LIVE ELECTION DAY SPECIAL – Trump VICTORY, Voting PRE-BUNKING & Last-Minute Dems PSY-OPS? SF485
57:55 Share

What do we, you know, hello you awakening wonders. Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand in what could be a peripheral or precipitous or extraordinary moment but also might be, I have a sense, and it's not just a sense, I suppose I'm listening to what people are saying, we could be like entering into a new purgatory. If you're watching this on YouTube,

Click the link in the description and get on over here to rumble where we can speak freely And if you haven't got rumble premium yet get rumble premium. It's a good way to consume rumble And if you haven't joined our awakened wonder community, that's our locals community where we make additional content every week Primarily in the form of a live stream join that Let me tell you what I mean as best as I can

In 2016, the world was staggered, flabbergasted, thumb struck and gobsmacked by the surprising victory of Donald Trump.

The planet was reeling yet from the peculiar result of the Brexit referendum in my country, the UK, where people voted to leave the European Union. At that moment, bureaucrats, state officials and those that manage reality on our behalf for us realised that they had lost control of the consciousness of the electorate.

of their subjects, of their citizens, of the masses. Since then, I imagine they've been working on new ways to surveil and censor and control information. We live in its midst. As Baudrillard once said, I think it's Baudrillard,

The fact that America has Disney World in it distracts us from the fact that America is Disney World. And what it means by that, I reckon, is that we live in a managed reality. I've been to Disney World recently, so it's on my mind. When you go in a Disney World, you are in a carnival, a sanitized carnival. The carnival...

Let me know in the comments in the chat, you guys, when you go to a carnival in your country or in mine. It is itinerant. It is peripatetic. It is filled with danger and potential. Bad things happen at fairgrounds and carnivals as well as fun and joy. There is danger.

There's not so much danger in Disney World, and if there is, it's in the subterranean tunnels. I'm not complaining, by the way, about Disney World. I had a pretty fantastic time. The Guardians of the Galaxy ride is unbelievable. The Star Wars ride is unbelievable. But in a world that's controlled, 360, a sphere of managed reality, you know that what you're dealing with is someone else's vision. If Walt Disney is like any contemporary figure, let me know. Who do you think?

Who is the modern equivalent of Walt Disney? Let me know in the comments and chat, and I'm going to tell you my answer real quick, and I'll see when this catches up. We do have a modern equivalent of Walt Disney, and I would say it's Elon Musk, someone who's entrepreneurial and is able to create a vision of reality. And I'm not making a moral judgment, actually, of either Walt Disney or...

awe of Elon Musk. I'm talking about people's ability to generate a universe and then populate it. Maybe Vince McMahon's like that. Maybe Dana White is like that. People that can create a carnival, kind of sovereigns, kings. And we have a moment now where we are literally deciding, or you, the American public, are supposed to be deciding if this is how these matters work on whether you

believe in the vision of Donald Trump and the MAGA movement with its enhancements, I would argue their enhancements, begat it and betrothed by the inclusion of Bobby Kennedy, Vivek Ramaswamy, Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk.

Indeed, isn't it increasingly difficult not to see that collaboration, that new pantheon as kind of a positive evolution on anything the Republican Party has previously offered and anything the current Democratic Party has.

Can offer. Who are you looking to? The elders like the Clintons and the Obamas. Who are you looking to? Kamala, the uber elder of Joe Biden, the current incumbent, if we're to literally believe in American politics and can we literally believe in it?

Because whether you're in America or Disney World or probably France or Morocco or Iceland, you are in a managed reality. And who manages information manages reality, you could argue, unless you're sort of a mendicant, unless you live separate from the world, unless you disavow it. And how many of us in the last 20 years have thought, God, I just don't have anything to do with this stuff, man.

Nevertheless, we're going to be talking about the people that control reality and the ways they control reality. We're going to, of course, be looking at Joe Rogan's conversation with Elon Musk. What do you think about Rogan endorsing Trump's fake on plea in a way? Isn't it sort of obvious, like in the Trump Rogan conversation when Donald Trump goes, you're not a Kamala guy. I don't see that. I don't see it. Like it's kind of it makes sense.

isn't it? It's kind of like a pretty rational thing. I'm Walt Disney to you, says Lady JV. Thank you. I'll take it. I'll take it. So we'll look at the Elon Musk, Joe Rogan conversation. We'll consider the impact of Rogan's endorsement. And again, given what we learned in 2016,

that social media is more powerful in affecting the outcomes of elections, no Brexit, no the Trump 2016 campaign, how can anything other than a Trump victory take place, either over the next 24 hours

or the coming weeks. But yet we're already getting exposed to what has become known as pre-bunking. I learned what pre-bunking was from Michael Schellenberger, the journalist who, along with Matt Taibbi, Barry Weiss and some others, participated when Twitter got took over and turned into XBimer.

in revealing just how involved the government had been in controlling what was on that site. Schellenberger told me and you, our audience, that what pre-bunking is, is when you are invited in advance to have a particular perception of a story. The Hunter Biden laptop story is a classic example of a

pre-bunk. They were told various journalists were literally invited to a conference and the example of the Hunter Biden laptop story was given to them as, hey, watch out. There's going to be some stories that there's crazy stuff on Hunter Biden's laptop. So be ready for that.

Now, it seems that there's some pre-bunking going on when it comes to voting machines. There are only three companies that make voting machines, Dominion and a couple of others. That's a near monopoly on something that's extraordinarily significant. We might be waking up tomorrow to a Trump administration or a Kamala administration, or we might find ourselves in a kind of extraordinary purgatory.

One thing we could be aware of is people are talking about voter integrity. You will have all seen those videos of people pressing Trump and it coming up Kamala. You'll have seen burning ballot boxes. You'll have seen all of those extraordinary iterations of this story. And here are some examples of...

pre-bunking. Like, look, these are some stories on that. How we know voting systems are secure. Staff at US voting machines prep for doxing misinformation. Voting machine companies are fighting the next disinformation war. Musk pushes debunked Dominion voting conspiracy theory. So look, we're getting... This is like, there's a lot of stories about...

on that subject um pull the steel please and uh what are i've been in situations myself personally where the media themselves function as a unit whether that's with literal integration collaboration another word for that is conspiracy breathe together like where british media organizations worked together on uh creating reframing stories about me and my past and then the

whole of the British media reported simultaneously on those stories and still indeed are trying to influence those stories. And it's peculiar to watch how the information machine manages information in order to achieve certain outcomes. They're very dexterous, they're very deliberate and

Now, though, they have a sort of some pretty serious opponents. Some of the people I've just listed, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, will be looking into that. But are we being pre-bunked right now when it comes to this election? Here's some here's an NBC news story talking about the likelihood that Nevada, for example, won't be concluded until, you know, maybe days, maybe longer. The way I said so she wins North Carolina.

We could be living here in Nevada, waiting and waiting and waiting. And if you remember, Nevada will take a week to count all their votes. Well, because they go four days after. And you'll have more ballots coming in. And then you're really going to be used a lot on air because this is going to be lawyers upon lawyers litigating which ballots can get fixed or cured is the language you'll start to see those provisional ballots. So the nightmare scenario where we're just waiting for weeks, sort of the Florida of 2000.

kart monson in the rumble chat says that the best neologisms of 24 are pre-bunking gaslighting what was the other one you said like you know and lawfare and lawfare nice yeah these are new words and these new words these new terms like people talk about gaslighting now because gaslighting has become a prevalent idea we're continually being told no if you think that there must be something wrong with you no what do

mean? Are you racist? Why would you even say that? Pre-bunking, we're getting used to the idea that stories are continually framed. It's probably always happened. I bet before there was a war between Britain and Germany, there was sort of gentle propaganda saying, we want to watch out for these Germans. You know, like

if you have to control entire populations you have to control their minds and you have to control their hearts if you can't control their hearts anymore because the era of the razzmatazz politicians like obama and clinton is over and you're sort of left with the dregs and i don't mean that in a derogatory sense in terms of their you know their uh their essential quality as a human but someone like kamala harris is not a razzmatazz politician like bill clinton or

Barack Obama doesn't have that kind of prestige or power. You've got to find ways of controlling people that are sort of, in a sense, outside of... Well, they're not going to be persuasive. They're not going to be persuasive. If you don't have recourse to charisma and good communication skills, the Lord alone knows what you have to do to get what you want. But here's Kamala Harris making a terrible catastrophe of a perfectly good rally. LAUGHTER Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. LAUGHTER

Let's vote! Let's get out the vote! Let's get out the vote! Let's vote! Let's get out the vote! Let's vote! Let's win!

The soaring costs of fuel prices could be counted is instead of offering people access to energy, you could put that video on and people could warm themselves with the flash of embarrassment in the chillier parts of the United States over the winter months. That was a perfectly good chant. Kamala, Kamala, Kamala.

Let's vote. Let's get out the vote. Oh no. Oh no. Let's win. Can we watch it again? Isaac, can we reset that? I just want to watch it one more time. I want to watch it from the beginning. Let's vote. Let's vote. Let's get out the vote. Let's vote. Let's get out the vote. Let's win. Alright.

That's not going to help in a modern media environment. Now, remember, I guess that we oughtn't be perhaps drawn solely to charismatic folk. We should perhaps look to government for managerial excellence and operational skill. But do any of us believe that there's any integrity or credibility at the heart of this democratic government, this sort of odd culture?

globalist cadre that would change their principles more frequently than Bill Clinton's interns change their frocks because there are no permanent principles to gird themselves to. Permanent principles would mean, I don't know, kindness because it's real and necessary, service because it's the way that we connect to one another and demonstrate humility. These are the kind of principles I'm referring to. Now, to

I see and demonstrate how the principles of power mesh to the actions of media. Have a look at the view now. I like if you watch Ghost, you're going to love Whoopi Goldberg. I've been on the view. Whoopi Goldberg is a lovely person. And if you've seen Donald Trump, all of you is something that people talk about now because we are sort of a little more of a with media studies. We've all seen Donald Trump prior to his ascent into politics or dissent depends on how you regard it.

fated over on The View. Now, Liz Cheney, who is connected to sort of pretty powerful military and energy forces and resources. Liz Cheney, who is a pretty hawkish politician. Liz Cheney, who Donald Trump said if

What he seemed to me was trying to say, and indeed did say in his own way, was if she advocates for war, she ought be willing to participate in it in a visceral and real way, i.e. by being on the front lines. That was, of course, mangled and manipulated. But if the view can now fate and adore...

Liz Cheney as they once feted and adored Donald Trump, what does it tell you about how power's moving around? I.e., what is it that they're trying to tell us? If they're saying that Liz Cheney is a great person, and by the way, she might be, but I don't think the view care about that. I think what the view care about is continuing to amplify and support the messaging of centralized interests in order that their business model can be perpetuated. So...

I have a question. Are you also a lawyer? I am. So you could conceivably be a great AG. And I say this because your moral core...

is magnificent. I know you probably don't want to, you don't want to think about it, but I just feel like I would feel a lot better

with you leading the FBI, the CIA, the NBC, the MNBC, everybody at NBC. That's just me. So I'm just saying, should it be floated, please think about it. And under the radar. You have to get Vice President Harris elected. Well, you know, I'm just, I'm being... That's really confusing. Where are the people...

Like the Whoopi Goldberg that lives in my imagination, there's one in there, would like love Bobby Kennedy. Would go, yeah man, think about what Bobby Kennedy's going to do with Pfizer and the FDA and the NIH. Think of how a figure like Bobby Kennedy in the upper echelons of the political establishment is going to

all of the health of millions of American people? Is it going to be better for Americans? And someone like Tulsi Gabbard who has military experience, who knows what war's like, who doesn't want to be involved in war, who has integrity. I don't understand it. I don't understand it. Glenn Greenwald gets a...

has a clearer understanding of it than I do, so does Mike Benz. Here's Greenwald's post. Whoopi Goldberg suggested today that Kamala should turn over the Justice Department to the Cheneys by making Liz Cheney the Attorney General. I think she'd far likelier be Kamala's Defence Secretary or Secretary of State. Benz, our friend Mike Benz. Liz Cheney does not have to do this. She can't just go on with her life. Her family fortune is in Halliburton, which...

which is here's his financial star to the tune of billions to the fate of Ukraine. Isn't that amazing? And still and likely related to these to her position, her assent, her alliance to the Democrats and the way that power is genuinely operating. And what you might have and what I certainly have is a sense that there is a

the opposite of what Whoopi Goldberg says, no moral core of the heart of this. We're going to be looking at some hypocrisy of the heart of establishment. If you watch this on YouTube, stay with us. We'll be with you for a couple more minutes. Here's a word from our sponsors who are offering you the opportunity to protect your online presence from a 360 perspective. Cybercrime. Ah!

It's the third largest economy. I wonder what the first one is. Military industrial complex, big pharma. Is it big tech? I don't know. But the third biggest one is cybercrime. And it targets like email, social media passwords.

Even AT&T announced that hackers have compromised all of their customers' text and call records. That's us. That's me. That's you. Bunker is an affordable all-in-one app protecting you and me against identity theft, fraud, surveillance, all stuff that you don't want, including patent-pending secure messaging, password management, and secure cloud storage. Why pay for different applications when you can protect yourself with Bunker for $12 annually? It's not much, is it? That's a dollar a month. Let me divide that into...

weeks, 27, it's not much.

Bunker is owned and operated by security professionals with a history of protecting the public against cyber criminals and surveillance. Bunker, they believe that people should be empowered to focus on what matters most, security and privacy and day-to-day life. For a limited time, Bunker's offering a one-year free trial for you, friends and family. That's if you sign up today. You've got to sign up today. You can have it free for a year. So download Bunker from the App Store or Play Store using the offer code BRAND, all caps, to get the first year for free.

Thank you. Hey, listen, if you watch this on YouTube, we're going to be talking about Joe Rogan's endorsement of Trump and we're going to be showing you their start their countdown, please. And we're going to restart and we're going to be showing you Elon Musk's conversation with Joe Rogan. In particular, I like the discussion on lawfare, the establishment of X, how X has altered the political conversation and Elon Musk's sighting of Stalin's right hand man. Do you

think let me know in the comments and chat that do you think that trump vance and musk's appearances on rogan are going to be enough to swing it and if they're not what does that tell you about the media landscape in america click the link in the description join us on rumble where we can speak freely

Right. OK, listen, this is an interesting moment when one of the things I suppose we are starting to sense is there's a lack of moral fortitude at the heart of the establishment. The Nelk boys with this stunt are able to, in a pretty whimsical way, expose what a lot of us sense, that there are people that make claims about

their moral position like you know i believe in mass migration because i think we have a duty to protect and love one another when they themselves would not be willing to open their hearts or homes to vulnerable vagrants i dressed up like i work for kamala's campaign and now i'm going to deliver immigrants to her supporters

We are voting for you. Don't worry. Are you? Of course. We do have a surprise, if that's okay. It's just real fast. You have a surprise? We're looking for a place for them to stay. They just came across. They'll sleep on floors. I mean, they're not picky, you know? We have like a two-year-old.

That's pretty good. We're a house of COVID.

We have been blighted with COVID and you know how. I mean, for people in their late 80s with comorbidities, that can be absolutely lethal. And there you have it. It's a pretty light high. That's very good comedy because it exposes something important. Do people that say that they believe in migration themselves have the spiritual and moral cojones to back that up?

Would you have homeless people or migrants that without homes live with you and your family? Some people would say, yeah. And those people, I think, are the best among us, people that are willing to love to that degree.

it's a significant step on the way to sainthood and what I reckon we sense when now that all the sheen and the glamour is left now that the party is all but over now that we're not dealing with Bill Clinton or Barack Obama or even sort of the sort of brown

1980s version of Joe Biden, where he in sepia tones snarled about the war on drugs. But instead, Kamala Harris, a sort of elevated bureaucrat, is difficult to find something to believe in.

What's there? What's behind all of this? Is there anything to believe in other than a deep and institutional loathing of Donald Trump here being excellently expressed by Joe Scarborough, who lacks nothing when it comes to commitment to his own opinion? I will ask the question that I think is a fair question to ask.

Who raised these people? Yeah, because they they were not raised by anybody in my neighborhoods that I grew up, any middle class neighborhoods that I grew up in. These people were not there. They were not raised. I mean, they weren't in the classes I went to growing up.

in elementary or middle or high school or college. They just weren't there. That wasn't the America I grew up in where people would laugh at the idea of people of press getting shot. Like everybody would like sit around and be like, what? What's he talking about? Or again, the other things, laughing at the Puerto Rican joke, that Puerto Ricans are a pile of trash are

are laughing at this 82, 83-year-old man being bludgeoned nearly to death. That's an applause line? That's a laugh line? Again. Again.

Now man, now you're in the territory of comedy. Now in the 80s and 90s there were some pretty dark comedians out there making some pretty dark and outrageous jokes and some of your best comedians and some of ours talking about like say Ricky Gervais or in my case as an Englishman or Woody Allen in your case as Americans saying make the point that when it comes to comedy it's

Anything that's funny is funny. And if it's shocking, that's probably because there's a mutual acknowledgement, certainly on behalf of the perpetrator or author of the joke and the recipients of the joke, that what you're saying is in fact scandalous. So you can't make a moral judgment.

of a group of people based on the fact that they're willing to laugh at a joke that's somewhat scandalous or a little hot and spicy. And what Joe Scarborough is doing there, if you ask me, is doubling down on the contempt for Trump supporters that characterize the 2015-16 era. If you like Trump, you're in that basket of deplorables. Unless you're on board with this project, then you yourself are a Nazi.

But we've just seen, even in that Nilk Boys skit, that people that are, you know, if not full throttle Kamala voters, then default Kamala voters, aren't that committed to what they believe in. And this is the problem, if you want to get a little deeper, I consider it to be a bit deeper, with living in a managed reality that has no proper principles behind it. What's underneath all of this? What is it you care about? You'll go to war if it's convenient and expedient to go to war. You'll believe

that you're willing to enter into the illusion that there's a humanitarian motivation between the Ukraine-Russia conflict, that NATO weren't involved in the provocation, that Taiwan now are all vulnerable and will help them, that there oughtn't be diplomacy brought about urgently to resolve warfare in the Middle East.

Unless you've got actual concrete or at least clear principles about what you want your government to do, both domestically and internationally. And a lot of people now, I think, are, I don't want to do anything internationally. I want to run my country well and fair. I want my country to be protected. I want it to be democratic or a republic as it was established. And I want to be able to have some, excuse me, autonomy in my community and some sovereignty in my own life. And my personal perspective is,

I want to be informed by my own relationship with God. What you don't want, I don't think, is for humankind to be at the apex of all our systems of morality for reason to be the ultimate value. Well, I can reason why I should be able to sleep around. I can reason why we should be able to go there and extract those resources. Reason can be deployed anywhere.

for a multitude of reasons to a multitude of objectives to fulfill any agenda. Virtue and principles are costly. It means you have to say, I will never do that. I will always do this. It's very, very difficult to live like that. And I think that what we're experiencing now is a centrist establishment that because of its alliance to globalism and corporatism, the economic interests and interests of dominion that they ultimately represent has to say stop.

contradictory stuff almost continually. It must be absolutely exhausting for them. For example, if Rachel Maddow believes that the right are repugnant and disgusting and that Trump is a new Hitler and that presumably a platform like Daily Wire is loathsome, why are MSNBC taking commercials for Am I Racist? What does that tell you about their real values? I've not seen the film Am I Racist yet. I spoke to Matt Walsh about it.

And I understand it to be an essay on the use of DEIs to create further division and unrest and a kind of ridiculous and hollow set of values that are ultimately behind movements that use racial equality as a way to leverage further division and further control of centralized forces. Let's have a look at this peculiar fact that.

The Daily Wire have got ad spots on MSNBC. We're going to take a quick break. When we come back, we've got a whole show for you. It's our last little show before the election. I think it's fair to say it's going to be pretty different than every other last show you've seen before the election, either on this network or any others. That's just because I'm a weirdo. This show for you, call it all right, is here with us tonight, live. We've got a lot to get to. I'll be right back with us after this break.

Growing up in the 90s, I never thought much about race. What's happening in this country? It's Nazism. Republicans are Nazis. I'm going to sort this out. I need to go deeper undercover. Joining us now is Matt, certified DEI expert. Here's my certification.

What's up with white people? What are you doing to de-center your whiteness? We're making it a center. Why are they doing that? What you're doing is you're stretching out of your whiteness. This is more for you than this for you. Am I racist? Now streaming only on Daily Wire+.

Smart investment by Daily Wire and Matt Walsh revealing about the mentality that ultimately prevails at companies and organizations like MSNBC. We all carry commercials and adverts. Do we all make money?

claims beyond the claims like individual sovereignty is vital, community democracy, vital, the ability to freely practice your religion, the ability to vote democratically when it comes to the way your communities and your country

are managed and controlled. The limitation of the ability of government to replace God in your life, for government to become the highest principle, and then to use that power to facilitate globalism, corporatism, and absolute control, total management of reality. This is the thing that we, I guess, have to oppose.

on channels like this one. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chats, Jeanette and Two-Face Cat and Trish McLeod and Asa Foxen. Let me know what you think, guys. We have now a commercial from the Wellness Partners who I do endorse. Peter McCulloch is a brilliant man. And this wellness kit, God, who knows what's going to happen in the next couple of weeks? Maybe it will be wise to have a wellness kit accessible with hydroxychloroquine.

And Ivermectin within it. Have a look at this message. It feels like the world's on edge right now, doesn't it? It's crazy. There's tensions over the upcoming election. How will it go? Economic insanity and instability, health threats popping up all over the gaff. With talk of a new pandemic on the horizon, you've got to take action for your family and be prepared. The wellness company's contagion emergency kit is exactly the way to do it. It's a lifesaver. It's put together by real experts like guest on the show, Dr.

Peter McCulloch. He's one of the first people to speak out during the pandemic. You can trust him. This kit's got medicines in it like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine. It's got budesonide in it and a nebulizer critical to treat respiratory illnesses, especially now that we're heading into flu season. Don't let anyone play the gatekeeper with your health. Take responsibility for it within a few clicks.

A kit can be delivered to your door. Peace of mind for the family in the event that something does happen. I've got my kit. I'm in America. I'm fully kitted up. You can get yours. Go to twc.health forward slash brand and use the code brand to get $30 off right now and free shipping. That's twc.health forward slash brand. Use the code brand for $30 off and free shipping. Don't wait for the next crisis to hit. Be prepared. Get your kit today and take control.

Elon Musk's gone out there, full support for Trump, likely to be part of any Trump MAGA government. And now on Joe Rogan has expressed in a number of ways the significance of this election, believing as many of the people on the other side do, as many Democrat people believe.

that this is a pivotal life-changing election. How many of you think that? How many of you think this is the election to change the world, whether you're a Democrat or a Republican? Surely you think that if the other side wins, it's kind of the end of the world as we know it. That's why I enjoyed talking to Dana White, which is why I'm going to go to work the next day. It's kind of made me feel a little more relaxed about everything on, let's face it, what is a pretty anxiety-inducing

...day in a peculiar vortex of a time. Rachel Maddow says that in the event of a Democratic Party victory, Elon Musk's numerous government contracts will be cancelled. Even if Trump doesn't win, the Defense Department and NASA are going to need a new arrangement for all their rockets and for all the multi-billion dollar contracts Elon Musk's companies have with the U.S. government.

The U.S. government is going to have to either, I mean, unwind from all of those contracts or Elon Musk's companies are going to have to unwind from him. This is an untenable reality in national security terms. Now that we know what we know about Elon Musk.

Hmm. Saying hello to my friends in the Awaken Wonder chat, like Beth in Wonderland. Hey, guys, how's it going? This is what I feel, is that this is...

An extraordinary moment. Early on in this election, we began to wonder, ah, really what's happening is that legacy media and new media are engaged in a battle of information. And if what we learned from Brexit and Trump 2015-16 holds true now, then once you've got Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson lining up behind Donald Trump, then a Trump victory is inevitable. But how many of you think that it is inevitable now?

How many of you believe that Facebook spaces, Meta spaces, Google, Alphabet, YouTube spaces will be managing reality, particularly when it comes to swing states and swing voters? And how many of you trust the integrity of voting machines? And how many of you trust the institutions themselves that operate?

Ultimately constitute democracy now. The judiciary, the police force, the military, and you'd have to say the set of interests and agencies that coalesce around health, although they ultimately coalesce around pharma now, which isn't even medicine. It's essentially a carousel of profiteering from the perpetually sick.

This seems to me to be an election where if you're invested in change, if you're invested in individual sovereignty, you won't be able to vote for a democratic party that has shown themselves allied with war, hawkishness, sickness of American people, institutionalism, bureaucracy, propaganda, surveillance, censorship, gaslighting, pre-bunking, deception, hatred of

the family hatred of the individual hatred of God all dressed up in a word mangling mess and presenting itself to you as freedom now Joe Rogan has endorsed Donald Trump surely

That's going to be enough. He's the Oprah Winfrey of our time. His endorsement, you would imagine, will push anyone over the line. And Elon Musk has gone on, Rogan, to give a kind of rallying cry for the undecided and those that haven't voted yet. So,

What will we be waking up to on November the 6th? And how is it that institutions like the judiciary can be deployed not in order to mete out justice

blindly and therefore openly but can themselves become further conduits for power and for powers excesses here is musk on rogan talking about how the acquisition of x and the control that can be asserted on musk through lawfare the term the neologism that we love

has become a key battlefront in this election. I think if Trump wins, we'll see probably most of the boycott lift. But if Kamala wins, we'll see that boycott get stronger. And they'll friggin' shut down. There's no way that the sort of Kamala-Povic regime would allow X to exist. You really think that they'll be able to shut it down, though? Is there a pathway to that? Yes. What would they do? Well, I mean, they can just... They can stick the DOJ on, you know, and say, like...

They've had this whole thing about hate speech, misinformation, whatever, except that they're the ones pushing the misinformation. But that doesn't stop them from filing massive lawsuits and using the DOJ. I mean, the DOJ has been attacking SpaceX, for example, for not hiring asylum seekers, even though it is legal for SpaceX to hire anyone who is not a permanent resident of the U.S. So we're damned if we do and damned if we don't.

This is just an example of what DOJ can do. So it's illegal to hire someone who's not an American citizen? SpaceX is considered an advanced weapons technology.

So it's covered by international traffic and arms regulations because we make rocket technology that can be used against the United States. It's like if North Korea or Iran got SpaceX rocket technology, they could use that to launch nukes at America. Right. That would be bad. Yeah. That would be really bad. That would be really bad. So since we are in the most extreme category of weapons technology at SpaceX, under all

US ITAR law, it is illegal for us to hire anyone who's not a permanent resident because the presumption is that if they're not a permanent resident, they're going to return to their home country and take the rocket technology with them.

So it's illegal for us to hire anyone who's not a... They can have a green card or be a citizen. They just have to be a permanent resident of the United States. Then there's another law that says if you discriminate against asylum seekers, you're also breaking the law.

So they just, so the DOJ, the DOJ can only do a small number of big lawsuits every year. Launched a giant lawsuit against SpaceX saying that SpaceX discriminated against asylum seekers. And we're like, but it's illegal for us to hire. And

And here, Musk talks specifically about the power of lawfare. The sheer number of hoaxes that the Democratic Party is pushing over and over again. And it's like, look, I understand like politicians are going to, you know, exaggerate. They're going to misspeak. And they'll tell occasional, you know, untruths, whatever. That's how it is in politics. But when you have deliberate, concerted, repeated pushing of hoaxes,

You're like, wait a second. Like, come on, man. This is too far. And you're supposed to be the good guys. You're supposed to... And you claim to be the good guys? I'm like, exactly. You're supposed to be the progressives. Yes. The Dems are like, oh, we're the good guys. We're the honest people. No, no, hang on. You can't claim to be the good guys. You can't claim to be the honest people. If you're deliberately post...

pushing hoaxes that have been debunked thoroughly. Yeah. Like even Snopes, which is a liberal thing, says it's bogus. Yeah. Like the fine people hoax. Obama just said that on stage. Obama just said that. I was like, what the flying fuck? He doesn't give a fuck.

He doesn't give a fuck. They're just going for it. That's a flat-out goddamn fucking lie. Flat-out lie. Flat-out fucking lie. How about the other one where Kamala's campaign used what Trump was saying about protecting women from illegal immigrants? Thank you. You remember that? Yeah. What he was saying is, if the women like it or not,

I'm gonna do it! Yeah. When he was saying that, they were trying to say that he was taking away women's right to choose whether women like it or not. Like, that's not what he was saying. Absolutely. He was literally talking about protecting them from dangerous people that are sneaking in through the border. Yes, exactly. They'll take, like...

Like, not even a full sentence, like a half a sentence from top. Yes. And then I'll push it on every ad, every speaking event, every media. And it gets repeated on the news. Yes. This is what's crazy. They'll talk about it on these news shows. Quote, news shows. Yeah, exactly. I mean, a recent one that came up, which had a lot of people, because a lot of people reached out to me, was like,

They're like, "Oh, Trump says he wants to execute Liz Cheney." I'm like, "That is utter bullshit." It's not what he said at all. It's not what he said at all. All he said was like, what he's saying is that, look, if Liz Cheney actually had to fight at the front lines, she'd think twice about going to war. Exactly. Like, it's easy to go to war, it's easy to be a warmonger if you don't have to risk dying at the front lines.

Like, if other... Like, basically, it's fucked up if people are having, like, fancy dinners in Washington, D.C., while people are being slaughtered in trenches. You know? It's like...

You're not feeling the pain. Exactly. You're not taking the risk. It's someone else dying. That's cruel and lacking in empathy. And all Trump was saying was that Liz Cheney would be much less of a warmonger, because she's a huge warmonger, just like her dad, if she actually had to go to the front lines and fight herself. And meanwhile, they're saying that he's saying she should be shot. Yes, which is a total lie.

But I had tons of people call me this weekend saying, oh, Trump says he's going to put Liz Tray in a firing squad. I'm like, that is an outrageous lie.

And legacy media ran with that lie, big time. Yeah, it's crazy. It's just wild to see. And if it wasn't for Twitter, or X now, I don't think we would know about all this stuff. I think it would be very difficult for you. I think YouTube throttled. They did something weird. They won't say what they did, but they did something weird with the Trump interview that I did. Yeah. Where you couldn't find it. It doesn't make sense. Like, like...

Made no sense. I mean, it was like the biggest interview on earth. Yeah. And you can't find it? Yeah. Not only that, it wasn't trending. Bullshit. It wasn't.

Yeah, we've had comparable challenges with YouTube, certainly not comparable in the sense of Joe Rogan interview with Trump, but clear manipulation of figures and direction of content. And that's, I suppose, becomes evident to anyone who operates on that channel. One of the other changes that's taken place since 2016 when it became clear.

evident that emergent media was more efficient in reaching and influencing people than traditional forms of media because it's more bespoke is one thing more authentic is another reason is that they were going to have to find ways of controlling it and indeed they have firstly they smear people that are prominent they control algorithms they direct you towards favorable sources of information and that's why i suppose this election is difficult to call if you're a person that lives

almost entirely an independent media like i do the kind of media i consume is probably the same as the type of media you lot consume i look at the people whose content we cite on this channel then it would seem like well like trump's got this sewn up you're adding to donald trump figures like you know in particular bobby kennedy who's an anti-establishment candidate in so much as he's outspoken or when it comes to bureaucrats like fauci and has given a sort of a

dark eulogy about Fauci's past in his book, The Real Anthony Fauci, who's outspoken about FISA, who's pro-environment. I mean, someone like that melded into the Trump movement you would think would make it a shoo-in when people are just exhausted and worn out with bureaucracy and institutional politics that seems unresponsive and unreflexive.

But, you know, we don't know what's going to happen, do we? That's the simple truth of this. None of us know how this is going to play out. But a lot of people I've spoken to have said this could be a time of disturbance, purgatory and peculiarness. Like a lot of people like emotionally now are feeling not comfortable.

like sort of robustly confident, but like we might be entering into a time that could be a little unusual. Let me know in the comments and chat if you feel that. And let me know where you stand on the independent media versus global legacy media war, which is ultimately the war that's taking place. And you can see what the alliances are from the way this is all lining up. But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.

One of the reasons people are... In fact, let's have a quick message. I think we've got another message, have we? Have a look at Kalshi, because, yeah, if you think you know for certain how this thing's going to go down, you can put your money where your mouth is with Kalshi. That's not my game, though. I'm not down with gambling and stuff. You know, you might be. Have a look at this. Hey, have you heard of Kalshi?

Kalshi is a company that allow you to legally bet on a bunch of things including the outcome of this election. Now I don't gamble because I don't agree with gambling as a matter of fact for a variety of reasons but if you're a person who likes gambling and can gamble Kalshi allows you to gamble on election outcomes. God it would be weird if you could influence that and then bet on it. Crazy. With the election being in all our minds we can put our money where our mouths are and we can bet

on not only the outcome of the election, but how Senate's going to roll out and what the proportions are going to be in Congress. Anyway, you could vote for either Kamala or Trump in this election. So if you are a person that does gamble, gamble with Kalshi. Me, I don't gamble. Gambling's not for me, but I'm also not a totalitarian despot, so I believe you should do what you want to do. So you could go to Kalshi.com forward slash brand and the first 500 traders who deposit $100 will get a $20 credit.

You might not get a clearer example of how media manipulation and political duplicity coexist and co-align than this. Now, it was broadcast on CNN, so that at least is a favorable nod in the direction of old school media institutions, but it's never anything other than disconcerting to see the same political candidate attempting to simultaneously reach

People on different sides of a literal war. Have a look at this. It's staggering. Tonight, mixed messages. A K-file investigation this hour finds Kamala Harris is targeting crucial battleground voters with vastly different messages on Gaza and Israel. This ad is running in Michigan, which has the largest Arab population in America.

What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering, and I will not be silent. All right, well, it's a very different story for an ad in Pennsylvania targeting Jewish voters. Let me be clear. I will always stand up for Israel's right to defend itself, and I will always

ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself because the people of Israel must never again face the horror that a terrorist organization called Hamas caused on October 7.

Different message. Andrew Kaczynski is out front now. So, Andrew, those obviously do sound starkly different, to say the least. Tell me more about what you found. Yeah, that's right. And look, this really illustrates the sort of fine line that the Harris campaign is trying to walk here in the closing weeks, closing days of this campaign on the issue of Israel. Here you have two entirely different constituencies and they are getting

to entirely different messages. There are often times these constituencies have very opposing views on this. If you are a Jewish person in Pennsylvania, you saw that ad that you're getting. You are getting that ad that talks about how strong she is in Israel. If you're a Muslim voter in Michigan, you are getting that ad on Facebook that's talking about

um talking about how she won't be silent on the issue of gaza now what's really interesting here is that ad uh that we that we just played the one that's going to judge jewish voters in pennsylvania now it sort of sounds like those two clips of her talking about israel are together but they actually cut part of it out take a listen to what they cut

What has happened in Gaza over the past 10 months is devastating. President Biden and I are working to end this war such that Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination.

And you've seen, too, that she will obviously cut out that portion of the ad where they talked about Gaza from her DNC speech. Those two ports were together. They sliced them. They cut that part out. Now, look, she's also getting hammered a lot on this issue by Republicans. We talked just a couple of days ago about how those robocalls were airing in Wisconsin that are made to sound like they're in support of Jill Stein talking about her position on Gaza, saying that they're highlighting her pro-Israel position.

and they're sort of trying to siphon those votes away from her. So this is a really delicate issue for her. Oh, it certainly is. I mean, the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination are being cut out. It's important to notice that. John Mearsheimer talking about the same issue. He's a sort of professor and a military expert talking about how he couldn't countenance voting for the Democrats as a result of their position on that conflict. Do you want to share who you're voting for? No.

But I will say that I'm not voting for Trump and I'm not voting for Harris. Oh, wow. But is there an independent candidate still running? There are a number of candidates. And you can also, in the United States, write in candidates. No, I won't vote for the Democrats personally.

because of the genocide in Gaza. I think that the Biden administration is complicit in the genocide and genocide's a red line for me. And I would never vote for Biden or for Kamala Harris because again, they're complicit in the genocide.

Wow. So in a sense, the Democrats have found themselves in an unassailable position of trying to appeal to people with directly contradictory views when they have no real values that undergird their position under the service of either globalist interests, deep state interests, corporate interests, and how those sets of interests

intersect to form, I suppose, the nexus of real power. And to prevent anyone from recognizing that they are merely a vehicle for those interests, they continually, I suppose, distract us with messaging about respecting the vulnerable. But when it comes to actions that protect

the vulnerable, they're unwilling to take them because there's no real virtue or principles behind their posturing. And that's not a judgment really of any individuals within that movement. What's the point in that? It's a kind of inertia that's captured the bureaucratic class. But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the comments and chat. Hey, listen, if you're not an awakened wonder yet and you are not participating in our break bread conversations, here's a moment from my conversation with Carlyle.

lens where he's about rather unusual ways of taking community. He said, "I want to do it now." And all we had was Gatorade and gummy bears. And he was like, "We can't do that." And I said, "Why can't we do that?" He said, "Well, don't they have to be a certain type of sacrament?" And I said, "My brother, that is a perfect picture of what's wrong with American religiosity. Like the beauty of communion is it's not about the elements and it's not about the people giving it. It's about who communion is about."

And the whole essence of communion for me has always been really easy. It is a giant reminder that I can't do any of this on my own. Like communion was designed originally to be a reception, a reminder of what we receive.

Wow. Listen, we don't know what world we're going to be entering into in 24 hours. We know it's going to be pretty extraordinary and purgatorial. Let's have a look at the incident that, in a sense, and the era that brought us here. The time that most of us lost our faith in the establishment, lost our faith in institutions, began looking at new ways to understand reality was during the pandemic period. You might have gone into that

pandemic as relatively cynical about government, pretty untrusting when it came to matters of global corporatism, already deeply sceptical about the means and movements of mass media. But if you weren't, then by the end of the pandemic, you certainly would be. During the conversation between Musk and Rogan is, of course, one of the subjects that they covered. And it's difficult to imagine that having had guests as prominent as Musk, Vance and Trump on in the immediate build up to the election, that that can't have a significant impact on

on its outcome. Nevertheless, we await on a precipice. Here's Musk and Rogan discussing the pandemic era and the significance of Operation Warp Speed. Like you guys had no strategy for dealing with it if it got out?

And so you have to make up this new vaccine in record time, operation warp speed, release it to the people with very little testing. It's fucking crazy. It was crazy. The whole thing's crazy, and everybody just went along with it. Looney Tunes next level. Well, the PSYOP was fascinating to watch people step in line. That's like one of the biggest PSYOPs of all time. Of all time. Of all time. Of all time. And everybody got in line. And when you take it back to when pharmaceutical drug companies were able to

advertise on media in the 1990s. That changed everything. We're one of two countries in the whole world that allows this. And because of that, because we don't have socialized medicine, it's a complete profit scam. And they went hard claiming all sorts of things that were never researched, all sorts of things that are not supported by data, like the fact that it would stop transmission, the fact that it would stop infection, the fact that it was safe for pregnant women, the fact that it was safe for children.

All of it's bullshit. Yes. And they pushed it on the whole world. And if you didn't say that at a cocktail party, you were a pariah. Yes. And you were an anti-vaxxer. It was totally psycho. It was like being a Holocaust denier. You got kicked out of polite society. Exactly. Fucking bananas. And I should say, like, I'm actually generally...

pro-vaccine overall. I think we should look at these things. But I believe in the scientific method. So you don't have a blanket except anything. You don't have a blanket except that any given medication or any given treatment is 100% good. You should always view it with some skepticism.

Especially when you're getting the data from pharmaceutical drug companies that have a long history of criminal conduct. They've got a vested interest in the research. It's sort of like asking tobacco companies about whether smoking is dangerous. It's exactly the same thing. According to our scientists, everything's fine. They lied in court forever. The same thing they did with OxyContin when they said that it wasn't addictive.

Like, they have a long history of being full of shit if it makes them money. And that's what they do. That's their business. They've literally lost multi-billion dollar lawsuits in this... Massive. Massive. They're in the... You have...

amazing scientists right you have these clinical researchers these people develop these incredible drugs and they this is their job their job is to figure out some new way to cure something yeah when you a to stop thing and then you have the money people sure and the problem is when you have this one thing that

you would assume they're only doing it to help people and then they have this other faction that they're all just numbers people and all they give a fuck about is maximizing profits and making sure they literally have an obligation to their shareholders they have to make the most amount of money possible

And so they just want to push it on everybody. Like the Vioxx scandal. There's internal emails showing they knew there was going to be cardiovascular events. People were going to get strokes. And they're like, I think we're still going to do well. And they did. They made like $12 billion. They got fined seven. And 50,000 to 60,000 people died. Holy shit. Yeah. One of them was a friend of mine got a stroke.

And died? No, he didn't die. He lived, but he was a really healthy guy. He was like not the same after his illness. Yeah, he had knee problems, and he took Vioxx, and all of a sudden he was slurring his words, and he couldn't concentrate, and people were like, I think you're having a fucking stroke, and they took him to the hospital, and then you have this giant class action lawsuit, and then Vioxx gets pulled from the market, and they get sued, and the whole thing's fucking crazy, but there's a long history of this. I think, what is the number? Like one-third of the drugs that the FDA approves gets pulled?

It's fucking bananas. That is crazy.

How do we make sense of all this? What awaits us around the corner? What matter of metamorphosis will we be about to go through? The reason that I do break bread is because I believe that a lot of the answers will come from conversations that go beyond the political purview. Eric Metaxas is joining us for break bread this week. It's going to be on Thursday now. Join me for that. Well, guys, if you're

I'm not American. So I'm in right in the middle of your country. I hope you have a beautiful day. I hope you vote as your conscience tells you to. If voting is your thing, I pray that the Republic or the democracy, whatever you regard it as, comes through tonight peacefully.

lovingly and I pray that really what begins to become evident and obvious to all of you is that without God without virtue and true principles you can't create a cohesive society because you can't create consensus with our principles and you can't create principles without meaning and you can't create meaning without God and you don't need to create God because God is real God is an actual

reality. But if we replace God with nothingness and human will and materialism, rationalism and science, not as observation and analysis of God's miracle, but itself a new orthodoxy, you end up in a peculiar priesthood, a peculiar cathedral that will, in the end, as we are experiencing, lead us to nihilism, a

dark kind of emptiness that will have as its characteristics a kind of hysteria, a bewilderment, a sense of loss and self-devouring and aurora beraulis of self-consumption. And this we must avoid at all costs. I imagine, I reckon, I pray.

by awakening hope the next 24 hours is peaceful and somewhat conclusive for all of you we will be back regardless tomorrow not for more of the same but for more of the different until then if you can stay free