Yes, but it depends on the player's brand value. High-profile players like Erling Haaland have image rights embedded in their contracts, entitling them to a share of the revenue from shirt sales with their name and number. For lower-league players, the sums are typically too small to warrant such arrangements.
Clubs generally receive around 5% to 7% of the retail price of a shirt. This percentage does not account for any share that players might receive from sales of shirts with their name and number.
No, there is no formal compensation for clubs when their players participate in the Africa Cup of Nations. This contrasts with FIFA tournaments like the World Cup, where clubs receive $11,000 per day for each player used by their national team.
The Premier League prohibits shirt number changes mid-season to protect fans who have already purchased jerseys. For example, when Cristiano Ronaldo returned to Manchester United, the club offered a free swap for fans who had bought Cavani's number 7 shirt.
Compensation costs for sacking a manager count towards a club's profitability and sustainability (P&S) limits. This can inhibit clubs close to the limit from making managerial changes or spending in the transfer window to avoid breaching financial regulations.
Clubs can agree to future transfers, locking in transfer fees and salaries, which helps with budgeting. This also prevents other clubs from gazumping the deal. For example, Brighton signed Mitoma and immediately loaned him out to allow him to adapt gradually.
Winning the FA Cup can be worth up to £100 million due to the potential for European qualification, which brings additional revenue from home games in competitions like the Europa League. The prize money itself is relatively small at £2 million.
After deducting hosting costs, gate receipts from FA Cup matches, including hospitality tickets, are split 45% to each club and 10% to the FA pool. This ensures both clubs benefit from ticket sales, including higher-priced hospitality packages.
As of the 2023-24 season, Leicester, Chelsea, Nottingham Forest, Everton, and Newcastle were closest to breaking Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR). However, they likely stayed within limits through player sales and financial maneuvers.
Spurs, Liverpool, Manchester City, Brentford, and Brighton have the most financial wriggle room under FFP. Brighton, in particular, benefits from significant player sales, while Spurs maintain a sustainable wage-to-revenue ratio.
Kevin and Kieran discuss whether players receive any extra income from shirts sold with their name on the back, and find out whether clubs get any financial compensation when their players take part in the Africa Cup of Nations.
Follow Kevin on X - @kevinhunterday
Follow Kieran on X - @KieranMaguire
Follow Producer Guy on X - @guykilty
Follow The Price of Football on X - @pof_pod
Send in a question:
Support The Price of Football on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/priceoffootball)
Check out the Price of Football merchandise store:
https://the-price-of-football.backstreetmerch.com/)
Visit the website:
For sponsorship email - [email protected])
The Price of Football is a Dap Dip production:
Get an Exclusive NordVPN deal here: https://nordvpn.com/priceoffootball
It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices)