The dodo's extinction was accelerated by human arrival in 1598, which brought hunting and the introduction of non-native animals like macaques, goats, deer, cattle, and pigs. These animals, especially the black rats, preyed on dodo eggs and chicks, leading to their rapid demise within a hundred years.
The concept of extinction emerged around the French Revolution because the decreasing influence of Christianity allowed scientists to consider the possibility that species could come and go. Prior to this, the idea was unthinkable, especially due to the belief in the great chain of being and the immortality of species.
Background extinction refers to the normal, slow rate of species disappearing, which is less frequent than speciation. Mass extinction, on the other hand, involves a sudden and rapid loss of a significant proportion of species over a geologically short period, leading to major transformations in Earth's biodiversity.
The Anthropocene is significant because it marks the current geological epoch where human activities have become a dominant force, causing significant changes to the environment and leading to a mass die-off of species. This epoch is characterized by land transformation, river damming, and atmospheric alteration through fossil fuel combustion and deforestation.
Todd May uses utilitarianism and deontology to consider human extinction. Utilitarianism weighs the overall happiness and suffering caused by humans, while deontology emphasizes the intrinsic value of human life and the duty to prevent harm to individuals, regardless of the overall consequences.
Ellie finds the comparison problematic because it suggests that the value of human cultural artifacts can outweigh the intrinsic value of animal life. She argues that this comparison is morally inconsistent, especially when it comes to the suffering of animals versus the preservation of inanimate objects.
May's book considers whether human existence brings more happiness than suffering to the world, the importance of human cultural experiences, and the significance of human life for current individuals. He also explores the ethical implications of human actions on future generations and non-human animals.
Critics argue that de-extinction technology is more about scientific curiosity and the 'coolness factor' than genuine conservation. Legal ambiguities around the status of de-extincted species and ethical concerns about the treatment of pregnant females and the potential for these organisms to become invasive species are also significant.
De-extinction technology might make us more cavalier because it suggests that extinction is not permanent, and we can 'undo' our mistakes. This could lead to a relaxed attitude toward conservation efforts and the protection of species, thinking we can always bring them back.
The ethical concern is that the de-extinct Pyrenean ibex lived only for 10 minutes before dying of respiratory failure, raising questions about the quality of life and the potential for suffering in these de-extinct organisms. Additionally, their legal status and protections are unclear, as they do not fit into existing categories of endangered species.
Dinosaurs, mammoths, ibexes, frogs: a great deal of animals have gone the way of the dodo. Are we next? And would the world be better off without us? In Episode 116 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk about extinction, from Christian eschatology, to the perils of Anthropocene, to cutting-edge de-extinction technology. They turn to animal ethics and scientific dilemmas in search of the ethical approaches that might equip us to think about the extinction of animals, and perhaps even our own. Plus, in the bonus, they talk love, cyborgs, tech bros, and the ethics of the future.Check out the episode's extended cut here!)Works DiscussedThom Van Dooren, Flight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of ExtinctionElizabeth Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural HistoryTodd May, *Should We Go Extinct?*Jacob Sherkow and Henry Greely, “What if Extinction is not Forever?”Émile Torres, Human Extinction: A History of the Science and Ethics of AnnihilationChildren of Men (2006) dir. Alfonso CuarónEpisode 46. Anti-Natalism **Modem Futura)**Modem Futura is your guide to the bold frontiers of tomorrow, where technology,... Listen on: Apple Podcasts) Spotify)
Support the show)
Patreon | patreon.com/overthinkpodcast) Website | overthinkpodcast.com)Instagram & Twitter | @overthink_pod)Email | [email protected])YouTube | Overthink podcast)