AI is being used to speed up drug discovery, predict severe weather events, improve vegan food taste, and enhance digital pathology. It's also helping in areas like material science and biology, potentially solving fundamental human problems.
Near-term risks include the potential for AI to be used in creating bioweapons, geopolitical tensions due to AI chip supply chains, and the displacement of human expertise in various fields, leading to an 'obsolescence regime' where AI systems outperform humans in most tasks.
Public skepticism stems from a lack of understanding of AI's capabilities and how to use it effectively. Economic insecurity also plays a role, as people fear AI will take their jobs or exacerbate existing inequalities.
The obsolescence regime refers to a future where AI systems make human expertise obsolete. Companies, militaries, and governments may rely on AI workers, executives, and decision-makers, leaving humans as figureheads or unable to compete without AI assistance.
AI companions could lead to increased loneliness and mental health issues if people become overly reliant on them, potentially reducing human interaction and emotional growth. There's also a risk of these technologies being misused without proper societal safeguards.
AI slop refers to the overwhelming amount of AI-generated content on the internet, which could make it hard to find human-generated content. Solutions include increasing the value of human-created content and developing better curation and taste-based systems to filter and highlight authentic human work.
The challenge lies in creating a fair compensation system for creators whose work is used to train AI models. Mechanisms like compulsory licenses and attribution as a service could help, but the political and legal systems must be functional enough to implement these solutions.
AI progress continues due to advancements in data curation, synthetic data, and the increasing number of researchers working on the problem. While data and compute costs may rise, new methods like test-time scaling could enhance model capabilities without hitting a wall.
By 2030, AGI could lead to AI systems that are indispensable in daily life, similar to how people rely on smartphones today. These systems could handle complex tasks, potentially transforming industries and making human expertise less critical in many areas.
The government could facilitate immigration policies to attract AI talent, fund academic research to bridge the gap between industry and academia, and implement targeted regulations to mitigate risks like bioweapons without stifling innovation.
A panel of leading voices in A.I., including experts on capabilities, safety and investing, and policy and governance, tease out some of the big debates over the future of A.I and try to find some common ground. The discussion is moderated by Kevin Roose, a technology columnist at The Times.
Participants:
The conversation was recorded at the annual DealBook Summit and recorded live in front of an audience at Jazz at Lincoln Center. Read more about highlights from the day at https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/12/04/business/dealbook-summit-news
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts) or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.