Everything's Computer: Trump Bought A Tesla, Hallow App Celebrity Endorsements, Meta A.I. Slop + Carlos Eduardo Espina Speaks To Covering Immigration
01:13:36 Share

So it's a new year, 2025, and you're thinking, how am I going to make this year different? How am I going to build something for myself? I'm dying to be my own boss, or maybe I can turn this business idea I've been kicking around into a reality, but I don't know how to make it happen. Shopify is how you're going to make it happen. And let me tell you how.

The best time to start your new business is right now. Shopify makes it simple to create your brand, open for business, and get your first sale. Get your store up and running easily with thousands of customizable templates. No coding or design skills required. All you need to do is drag and drop. Their powerful social media tools let you connect all your channels, create shoppable posts, and help you sell everywhere people scroll. Shopify makes it easy to manage your growing business. They help with the details like shipping, taxes, and payments from one single dashboard, allowing you to focus on the important stuff like growing your business.

What happens if you don't act now? Will you regret it? What if someone beats you to the idea? Don't kick yourself when you hear this again in a year because you didn't do anything now. With Shopify, your first sale is closer than you think. Established in 2025 has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash betches, all lowercase. Go to shopify.com slash betches to start selling with Shopify today. Shopify.com slash betches.

Rise and shine, fever dreamers. Look alive, my friends. I'm V Spear. And I'm Sammy Sage. And this is American Fever Dream presented by Betches News. Where we explore the absurdities and oddities of our uniquely American experience.

Fever dreamy it is, as ever. It's a fever dreamy time of year too. We didn't celebrate it, but it was just Purim, which is my favorite Jewish holiday because it's like Jewish Halloween kind of. It's super fun. I love it. Yeah, it's a good time. It's mostly, you know, at this point celebrated by, you know, young children and the Orthodox. Yes.

And also college boys. I saw a lot of. Yeah, it's honestly the most for sure by miles, the most fun Jewish holiday. So I thought because I'm in my Catholic era right now, maybe this is why I was getting so many ads for this particular app. But it turns out, no, all of you are getting ads for the hollow app with Gwen Stefani.

I saw an article about it or someone posted about it. Maybe it was Kate Kennedy who posted about it being like, what is this? And I wrote to her.

It's Peter Thiel. It is. Well, let me tell you about it. So I knew here's the thing. When you, once a Catholic, always a curious, right? Because those gilded churches and the stained glass and the songs, they'll bring you back. And I was like, why, why is this happening to me? So Gwen Stefani didn't add recently for the hollow app, which is also running campaigns with Mark Wahlberg, the QAnon peddler, Jim Cavazel, uh,

anti-Semite and convicted abuser Mel Gibson and alleged rapist Russell Brandt. They all star in Holo app, little social media commercials. And Holo is kind of like a headspace or a calm relaxation app for people who like to chill to stories of fire and brimstone. You can do a prayer. That's quite a large market, actually. It's pretty big. You could do a prayer or they can read the Bible to you. Different people read the Bible to you. It is funded by

Republican super donor Peter Thiel and none other than vice president and couch connoisseur J.D. Vance. J.D. Vance also put money into this. Now, the premium version that's if you will, what's the premium version? The premium version of hollow is sixty nine dollars and ninety nine cents annually, which I think is on purpose. Oh,

What about so stupid? Or it's one hundred nineteen dollars and ninety nine cents for the friends and family pack. And as Chris Shell from selling Sunset and the Traders calls it, this is a pay to pray price. What do you think the number one one nine nine nine means? I don't know. But making that making it sixty nine dollars on a Catholic app is just like so stupid. You did that on purpose, you little freaks.

but they have money. Let me just say like Parker Posey said in the white Lotus last night, look at the Catholics, sexual deviance and organized religion can coexist. It's true. They're getting money though. It was the number one app for a while. Um,

And they had a Super Bowl ad, which is in addition to the He Gets Us ads, which is run by a different Catholic nutjob, David Green, who owns Hobby Lobby. Something about Hobby Lobby you might not know if you shop there is that David Green believes that devils live in barcodes, which is why there is no scanner at Hobby Lobby and they have to type in the price of everything. Why does he think that?

He just he decided that the devil is in the barcodes. This is the man who also funded the Museum of the Bible in D.C. He's a very this is like Chick-fil-A Hobby Lobby world. OK, but that's a different form of Catholic than the ones we're talking about. That's the he gets us Catholic. We are talking about the hollow app Catholics. So hollow got a bunch of celebrity endorsements. Gwen Stefani. Yes, which people were shocked by. But I am not because Gwen has always kind of like.

She always like is taking on somebody else's personality, right? Like she's not like inherently her own. So it makes sense to me that she would like be easily persuaded by the Catholics. I get it. I mean, did she grow up Catholic? That's kind of important. I think she grew up Christian, but she's Catholic now. So that's interesting. So is J.D. Vance. Yeah.

Well, they all converted. This is the thing. There was like a conversion. And let me get to that. So also making ads here is Madison Pruitt from The Bachelor, who levied her infamy as an openly virginal girl of God into being a TikTok evangelist. She's the one who says, yes, sex is great. But have you ever had a conversation with God in a TikTok? That was like very iconic. Mario Lopez, Mario Lopez from Saved by the Bell, AC Slater converted to Catholicism and

Um, and of course, Chris Pratt. Oh yes. Yeah. Nobody's excited about that. Married to Katherine Schwarzenegger. Yeah. No one's excited about that. But let me just, let me just say one thing about these ads. Um, it deeply upsets me that there's a, he gets us ad that uses a really good cover of the song personal Jesus. And I actually was like, Oh, I really like this. This is a great song. And I, um,

I regrettably realized it was part of that, but you know,

Look, I'm like, they can't get me. It's just Jew. Yeah. I'm like, you have the Jewish shield of light that keeps you. Yeah, exactly. Throughout the generations. I am at risk. I'm an at risk. You had me reading the Torah earlier on this show. I know I'm telling you and like, it's alluring. I get it. But Peter, the problem with the hollow app is not if you download it, because I'm sure a lot of people here do. And like, that's great. Do whichever you need to do to find peace or whatever. But no, no.

that because Peter Thiel is the co-founder of this, you are essentially giving your data to him, right? And he owns Palantir, which does work for the CIA and government agencies. They were also involved in the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

They also come back to later. We will. And Peter Thiel also funds the Tradwife Lifestyle Magazine EV. We've talked about here before. He has a period tracker called 28, which I know you're going to be like, oh, there's 28 days in cycle. Not in mine. And 28 is a known Nazi dog whistle. So, you know, it does make sense to be. It does. And now he has a prayer app. And he also wants to build techno feudalist.

Yes. So beware. Beware of him and beware, especially because as I got deeper into this, eventually it all like comes back around to Trump. So a lot of these celebrities had like a mental B and converted to Catholicism in like 2018, 2019. So right before the pandemic, but then got deep into conspiracy theory during the pandemic.

I don't know why then. I think it was like coming off the end of Trump's first term. Christian nationalism was kind of becoming a thing. Did the devil possess them via barcode? It might have been. Probably. I think it's because the Christians finally let the Catholics be involved. They usually don't. Yeah, people were bucking the Pope. The Pope was like being super lib back then. And I think that it was just getting weird. Well, this one was, but he was like getting super libby. It was coming off of like...

you know, it was like coming off of gay marriage being legalized and like, it was those little time. Yeah, I guess so. Okay. Yes. You know what? The problem is Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon is a big Catholic

and he has a connection to the app as well. When Trump lost in 2020, Steve Bannon transformed his War Room podcast into a stop-the-steal machine. Catholic groups normally focused on abortion or religious liberty joined lawsuits to block Biden's certification. This is where you get Nick Fuentes and the Gripers movement that did the Million Maga March shouting Christ is King. A Texas bishop addressed the carnival-esque December 2020 Jericho March. Um...

And then remember on January 6th, a Nebraska Catholic priest exercised the Capitol. So is that the problem? Yeah, we were having, we were doing exorcisms at the Capitol. Maybe that's why everything is so cursed. It was actual demons. I'm just spooked as a person who was raised Catholic and actually had like a pretty decent Catholic experience. I, it wasn't bad. Um, and I like the music and I like the priest outfits I think are so like Catholic.

They're kind of cunty and I love them. But, and like the stained glass and the history. So my name is Vitus. Okay. It's a saint's name. Like it's a real thing. Okay. Like I'm, I'm, I'm very at risk. I'm an at-risk Catholic youth.

But I don't like that these are the people being involved in it because when I think of Catholic, I think of like the badass nuns that did protests and like the ways that like there's a whole like history of nuns that is super fucking dope that we don't talk about enough. And I want them to get their credit. The nuns that saved the Von Trapps and the Sound of Music. Yes. And also Sister Act. Yes.

OK, like these were the good Catholic things. OK, and now I'm like, oh, God, Steve Bannon, way to ruin it. Well, let me just say one thing to watch is the conflict between Steve Bannon, who does seem to have that like religious awareness of the soul, at least more than Elon Musk. And that's why they they conflict, because Steve Bannon is not into this techno feudal thing.

Like he thinks that that's dangerous to humanity. So he has that slight ideological difference, but you know, for, for all intents and purposes, not a great situation in either of their ideal worlds. But also I think what this really points to is, and you think about how some of these, how many celebrities stumble upon this,

being religious. And we had actually spoken about this in the Marianne Williamson episode, in case anyone was too busy protesting that. You'll hear this, you'll hear a sneak peek of what we discussed there, which was that my theory on all of this is that what organized religion does, and it's built through patriarchal structures, like you don't look at, there's no religion where like women are in charge. And they basically, in my view, kind of use

in some cases exploit the natural human tendency to connect with a higher power, whether you want to call it God, whether you want to call it no matter what you want to call it, Jesus, the idea that there's like a high, like the idea that there's something greater than just what we can see with our five senses and what the, these organized religions basically end up doing and the way that, you know, these leaders operate,

who were forming these organized religions, the way that they...

created control over the population was basically trying to tell, like telling people like you have to do these things and you have to obey these people in order to access your connection with God or this spiritual being or whatever it is. So it makes sense that in a time when people are trying to consolidate power, that they are using religion and that they are like, you

culturally injecting or injecting religion, religiosity into culture so that they can

bring more people over to their ideological side. It's so crazy that, you know, in the 60s, they were worried about John F. Kennedy being president because they were afraid of him being Catholic and that he would like defer to the Vatican. And now we have like Steve Bannon being one of Trump's closest advisors, Mel Gibson being a longtime friend and advisor of Trump. Trump's own former spiritual advisor, Robert Morris, a megachurch pastor from Texas, was indicted for child sex crimes literally last week. So...

It's not great. It's not good. And then there's, you know, and we are like the Pope is like hanging on by a thread right now, but they're looking at new Popes and the most popular, if you want to call them that American Pope is Cardinal American Pope, American priest is Cardinal Burke, who is deeply Christo fastest and deeply hates women. He said that allowing little girls to serve as like altar servers, um,

was like part of ruining the history and tradition of the church and that it should only be altar boys and there should be no role at all for women in the church other than as like silent nuns. And I'm like, go watch Conclave and shut up, brother. Anyway, that's our little Catholic diversion for this time between St. Patrick's Day and Easter.

Am I a propagandist? A truth teller? An influencer? There's probably no more contested profession in the world today than mine, journalism. I'm Brian Reed, and on my show, Question Everything, we dive headfirst into the conflicts we're all facing over truth and who gets to tell it. Listen now to Question Everything, part of the NPR Podcast Network.

It's tourney time. And with FanDuel's dog of the day, you can get a daily profit boost during the college conference championships to bet on any underdog. So get ready to celebrate some upsets. No one saw that coming. Except for me, baby. 21 plus and present in select states. Opt-in required. Minimum plus 100 eyes required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable profit boost tokens. Restrictions apply, including token expiration and max wage or amount. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Welcome back, friends. Speaking of things you should say a prayer before doing, Donald Trump bought a new car. And perhaps thoughts and prayers to him before he or anyone he knows or loves gives it a drive.

Can you talk about this Tesla purchase? Well, first we have to talk about the fever dream that was the happy Honda days event on the White House lawn. Did you happen to catch that? Yes, it was truly insane. Like he's not even good at selling the car though either. He didn't really know anything about it. He had his little cheat sheet of notes there. Like, I mean, that was just,

just that was a fever dream. I mean, he's basically, uh, this was an attempt to drive up Tesla sales, which are down 6% in the U S from last February, down 75% in Europe. Can't imagine why. And then 65% in Australia so far this year, the only place bucking the trend. Cause I want to be a fair and balanced reporter is in the UK where they're actually up 20% since last February, but the stock price is also, uh,

stock price has also fallen by half since its peak right after the election.

And, you know, did you see his event on the White House? I did. And for being a guy who's like, I hate e-vehicles, we're bringing back fossil fuel. We want American made trucks. All of a sudden now you're trying to get your people to buy Teslas. One, they're too expensive. They're not going to. Nobody's spending 80, 90, 100 thousand dollars on an e-vehicle that's voting for Trump. OK, they already have the F-350 lifted trucks that are wrapped. They can't afford another vehicle. I also thought he hates them. But then he was like so amazed. Right.

It's a computer. Everything's computer. I love Tesla. I love Tesla. So he bought the Model S Plaid Edition model. I don't know. I don't know how to talk about cars. Or as he calls it, the red one. The red one.

It's a high performance electric vehicle. Now, here's the thing. This man does not drive. No, I've never seen him drive ever. No, not even like for in the 80s. He had a limo driver. Yeah, I don't think he's ever driven. Right. Everything I've seen of him. He has had someone drive. Does he even have a driver's license? I really don't know. I don't know. I've never seen him drive ever, ever, ever. He lives in Manhattan. He didn't drive.

Right. But like he had other houses. He drove. Yeah. He had drivers and stuff. Right. That's what I'm thinking. Like he didn't bother. Um, and along that line, along in that vein, I was also reflecting on his obsession with the word groceries and why he was like talking about how great that was during the campaign, which I found odd. And I realized he's probably, uh,

maybe never gone grocery shopping, but also I doubt he's ever eaten in a setting where the food was not served to him, like unwrapped and prepared. Like has he ever made himself a snack? Oh, has he ever like grabbed an apple out the fridge? That's what I'm saying. Like grabbed a couple of peanuts on it. He's never had girl dinner. He never has ever, never literally never asshole. Well done steak and ketchup every night. Yeah. He's probably never like thrown a bag of popcorn in the microwave or like

put together some chicken nuggets for his kids or something. No, no chance. Certainly not. But yeah, no. Has he ever made a sandwich? No. How many sandwiches have you made for me? None. I also, okay. So I feel like people are reporting that he bought the car, but they're not. So he paid $90,000, but they're not necessarily reporting with the exception of Wired that it has 37 recall notices against it.

for a whole host of things. Like, I don't know if, if you combine them all, like you might have the whole car there's including, there were issues with the seatbelt warning system, malfunctioning issues with the everything's computer circuit board, airbag problems, faulty door handles, warped brake discs, and unexpected speed and lane changes. Yeah.

I also put in reporting in the morning announcements yesterday about how Attorney General Pam Bondi is coming to the defense of Tesla dealerships and vehicles that have suffered the consequences of Americans' anger towards Elon Musk. But they do have one defender, and it is Kim Kardashian. Oh, my God. Have you seen her photo shoot with a Cybertruck? See?

Do you think she's getting paid or just paid in Tesla robots? You know, I, I don't know. But one thing I do know about the Kardashians is they don't decide anything willy nilly and they do decide to do bad stuff even sometimes if it'll benefit them. Right. So I can't imagine what the value is for her to do this. Um,

I think they

think that you think they're much more discerning about things than they are yeah they will take the money and anytime but i wonder if she got money this is like a decidedly stupid thing to do i believe i would get she got money and i don't think she thinks it's a stupid thing to do i think she thinks oh this is where the culture is so i can finally unmask my true ideologies

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. It's tax season, and we're all a bit tired of numbers. But here's one you need to hear. $16.5 billion. That's how much the IRS flagged for possible identity fraud last year. Now here's a good number. $100 million. That's how many data points LifeLock monitors every second. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it. Guaranteed. Save up to 40% your first year at LifeLock.com slash podcast. Terms apply.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well, with the Name Your Price tool from Progressive, you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills. Try it at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states.

Welcome back, friends. I hope during the break you said three Hail Marys to forgive yourself of all your sins. I know I did. Sammy. Sammy's already one of the chosen ones. She doesn't have to repent. Thank you. Thank you. Oh, my God. Girl, we have another thing to talk about. That is just another fever dream disaster. Once again, frequent guest of the show, Mark, not Wahlberg, but Zuckerberg. We'll be talking about next.

Speaking of trying to keep things a secret, cloistered. He'd like this next thing to be cloistered away. But he really Streisand affected himself, to be honest. I spent the weekend reading a book I could not put down. Was it Rage Prayers? Because that's what I was reading. I don't even know what that is.

It was not the Bible. It's this new book that just came out called Careless People written by a former employee of Facebook named Sarah Wynn Williams. She was employed at Facebook for seven years around 2010 through 2017 and worked on their global policy team. So that became a highly relevant department during the time she was there.

And her book essentially gives all these really deep insights into how the company developed during that time, which very much shaped where Mark Zuckerberg and Meta are now. And you mentioned Cloistered. If you haven't heard of this book, that was by design because the author and the publisher kept it under wraps because they correctly anticipated that Meta would be quite unhappy with

with this book and make efforts to block it, which they actually have. They sued and an arbitrator agreed to block the publisher and the author from promoting the book. Wow. Technically. But it seems that they're still publishing it. They're still putting it out there. And if anything, it actually just made it more popular because the book was number one on Amazon on Sunday night. And,

And that is well-deserved because I literally just, I couldn't put it down. Well, I did not read the book because, you know, Catholics don't read. We are read too. So tell me, Sammy, what was it about? Just give us the sermon.

Okay, I'm going to give you a top line summary that comes from the intro because I think it really explains it and it's in her words. She says,

By the end, I watched hopelessly as they sucked up to authoritarian regimes like China's and casually misled the public. I was on a private jet with Mark the day he finally understood that Facebook probably did put Donald Trump in the White House and came to his own dark conclusions from there.

But most days working on policy at Facebook was way less like enacting a chapter for Machiavelli and way more like watching a bunch of 14 year olds who had been given superpowers and an ungodly amount of money as they jet around the world to figure out what power has bought and brought them. Yeah, that tracks.

This is the thing. I hate when people think that just because somebody has money, they're smart or they're like somehow all knowing or good. Like a lot of times they failed up. A lot of times they just got a big investment and it shook out and it was fun. And that's where we're at. I think this makes sense to me. I wouldn't necessarily say that he failed up, but I would say that he was...

Someone who got extremely lucky in the way that he got lightning in a bottle, wrestled the company away from his partners and the idea. And then basically, I think because these VCs, largely from this PayPal mafia, 90s tech generation, it seems like they kind of

knew what they were doing because they had done it before. And they carried him along to billionairesville because they knew that he had something and that they could make it huge. You know what else I think they might've liked about him now that we're seeing it more and more is they like the idea of a dropout.

The fact that he got into Harvard, but then he dropped out because this idea of like education is shit. Nobody needs to go to college is very popular right now from people who did go to college or went to college and dropped out because they got some sort of early investment. And I'm going to bet that this at the time furthered that narrative that like Curtis Yarvin, like tech bro bullshit that like education and academia is like worthless. Look at this guy. He was a dropout and he did so great.

But he got in. We need you to know he's smart. He got in Harvard, but he didn't need it. He got there and realized he was too good. Right. Yeah. I mean, I think there's complexity to it because-

you know, Bill Gates was a dropout. There's, there's, there's this genius dropout. Right, right. Exactly. When there's a lot of luck and other things involved in this, but the, let me just say what, as a specific anecdote that I think was kind of emblematic of the journey she went on. So the author, Sarah described how the company had changed in the years culturally from when she started and when she left. And she says that when she started, um,

people were like super close and it was idealistic. And ultimately it just became about growth at all costs and laws and morals and human lives kind of be damned. And

And she describes a situation like during her last year there where an employee had a seizure in the middle of the open floor plan at the Metta office or the Facebook office at the time. And everyone just ignored her and her own manager, like didn't say her name. Like she was just like, Oh, she's just a contractor. And it just became for me, that was like a really salient anecdote that was very emblematic of the carelessness and how people just do not give a fuck at all. It seems like,

So, yeah, it's just wild. I hate meta a little bit more every single day, but... Well, get ready for everything I'm about to tell you. I logged into my Facebook this morning because I hadn't in so long and I had to make sure that we were syndicating under the desk over there. And I'll tell you, it gives me... It was a jump scare. Maybe I... I don't know. Maybe it was a bad idea. There's a lot of AI slop over there. Yeah. But let me just give you the background because I'm going to break down a lot of...

So the author... Good, because I will never read this book. So thank you for this. Look, here I am reading to you. The author, Sarah Wynn Williams, she was a former diplomat from New Zealand and she was born there. And she was an early user of Facebook when it was first ascendant. And she immediately recognized it as like this game changing tool and ultimately a tool for political communication that could be used either for really good things or really bad things.

And she ended up working there because she was such a huge evangelist for the company that... And saw so much potential that she like...

basically stalked them to get this job. You know, she really tried to get a job. I mean, as lots of people do when they really want to work somewhere. So she eventually saw that the company had hired a vice president of global public policy. And then she continued pitching herself repeatedly over the course of the year to that person before they even seemed to recognize that they were this engine for political communication. Yeah.

And they basically were like, why would Facebook ever need a diplomat? And what happened was her, the author's sister was like, went missing for several hours during an earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand. And she was able to eventually like figure out where she was because of Facebook and people were able to keep in touch. And that's what she pitched to the company. Like that was like her last Hail Mary speaking of like,

To try to get a job. And she pitched her own job to them. Eventually, they hire her and let her start. And her job is to handle basically any meetings with foreign heads of state, which at the time were not many cared about that yet, but it was on the way.

And at the time, their priority was growth. And it still is, obviously. But they didn't have enough users that they had not like run out. Like once they got to a billion users, they had to start getting into like some sketchy places. Like they didn't start to care about global policy more broadly or about courting foreign leaders until they basically ran out of users that they could get in conversations.

countries where Facebook had an easy time entering. After about a billion users, they basically ran out of users that they could add onto the platform without tapping into more complicated markets like China, India, places with big populations that were more tricky either because they don't have internet access there. It's incompatible.

The tech is incompatible. People don't have smartphones. The costs are prohibitive for users. The culture of those areas was one of state censorship. So to give people a digital town square who are not used to communicating directly with each other and fact finding and truth telling it, obviously, as we know, it causes

It like broke societies in some places. Yeah. And basically she was there for the situation with Myanmar and she breaks down exactly how and why that was able to happen. And what happened in Myanmar was really basically a result of Mark wanting to a push into places because they had a pretty big market. I believe it was either 40 million or 60 million people live there.

And he was saying in those days, like he wants to find a way to connect everyone in the globe and even remote places without internet access. And he was pushing this really idealistic version. But like you said, when there's places where

The society is not stable. The government's not stable. Like that can result in a really big problems. And especially when that's the only internet, like Facebook was the internet. That was their Google, their internet, everything. Right. Yeah. So her job became much more important as, as,

you know, as they're growing and getting into foreign countries that become more a little sticky. But also even right kind of in the beginning of when she started, Facebook already had issues with some foreign countries. So like Germany had big issues with their data privacy policies and their content moderation policies. And they were like never buying the bullshit about connecting people and all that stuff. But overall, she started...

out in a way that she needed to convince them that they needed her. And she eventually becomes extremely important because she's working directly with Mark and Cheryl and a guy named Joel Kaplan, who is currently the president of global affairs at Meta. Very powerful guy. And he's really a very interesting and critical figure in the book. So Joel Kaplan, he became the author's boss at Facebook.

He was also Cheryl's ex-boyfriend at Harvard. No conflict. No conflict. That's fine. Well, it's interesting you say that because something I didn't necessarily realize about the leadership at Facebook was that it was very incestuous. Really? Yeah.

She, this is a, there was a good passage that I thought explained it. By now I've realized that Facebook's leadership includes a web of people all entangled as bridesmaids, best friends, neighbors, and exes. Their fealty is seemingly to each other ahead of any ideology or anything else. Their past, presence, and futures are all deeply intertwined in a way that mine are not.

They hire each other for jobs with big salaries, responsible for each other's promotions and bonuses. A tiny and meshed group of people increasingly responsible for shaping the attention of billions. Their preferences turned into policy. I have to tell you, as a person who worked at a startup, I,

That tracks, right? That, that does feel like so real, especially when you get hired at a high level or you have like a special job and then you're trying to work with people who were like college buddies or that, or that dated each other in particular. In my experience, if people had dated each other, you always feel on the outside because when you, the problem I had with that, that I'm sure she had too, is like, no matter how late you stay at the office, you never stay late enough to go home with them.

And so when you work for a team that like either lives together like they all were or used to date or was currently dating, no matter how much work I put in, come 11 o'clock, midnight, whatever it was, I went home and they went home together. And then we'd come in the next morning and was like everything we worked on was gone because over the night they were with each other and they would like influence each other's decisions.

Based on preference, not on stats. Yeah. That's exactly the position she was in. Yep. And she was dealing with some of the most consequential world issues that there are. Yeah. So let's talk about Joel Kaplan for a second. Oh, Joel. Are you familiar with the Brooks Brothers riot? Vaguely. It's like ringing a bell, but I'm not like getting it. It's not coming back to me. So in the 2000 election, in case this was before any listeners time, there was this demonstration in,

of hundreds of people, including Republican staffers, hence the nickname because they were dressed fancy. They stormed into a meeting of election canvassers in Miami-Dade County where votes for the Bush-Gore election were being recounted with the goal of shutting down the recount. So like early January 6th inspiration. And they were actually successful in getting the recount shut down early. There's actually an HBO movie about it called...

And Joel, too, went to Harvard. That's where he dated Sheryl Sandberg. And interestingly, he actually was sitting two rows behind Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings. Oh, no. Yeah. The author describes him as being over time extremely creepy to her, making comments about her body, her husband, sending her inappropriate texts.

After she had a very traumatic birth where she ended up in a coma, he asked her where she was bleeding from. And she also claims that he grinded with her on the dance floor during a company party and that many people saw. He's much older than Mark and them, though. Significantly older than like the young people who would have been working there. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. And I mean, he made her work on maternity leave and she basically this was kind of the thing that got her fired in the end was that she wanted to like move off his team. She had voiced a complaint about the sexual harassment. They opened up an investigation, didn't actually get all her evidence, cleared him. And essentially she gets fired for performance, right?

Um, but she had also been putting up like complaints and, you know, being resistant. So, well, yeah, if he hangs with, uh, Kavanaugh or is at least, you know, on that side of Harvard, I'd imagine that he's not a great guy. We know that he, I know that he's like a very conservative voice and kind of gross in that way. So, yeah.

Yeah. I mean, he's also the person who got the company into political advertising because he didn't want the policy team to be a cost center of the business. So he used it to sell political ads. And then that over time led Mark to realize that the way to grow power and to prevent politicians from regulating them in any country is to make them reliant on Facebook to both communicate with their audiences and to win elections. So the more they cozy up, the better. Yeah.

Yeah. And homeboy used to work for George Bush. So like, yeah, hence the Brooks brothers riot. Yeah. And I think the real point of the book is that having guys like Joel Kaplan and Mark Zuckerberg, who are seemingly quite amoral,

these decisions and it's really problematic. That's really like the story. It's like really bad to have such careless people working on such a consequential platform. So she tells like a bunch of anecdotes with how Facebook interface with various countries. And like, all I can say is that they just seemed like the worst stereotypes of ignorant Americans ever. Like Joel Kaplan didn't know Taiwan was an island.

Something that you might think that a Harvard grad working in Facebook's global policy with a focus on China might know. They also just like she said, they basically refuse to enforce laws in foreign countries unless the governments would take very specific and strict measures to regulate them, which then they would complain about and try to use leverage to undo. Mm hmm.

And the common thread is that they just continually pissed off other people, you know, other leaders due to their extreme insensitivity. The other thing that I find quite concerning and symptomatic of their flippancy towards everything is that they were very much okay with letting their own employees get arrested in foreign countries. So I'll give an example.

Mark Zuckerberg wanted to travel to South Korea, but there was an arrest warrant out for him and Sheryl Sandberg there. Really? Because, yeah, because, and the reason is sort of stupid. The gaming authority there had written to the company requiring them to submit the games on their platform to be raided by the government.

And the South Koreans basically said that they ignored the letter and thus the arrest warrants. And so they wanted to test out to see if South Korea would actually act on something if they went there. So they sent a lower level employee to test out if they would get arrested when they traveled there. And then once they didn't get arrested, they realized the coast was clear so they could send Mark on his little tour. This is stupid. They basically perceive...

an employee arrest as the cost of doing business. Did anybody like, did this happen a lot? Like, so there was an, there was an employee that was sent to jail in Brazil as a result of the company's actions. Mark then puts up a whole Facebook post about how amazing this employee is that he would sacrifice for the company's mission. He calls it a heartwarming story. This employee being in jail.

Then a while later, Mark and this employee who is now the company's vice president of Latin America. Okay. They're together in Peru at like a conference and there, and the, that guy obviously wants to meet Mark Zuckerberg. Mark Zuckerberg snubs him.

Because he's too busy chasing Xi Jinping around. Mark Zuckerberg tried to arrange to have his like green room staging area next to Xi Jinping so that he could have a run in with him. Oh my God. Because he was just, he had an obsession with him. He wants a little meet cute, a little Hallmark moment with Xi Jinping. Exactly. And what Xi Jinping did was he had his guards build a wall of people.

So that Mark Zuckerberg, he could walk in without Mark Zuckerberg getting to him. Oh my God. That's crazy. I would. Okay. Number one,

Has Mark Zuckerberg never seen the Claire Danes movie Broken Down Palace? You don't send Americans to get arrested in other countries and think it's going to turn out OK. No, I think he doesn't care if it turns out OK. He doesn't care. OK. That movie scared me so bad I didn't get a passport till I was like 25. And the obsession with Xi Jinping and creating a wall around him is truly wild, like the Great Wall of China security. Right.

Literally, he was really desperate to get a photo with Xi Jinping. At one point, he did post a photo of him and Xi Jinping, but he violated the rule. But in another example of their cultural insensitivity.

He violated the norms by posting a photo where it's, it was him from face on and Xi from the behind. And that's like a big no-no. Yeah. But he did it anyway. To top that, at a state dinner at the White House, he once asked Xi Jinping in Mandarin if Xi would do him the honor of naming his unborn child for him. What?

The most embarrassing part is that Xi Jinping declined. That's crazy. Number one. Number two, I know that Mark Zuckerberg is married to Priscilla Chan. Does he does he have like a is this like a fetish thing for it? Like what is his obsession? My understanding with China is it's about growth for Facebook.

It's actually, you know, I can talk about that now. He is dying to get into China because of the growth potential. There's a whole three year longer project called Project Aldrin that that was what they named their approach again to China. They would, and this is, the author basically said her

Her line was that even though she was working on pretty much every foreign country and their department was growing so that people were taking different regions, she refused to work on China. She's like, I won't get mixed up in that. Because she knew that it was really walking a line. It's illegal in the United States that they would have to make concessions to the CCP in order to be operating there.

which is also brings up why TikTok was so problematic. I know. They so badly wanted to get into China that they would make compromises to assist the CCP around content moderation, suspending activist accounts, building software for them to help them censor and giving them data access. She was also tasked with hiring the company's lead in China. And basically because

They can't technically operate, but they would find other ways to operate. They would hire people. China was their second largest market and provided 10% of their revenue because advertisers were buying ads. Chinese advertisers were buying ads outside China. So they were like, this is so much money at stake that is on the table. And they're also, because they're a public company or because they became one,

Like the stock price, it's not just driven by like the absolute profits. It's driven by the stock price and people's belief about how the company will do and will it be able to have this growth. Right. And yeah,

They had office space there. They basically like were fully operating there. They knew they were illicitly operating and they misled Congress about it. She also describes how they prepared for their congressional hearings and essentially that the lawmakers would have to know how to word a question exactly in order to get the true answer, which is not possible because...

It's like a very technical. Remember the incident, the situation I talked about in Peru with Xi Jinping. So that was a conference in Peru. And at the time there was a risk of Zika to anyone who wanted to get pregnant. Oh, right. And Mark wanted to have a baby at this time. Right. So he had the conference construct a private Zika bubble on site so that he would not have to risk being around mosquitoes. Right.

But he left the Zika bubble at one point so that he could meet Obama. Oh, my God. And this meeting arguably changed the course of history, similar to how the White House Correspondents Dinner did. Ugh.

Obama made the joke about Trump. And it was, it was ultimately through his interactions with world leaders and wanting to kind of get the shine of being as powerful as one of them that he got into politics. Like, like I said, the author had to convince them that politics was relevant to them at all as a whole company. And, and,

he took basically no interest in politics or anything until one day he went on a trip to Indonesia. He took this big trip to Southeast Asia, to Asia. And he was doing one of these tours with the Indonesian president elect who was very popular. And Zuckerberg just loved the thrill of the fandom. She tells this story where

He wanted to set up a situation where he could be like gently mobbed, like a beloved world leader. And he just loved it. She said he kept going on about like how big the crowd was. And after that, he wanted to be positioned near and similarly to these world leaders. And.

This was the this was the making of the political celebrity that wasn't a Kennedy, though, also, because back in 2012, even which I imagine is around the time that this is happening. He Facebook did big parties for the DNC, huge parties for the RNC. They were like very involved with politics and trying to get like young, cool stuff going on with them.

I don't know if that was about politics as much as share as about culture. They were like about culture, right? But it was about the creation of the political celebrity, right? Obama was really a political celebrity and then it became like cool to be a politician. And now we see politicians broadly act like celebrities. They do cameo. They do like all kinds. They write books and go on book tours and they act like celebrities in a way that's very different. They have podcasts in a way that's very different from the way that it was before. Mark Zuckerberg.

and Trump have way more in common than I realized. Bad poofy hair. Bad style. Okay. Weird tans. Weird tans. So Zuckerberg's favorite president, I learned, is Andrew Jackson. No. Yeah.

They, again, and I will blame musical theater. I don't know if he saw the play, but he might have. Broadway came out with a musical in the early 2000s called Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson that very much painted Andrew Jackson as this like cool guy who got orphaned at nine years old and like fucking ride or die, man. He could do this.

whatever he wanted. He was like a rock star. They completely left out all the bad stuff about him and just made it about this like deeply flawed, cool guy that nobody understands and like the ways that he improved this country because he was such a patriot and whatnot. Now I'm going to blame the musical for why Mark Zuckerberg likes him, but I, I really hope that by the end of this era, we do not. I really hope cruelty. I really hope that by the end of this era, we do not end up with a play about how Hitler had a painting career.

And loved dogs and was vegetarian. Yeah, all of that shit. That's the thing. This bloody, bloody Andrew Jackson should have never been made. But it was at the time widely accepted. They did it on the Tonys. Now you don't see it show up anymore. So go looking for it. But interesting. Bad ideas. Well, they called it bloody, bloody for bloody, bloody Andrew Jackson. Yeah. But it was about how he was just like this genius guy. And he was like a rebel. It was very like pop punk musical. Yeah.

Right. Which is very much fight, fight, fight. Propaganda. Propaganda from the musical theater people. Yes. Indeed. But okay. So Zuckerberg was really taken by this crowd size thing, much like our friend. This demand for endless growth, this obsession with size and raw power. In 2017, Zuckerberg was,

which supposedly was running, considering running for president. And he said he wanted to travel to all the swing States. Cause once he saw that Trump could do it. Yeah. He thought that he could too. Yeah. Also. And I think this is very interesting.

He dug in especially hard that Facebook did not change the 2016 election after Obama essentially dressed him down in a private interaction, the one where he escaped the Zika bubble to go meet with him. And Obama told him that he wasn't taking misinformation and fake news on the platform seriously enough and that it was playing a destructive role globally. He said this to him after the 2016 election and he was supposedly really, really mad and that like made him double down.

And what's crazy is that all of this, so much of this book revolved around a guy who also was trying to stop the 2000 election from being counted. It's like they all come from the same, they all come from the same hovel. Yeah. Yeah. A hovel. Yeah.

No, it's because they think populism is like cool and makes them like counterculture interesting. It's also why they like Andrew Jackson and that musical, which has a song, a number called Populism. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. But in all of this, right. And we know that there's so much more to this book. People should read it. It's called Careless People because it gets into the nitty gritty of some of the other like fuckery that he did. Like how they make deals with foreign leaders to evade taxes, right?

Reduce their taxes. Oh, and all the details of what happened in Myanmar, like how they had no content moderation during this war. Yeah. During the war. And they also couldn't see the Burmese characters anywhere outside of Myanmar. It just was so careless. And yet they're hiring swaths of people to work in China. Well, what I'm missing from this story, and I'm leaning in to ask-

Where is Sheryl Sandberg? Oh, wow. There are so many weird things about her. They talk about her in it too? A lot. I mean, she seems quite different from Mark. Very much the adult in the room. Very charming. She's like 20 years older. Yeah. Yeah. And she's able to turn the charm on and off at will. Okay. Very much so. What they do seem to have in common is a big star fucker energy. Yeah. There are so many anecdotes of them both wanting to use...

their position or their events to get pictures with certain people or promote their fan foundations or their books or whatever, but really especially her. Ultimately, she no longer is at Facebook because of in part accusations that she had misused company resources for her own benefit. The lean in, the lean in shtick. I mean, that is...

It doesn't seem like it was really all that, but she claimed it was. I always thought it was weird that she had this like lean in, like listen to me thing when she was obviously like wildly powerful. Like it wasn't like she was some meek leader from behind, like silent figure person. I mean, her whole thing is about how women should kind of bring their whole selves to work and they should like...

Try it. Was that what it was? And, and how Facebook was so good to mothers. And basically what you learn from the story is that they are, everyone at Facebook is expected to parent invisibly. Right. The way she told the way she told the story, like they basically were like, you have to get a nanny. Again. A Filipina nanny. Right.

Right. As a person who worked at a startup, I'm going to tell you, the executives say that shit. They say, bring your whole self. We bring our kids. We bring our dogs. And then fucking people like me who were low on the totem pole end up babysitting, nannying, and cleaning up dog piss all day in addition to your job because they've brought their whole self to work. And the folks making like $42,000 a year are like, ugh.

I guess I'm the nanny now because you want to do everything you can to please those higher ups, but it never ends up working out for you. I lasted about six months at this job. It did not go well. Startup life, I would not say. Startup life. I'm glad I did it for the culture. But yeah, when they say bring your whole self, they mean and then dump it on other people. Yeah.

Yeah. And it's, I mean, I think what their thing is, they didn't mean bring your whole self at all. It was like, pretend that none of that exists and only work all the time. It was like, it wasn't even saying that it was like, they basically, even she basically said, like, I put everything ahead.

Yeah. Cause they're looking for that dopamine hit. They're looking for that next thing. What's coming in on the Blackberry? What is being tweeted about? How many users do we have today? What foreign leader am I meeting with? Uh, what cool activation do I have? Who's the new hire? Who's got fired? All of that is like a dopamine adrenaline rush for them. So they want to be in that zone the whole time. That's why they started doing like kitchens. This is what I learned in my chef world. When we started doing kitchens for Google and everybody else, it was to keep them there longer because it was like, Oh, my needs are met. My needs are met. I,

I live in a company town. Yeah. Oh, absolutely. They would do their dry cleaning, like make it easy for them to be there. So the story that's getting a lot of tabloid play is that Sheryl Sandberg sort of Sandberg commanded the author to like come to bed with her on their private jet while they were flying overnight. And,

She'd said that her assistant had slept over many times, but she kept refusing because she like had to do work overnight, which was true. And then after that, her relationship with Cheryl was never the same because Cheryl had quote unspoken rules about obedience and closeness and people closest to her were rewarded.

And there's this one anecdote that I'm just going to read exactly what it said in the book. And you tell me how you interpret this. I'm already getting like scrunchy, Heine. I'm already scared. So she bought her. So she instructed her assistant to buy lingerie for both of them. The assistant buys $13,000 worth of lingerie, $3,000 for herself and $10,000 for Cheryl. And this is the passage.

When Sadie, the assistant, tries on one of the bras that Cheryl purchased for the first time, she emails her, this bra is incredibly beautiful and fits perfectly. So grateful. This is my breasts equivalent of flying privately for the first time. Cheryl responds, happy to treat your breasts as they should be treated.

Sadie confides that she never spent this much on a single item of underwear in her life, messaging Cheryl that the experience is a total pretty woman moment. I feel like the fanciest 26-year-old in the world. Cheryl responds by asking her 26-year-old assistant to come over to her house to try on the underwear and have dinner. Later, the invite becomes one to stay over.

What are you reading about that?

Look, there are other ways to show appreciation for your assistant. And this is not one. And this is where they say like, oh, men are creepy. If a man did this, you know, it'd be very obviously creepy because it's her. It's like, oh, it's a sisterhood. Lovely thing. Now, I think it's creepy. Although I did have a boss who bought me Tom Ford sunglasses after making me cry one time. So I'm all for getting really expensive gifts from your fancy rich bosses. Just not underwear that you have to try on for them. But like buy him some Tom Ford sunglasses. But I'm not a fan of Tom Ford sunglasses.

Buy him some Tory Burch flip flops. Buy him like even buying them a massage, I think is a little bit too much because now we're getting into intimate spa care type stuff. We're not there at the massage. I'm just saying it's a little like, OK, but but this to say your breasts deserve to fly private is just.

I can't see him. He invited her over. No, I would die. I would absolutely. Here's the thing. There are a lot of things that I can handle in life. Being uncomfortable with like an older woman doing something weird sex at me. It's like as a lesbian, you would think I'd have experience with this. I don't. I freeze and panic and cry every single time. I cannot. I cannot imagine being this girl. And I'm sure our listeners have stories about weird shit that happened. And like I said, it's,

She bought me Tom Ford sunglasses after making me cry. This is like the gossipy part of it. Yeah. I mean, maybe not depending on what actually happened. But the fact is that there's...

quite irresponsible people running quite a consequential platform. People who are missing intimacy and a personal life because they've made their work their entire life. And those, those boundaries blend too much. And now you're doing sleepovers with your assistant and treating each other like maybe best gal pals or even dating partners in a little bit of an intimacy way here. But like that is a direct consequence.

symptom of the root cause of you not having a separation of your personal and business life. And that's bad. Yes. And benefits the company. Yeah. Anyway, let's go return to our personal lives and get off this recording. I know I want to go like, uh, you know, watch myself in holy water after that one. Everybody say three more Hail Mary's.

Up next, we have a longtime pal of mine and news communicator. He does all the Spanish language news on TikTok and YouTube. He's been called the one man Telemundo, and he's going to give us a real look at how things in reporting on immigration are going. Up next, Carlos Eduardo Espina. OK, friends, we have a very special guest. I have had the honor of being friends with Carlos Eduardo Espina for just about a year now. We've met, I believe, the first time in like the Oval Office or something like

Carlos has been in some really incredible rooms and he is one of the pioneers when it comes to Spanish language news communication. He's been called the one man Telemundo by some folks who know news best. Welcome to the show, Carlos. Oh, nice to be here. And thank you.

Thank you for having me. I'm really excited. I'm excited to have you here too, because a lot of what we've been talking about on American Fever Dream is the fact that like our systems aren't just failing, but also we're being kept from them. And one of the biggest thing that's happening right now is like censorship, bad information, flooding the zone, especially as it relates to immigration and what's going on in that kind of sector.

I wanted to give you an opportunity to first tell people where they can find you, because I think there's a lot of folks who watch this show who probably would love to send your content to their moms and whatnot, who maybe would be more interested in hearing it straight from you. And also, what do you think is like the biggest danger that you're facing right now in covering immigration?

Yeah. So first off, uh, you can find me on TikTok, Instagram, uh, Facebook, basically any platform as Carlos Eduardo Espina. That's just my name. You look me up and I make content in Spanish about immigration, social issues, politics, and a little bit of everything. But yeah, I think the biggest issue we're facing right now is when you have misinformation and disinformation and just outright lies coming straight from the government, uh,

I'm trying to tell everyone, you know, we should be questioning the narratives that the Trump administration is putting out. One very big example is when they started sending immigrants to Guantanamo, they came out and even Trump came out and said, you know, we're sending the worst of the worst. We're sending murderers and all these horrible people to Guantanamo. And many people believe it. Oh, the government's saying it's true. And then I made a video about the first people that got to Guantanamo and I started reading my comments and,

A couple of people were like, hey, those are my family members there and they haven't murdered anyone or done any of this. So I started digging into it, you know, verified the information, passed it off to some, you know, traditional media sources. The New York Times ended up running a story about how the people, you know, being sent to Guantanamo weren't actually the dangerous, violent murderers that the Trump administration was saying. It became this whole thing. And then eventually they were like, yeah, actually, you know, we've been sending some people that don't.

are not high risk immigrants as they call them, but you know, it's still okay to send them there. So then the narrative starts to break and people are like, Oh wait, maybe they're not what they were saying. And now we're seeing it again. Yesterday, they sent 200 something people to El Salvador saying they're the worst of the worst, this and that. And we're already starting to get stories that it's not actually the case. So yeah, that's what I always try to encourage people to really challenge these narratives and,

And, you know, we would hope that the government tells us the truth. History has shown us that's not always the case, and especially in this moment. So that's the kind of stuff I'm super interested in, right? Because if it wasn't for you posting it where people could identify, hey, that's my family member, like that's not the news is lying. Essentially, the administration is lying about who these people are. We might not have caught this maybe at all. What are some other things that you think maybe the general news watching audience isn't getting right now that you're finding in the work that you do?

You know, it's very troubling to see a lot of traditional media just kind of accept what the Trump administration is saying. I mean, yesterday, for example, when they sent 200 something people to El Salvador because supposedly they're horrible gang members and, you know, it's starting to come out similar to Guantanamo. That doesn't necessarily seem to be the case. But you see all these headlines, you know, gangsters sent to El Salvador or

horrible criminal and all this. And I'm like, you know, we have to really challenge the narrative. And okay, if they are, you know, horrible gangsters that have murdered people, then where's the proof? You can't just send people with no due process and then label them as this. And then everyone just accepts it as reality. So I think that's really what we need to be doing, especially when there's just such an imbalance of power, the government, the state,

has all these official channels to disseminate their version. And the families who are being affected really have no other means other than social media, try to reach out to a content creator like myself or maybe some news outlet to pick up the story. But even then, there's just such an imbalance of power that I think we need to be really careful when we just blindly follow the narratives that the government is putting out in these moments. I mean, even you look

early on he said oh we're only gonna go and arrest the worst of the worst the criminals the rapists all these and this now you're seeing the statistics show that over 50 of those who have been arrested in ice freight so far have no criminal record other than having entered the country legally many have been here for 10 15 20 years working paying taxes so that's not really adding up with the whole you know violent criminals narrative yeah and you know we're seeing stuff where

Anybody who thought this wasn't going to come to their door, it is coming to their door. There was a doctor who's a professor at Brown University, a transplant surgeon who was just deported coming into Logan Airport. There was another guy from Luxembourg who had gone home to visit his mother, who's been a green card holder since 2008.

He was detained and actually ended up having to go to the hospital because of how dire the conditions and detainment were in Massachusetts. This isn't these worst of the worst criminals and sending them to Louisiana or Texas. This is like Massachusetts liberal state. And it's happening there as well. How do you think that the Latino and Hispanic community is preparing for this new wave of like surveillance and lack of due process and, uh,

you know, discrimination and attack right now? Well, I think the first thing that's happening is a lot of people are recognizing, like you're saying, that they're not protected. Unfortunately, there are, you know, many Latinos who voted for this guy or supported him, even though they couldn't vote, you know, telling family members to vote for him, thinking he was only going to go for the worst of the worst. Now we've seen cases of Latinos who voted for Trump, who are citizens and who have been picked up by ICE. We've seen Puerto Ricans. I mean, it's just...

it's getting out of control. And I think the first thing that we're seeing is people waking up and being like, oh shit, maybe I messed up and maybe I do need to prepare. And a lot of people didn't prepare thinking it would never get to them. But now that it has, you know, obviously the basics of knowing your rights and all that, but the big issue is what does knowing your rights do if the government is outright violating those rights? I mean, they say, don't open your door. Don't, you know, answer questions, but then they come in busting to your house or using tear gas. I mean,

So I think right now we're really just trying to figure out like what the hell is going on. You know, we've been thinking the government traditionally follows court orders, follows the law. Not anymore. So I think right now it's really a lot of uncertainty. And I can't come out here and say I have the answers because frankly, I don't. This is like new terrain, uncharted territory.

I know it's wild and we certainly couldn't have expected that the Trump administration knows or cares the difference between a Puerto Rican citizen and Mexican immigrant.

somebody who's a green card holder from Spain, like they don't care. They're like, this is basically like a skin color test and we're just going to shake you down and harass you and assume that you're a gang leader if you're not pure, pure, perfect white looking to them. What are the ways that people can be like best supporting their local community right now and standing up against this, um,

grave in decency. Well, I don't want to be too pessimistic, but I'm telling people right now, there really is nothing you can do in the moment. Like it is what it is. Like they're doing what they're doing. I think the best thing we can do is educate ourselves as a community. And next time elections come around, be a little bit, uh, you know, more intelligent with our vote to put it lightly and, you know, limit the powers that they have. But right now with control of the house, the Senate, uh,

the executive branch, many of the courts, I can't tell people, "Hey, do this and you'll be fine." Because realistically, there's nothing you can do to be fine in these moments. And that's just the reality we have to accept. We put this guy into power. Well, I mean, not me, but collectively as a society, we put them into power.

And now we just have to take it as it is and, you know, write it out. And then in two years when there's midterms, you know, we're hoping that all of this kind of awakens our community and not just our community. Obviously, we're talking about everyone in general. And like I said, we'll be a little bit more intelligent with our vote. And then after maybe...

Democrats are able to recover the House and potentially the Senate, then we can see, okay, what can be done. But right now there really is a, I think that's the scary thing. Many saw the courts as the guardrail, but yesterday they just started blatantly ignoring the courts. So what do we do now? I don't think there is much we can do. I know using military planes and whatnot too, like it's not even like the commercial airlines can try to stop it. It's a scary thought, but I'm glad that you're being honest and saying it is sometimes we just like are in the shit and it's

And that's where we are. And so what can we do next comes later. Yeah, and I get a lot of criticism, you know, some people are like, oh, your content is like so negative, like, you know, give us some optimism. I can't like, I can't lie to you. I can't tell you everything's going to be fine when it when it's not going to be fine. And like we said, many of us thought, oh, knowing your rights and all this is going to protect you.

We've now seen two months in there is no regard for your rights. There is no regard for, you know, established precedent. There is no regard for anything really. It's people don't seem to realize Trump put a quota. He said, ice, I need you to arrest 1500 people a day. And that's what it's going to be. And

And it doesn't matter to them, you know, if you're a U.S. citizen, if you're this or you're that, people are getting caught up. Many people who thought it would never affect them, but it is affecting them now. And that's the reality we're living in. We have to adapt to it and then prepare better for the future.

What made you want to get into the news business, Carlos? What were you doing before? I graduated college or university in 2020. I went to Vassar College in New York, graduated in 2020, and I was going to work in a nonprofit organization. But that fell through because of the pandemic. So while I was figuring out what to do, I started teaching citizenship classes on TikTok and Facebook. And at that point, I was like the only person...

making content in Spanish for Latinos here in the United States. And so when I ran out of the citizenship questions, people were like, well, we want more content. And I just started sharing the news that was going on. At that point, it was the end of Trump's first term and going into the 2020 elections.

And I never presented myself as a journalist or even a news reporter. I just say, hey, I'm more of like a political commentator. This is the news. And I think this is good. I think this is bad. Or I think this is a bit more complicated than it seems. And I guess people just liked, you know, the way I view the world, the way I express myself. And it just kind of went from there. And yeah.

really everything that I share is stuff that I read and I care about deeply. And I think, Hey, you know, maybe other people care about it too. And clearly it seems that they do. Yeah, they sure do. Well, Carlos, thank you for taking the time to come and chat with us. Um, you're welcome back anytime and folks can find him at Carlos Eduardo Espina on all channels. Um,

I follow your content. I speak not great Spanish, but I follow your content anyway, because I just will do literally anything to boost you. You're like the best in the world and folks are lucky to have you. And we're lucky to have you here today. So thank you for being with us. We're friends in the Pew Research Center poll. Yes, we are. I always get excited. I look for like a couple of people's names, right? When they talk about news communicators online, I'm like, okay, where's Carlos? Where's Harry? Where's Brian? Right.

So, yeah. It's cool to see. But no, keep up the good work. We'll be in touch. Awesome. We have a long road ahead of us. I know. All right. Thanks, Carlos. Until next time, I'm Bea Spear. And I'm Sammy Sage. And this is American Fever Dream.