cover of episode 'If You Can Keep It': The Future Of The Federal Judiciary

'If You Can Keep It': The Future Of The Federal Judiciary

2024/12/16
logo of podcast 1A

1A

People
乔什·格斯坦
杰夫·罗森
玛丽·麦考德
米奇·麦康奈尔
Topics
米奇·麦康奈尔:认为阻挠增加联邦法官人数的法案是出于党派政治,缺乏正当理由。他认为,否决这项明显符合实际需要的法案是不可思议的。 乔什·格斯坦:详细阐述了联邦法官审理的各种案件类型,包括商业纠纷、民权案件、以及与政府政策相关的案件,例如疫苗强制令、堕胎、移民和环境问题。他还指出,案件审理的延迟会对个人权利和诉讼结果造成严重影响。 玛丽·麦考德:分析了联邦法官的任命流程,指出该流程近年来日益政治化,并举例说明了不同总统任期内提名和确认过程中的党派斗争。她还强调了确保法官队伍多元化的重要性,以维护司法体系的公正性和公信力。 杰夫·罗森:比较了特朗普和拜登总统任命联邦法官的策略,特朗普注重任命保守派法官,而拜登更注重多样性。他指出,尽管存在政治化倾向,但下级法院法官通常以非党派方式工作,并愿意对任命他们的总统进行制衡。 乔什·格斯坦:讨论了联邦法院案件积压和审理延迟的问题,指出这与法官人数不足以及参议员阻挠法官任命有关。他认为,案件延迟会对个人权利和诉讼结果造成严重影响,尤其是在涉及民权和就业等问题时。 玛丽·麦考德:解释了增加联邦法官人数的必要性,并指出这与扩大最高法院规模的讨论不同。她认为,增加法官人数的法案能够解决案件积压问题,并确保不同党派的总统都有机会任命法官。 杰夫·罗森:讨论了增加法官人数的必要性,指出这与过去对最高法院规模的政治性扩张和收缩不同,下级法院的扩张通常是为了应对实际的案件增加。他还指出,由于法官提名过程的政治化,以非党派方式增加法官人数变得非常困难。 乔什·格斯坦:讨论了扩大最高法院规模的政治可能性,指出这取决于时机和政治利益。他认为,在总统任期结束时提出这种改革方案,很难说服立法者将法官职位交给另一党派的总统。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did President Biden vow to veto the Judges Act?

President Biden vowed to veto the Judges Act, which aimed to create 63 new permanent judgeships, due to concerns about partisanship and the potential for future Republican presidents to fill these seats.

How many federal judges did Trump appoint in his first term?

Trump appointed 234 federal judges in his first term, which is more than any other recent president.

What is President Biden's approach to federal judge appointments?

President Biden has focused on diversity, appointing more judges of color and women than any of his predecessors, and prioritizing public defenders and other diverse expertise.

Why are there delays in the federal court system?

Delays in the federal court system are due to a lack of new judgeships, population growth, and increased litigation in certain areas like tech and business disputes.

What is the role of the Federalist Society in judicial appointments?

The Federalist Society was instrumental in recommending conservative judges for Trump's first term, but its influence is expected to wane in his second term.

How has the confirmation process for federal judges become politicized?

The confirmation process has become politicized with nominees often being blocked or delayed based on partisan lines, and votes frequently split along party lines.

What impact do federal judge appointments have on the court system?

Federal judge appointments shift the court system in one direction or another, reflecting the ideological preferences of the appointing president and influencing decisions on key issues like abortion, immigration, and civil rights.

What is the significance of the Judges Act?

The Judges Act aims to address the backlog of cases by creating 63 new permanent judgeships, which would help reduce delays and improve access to justice.

How does the Senate typically respond to judges who don't meet qualifications?

The Senate's response to unqualified judges has become more politicized, with both parties defending their nominees regardless of the American Bar Association's assessments.

What is the current debate around expanding the Supreme Court?

The debate around expanding the Supreme Court includes proposals to add six justices and implement term limits, but these ideas have largely been political nonstarters.

Chapters
The House passed a bill to create 63 new federal judgeships, addressing case backlogs. President Biden vowed to veto it, despite initial bipartisan support. The discussion covers the number of judges appointed by Presidents Trump and Biden, and the latter's focus on diversity in judicial appointments.
  • House passed a bill to create 63 new permanent judgeships
  • President Biden vowed to veto the bill
  • Trump appointed more judges than almost any president in history; Biden surpassed that number
  • Biden appointed more judges of color than any predecessor

Shownotes Transcript

Last week, the House passed a bill to create 63 new permanent judgeships. Case backlogs and delays have had many lawmakers saying we need more federal judges. If the bill did become law, President-elect Donald Trump would have 22 new seats to fill. The legislation originally had bipartisan support, but President Joe Biden vowed to veto it, with the support of many Democrats. In his first term, Trump put more judges in place than almost any president in history. Biden has made his mark too, surpassing that number. As of last week, he had also put more judges of color on the bench than any of his predecessors.Federal judges almost always serve life terms, meaning each of these picks can have lasting consequences for Americans.We look back and look ahead at our federal judiciary.Want to support 1A? Give to your local public radio station) and subscribe to this podcast. Have questions? Connect) with us. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a).Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices)NPR Privacy Policy)