They accused her of stealing several thousand dollars from one of their wallets at a club where she worked as a host.
They claimed she died from a self-induced drug overdose, not from torture, and that they found her unresponsive when they returned home.
It added to the bizarre and gruesome nature of the crime scene, contrasting with the brutality of the acts committed there.
She was the only known eyewitness and provided crucial testimony about the events, including the torture and abuse Fan Man Yi endured.
They were found guilty of unlawful imprisonment, preventing a lawful burial, and manslaughter, but not murder. They were sentenced to life in prison.
Mainland authorities reached out to the triads, offering them legitimate business opportunities if they remained loyal, leading to a decrease in criminal activity.
They argued that without a definitive cause of death, the jury could not determine if their actions contributed to Fan Man Yi's death.
The defense claimed that drug use, particularly methamphetamine, contributed to the extreme violence and could have caused Fan Man Yi's death.
It occurred during a period of uncertainty and high-profile gang crimes, just before Hong Kong's handover from British to Chinese rule.
The public was outraged by the cruelty and brutality described, but the lack of a definitive cause of death led to a controversial verdict.
In May 1999, Hong Kong police found the scattered remains of a young mother in a flat in the city’s Kowloon district. The crime scene was like nothing anyone had seen before: unimaginable brutality set against a backdrop of Hello Kitty memorabilia. Investigators eventually pieced together a harrowing tale of abduction, torture, and immense suffering. But one question remained at trial: did a murder occur?
Keep up with us on Instagram @serialkillerspodcast)! Have a story to share? Email us at [email protected]).
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices)