cover of episode What’s going on with fluoride?

What’s going on with fluoride?

2024/11/28
logo of podcast Science Weekly

Science Weekly

People
C
Catherine Carstairs
I
Ian Sample
O
Oliver Jones
Topics
Catherine Carstairs: 加氟的早期研究结果非常有前景,显著降低了儿童龋齿率。然而,反对意见很快出现,一部分人担心其对健康的影响,例如骨骼健康和癌症风险,也有人反对其强制性。许多反对者更关注健康风险,而非政治阴谋论。 尽管现在有含氟牙膏和更好的口腔卫生习惯,在水中添加氟化物仍然有益处,特别是在帮助缩小口腔健康方面的社会经济差距方面。对于那些无法定期刷牙或无法负担牙医费用的儿童,加氟仍然有益。 然而,加氟的政治成本可能过高,公众普遍反对,或许应该将精力放在其他能使儿童受益的措施上,而不是一味地追求加氟。 Oliver Jones: 毒理学的核心是剂量决定毒性。关于氟化物对健康的影响,关键在于剂量。 2019年的一项加拿大研究指出,孕期饮用含氟水与男童智商降低之间存在关联,但这项研究存在样本量小、只检测了尿液中的氟化物含量等缺陷,且没有在女孩身上观察到类似影响。 大多数设计良好的研究并未发现氟化物与智商降低之间存在关联。 美国联邦法官的裁决要求环保署采取行动,但这并不意味着氟化物会造成神经毒性,也没有明确规定具体的措施。 没有证据表明氟化物会导致癌症,但高剂量的氟化物可能会影响骨骼健康。 科学家和公共卫生专业人员需要更好地与公众沟通,理解公众的担忧,并重建信任。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What led to the discovery of fluoride's benefits for dental health?

In the early 1900s, dentist Fred McKay noticed that many residents of Colorado Springs had dark, pitted teeth but were surprisingly resilient to decay. After 30 years of research, it was discovered that the stain was caused by high levels of naturally occurring fluoride in the water supply, leading to the idea of adding fluoride to water supplies to replicate these benefits.

Why did fluoridation become controversial?

Fluoridation faced immediate opposition due to concerns about health effects, such as impacts on bone health and potential long-term risks. Some feared it could be a tool for communist saboteurs, but most concerns were about the lack of sufficient long-term studies and the idea of enforced medication through the public water supply.

What is the current status of fluoride in U.S. drinking water?

More than 200 million Americans, or about 75% of the population, have fluoride added to their drinking water at recommended levels of 0.7 milligrams per liter. High levels of fluoride, over 3 milligrams per liter, can cause severe skeletal deformities and dental fluorosis.

What did a 2019 Canadian study find about fluoride and children's IQ?

A 2019 Canadian study found an association between drinking fluoridated water during pregnancy and lower IQ in male children, but not in girls. The study was observational and had limitations, such as a lack of comprehensive coverage of fluoride sources and a small sample size.

What was the outcome of the 2023 federal court ruling on fluoride?

In September 2023, a federal judge ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must begin the process of strengthening fluoride regulations due to concerns about potential health risks. The judge did not specify actions but noted a risk that fluoride might cause neurotoxicity.

What are the other health impacts of fluoride that have been suggested?

Some studies suggest fluoride might be linked to arthritis, bone fractures, and bone cancer, but these claims are not well-supported. Over 50 years of research show no association between fluoride and cancer. Higher doses can cause dental fluorosis and potential bone health issues, but these effects are rare at recommended levels.

How has the benefit of water fluoridation changed over time?

The benefits of water fluoridation have decreased since the 1950s due to improved oral hygiene and the widespread use of fluoride toothpaste. However, it still helps reduce socioeconomic disparities in oral health, providing benefits to children in low-income households.

What are the future considerations for water fluoridation?

Given the controversy and political costs, some experts suggest focusing on other initiatives to deliver fluoride benefits, especially to children who need it most. While water fluoridation is beneficial, the political and public trust costs may outweigh the benefits in the current climate.

Chapters
This chapter explores the origins of adding fluoride to water, starting from its discovery in Colorado Springs and its initial promising results in reducing tooth decay. It also delves into the early controversies and conspiracies surrounding fluoridation, highlighting concerns about its safety and compulsory nature.
  • Discovery of naturally occurring fluoride in Colorado Springs water and its unexpected effect on tooth decay.
  • Early success of fluoridation in reducing cavities by 50-70%.
  • Initial controversies and conspiracy theories surrounding fluoridation, including concerns about communist plots and health effects.
  • Concerns about compulsory medication and lack of choice regarding fluoride consumption.

Shownotes Transcript

The conversation about fluoride’s health benefits has exploded recently after a US federal toxicology report, court ruling and independent scientific review all called for updated risk-benefit analysis. Ian Sample hears from Catherine Carstairs, professor of history at the University of Guelph in Canada, about how attitudes to fluoridation have evolved, and Oliver Jones, professor of chemistry at RMIT University in Australia, about where the science stands today. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/sciencepod)