cover of episode Lopetegui to Potter: Inside West Ham's crazy week

Lopetegui to Potter: Inside West Ham's crazy week

2025/1/9
logo of podcast The Athletic FC Podcast

The Athletic FC Podcast

People
D
David Ornstein
I
Ian Irving
L
Liam Tharme
R
Roshane Thomas
Topics
David Ornstein: 我认为洛佩特吉的任命从一开始就不被看好,有很多预兆表明他的执教不会成功。他并非俱乐部首选,在季前训练中也暴露出一些问题。糟糕的比赛结果、球员引进的失败以及与球员和管理层关系的破裂最终导致了他的下课。俱乐部在圣诞节前就已开始考虑解雇他,并与波特进行了接触。虽然过程有些混乱,但这并非西汉姆联独有的现象,很多顶级俱乐部都曾经历过类似的情况。波特最终与俱乐部就合同期限达成一致,这促使了洛佩特吉的下课。我认为波特是一个非常强有力的候选人,尽管他可能并非所有人的首选。 Roshane Thomas: 洛佩特吉的执教表现非常糟糕,球队士气低落,他未能有效地管理球队,与多名球员发生冲突。球队在多场比赛中惨败,球迷们也表达了他们的不满。我认为俱乐部应该坚持聘用英国籍主教练,因为他们以往在这方面取得了更多成功。洛佩特吉的球员引进策略也存在问题,许多球员并不适合球队的长期发展规划,俱乐部在球员引进方面需要加强尽职调查。此外,俱乐部管理层在处理教练更换事宜上的不当行为也激怒了球迷。波特在新闻发布会上表现出色,表达了他对俱乐部的雄心壮志以及他从之前的失败中吸取的教训。他与俱乐部在目标和理念上达成了一致,这让他决定接受这份工作。 Liam Tharme: 波特的执教风格并非一成不变,他可以根据球队的实际情况进行调整,这使得他成为西汉姆联的合适人选。他擅长提升球队的整体实力,并培养年轻球员。然而,他需要根据西汉姆联的现有阵容调整战术策略,特别是如何有效利用球队的边路球员。西汉姆联需要改善防守,减少丢球数量,这是波特面临的一大挑战。波特需要在短期内取得成绩,同时也要逐步实施自己的战术理念,这对他来说是一个巨大的挑战。他需要解决球队在伦敦德比中的表现不佳的问题。 Ian Irving: 洛佩特吉仅仅执教22场比赛就被解雇,这表明俱乐部承认了夏窗引援的失误。波特在西汉姆联面临的挑战更接近于他在切尔西的经历,而非在布莱顿的经历。俱乐部在比赛前解雇主教练的做法并不理想,这给球队备战带来了困难。波特与俱乐部就合同期限的谈判是导致解雇洛佩特吉时间延后的主要原因。洛佩特吉在父亲去世后不久被解雇,这对他来说是一段艰难的时期。西汉姆联球迷对波特的到来持乐观态度,希望他能带领球队取得成功,并解决球队防守薄弱的问题。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why was Julen Lopetegui sacked by West Ham after just eight months?

Julen Lopetegui was sacked due to a combination of poor results, a lack of influence over key signings, and a breakdown in relationships with players and staff. West Ham suffered nine defeats in his 22-game tenure, and there were reports of clashes with players like Kudus and Tadebo. Additionally, the style of football did not meet expectations, and the club felt the need to act quickly to avoid relegation.

What were the key issues with West Ham's recruitment under Lopetegui?

West Ham spent around £200 million on new signings, but many of the recruits, such as Nicholas Fulcroog (31 years old, £30 million), were seen as short-term solutions rather than long-term investments. Lopetegui's influence over these signings was unclear, and some players, like Kudos, underperformed. The recruitment strategy was criticized for lacking a clear vision, contributing to the team's struggles.

Why did West Ham choose Graham Potter as their new head coach?

Graham Potter was chosen due to his successful track record at Brighton, where he improved player performance and implemented an attractive style of play. West Ham saw him as a strong candidate to stabilize the team and improve their defensive record, which has been poor this season. Potter also aligned with the club's long-term vision, signing a two-and-a-half-year contract.

How did West Ham fans react to the appointment of Graham Potter?

West Ham fans reacted positively to Graham Potter's appointment, with optimism about his ability to replicate the success of David Moyes. Fans were encouraged by his focus on improving the defense and his ambition to challenge for European competition. Social media and fan forums reflected widespread approval of the decision.

What challenges does Graham Potter face at West Ham?

Graham Potter faces the challenge of improving West Ham's defense, which has conceded 39 goals this season, the third-highest in the league. He must also adapt his tactical approach to a squad that has traditionally relied on wingers, unlike his preference for central players at Brighton. Additionally, he needs to quickly build cohesion within a team that has struggled with morale and performance under Lopetegui.

How does Graham Potter's appointment compare to his previous roles at Brighton and Chelsea?

Potter's role at West Ham is more similar to his time at Chelsea than Brighton. At Brighton, he inherited a stable and well-structured environment, whereas Chelsea and West Ham both presented more chaotic and disjointed setups. However, Potter appeared more at ease during his West Ham press conference, suggesting he feels more aligned with the club's vision compared to his tenure at Chelsea.

Chapters
West Ham's decision to sack Julen Lopetegui after only eight months is analyzed. The reasons cited include a poor start to the season, recruitment issues, clashes with players, and a breakdown in the relationship between Lopetegui and the club's hierarchy. The short tenure highlights the club's misjudgment in the summer's appointment and subsequent signings.
  • Lopetegui's eight-month tenure was the shortest in West Ham's 124-year history.
  • Red flags were present from the start, including Lopetegui not being the club's top choice.
  • Issues with training intensity, poor results, and player fallouts contributed to his dismissal.
  • The club's summer recruitment, costing around £200 million, is heavily criticized.
  • The situation is seen as a failure with multiple contributing factors, including the sporting director, recruitment team, and board.

Shownotes Transcript

On Wednesday, after weeks of speculation West Ham finally sacked Julen Lopetegui.

The Spaniard lasted just eight months - and 22 games in charge of the Hammers, the shortest reign of a permanent manager or head coach in the club's 124-year history

Joining Ian Irving to analyse the decision to sack Lopetegui and replace him with Graham Potter are The Athletic's football correspondent David Ornstein and West Ham United writer Roshane Thomas.

Plus, Football Tactics writer Liam Tharme also drops-by to discuss Potter's fit at the London Stadium and look back on his previously successful spell in the Premier League with Brighton & Hove Albion.

Host: Ian Irving

With: David Ornstein, Roshane Thomas and Liam Tharme

Executive Producer: Adey Moorhead

Producer: Guy Clarke

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)