WOAH! Brazil CRIMINALLY Investigates Musk Over X After Rumble Pulls From Brazil- Stay Free #342
01:14:56 Share

Hello you awakening wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle,

gurgle dot or wherever you download your podcast these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda we appreciate you and we love you you're part of our community so that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live rumble show five days a week it's on Monday to Friday we decipher the latest news stories we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering and if they aren't

then we critique why they're not and what they are covering. Every week as well, right, we do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker, Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate. These things are already up and you can listen to them now. So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show. To tune in live, go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand. You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.

Now, please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand. Thanks. No, here's the fucking news.

Hello there, you awakening wonders. Thank you so much for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand. If you're watching this anywhere else in the world, I don't mean here in this room, I understand how space works. I mean outside the platform of Rumble. Rumble, the platform that has stood up boldly in Brazil and said, no more.

No more censorship. You will speak Portuguese freely in Brazil. You will say whatever you want to. And if you lot noticed that once again, the situation in Brazil is demonstration that the language of liberalism is used to legitimize yet more authoritarianism and yet more censorship. Let me know if you have noticed that extraordinary phenomena, for we will be talking about Brazil and censorship now.

And Elon Musk's position as the potential, not sole, but a significant opponent of this censorship in Brazil. And what we have to do, what all of us have to do collectively for...

The Messiah will not be a human Messiah. That much we surely know. It won't be. No one's coming to save us in human form, I don't think. Let me know what you lot think on that. So we're talking about Musk censorship. We're going to be talking a lot about some of the things I've missed. Because did you know, do I look brown? Because I've been away quite a lot. So I'm hoping that I look brown.

at least well. I mean, I'm essentially looking to the Rumble chat now for some form of compliment. If you want to support our content, you can join us at Become an Awakened Wonder on Locals, which is where we've got our home. You get an additional video every single week. We're talking about Project Paperclip this week, which, as I understand it, and I've not researched this yet, it's where, at the end of the Second World War, a whole bunch of scientists were...

imported from a little old country called Germany to do some research for NASA and the likes. Let me know if you want to get an additional video. In fact, here's all of the content we'll be doing on Locals this week. We've got Roseanne Barr. You'll be able to join us tomorrow for our conversation with Roseanne live. Put your questions to Roseanne.

Sending you all a lot of love. Operation Paperclip. Did I call it the right thing? Did I say the right thing? So listen, it's been a really interesting and peculiar time since we've been away on this break. I hope you've enjoyed some of our conversations with Dr. Lapidot Ladapo. Yeah, Ladapo. And the Steve Bannon chat. That was pretty fantastic. I look bronzed. Thank you very much. I've not been on some bits.

I've been in Florida, baby. I've been in DeSantis land. I've been in that sweet land of freedom and free speech that you call Florida. And it's been absolutely fantastic. Thanks for the compliments. Didn't did it. I appreciate Operation Paper Hat, says Frank Dick. Don't be childish. It's been extraordinary time, even cosmic time.

events and celestial orchestrations have informed us that this is a magical time. And current president of the United States of America, Joe Biden, has advice for all of us facing a topsy-turvy world where day will become night and night will become day. Folks, enjoy the eclipse, but play it safe. Don't be silly.

silly in an eclipse don't be silly about it when the moon crosses the sun remain just calm i've seen people actually like do you see everyone's trying to hijack that eclipse and sort of go this eclipse will cause more get vaccinated from that eclipse like everyone's trying to say that it's somehow connected to their single issue but if one person has utilized that clips for a marketing

It's your friend, and I know many of you hope, the next president of the United States of America. Yes.

In the chat, Jarden68 goes, the eclipse gave me fibrous white blood clots. It's pretty funny. Already, you can see, like, say what you like about Trump. The guy knows how to meme. I never thought I'd do this. Oh, my God.

Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God!

That's good promo. That's good promo. The dude understands marketing. There's no question about that. He's also, I think, in the use of that silhouette, shown as sort of a good personality and a good sense of humour.

about his own image and likeness. Do you think? It's Eid for our Muslim brothers and sisters out there. Happy Eid. I don't know how to say it. I know there's a proper way of saying it, you know, but I don't know how to say it. But if you are Muslim, happy Eid to all of you. If you are Christian, hey, I hope you're enjoying this Easter season. If you're an atheist, hey, come on over. Join us. Join our religious revolution by Holy Christ.

Hey, you know Paxlovid? It was always a stupid name. And now we know it was absolutely bloody pointless. It doesn't even do anything. It's made up. They just did that because they were angry about ivermectin, didn't they? They were like, no, ivermectin, you can't. No, just introduce a drug. We've got to have...

some of that money. Apparently, you'd have been better off having a simple cup of tea and that is why no one in England got COVID ever. That's why. Have that misinformation and disinformation and malinformation. That's a little old thing we used to have on this planet called a joke, where you used to be able to muck about and have a laugh before centralised authoritarian forces vampirically sucked the joy out of every aspect of our life, locking us in an unwinnable culture war so we would

all hate each other and not be able to rise up together and oppose this kind of peculiar fascism that has emerged. But there are some people we can rely on. There are some people we can rely on to confront this stuff. Among them, your friend and mine, Tucker Carlson, in an extraordinary position of kicking off Kid Rock's tour. Like Kid Rock, I feel like he's an old school, like Billy Idol style guy.

performer like I've not met Kid Rock before but I feel like you know there are some people you feel like it might be hard to get on a relaxed normal alright mate how's it going Kid Rock like I feel like he's always quite intense I don't know because I don't know him but Tucker Carlson's gone out there and intro'd him on tour remember if you're watching us on YouTube or anywhere else

YouTube's not a person, although corporations, didn't they say that they've got the same rights as people? I don't know how it works. Hey, if YouTube was a person, what kind of person would they be? We did a thing earlier, didn't we? Like a little poll to see which platforms you trust. We'll show you the results of that in a little while. Remember, later we're going to be talking about Elon and Brazil. We've got a whole bunch of fantastic topics and subjects to discuss with you on Rumble, the one platform that will stand up.

and not even stream in Brazil because of Brazil's lack of respect for free speech. They're already out of France because France wanted to ban Russia today. What worries me is those are both likely World Cup winner countries. So you could have, like, you know, France win a lot of World Cups. Brazil, they win a lot of World Cups. You won't care because you're likely an American of some description, aren't you? But we care about stuff like that. And we care about freedom and so does Tucker. But he also is introducing Kid Rock. Let me see this. I've not watched this yet.

*Celebration*

There we go, it's Tucker making a lot of new friends out there. As a comedian who has in the past performed with musical acts, it's no joke. It's no fun to have to go up on a stage and sort of do talking and then like have bands on. You remember I used to do things like the MTV VMA Awards and stuff like that.

That is a pressurized environment, man. Thank you, Heavenly Father, for releasing me from that. Tuck has been on that show, Kill Tony, so a lot of people are saying he must have gone on Rogan, which that's the first time I figure those two have spoke together. That would be interesting if that's what's gone down because let's face it, the two of them are...

dominant figures in American media and determine more now, I suppose, the nature of the conversation in public spaces than your CNNs or your MSNBCs or your Fox. It's fascinating. Gustavo XD on the Rumble chat saying, definitely getting fired from Fox was the best thing ever to happen to Tucker. Meanwhile, Oopie Doop says, if YouTube was a person, he would be sensorial. Eid Mubarak. Thanks, man. Thanks for giving me that phrase.

mate. Okay, let's have a look at Tucker on Kill Tony. Tucker Carlson high-fiving. Yeah, it's crazy. My grandma hates you, nigga. Cheers.

It's good because that's a use of N-word there to call Tucker Carlson N-word. Nice. That's good. There's no coming back from that. Also, it's a grandma's loathing that's being conveyed. Yep, I would say that's near confirmation that there'll be two to three hours of Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson coming soon. So that's going to be an interesting show for us to check out. We're talking a lot about censorship today. Later, we'll be talking about Brazil's threatened censorship of N-word.

X and Rumble's departure. Rumble already departed that nation in anticipation and in awareness of some of the censorship that's already being implemented. We asked you a little earlier what platforms you most trust, and you've said Rumble X way, way, way more than Meta, your Googles and Alphabet companies, and that makes perfect sense. So coming up in the show later, we've got all sorts of stuff about Elon Musk and...

I mean, do you guys care about this anymore? Do you care at all about...

You can't see my naked chest. It feels weird. Well, it's there. It's all in there. Do you not care anymore about what celebrities think about presidents? Evidently, a lot of people do. Do you remember when there was all that sort of chaos about who Taylor Swift would be into and stuff? Do you remember that? People like remember like Joe Biden posted that red eye picture of himself. I remember the rock endorsed evidently Biden at some point previously. But this is an endorsement that he appears to be withdrawing. Let's have a look at that.

You made that endorsement in 2020. Are you happy with the state of America? Am I happy with the state of America right now? Well, that answer is no. Do I believe we're going to get better? I believe in that. I'm an optimistic guy and I believe we can get better. The endorsement that I made years ago with Biden was what I thought was the best decision for me at that time. And I thought back then when we talk about, hey, you know, I'm in this position now.

where I have some influence and it's my job then, I felt like that then, it's my job now to exercise my influence and share with this is who I'm going to endorse. Am I going to do that again this year? That answer's no. There you go, that's interesting. Is it, a lot of you are saying that you don't care, that you don't care about that and I suppose, look,

I've been on a journey of celebrity myself where I was on that carousel and immersed in that world already today. I've mentioned the VMAs and sometimes like maybe I'll see a bit of SNL and think, wow, I hosted that or I'll see Rolling Stone and think, wow, I was on the cover of that. And now I am a, what do you say, apostate of that world. You know, it's a...

sickly, seductive, dark, dark world, as is being experienced now, because barely a day goes by when you don't hear yet more, even rumours, and obviously I've been the subject of scurrilous, untrue rumours myself, so I'm pretty cautious about repeating them, but

By God, it seems like a dark, dark world, doesn't it, Hollywood? Let's see. This is an interesting story. Let me know what you think about this in the chat, right? Because Trump has told billionaires he'll keep taxes low, okay? And that's... I guess if you're at a fundraiser, these are the kind of things people say. Now, how's this being covered by MSNBC and CNN and all that kind of stuff? How are they covering that? Are they attacking Trump for that? Because... And if so...

Why are they not more transparent about this? You know, like it was a moment for me when I heard that Joe Biden told like sort of Wall Street financiers and stuff that nothing would fundamentally change if he were elected. I thought, what is all this hysteria about? What is all of the condemnation of Trump, that wall to wall damnation? What is it about when Joe Biden has told the powerful people

plainly and in plain sight that he ain't going to do nothing to impair or impede their agenda. It's pretty extraordinary. Over the course of this week, we're looking more and more about how public spaces are controlled and curated. Even when something like...

It's not a whistleblower, is it? When that sting operation has been pulled on that CIA and FBI operative where they admit that they've been nudging and implement in measures against Alex Jones. You think, how come these stories don't gain more traction? How come, like, you know, when Aaron Bushnell sets himself on fire,

fire and post it as an anti-war protest. It's kind of scrubbed from the internet. Not easy to find that image now. Imagine if that protest, as I've said to you before, had been demonstrating against something that could be utilised by the establishment. You'd have an Aaron Bushnell day by now. There ain't no Aaron Bushnell day.

So let's have a look at one of the measures by which information is funded. The creation of that category of misinformation in and of itself. Here's some a new extraordinary piece of anti misinformation propaganda. This is a U.S. government funded comic book that tries to give us all some new perspectives.

And flowerpower678, why don't you allow free speech on your ex account? I do allow it. You know that ex account? I just post stuff on there. You can do what you want on there, mate. You can do what you want on there. Real Fake, the first graphic novel in SZA's resilience series, explores the deceitful tactics of disinformation.

Follow protagonists Rachel and Andre as they travel the world and expose a vast network manipulating... If they're going around on a private jet, anyway, I would say that there's a... They're very, very well funded. ...content and pushing American voters to the brink. With elections coming up, will they be able to follow the trail of deepfakes... That's the mosque. Oh, really? ...synthetic media and stop the real assailants from causing chaos, confusion, and division...

Look at this. And then it shows you. Look at the badge of the people that sort of is making it.

Like that, that's CISA, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. It's like an eagle with a badge and like a circuit board on its wing. That's not a bad bit of design. It's actually quite beautiful. But that does not fill me with confidence. Why does Russell talk about American news? Well, because I believe that America is still the most powerful nation in the world that generates the most important culture and determines the

politics, not only of the United States, but of many, many nations. And even though a country like yours is becoming subordinate to groups like NATO in particular, and we've got some interesting information on how NATO are trying to Trump-proof their funding coming up a little later, American culture still determines

the agenda and events that affect many, many lives. Would you agree with that, whether you're American or not? It's America after all that gave us the FBI and the CIA. It's America that gave us the deep state. I'm not saying that the KGB ain't powerful or that the Communist Party in China don't have their own deep state power. But

Have a look at this, this recent sting operation where a CIA officer was caught bragging about being able to put right wing journalists in jail. How the FBI had insiders and agents at January 6th. Happy birthday, Sean P. Happy birthday. Just a simple request there. We've got you have to recognize it's the most powerful program.

in the world with some of the most powerful and influential agencies in the world. And their power goes way, way beyond American politics. And what we're starting to experience is the criminalization and demonization of entire segments of our population. Of course, this began with Trump

But prior to that, actually, it didn't begin because the FBI have long done operations against Muslim folk. And during the civil rights movements, they were continually looking for ways to criminalize and bring down activists. And evidently, Alex Jones is now, you know, at least has grounds for a case and says he's going to sue the FBI and CIA after seeing this incredible sting. We'll show you a little bit of that, of course, because we're fascinated by it.

First, here's what Alex Jones said. This is a FBI agent, a CIA boss. He's a contract manager over a large contract operation. That's a boss. That's like a mini section chief saying all of this and and admitting all of this like it's no big deal. He needs to be subpoenaed by Congress. I am planning to launch a lawsuit against the CIA and the FBI. We have to bring all this out.

Right, there you are. So the reason for that, of course, is because of this sting operation. They seem to, as I recall from our friend James O'Keefe, do you remember his sting against that dude from Pfizer? Often it seems to take the form of a same-sex date. And I don't know all the details, but this seems to be a same-sex date sting also. It's

Pretty interesting. Here's a CIA officer, or at least a CIA official, bragging about being able to put right-wing journalists in jail. Potentially the FBI were present on January 6th and that they've been specifically targeting Alex Jones. Let's have a look. As long as the Bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro-lifers in jail whenever they want.

Yeah. Firstly, if you're on a date and you're looking at your phone like that, that date ain't going anywhere, Gavin. So not only loose lips sink ships when it comes to chatting about CIA secrets, when you're on a date, eye contact, ask questions. What do you do? Oh, that's interesting. That kind of thing. That's on the agenda. We can, we can, you can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. How? Just let them up. Set them up.

You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse... I like he's sort of like Oliver Hardy, mad boy. You set them up. You put them in a situation where they're unable but to act on their impulses. And in a minute, when he does crossing the line, he demonstrates the line that can be crossed as a sort of some sort of little camp fish swimming across a shoreline. We call that entrapment. It's a fine line.

It's Bureau practice entrapment. Define line! We get really close. Not officially. No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it. So they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing things that they don't do. Depending, yeah. We call it a nudge. A nudge. A nudge. Mmm. Sometimes you just gotta give them a quick little click just to see what happens, right? And how does that happen?

You put a post out there or you... Sweetest CIA official I've ever... You just set them up. You play little games with their minds and with their emotions. Have someone fake the profile, say something that triggers... That we know is going to trigger them, right? Like, we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about you. So we're like, oh, this will piss them off.

Sometimes you light the fuse and just wait for it to follow. Like a railing. Like a "Oh!" So when a railing happens. A journalist who's doing great work there at Sound Investigations is overplaying the part of their "Oh! Tell me more! Tell me more! Did they get very far?" Sometimes the bureau behind it. Yeah, sometimes.

Nothing like putting out a fake social media thing to really get people mad. Mm-hmm. Post fake news. Sometimes it's... It's mad, isn't it? We've just seen that the government are spending money creating comic books to warn us of the problems of fake news and misinformation while a deep state CIA official admits that they create fake posts themselves. So the government are preventing other people, institutions and organizations doing fake

what they do. So there is no morality. There are no values. There is simple utility. If something is useful to them, they'll do it. But you are not allowed to do it. Fake? It's embellished a little bit. Who would be like a big influence that you're... Influencer that you're after? You're like a...

I don't know, like, um... I don't even know these names. Like a Fox News person, or like a Tucker Carlson, or like... Oh, I'm sure he's in there. Right. You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that, what was his name? The one that said, uh... The Sandy Hook didn't happen. Alex Jones. Yeah, so we were after him. You are? Are you still after him? Yeah. Why? Because he's broke. Why?

You got found guilty. More evidence that what the establishment engage in is lawfare, where they engage in legal complexity, opponents or dissidents in order to drain their resources, whether that's Donald Trump or Alex Jones or add individuals.

Let me know in the chat

whether or not you think Alex Jones has got a case against the CIA, Y or N. And we are going to have to leave YouTube right now because we're going to be talking about Elon on Brazil. We're going to be talking a lot about the Ukraine war. We're going to be talking about NATO, Trump proofing their funding. Before I leave you guys on YouTube, I want to endorse NMNs. This is a potential therapy for

age-related diseases and ultimately age is going to affect us all. Cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes. Big pharma want to monopolize charging thousands of dollars in some cases and taking away your rights to non-pharmaceutical alternatives. You know what the FDA are like. They are, well, I would say due to their funding models and due to recent events, whether it's the opioid crisis or the coronavirus period, not worthy of our trust.

Transitioning NMN to a drug could inflate costs and prescription fees up to, and this is ridiculous, $30,000. It will make it completely unattainable without insurance. Black Forest partnered with Natural Product Association and are fighting against the FDA and their stance on MNN. This amazing Black Forest supplement could become the first...

anti-aging FDA approved drug where you would need prescription to buy it. It's going to cost you a bunch. So fight against big pharma and FDA corruption as well as fight in time itself. War against time. Buy this NMN and if you use this code that we've got, they'll know that their adverts with us are working. So please do go to blackforestsupplements.com forward slash Russell. You'll get 25% off by the way and they'll know that our ads work which is good for our business. Excuse me.

Mm-hmm.

Hold on a minute. Did I just Benjamin Button myself right back into adolescence? I think I did. So, hey, we're leaving you if you're watching us on YouTube now. Get over onto Rumble. We're going to be talking about Elon and Brazil. We're going to talk a lot more about the censorship war. We've got so much to discuss with you. You might want to become an awakened wonder. So you can join us live for our conversation with Roseanne Barr tomorrow. But more importantly, you will be part of a movement that opposes corruption across the world that believes in your individual sovereignty, freedom and ability to

to self-determine while building communities of joy and wonder together whether you are religious not religious we believe in the glory for all of you see you in a few seconds click the link in the description come on over to run the brawl my nose is not broken kenzie what's wrong with you okay guys so uh should we finish off the like i think we've covered that uh the alex jones thing

This is fascinating about the events in the Ukraine war. This is a comparable story in some ways about how democracy and freedom are hedged. For example, NATO are Trump-proofing Ukraine aid. So that's, in a sense...

subversion of democracy and a subordination of national sovereignty in order to ensure ongoing perpetuation, forgive the tautology, of an unpopular war. And people that happen to be anti-Trump will think, well, that's a great thing.

simply because they are anti-Trump. And God knows there's a lot of anti-Trump messaging out there, coaching people to distrust Donald Trump. And you know where I stand on this. I'm not sure that we should be working within those models at all. I believe in decentralization and the empowerment of your community. I think it's the only way for us to get over some of the tensions that are defining the world right now. But the people that are supportive of NATO's ability to Trump-proof Ukraine aid are short

termist in their thinking because you may not agree with them next time. Before this, let's have a look at our former Prime Minister David Cameron admitting publicly that the Ukraine-Russia conflict, in spite of the hundreds of thousands of lives lost and in spite of its devastation, evident corruption and media deception and deceit, is good value for money. Look at the way that they see the world in economic terms, not in human terms. And let me know if you think that's kind of

Luciferian in some way to even place a monetary value on something as devastating and terrifying as war. Listen to me, I argue that it is extremely good value for money for the United States and for others, perhaps for about five or 10% of your defense budget.

Almost half of Russia's pre-war military equipment has been destroyed. It's war. It's a war and it's a bargain war. It's 5%, 10% off. We can annihilate the entire Balkan region. It's no money lost. No money back, no income tax, no VAT. It's been destroyed without the loss of a single American life. This is an investment in United States security. How does that tally with the...

ongoing rhetoric up till now about this is humanitarian war, that we have a duty to support Ukraine and Ukraine are being attacked by in an unprovoked war. It's extraordinary the lack of morality. Suddenly and occasionally you will witness symptoms of a deeper truth.

you will see that these geopolitical conflicts are the observable signs of advancing globalism and an attempt, in many people's view, to create a one world government, which you can oppose by becoming an awakened wonder. Have you seen this thing? This is our item of the week this week. I've not worn this one yet, but have I worn it? I think I've had a little go on it. Have a look at this thing. Can you guys see it? This week, there's 25% off this glorious item. Let me know if you fancy it. Now, check this out.

NATO to ensure that even in the event of a Trump victory, they will be able to continue to wage war

proxy war, in fact, between Ukraine and Russia by protecting their aid. This is an extraordinary story and a great indicator of how the politics of your nation and the world at large play out now. In the event that you might vote for a president or any politician that is anti-war or anti-globalism more broadly, I would argue, the globalist machine will

will find a means to ensure that its agenda can still be pursued. And I would say that this, aside from the bureaucratic language and legalese and the peculiar normalization of a war-like geopolitical agenda, this is evidence of that. Have a look.

NATO foreign ministers met on Wednesday to discuss a proposal for a €100 billion five-year fund. It is a plan seen as a way to trump-proof aid for Ukraine. The proposals would give the Western alliance a more direct role in coordinating the supply of arms, ammunition and equipment to Kiev as it fights Russia's invasion.

diplomats say. Speaking before the meeting, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the proposal aims to send the message to Russia that it cannot win the war. What is obvious is that we need new and more money for Ukraine, and we need it over many years.

And the whole idea of now discussing frameworks, commitments, an institutionalized framework for the support is to ensure more predictability. It's like gym membership. It's like they're trying to get you to sign up for more years of war without the possibility to withdraw.

As if we're supposed to forget what happened for a decade in Afghanistan and the $2 trillion that that conflict cost and for what.

Because now there are ongoing very public conversations and public opposition to both the conflicts in the Middle East and this war, there is an attempt to bypass public opinion, to shut down dissent and to ensure most importantly of all that the funding can continue uninterrupted regardless of very obvious public opposition.

You will notice that across the world there appear to be ongoing pilot schemes, whether it's for censorship or extreme measures during the coronavirus pandemic, that sometimes play out in nations like Australia or Canada, almost as if we're being prepared for new globalist measures, the legitimisation of further authoritarianism.

It's happening right now in Brazil. A Brazilian Supreme Court judge is introducing new measures to legitimize censorship and control of social media platforms. Rumble has already left Brazil because they don't want to be bogged down and tied up in this type of censorship and this type of corruption. Now, what you will remember is when Bolsonaro was in office, he was regarded as the Brazilian Trump. We got

to get rid of this guy. He's a tyrant. He's a dictator. He's an authoritarian lunatic. We've got to bring in Lula da Silva, a liberal politician, a person who's going to bring freedom back to Brazil. And yet, under the guise of neoliberalism, we're seeing more authoritarianism, more

censorship. This is extraordinary. Now, whatever you think of Elon Musk, when it comes to matters such as these, as you will see Michael Schellenberger say in a minute, he is uniquely positioned and empowered to oppose the type of censorship that will affect all

all of us sooner or later, because increasingly it becomes clear to me that once the terrorist was regarded as a foreign invader and a mad renegade, but increasingly this term terrorist could be applied to you or to me or to any dissenting voice. Let's have a look at how Brazil are now using censorship laws that would have been

unthinkable a few years ago how Elon Musk is opposing it and what we're all going to have to do if we don't want Brazil to become a test case for global censorship. We've seen it in Canada. We've seen it in our country, the UK, online censorship bills. They're not being fully utilized and pushed yet, but you can bet

they will be and notably we've seen it in Ireland with their new hate speech laws you have to firstly demonise the public legitimise the use of moral authority and I believe that an integral part of it when there's a globalist model that's being craved and worked towards is pile

it in it in territories where you might be able to get away with a little more. Let's see how this Brazil thing plays out and let's have a look at some legacy media reporting on the story to kick us off. He says he will challenge an order by a Supreme Court judge in Brazil who ordered his company,

formerly known as Twitter, to block some accounts. In a post on X, Musk accused the judge of violating Brazil's constitution and he called for him to resign or be impeached. The judge has been involved in efforts to crack down on... So it's unconstitutional, brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.

Imagine these measures were being passed under Bolsonaro. They would have said, see the Brazilian Trump, fear these right-wing populist figures, these neo 20th century dictators. We got to shut them down. And yet once again, it's under the guise of liberalism that we're seeing this authoritarianism being legitimized. Information in Brazil and threatened to impose heavy fines for any reactivation of the accounts in question.

So is it only censorship when it's used to shut down the free speech of people who you think should be silenced? Or is the principle of free speech something that you would afford to those that most oppose you? Clearly, it's the latter that's true. Michael Schellenberger, friend of the show, great journalist in my view, has spoken out on this. Let's have a look. This is Michael Schellenberger reporting from Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Last night, around 8 p.m. local time, Federal Supreme Court Justice Alexandre G. Moraes announced a criminal investigation into Elon Musk, the owner of X, formerly known as Twitter, for allegedly spreading disinformation, obstructing justice, and allowing people who G. Moraes had banned from social media to freely express their views. G. Moraes said he would fine X $20,000 per day for every banned person who Musk allows to speak.

As such, Gmordice has taken Brazil one step closer to being a dictatorship. What's more, the events of the last few weeks make clear that Elon Musk is the only thing standing in the way of global totalitarianism. Without free speech, there can be no democracy. If X goes down, we must continue to fight. We can continue to communicate through email and other social media platforms such as Facebook.

But email is no substitute for the capacity of social media platforms to share information instantaneously with millions of people. It's extraordinary that a platform of that scale and a person who wields the kind of financial and political and social power that Elon Musk currently has can be opposed in this way. It's extraordinary to me that free speech appears now to be a mutable matter.

that really, when people are talking about free speech and censorship, they are continually recalibrating what free speech constitutes, what is legitimate to censor and control. Now, Rumble, somewhat nobly, one has to say, have already left Brazil precisely because they don't want to be subject to this type of compromises and no doubt these kind of fines.

Now, whatever you think about Elon Musk, you know, because he's got a lot of interest. He's got interest in electronic vehicles. He's got interest in satellites and space exploration. He's even got interest in fire extinguishers. When it comes to this issue, Elon Musk...

says he is and appears to be behaving like a free speech absolutist. If Brazil are able to ultimately prevent X from freely publishing and are able to ensure through fines that X censors certain accounts, presumably to shut down opponents of the state. Of course, they won't say that. Oh, they're opponents of the state. They'll say it's disinformation or misinformation. This is another step towards the kind of

centralized totalitarianism that I think all of you in the freedom movement are terrified of, that all of us are collectively trying to oppose. You've heard that the EU are implementing comparable measures. You know that in Ireland, hate laws are being proposed that would mean that the police would have the right to come and search your house, search your devices. You're aware from the story we've just seen about Alex Jones that the deep state calls

confess that they themselves publish information that they know not to be true in order to bait and provoke and control and shut down dissent. This is an extraordinary moment for all of us. Let's have a look at Elon Musk's explanation on his own platform X. We kept getting these demands from...

Judge Alexander. That's his name on Twitter, at Alexander. Even Elon Musk still calls it Twitter. How are you going to get this rebrand over if Elon Musk forgets that it's been called X now? There would be to suspend accounts immediately. We're given typically two hours to suspend an account or face massive fines.

And the final straw is we were being given demands to suspend sitting members of the parliament and major journalists. And moreover, we could not tell them that this was at the behest of Alexander Morales. We had to pretend that it was due to our rules of service. And that was the final straw, and we said no.

It's extraordinary now. I suppose what we're being invited to do is ignore that principles are being violated, which many people are willing to do just because of the side of the argument they happen to be on. There'll be many people that because of their disdain for Donald Trump,

will not notice how terrifying it is that NATO are bypassing the national sovereignty of the nation of America, let alone the population of America, by ensuring that the funding model for the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict is protected in the event of a Trump presidency.

It seems that even becoming president of the United States is not enough to ensure that democracy endures. And when it comes to what's happening now in the nation of Brazil, you know, because in Trump and Musk, we're talking about some of the most powerful anti-authoritarian voices. I don't know if you like Elon Musk or Donald Trump. I know there'll be people here watching this that loathe Elon Musk, that loathe Donald Trump, that despair of me.

That's why it's important to have values and principles because if you've got values and principles, the personalities are not so relevant. Do I believe in free speech? Yes. Do I recognize that the value of free speech means that I will sometimes hear speech that I disagree with and in fact, that has to be the speech that I consider most valuable and most worthy of protection.

Well, then now we can have an argument about morality and philosophy and all of those things can happen in a democratic forum. But for now, what we are ultimately either through our passivity or by our active endorsement engaging in is the legitimization of further authoritarianism. Let's look at this in a little more detail.

This is from public.

Musk was posting about restrictions imposed on accounts on X at the behest of Brazil's authorities. And on Sunday said he would publish everything demanded by Moraes and how those requests violate Brazilian law. He also called for external justice, Alexandre de Moraes, to resign or to be impeached.

Since taking office, President Lula da Silva has massively increased government funding of the mainstream corporate news media, most of which are encouraging increased censorship. I always think this when you see a dissident being attacked. And obviously, I'm not pretending that I've not been personally affected by that. I have.

that the legacy media are not neutral observers. They got skin in the game. They are heavily invested in shutting down independent media. And as your great comedian, George Carlin said, where interests converge, no conspiracy is required.

If the state want people on lockdown, if Big Pharma want people to take a medication, if the legacy media receive a significant amount of their funding from Big Pharma, those interests converge. No conspiracy is required. I'm not saying that there isn't a conspiracy, but as you know, on this channel, we believe it is important to corroborate our claims.

Plainly what's happening in Brazil is the simultaneous subsidy of corporate media in exchange, I would assume, for their support of Lula's presidency. And in conjunction with that, more draconian and punitive measures for social media, but in particular, independent media operatives utilizing those platforms. If they can do it in Brazil, they can do it in America. They can do it in the UK.

Already Rumble have left France. Rumble are out of Brazil. I'm not saying Rumble is the perfect platform, but they have been perfect when it comes to the principle of free speech. Saying simply this, we don't get involved in what the content creators create.

We simply provide a platform that leaves the moral choices to you. You can decide whether you like me or trust me or don't like me or think I'm lying. That's entirely up to you. And I would say that that discernment, your ability to decide for yourself whether your government's lying, the judiciary are lying, the legacy media are lying. That is your freedom.

Don't allow anybody in that space between you and what I would call God and what you might call intuition. There's no way that we can legitimize or allow the legitimization of authoritarianism of this nature. This is cause for, I would say, deep concern.

Since taking office, I've mentioned to you he's massively increased government funding. Moraes illegally demanded that Twitter reveal private information about Twitter users. We've seen more of this. We've seen Google giving over caches of information. We've seen your American government using private firms to capture information, which they then purchase, bypassing laws that prevent them doing that directly.

Twitter users who used hashtags he considered inappropriate. He demanded access to Twitter's internal data violating the platform's policy, let alone, never mind the platform's policy, what about the laws of that nation?

He censored on his own initiative and without any respect for due process, posts on Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian Congress. And Moraes tried to turn Twitter's content moderation policies into a weapon against supporters of then-president Jair Bolsonaro. Remember, that guy was the baddie. Do you remember that? Do you remember that? You rarely mention Latin America, and when you do, you get it wrong. Listen, man, you check those sources. You can check the sources. Our sources are here for you to observe yourself.

The Twitter files also revealed that Google, Facebook, Uber, WhatsApp and Instagram betrayed the people of Brazil. They provided the Brazilian government with personal registration data and telephone numbers without a court order, therefore violating the law. Oh, well, if you've got...

If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide. Yeah, well, let's just hope that one day the stuff you care about, the stuff you believe in, doesn't transgress the internal policies of an increasingly authoritarian Brazilian government. And yet more terrifyingly than that, even though Brazil is, of course, one of the most populous and glorious nations on this planet, an entire planet,

yielding to this kind of mentality. When Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities with private user information, including direct messages, the government attempted to sue Twitter's top Brazilian lawyer.

Mark Zuckerberg, the owner of Facebook, abandoned his principled free speech position in 2020 after three years of relentless pressure from activist NGOs, Democrats and corporate advertisers. Today, Facebook actively represses the spread of news. Indeed, you will recall that Instagram just slyly, suddenly, without any announcement or fanfare, just flippantly,

flipped a switch within the app that meant you will not see news on that platform unless you directly request it. And I can already see that the way that some of our posts are being received on that platform has been impacted. They're not trying to protect you. You would have to have almost limitless trust in their motives to believe that this is anything other than the protection and assertion of power.

But I will say that they've introduced me to a pretty novel concept. For the first time ever there, I felt, except for when I was watching the Social Network movie, I felt a little bit sorry for Mark Zuckerberg because I feel like, well, even though he's one of the world's most powerful men, he's only powerful in that role. He's only powerful if he complies. He only has the power to support the system, getting pressure from NGOs, Democrats, corporate advertisers. He's a human being like you and me, and he is a part of the system and a part...

of the machine. And I guess, again, whatever you think about Elon Musk, he ain't yielding. So I know a lot of people, I see cynicism and I see people attacking me. I see people attacking all sorts of people. But he is standing up, isn't he? He's standing up. He's participating in the fight right now when it comes to this issue.

The mainstream corporate news media have never been more corrupt and totalitarian, with few exceptions. They spread government propaganda as a matter of policy. Nobody demands censorship more than the corporate media, which benefit from governments shutting down their competitors. Again, this is something I can speak about with...

some personal experience and understanding. The legacy media want to destroy independent media voices because day by day, their audience is diminishing because you don't trust them. And you're right not to trust them because they see it as their role to normalize privacy.

popularize and convey the agenda of the powerful with as little circumspection as possible. Think of any shiny floor American news show you like and just hear the dumb timbre of the voice and the constant conveyance of the agenda of the powerful. The pandemic was a seismic, epochal moment because it showed us

how these institutions work together to ensure a kind of 360 orb of power impenetrable by all but the most awakened of minds. That's why we have a duty to engage in personal disciplines that allow us to awaken together and discern and a set of values and principles are about the freedom of speech of people we disagree with.

Governments are either not protecting free speech or actively participating in the war upon it. So again, Schellenberger here makes the point that legacy media and governments don't, they don't need to be drilled. The legacy media do not like Joe Rogan's success or Tucker Carlson's success or even my success. They don't like it. The,

me and you have this vibe that we trust one another, that you know I'm different from you in a hundred ways, that you would disagree with me on a thousand topics, but I believe in your freedom. I believe in your right to disagree with me. I believe in your right to your religion or lack of religion or your culture or your identity. We have a set of basic principles that they're pretending aren't there.

about free speech, about consent, about care, about love, about community. And they're saying, although these things, they're post-structuralist, bizarre concoction. There's no such thing as meaning. There's no such thing as God. There's no such thing as friendship. We're just blobs here to consume and devour whatever's put in front of us, whether it's bad information or bad, bad television, bad content, bad food. They just put it in front of us and expect us to consume.

Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court held a hearing where justices made clear that they were fine with the U.S. government pressuring social media companies to censor. Last week, the Scottish government implemented a law to crack down on so-called hate speech, including jokes by comedians. Are you starting to notice a trend yet?

Are you noticing how it's never to empower their opponents? Are you noticing how it's never to empower ordinary people? Do you notice how there's always some slew of victims that they can utilize? It's all that we've got to protect these people. Do you really think that's what got them into politics? What got them into business? Got them into media? Anything other than this wild and vapid outcry

appetite for power, although even this I want to retract because I know they're human beings too and we must operate from a place of love and forgiveness.

That's the end of that piece, huh? Or is there another one? There's another one. In Ireland, the government wants the power to send police into people's homes to search computers and phones for hate speech. In Canada, the governing Liberal Party wants the power to send people to prison for life for the things they've said. And the European Union has empowered a tiny group of bureaucrats to decide what is true and false and engage in mass censorship.

All of this is happening at the very same moment that government intelligence organizations are working through NGOs to interfere in elections by spreading disinformation about populist activists and political candidates. Indeed, it's these kind of NGOs and organizations that were instrumental in the attacks on me in September. We have Freedom of Information Act requesting with several significant agencies and government departments that have already been incredibly revealing and they're

still trying to control that information is an astonishing time in other words governments are demanding censorship in order to protect their ability to spread disinformation of course it's that of course they don't care about you what would make you imagine for even a moment that your government cares about you what have they done for you lately which of the wars which of the policies what

What aspect of the facilitation of global corporations or unelected globalist bodies is it that makes you think they love you and your family and the people you care about? What have they done for you lately? Making matters worse, governments are directly financing corporate news media. The current Brazilian government is spending 30 times more than the previous government on media advertising in order to spread its disinformation.

Similarly, in recent years, the political party that runs our country, the Conservative Party, spent more money than any other organisation on advertising. I'd love to fact check that, but I seem to recall it. We'll get a fact check on it before I convey it because we take this stuff pretty seriously.

After Musk bought Twitter, the Biden administration and the Democratic Party declared war on him. Various government agencies filed multiple frivolous lawsuits against Musk and his companies in ways very similar to the war the Brazilian government is waging against X. What all of this reveals is that until Musk bought Twitter, he didn't really have freedom of expression. The US government felt that it controlled both the corporate news media and social media companies.

We saw in the Twitter files that the FBI orchestrated a disinformation and censorship campaign in order to protect Joe Biden. That amounts to anti-democratic practices. We know that Google filter, control and curate information to ensure that a news agenda favorable to the Biden administration can be met. And that's not because they love Joe Biden and his ice cream licking lips and his aviator shades. It's because Joe Biden is a stooge of the establishment that the Democrat Party is the party of war, the party of censorship, the party of patriarchy.

now

After that, the US Department of Homeland Security and the Stanford Internet Observatory engaged in a mass censorship effort around the 2020 elections and COVID. And that's why COVID was such a significant time for all of us. We all learned a great deal during that period. Primarily, legacy media works together with government organizations, state departments, peculiar, shaded, often publicly funded, yet private organizations that are interested in censorship and de-amplification of information that empowers you

you. And here's a significant piece in all this. This is Bernie Sanders in 2022 talking about Joe Biden sending the CIA to ensure democracy in Brazil. Fortunately, that election went the way that the Biden administration would have it, having a companion, an ally in Lula, something they did not have in the previous...

incumbent of office in that country. Let's have a look at Bernie Sanders saying that. I believe this is from 2022. And by the way, in fairness to the Biden administration, before we talk about their relationships with progressive governments, they have, and I think in an unusual way, you know, sent the CIA and sent the Secretary of Defense down to Brazil. Yeah.

over the last several months to make it clear that they did not want to see a rigged election or a coup. And that's what the Biden people did. And I appreciate that.

Why would you trust the CIA? Isn't that in a way comparable to the CIA involvement in Ukrainian elections and even a Ukrainian coup in 2014? You've got democracy as long as that democracy is in absolute alignment with the interests of the powerful. Otherwise, you ain't got no democracy. You ain't got no free speech at all. But hey, that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the comments. Stay free.

And check this out. This is an extraordinary story. The CDC have been accused of redacting every single word of a 148-page study on myocarditis after COVID-19, after the vaccination, excuse me.

Now, this can't be entirely verified, but it's something that's been subject to discussion in a significant hearing. And you're going to love this story. And we know that the CDC has a history of not publishing large portions of its COVID data. And you know that it's likely that they covered up myocarditis risks. I want to welcome all of you that are new members of our community. If you're an awakened wonder, thank you for participating. Remember, you can get that glorious, where the hell is that glorious switch?

shirt that's been stolen it's a brilliant piece of merch we've got so much fantastic content coming up for you stay with us and we've got a fantastic show with you tomorrow here's the news no here's the effing news

No, here's the fucking news. The CDC appeared to have redacted 148 pages of a 148-page document looking into the impact of mRNA vaccines into myocarditis. So what are they covering up? Really good news about how it doesn't have any impact.

Without independent media, where would we be now when it comes to our understanding of what happened during the pandemic period? What is the official narrative now? I find it difficult to even identify in the midst of all of the fallen truths and discovered deceptions that have taken place in the last couple of months. Now we know, or at least it appears, that the CDC censored...

of 148 pages in its entirety. We certainly know in the past they have withheld significant information and indeed the claim that they redacted an entire document can be seen by all of us. It's made in a committee hearing which will show you a little bit of now. If this practice of redaction continues, how

will we ever get to the truth about what's happened in the last five years and what that tells us about these sets of institutions and how they behave when they face dissent or any threat to their authority just keeps happening the cdc redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after covid vaccination so i asked research to print the study for me 148 pages

The entire thing is redacted. The good news is you could put that straight back into the photocopier and it could go through again with minimal impact on the environment. And surely it's the environment that must be utmost in our concerns now. Although I'd be worried about dying in a pandemic or from a nuclear war. Then probably environment. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I want to know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. We're witnessing an active cover-up.

of a colossal consumer product safety debacle.

That is, it's basically affecting the entire world. This is Dr. Peter McCulloch's testimony. And I wonder where this committee and its findings will ultimately lead, because already in his first sentence, he's told us that there's been a debacle and a cover up. Are we ever likely to hear those terms spoken at the level of authority necessary for there to be the obviously required reckoning? So in the United States, our CDC says

National Institutes of Health and the FDA are actively involved in a cover-up. And the same is occurring in the UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. So evidently the regulatory bodies in all territories are willing to participate, it seems, in

in facilitating these pharmaceutical companies, in avoiding the consequences or even an investigation into the inefficiency of their product, possibly the dangers of their products. Because it doesn't matter where it's taking place globally, Australia, the UK, the United States, there is no clear accountability. Neither is there sufficient journalistic investigation, neither are there sufficient clinical trials. Everything that Peter McCulloch, whilst at this point not being 100% verifiable, at least seems plausible.

Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce 90 days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company, like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available.

When it came to 90 days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved December 10th, 2020. Pfizer didn't produce a report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't want to release Pfizer's dossier for 55 years. 55 years. And the plaintiff pushed Pfizer.

And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. So we'll start with the claim that indeed the CDC have redacted 148 pages of 148 page documents. Seems bloody ridiculous. Then we'll look at comparable recent instances where information has been withheld. Then we'll look at

how we know something extraordinary is happening because of the increase in excess deaths, the change in the way that excess deaths are calculated and the necessity of insurance companies to reevaluate the way they impose premiums and charges because people are dying at surprising times from surprising things since about 2021. That's as a result of the research and inquiry mostly of Pierre Corey. So let's go through this information together and see if in the face of a good deal of propaganda,

we can discern some important truths. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, released a 148-page study on myocarditis after COVID-19, mRNA vaccination, and every single word on every page has been completely redacted. The 148-page document released by the CDC was in response to a Freedom of Information Act, FOIA request by the Epoch Times. They could have left in words like the and a and is. That's an over-redaction. T-he, t-he. The. T-o.

Oh, duh. Perhaps when you hear a name like Epoch Times, you think, well, this is a new and emergent media space and maybe you don't trust them. Maybe you need legacy media to make you feel comfortable that the information you're consuming has been verified. So this is a piece from the New York Times in 2022 that shows that the CDC redacting and controlling information is a sort of par for the course.

For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race, and vaccination status. But it has not made most of the information public. When the CDC published the first significant data on the effectiveness of boosters in adults younger than 65 two weeks ago, it left out the numbers for a huge portion of that population...

18 to 49 year olds, the group least likely to benefit from extra shots. So in a way that's the New York Times a couple of years ago observing that this information was being controlled, presumably with, in this case, a financial outcome. So even if you want to look at this whole exercise,

simply as an opportunistic way to make money, this piece of information from the New York Times is cause for concern. That's before you get into the health impact and the sort of stuff that Pierre McCulloch and Dr. Pierre Corey are talking about. There's already...

there in the midst of the mainstream cause for concern. Two full years into the pandemic, the agency leading the country's response to the public health emergency has published only a tiny fraction of the data it's collected, several people familiar with the data said. But the CDC has been routinely collecting information since the COVID vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective, which seems like a

reasonable interpretation. And if data leads you to a particular interpretation, then it's data that's led you to it. It's not speculative at that point, is it? Hey, we've got a lovely partner today. It's our friends at Halo. Halo is the number one prayer app in the world. I use it. You can explore Christianity with over 10,000 prayers, meditations and music. And as Lent continues, what better way

to deepen your connection to the loving Lord Christ. It's been downloaded 4 million times in 150 countries, be it like Calm or Headspace, but for Christians. Halo helps you pray and meditate and sleep better. It's helped me build a daily routine of habit and prayer. I do the rosary. I know it off by heart, except

the end bit. I've got to learn that. You can pray alongside Mark Wahlberg, Jim Caviezel. He was Jesus. Jonathan Rumi. He was Jesus in The Chosen. You can choose your own Jesus. What version of Christianity do you want? And you know Jonathan Rumi was my body double in Ballers. Jesus was my body double. Download it today. Reclaim your rightful peace and grow closer to God. Go to hallow.com forward slash brand to try the Hello Prayer app. You will love it. Okay, let's get back to the content.

There's also some evidence that the CDC facilitated cover-ups and certainly delayed the release of information according to rhythms that are not immediately clear. A mounting body of evidence shows that the CDC and White House chose to ignore and cover up evidence of a significant myocarditis safety signal in early 2021, putting young people at risk of serious adverse events. On 8

27th 2021 then director of the CDC Rochelle Walensky stated we have not seen any reports of post vaccination myocarditis but this was a false statement at the time journalist Zachary Stiber of the Epoch Times obtained internal CDC emails through a Freedom of Information Act request notice this information only comes available because independent journalists make inquiries using what Mount

to legal loopholes. As a person who's made Freedom of Information Act inquiries and requests, it's really difficult. They delay it as long as possible. They put you off. You have to involve lawyers. It's a total nightmare to get information that's yours by right. So remember, this is not an example of, well, look, we're being clear and transparent now. They're not being clear and transparent now. The information that we have is a result

of independent journalism and independent inquiry. And they continue, it appears, based on this committee to redact significant information even now. And I think we're all beginning to get a picture of just why that might be. Although even perhaps the most sceptical, cynical and fearful among us might not understand the full scale of what we are facing.

When Walensky claimed to have not seen any reports, there were dozens of reports in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS. Although we can't know for sure if Walensky had seen reports of post-vaccine myocarditis, a U.S. government memorandum from March 2021, also obtained by Stiba, stated there were 27 cases of myocarditis, myoprachiditis, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining around the heart.

on theirs. In June 2021, after most people who were planning to get vaccinated had received at least one dose, the CDC began publicly investigating myocarditis and speaking to the news media about it. So I suppose the implication is they waited till people were vaccinated

before telling them that there were risks associated with vaccines, and that doesn't seem responsible. The CDC, notes Stiba, was warned by Israel on February 28, 2021, about a large number of myocarditis cases after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination, documents obtained by the Epoch Times show.

Internally, the warning was designated as high importance and set for review of U.S. data. Walensky let months go by after receiving a warning from the Israeli Ministry of Health, and even when more information about myocarditis became public, her agency continued to downplay the risks. In November 2021, the Biden administration announced sweeping mandates for working-age people.

many of whom were in the group, men under 30, who would be most at risk. So actually, there were mandates in place to ensure the necessity of taking a medication that they knew had risks, and indeed, they insisted the most at-risk group

be mandated to take that medication. When you're watching something like the Hunter Biden inquiries and whether or not Joe Biden should be impeached because of financial impropriety and being involved in his son's business dealings, you forget that actually in recent memory there's been corruption and negligence of such scale that the entire government needs to be reviewed and you

you might argue, replaced. In fact, the challenge is so enormous that even people that are enthusiastic about change slightly balk at recognising the significance of just a piece of information like that. It may be that Walensky chose to disregard the safety signals from Israel and the military because she did not want to interrupt

the vaccination campaign. After a few reports of blood clots following Johnson and Johnson shots, the CDC placed a temporary pause on the company's vaccines, doing something similar for Pfizer and Moderna might brought the whole vaccine rollout to a halt. Right, I see. So they were just managing the perception of the vaccine, knowing that all that while hesitancy, shaming, reluctance, really what should have been happening is there are risks. These are the risks.

Actually, they were being bombastic, assertive, propagandist and mandating the taking of those medications. And now they're curious as to why there is significant and maybe even historic mistrust in the government and in the pharmaceutical industry. To this day, the CDC has not released complete updated data on myocarditis. The agency's cover-up of adverse cardiac events has had profound consequences and represents a major breach of trust.

and abuse of authority. Because of that lack of transparency, there are now data sets of billions of people that have taken vaccines and now a study has revealed just how significant a portion of people suffered adverse effects and injuries. A new study on COVID-19 vaccines that looked at nearly 100 million vaccinated individuals affirmed

the vaccine's previously observed links to increased risks for certain adverse effects, including myocarditis and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Both mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were associated with instance of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, which occurred more than was expected in the study, with the condition having a significant observed to expected ratio consistently after the first, second and third doses. Significantly higher than expected cases of pericarditis, inflammation of the sac-like structure that surrounds the heart, were

also observed following first and fourth doses of Moderna's vaccines. So that's perhaps an indication as to why the CDC have been reluctant to fully release information on myocarditis. It's likely that the information is significant. And now the subject that represents the jewel in the crown of coronavirus conspiracy theories, excess deaths. There is significant evidence to suggest that excess deaths, well, there are calculations, not theories, excess deaths are higher than

there are attempts to manipulate those figures, but they are not manipulating those figures when it comes to assessing life insurance. There, of course, because of the financial implications, they have to be rigorous in understanding how likely you are to get sick and die because it would cost them

financially if they miscalculate. So let's get into excess deaths and the evidence that excess deaths is something to be taken very seriously. 21 British MPs and peers have accused the health secretary of withholding data that could link the COVID vaccine to excess deaths and criticised a wall of silence on the topic.

Ministers have blamed the rise in excess deaths on record NHS waiting lists and the pandemic backlog, but the parliamentarians are demanding to be shown the underlying data to support the government's assertion that there is no evidence linking excess deaths to the vaccines for COVID-19. If those data do indeed exist, please share them.

If thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports, their letter says. There is no place here for blind faith. They believe potentially critical data which maps the date of people's COVID-19 vaccine doses to the date of their deaths have been released to pharmaceutical companies, but not to the public.

put into the public domain. The MPs argue that the data should be released on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with pharmaceutical groups and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately. If indeed the information has been shared within the pharmaceutical industry and not shared with the public, it's a further indication that something is being significantly masked and you've got to assume that if evidence existed to show that there was no correlation that that evidence would be being pretty loudly shared and trumpeted.

This while life insurance actuaries are finding that more people are continuing to die at alarming rates even more than before the pandemic that cannot be accounted for by COVID. For instance, the Society of Actuaries Research Institute found there was a 34% increase in deaths among working age people 35 to 44 in the last quarter of 2022. Many of them are working age people who are in the

prime of their life who were suffering deaths from cardiac and neurological disorders life insurers have been consistently sounding the alarm over these unexpected or excess deaths which claimed 158 000 more americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period in 2019 that exceeds america's combined losses from every war since vietnam so whatever this collection of cover-up

are ultimately about, it appears that by piecing together a mosaic of the known and indications of what the unknown might include, that as you have long suspected, something significant is taking place. But given that the bureaucracies, whether they are apparent regulatory bodies or state institutions like the CDC, are all

either financially entwined with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry or ideologically entwined with the sets of systems that have coalesced around this issue, presumably existed prior to the pandemic and will continue to remain in some form of power until that trajectory and tendency is interrupted. We are unlikely to receive the truth until it's too late. In fact, the example of the information about myocarditis being withheld till people have taken the vaccinations is probably a pretty good metaphor

for how these things are generally handled. They give you the information, sure, but only when it's too late for you to do anything about it. That's why we in independent media are keen to share this information while we can still assess and to a degree intuit what might be happening right now.

It seems significant that the inquiry into COVID in our country, the UK, has, with regard to vaccines, been delayed indefinitely. And they're not even willing to commit to when they look into some of these questions. And in Australia, there still seems to be a degree of scepticism and inhibition. And of course, in America, the belly of the beast, you might say,

as usual the influence and power of the pharmaceutical industry and this set of subsidiary industries ultimately the regulatory bodies you might argue aren't powerful enough to impose sanctions or expose truth or be transparent means that it's going to be left to you and organizations like ours to investigate and piece together this information and perhaps critically make decisions going forward based on what we understand now and to acknowledge that we're unlikely to be able to

institutional corruption of this scale simply by voting for one of two parties within a system that seems to have been, broadly speaking, co-opted. But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the chat. No. Here's the fucking news.