cover of episode 109: Martian Mysteries: What NASA doesn't want you to know

109: Martian Mysteries: What NASA doesn't want you to know

2023/4/27
logo of podcast The Why Files: Operation Podcast

The Why Files: Operation Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
N
NASA科学家
播音员
主持著名true crime播客《Crime Junkie》的播音员和创始人。
Topics
NASA科学家:1976年在火星赛多尼亚地区发现类似人脸的结构。 播音员:NASA最初发布人脸照片以吸引公众关注,后声称其为光影错觉,但第二张照片并不存在。 Richard Hoagland:组织独立研究小组,利用媒体平台向NASA施压,要求其拍摄更多照片,揭露NASA的隐瞒行为。 Dr. John Brandenburg:认为火星曾发生过大规模核爆炸,导致文明毁灭。 Art Bell:在Coast to Coast AM节目中讨论火星人脸话题,扩大公众影响力。 Dr. Bevan French:在电视辩论中未能有效反驳Hoagland的观点,之后火星观察者号探测器失踪。 Len Fleming:证实NASA对火星人脸照片进行了处理。 Carl Sagan:对火星人脸理论表示质疑。 Errol Torin:认为赛多尼亚地区的物体并非自然形成。 Vince DiPietro和Greg Molinar:重新分析火星人脸照片,发现更多细节。 Chris Martinez:讨论NASA修改太空图像的行为。 播音员:火星表面存在许多疑似人工建筑的异常物体,例如金字塔、巨型石碑、类似建筑的痕迹等。这些物体并非自然形成,可能暗示存在古代火星文明。 NASA对这些异常现象的解释存在疑点,例如对火星人脸照片的处理,以及对赛多尼亚地区探测的回避。 火星可能曾拥有海洋和厚厚的大气层,支持生命存在。 火星土壤中存在高浓度的氙-129,这可能是核武器爆炸的证据,暗示火星可能经历过一场全球性的核战争。 火星核战争理论存在争议,但值得关注。 即使火星人脸是自然形成的,也有必要进行调查。

Deep Dive

Chapters
A NASA scientist discovers a human-like face on Mars, sparking questions about its origins and whether it's a message from an advanced civilization. NASA later claims it's an optical illusion, but questions remain about their explanation.

Shownotes Transcript

On July 25th, a NASA scientist was studying images of a region of Mars called "Cydonia" when something caught his eye.

He had to take a second to process what he was seeing. He grabbed a magnifying glass.

There was no doubt. On the surface of Mars, 140 million miles from Earth, was a structure in the shape of a human face.

It was huge; about a mile wide; and showed two eyes, a nose, and a mouth. Around the Face were pyramids and structures that didn't look natural. They look like they were built... by someone.

The following day, NASA held a press conference. Of the thousands of photos sent back from Mars, all anyone asked about was The Face.

Who built it and why? Is it a message from an advanced civilization now long extinct? Is it a religious artifact? Is it solid like the Great Sphinx? Or could it contain chambers like the Great Pyramid?

Then NASA threw cold water on the speculation. They said there was a second photograph of the area taken shortly after.

And that photo showed that the face was nothing more than an optical illusion.

Small problem. That second photo doesn't exist.

So why did NASA lie?

The answer to that question is in the other pictures.


Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thewhyfiles/support)