Hillary Clinton DEMANDS Free Speech CENSORSHIP CRACKDOWN – Rumble, X TARGETED! - SF469
58:29 Share

Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand. We are in the midst of a censorship war. Old media and independent media vie for your attention and ultimately compete for your vote in a forthcoming election. But that's

merely a metric measurement system. What's really at stake, of course, is the nature of reality itself. Who controls reality? I know that sounds like a grand ontological claim, but we're talking about who controls what you see and what you believe.

What information do you gain access to? And what information are you denied access to? I'm looking at that rumble chat and I can see you, Rafe87642. I'm looking at the Awaken Wonder chat on Locals, Lily Farm Girl, and all you guys. How's it going? I'm looking at T-Funk. I'm...

actually applauding your free speech and open communication in there. And that is not what you're going to get from Hillary. Is it Hillary Rodham Clinton? I've always found that middle name sort of slightly captivating. Hillary Rodham, I think it's Rodham, or is it Bill Rodham Clinton? In my mind, they've become some composite creature, the Clintons.

and the obamas too some sort of human soup of glistening ideas sort of a morass of interchangeable flesh with a grin within it speaking on behalf of deep state power it's no coincidence that this conglomerate creature would look like a blob imagine the individuals dropped into this

giddy morass of skin reporting only what you're capable of hearing, what's expedient for you to hear. Here's Hillary Clinton saying that social media companies need to be controlled. And it's not a surprise that she believes that because as the campaign escalates,

We've got Elon Musk on Tucker Carlson. There's a brilliant bit where he talks about like, you know, if Trump don't win this election, how long am I going to jail for? And you've got Kamala Harris on 60 Minutes.

which is, I believe, a CNN commodity, isn't it? I don't know which particular legacy media outfit owns 60 Minutes. But what I can tell you is that legacy media, which is centralized authority funded by corporate interests, and independent media, which of course has corporate interests. I'm not suggesting that Elon Musk isn't a billionaire, but it's pretty plain that he's an independent...

are vying with one another. Why would it be that Hillary Clinton is saying that social media companies need to be controlled? Because if social media companies were controlled, then you wouldn't have...

the spectacle or the phenomena of Elon Musk talking to Tucker Carlson on subjects like the southern border and immigration, on subjects like war. And you would only have access to the information that they want you to have access to. Here's Hillary Clinton saying that...

Social media companies need to be controlled. And remember that companies like X and Rumble, where you're watching this right now, are banned in multiple countries. Is that to protect you, do you think? Or is it to control you? X and Rumble banned in Brazil. Rumble banned in France. Rumble banned in Russia. Who do you think benefits?

from that, let me know in the chat. Now, if you're watching this on YouTube, I'll be with you for about another 12 minutes, simply because we want you to understand this offering. But you've got to know that YouTube is not what it once was. YouTube is currently itself a controlled space where the algorithm moves in accordance with globalist and corporate whims. You'll see that, obviously, by looking at your own feed and you'll note

that it is controlled information that you're granted access to. Let's have a look at Hillary Clinton. We should be, in my view, repealing something called Section 230, which gave platforms on the Internet.

I've always enjoyed that guy because in fact, can we go PIP on the still that I just froze it on Elaine just for a second. Look at how he stares. Look, he's like, he's always absolutely astonished by the news. Like, I actually wonder if he might be coming over to our side because like,

Oh, man, is this really the news? Is this really the news? Now, already Hillary Clinton's talked about repealing a section. Or is it 302? I can't remember what she said. But I know what it will be about. It will be about free speech. Let's watch the rest of it. You know, platforms on the Internet immunity because they were thought to be just pass-throughs, that they shouldn't be judged for the content that is posted.

It's brilliant because what I remember is when like they controlled it because, you know, Twitter had been infiltrated by FBI, CIA and everything. They would always say, do you remember this? It's not that long ago. They'd go, Facebook's a private company. You can't tell private companies what to say. They said that stuff all the time. Now there is a sort of a couple of rogue platforms like Rumble. There we are. Like Rumble and like X.

But now it's like, you know, you can't have these organizations getting out there, allowing people to speak freely. Remember, they want maximum privacy for the government, maximum transparency for you. It should be the other way around. The government should be transparent and we should be able to...

enjoy privacy. There shouldn't be the assumption that we move between being children and criminals. There shouldn't be the assumption that the state is empowered to replace God, a set of universal, unviable, unviolatable principles that they are in control of, that they can change. One minute, Facebook's a private company, leave them alone. The next minute, you can't have these rogue companies. That's because utility is everything, i.e.,

There's a plan. There's an agenda. It is posted. But we now know that that was an overly simple view, that if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or Twitter X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control. And it's not just the social and psychological effects. It's real harm. Right.

Whoa, real harm indeed. Well, over the course of the next hour, we're going to be looking at the nature of that harm. What's the significance of Kamala's appearance on 60 Minutes? How did she do? Benny Johnson, I know, said that...

she has thrown the whole election. The whole election has been thrown because of the way she's handled the conversation around her flip-flopping, the conversation around immigration, and of course, importantly, around war. Now, as for Hillary Clinton's remarks just then, let's go to this still image now, Elaine. We're going to go to a still image. Let's have a look at what

Glenn Greenwald and Mike Benz have to say in response to Hillary Clinton's declaration that she requires the ability to sense. Western liberals united with neoliberal billionaires and intelligence agencies to manufacture fake disinformation.

industry to manufacture a fake disinformation industry whose sole purpose was to radically expand and justify internet censorship dems like hillary and tim waltz were explicit about the goal says our man here's chenk over on like who's more from the left let's see what he's saying hillary clinton just said on cnn we lose total control if social media content is not regulated

She's accidentally admitting the whole point of the attack on social media. Social media can't be contained and they're losing their grip on power. They hate it. So like that's the left and not Glenn Greenwald's not figured out. Actually, go back to that, mate. I was reading that. Like that's the left and the right simultaneously agreeing that the censorship issue is out of control. In fact, go full screen now for me, mate, on the text. Thank you. I've been.

put here on God's green earth sent from the future to tell you... Look at Mike Benz. He's getting... Tell you what, this Christianity is cashing. To tell you this...

the current consensus policy pivot of every major organ of the US State Department, which Hillary Clinton used to run and state's program is specifically designed to achieve total control. So look at that. That's a variety of interesting and sort of somewhat diverse views. Everyone agreeing that the agenda is the same. Total social media control. Astonishing. This is a pivotal moment. Now, over the course of the next

We're going to look at Kamala on 60 Minutes. We're going to look at Elon Musk on Tucker. And we're going to show you how this election is going to shape reality. That's what we're going to be discussing. That's what we're going to be demonstrating. Before we get into that, let's have a quick word from one of our partners today. This is Airstech that will provide you support and protection from electromagnetic fields as you travel through airports. Let's look at that now.

Imagine sitting on a commercial flight, every single person there smothered in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, earbuds, all that stuff. You might as well be in a fuselage made of electromagnetic energy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classifies airline crew members as radiation workers precisely because of this fact. Airstech.

As you know, probably, are an official partner of the UFC. They're the only scientifically validated EMF protection solution. Hang that little thing around your neck, it saps up those sweet little problems. AirTech uses EMF modulation technology that is trusted and used around the world.

Go to airstech.com forward slash pages forward slash Russell dash brand. Use code Russell30 for 30% off. That's code Russell30 for 30% off. Give yourself the advantages that these devices represent.

Okay, so let's get into this. Thank you for that message for our partners Airsteck. If that's a product that will be useful to you, take advantage of it. Okay guys, let's get into the main story today. This is what's really fascinating me, of course. This is the story that we're covering most of all. I didn't know this happened because we're in Miami. We're in the middle of a mad hurricane. It's crazy and it's insane here.

I don't think it's in particular going to affect Miami, as I understand. Let me know in the comments and chat. It's more going to be relevant to the dear good people of Tampa. You're getting a lot of love in the chat there, Elaine. People are like the Rumble viewers. I tell you this. These are a compassionate and loving group. No home screen images. That's not going out there. It's just going out on my monitor. Fantastic.

But I didn't know that Elon Musk had appeared on Tucker Carlson's show. The reason I'm fascinated by this is it's showing you how media, propaganda, messaging and social communication is changing. Some of the early examples of this were the Arab Spring, the Occupy movement, Brexit and Trump 2016. Now we're a lot further down that road. And in November, we will see what form of campaigning is most successful.

To start off, let's have a look at Elon Musk reflecting on what he might personally incur in the event of a Kamala victory. If he loses, man, what? You're fucked, dude. I'm fucked. If he loses, I'm fucked. It does seem that way.

You can't just be like, you can't just be like, yeah, I'm like, how long do you think my prison sentence is going to be? Do you think? Will I see my children? I don't know. Because it's not like you can say, well, yeah, I maxed out to him, but, you know, I get. I have no plausible deniability. No, no, and I've been trashing Kampala nonstop. Oh, I know.

So there you go. It's a pretty lighthearted way to get into this conversation, but what power is being concealed and what power is being expressed as this campaign takes shape. Now, before we get into start the countdown to leave YouTube Elaine now, please, before we get into, uh,

some of Elon's extraordinary theories, most notably that the reason celebrities are willing to support the Kamala campaign is because they know that if Trump gets into power, he will release the Epstein list and Lord knows what happened with the Diddy case in the event that Trump's in power. Before

we get into that story, we're going to have to ask you if you're watching this on YouTube to click the link in the description. Join us on Rumble. Consider getting Rumble Premium. And remember, turn on your notification bell if you're watching this on YouTube. Otherwise, the algorithm will not direct you towards our content. Click that link. So here, Elon Musk says that celebrities are supporting Kamala because Trump will release the Epstein client list if he wins. Is that true? Is what we're learning now that these institutions of entertainment are

Almost actually institutionally corrupt. There's not one or two rogues like, you know, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Diddy, Puffy. It's actually the whole institutions themselves that are built on malfeasance, trafficking and exploitation. We're not talking about the epicurean hedonistic excesses of poverty.

plucky kids from the street that are making it in Hollywood and going on a little bit of a flirty saucy odyssey of wonder no we're talking on institutionalized corruption we are talking about deep darkness we are talking about nothing short of spiritual warfare whose side are you going to be on in this spiritual warfare what side do you want to wake up on on November the 5th do you want constricted authoritarianism and total control do you want godlessness do you want

a world where the rationalists, those that deny our Lord, that sort of timidly tiptoe through their materialist arguments, well, of course, it's much better to have these legislators in power. It's a lot better to have the ability to control free speech. I can't think for myself. Tell me what to think. Let's have a look at Elon's claim.

that celebrities are supporting Kamala because of the Epstein list. I'm sure he's just joking, but what a story. Will that ever come out, do you think? You know, I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. Yes. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome. Yeah. Do you think Reid Hoffman's uncomfortable? Yes. And Gates. And Gates. Yeah. Yeah.

And I only ask that because you can sort of, you just look at them and you're like, that's a nervous person right there. I don't know. I mean, I assume you know them. Yeah. Yes. Reid Hoffman was my vice president of business development at PayPal. Yeah. I think he is concerned about the Epstein situation. Whoa. Full screen on me. Whoa. What an extraordinary time. What an extraordinary story. Yeah.

Is it possible that the reason that the establishment is so opposed to Trump 2024, remember Trump 2024 includes Tulsi Gabbard, includes Bobby Kennedy, it includes anti-war, anti-corporate, anti-global candidates, outspoken advocates for liberty and freedom, outspoken advocates for a spiritual perspective. I'm not for a second naive enough, fool enough to claim that these individuals are populists.

when it comes to a whole variety of subjects, a whole variety of subjects. But generally speaking, you know, when I heard Bobby Kennedy speak that day as a part of the Maha conversation with Tulsi Gabbard, it became clear that he has got a strong anti-big pharma, anti-corporate message. You only have to read his book on the real Anthony Fauci to know that and how fascinating to hear. This is massive, isn't it? The Bill Gates, let me know in the chat.

If you watch this on Rumble, Bill Gates might be beyond nervous, terrified about what's happening. Let me know. Awaken wonders in the locals chat. What you think it means when someone is high profile and is connected as Elon Musk says that this billionaire class, which is a member of, will be terrified about the possibility of a Trump election, which would likely mean that the war machine would be disrupted, would likely mean. And this is my prayer that.

big pharma and big food would be held accountable and that the health of ordinary Americans would come to the forefront. If you have a better America, hopefully you have a better world. We could have a conversation about the financial collapses taking place and the advent of bricks and the collapse of the petrodollar and countries like mine, the United Kingdom, if I...

Ever go back to that breezy, bright and wonderful land, our Albany or Albion. We'll stop being co-opted by authoritarian centralist legislators and we'll return to the people that built the nation. And that's certainly my prayer for your country. Now, if you want to see a little more of Bobby Kennedy, our conversation with him is up.

Now, he's talking about how the electorate are being confused by the inclusion of his name on the ballot. Remember when Bobby was still running as an independent, the Dems wanted him off of the ballot paper. Now he's running in advocacy of Trump. They want him to stay off.

on the ballot paper, do you spot the theme? There are no consistent principles. There is only an agenda to be pursued. And that agenda is about control. If I was going to sum it up in one word, that word would be control. Let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with that. And if you're not on Awake and Wonder yet, consider becoming one now and you'll get access to early interviews like this one with Bobby. Here he is saying that the electorate are being confused. ...and a couple of the battlegrounds say it's like Michigan.

Where I fought very hard to get off the ballot, I actually won the case in the Court of Appeals and they ordered the Board of Elections to remove me from the ballot. The Democratic Party, which had been trying to keep me off the ballot for four months,

then pivoted and now is sued to keep me on the ballot because they knew that that would confuse the electorate. Yeah. You know, it's a deliberate anti-democratic imagination. And, you know, I'm urging people not to fall for it. I don't want to be on the ballot and I don't want you to vote for me. I want you to vote for Donald Trump because that's the only way that I'm going to get to Washington and fix the food system.

Fix the pharmaceutical system. Unravel this corrupt merger of state and corporate power that has turned our agencies predatory against the American public.

Wow. Against the American public. This is an extraordinary opportunity, I would say, this election. If you want to, excuse me, see that conversation, go over to Locals. It's up there now. Let me know what you think of it, Miss Molly. You're an awakened wonder. Let me know what you think of it, Trucia. You're an awakened wonder. I'll be fascinated to see your feedback because I think it's the best conversation ever.

I've ever had with Bobby Kennedy and we were having it, of course, at a crucial time. Now, we all know what Elon Musk thinks about almost everything because Elon Musk is the proprietor and in a sense star attraction on X.

But we are, I believe, involved in something beyond a moment of political discourse and dispute. We are involved, I believe, in what can only be described as spiritual warfare. What do you mean by that, Russell? I mean that there are ulterior and potentially ethereal forces at play. That sounds crazy, man. Well...

put it this way what motivates you moment to moment what's in your heart what's in your mind are you beginning to see how the rational and material world is buttressed when there is no recourse to a kind of universal divine set of principles and ideas that might guide and direct us do you see that if you annihilate god what you end up being left with is man as the apex of all power mankind and who are

the nominees of this new materialist power justin trudeau macron starmer kamala bill gates when we talk about this cartel cadre of globalist corporatists what we're talking about is the replacement of the authority of god and the divine i'm not making any claim that one religion is superior to any other that's a claim that all of us must individually decipher for ourselves

But decipher is right because the ciphers are who are in charge now. Conduits, I believe, for a dark power that's hell bent on globalism and totalitarianism. It's interesting and fascinating to hear Elon Musk talk, certainly the first time I've ever heard him talk about the need for God, the need for theology, the need for religion and spirituality in many of the dystopian depictions

that we've seen in the last few years. Just to give you one example, Handmaid's Tale, brilliant novel by Margaret Atwood. What's being offered to you is that what you must fear is a kind of Christian totalitarianism. I myself, in fact, in my Russell Brand stand-up breakdown on Locals, you're going to love it, guys, looked at a bit of stand-up I once did on the Ten Commandments.

I can see then that I was focused very much on the Christian right and how I saw that Christianity was used to marshal political authority. But now it is humanitarianism that's used to marshal human authority, governmental authority. Let me give you one example. What's the reason? Look at the mainstream media. What's the reason that your taxes are being used and spent on the Ukraine-Russia conflict? Tell me what that is.

is because Putin is a criminal interlocutor and intruder on Ukrainian territory, and that we as humanitarians must protect the Ukrainian people. Now, of course, a religious purview would provide you with ample motivation to end all wars, to protect all of the vulnerable people in the world, to look at all of the people in the world as a part of a sacred brotherhood worthy of sanctuary and sanctity. But from a materialistic

humanitarian perspective you can elect and select which wars you care about which rubble is important which refugees are important which dead and damned people are important they are doing nothing less than replacing divine authority with their own authority we don't

don't decide whether or not we worship, we decide who we worship. And they're deciding on our behalf over the course of this electoral cycle that we will worship them, not just nationally, but internationally, not just internationally, but globally. They want a 360 sphere of information control. In this conversation with Tucker, Elon Musk talks about the role of religion. He talks about the impact of the decline in religion. Let's have a look at that.

Right now. Part of it, I suppose, is sort of the decline of religion. So, you know, as the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum. So when you have essentially a decline in religion and increase in the secular nature of society, for most people, they need something to fill that void.

And so they adopt a religion. It's not called a religion, but effectively like woke, the woke mind virus. It takes the place of religion. Yes. And they internalize it and they feel it with religious fervor. Yes. And rigidity. Yes. Yes. And they essentially conduct like a holy war, effectively. It's just not called a religion, but it is a religion, sort of a woke holy war.

And they're highly resistant to change as is normal for religions. So, now for myself, I sort of see myself as a sort of, you know, engineer, physicist. For me, I'm culturally Christian. I grew up Christian. I mean, I was Anglican, was baptized, you know.

I went to Sunday school. Yeah. Actually, oddly enough, I was sent to Hebrew preschool and Anglican Sunday school at the same time. So it was Haban de Gila one day, Jesus El O the next. Which is, you know, if you're five years old, it's fine. There's no, you know. So, yeah.

I'm not Jewish, it's just that my father's two partners in his engineering firm went to the same Hebrew preschool and it was near our house, so I just got sent there. And so... But, you know, I... Maybe this will make me even more amused, but I have trouble sort of believing all these stories, these religious stories, but a lot of people do. Yeah.

And I respect people who want to have religious views. I'm not trying to dissuade them from their religious views. But anyway, I guess the operating system I have is sort of a physics engineering operating system where I try to understand as much as possible about reality. In physics, you're not supposed to believe anything absolutely. You're supposed to question things. That's how you discover new physics.

um you know in engineering that's how you discover if your machine will work or not work will the rocket get to orbit well you know yeah um you know if you if your rocket is designed with you know physics in mind uh correctly it will get to orbit and if it is not it will not get to orbit uh no matter what your belief system is you can believe um you know yeah um

Yeah, it's like, I meet a lot of people, speaking of LA, I meet a lot of people in LA who believe witchcraft is real, and that you can do spells, and that spells and witchcraft magic is real. I'm like, can you magic us to the moon? And no one has yet been able to magic us to the moon. Spells can't be that good, okay, if you can't, I want to go to the moon, let's go, how about Mars?

We got to the moon the first time. We definitely went to the moon. Yes, we went to the moon. We went to the moon several times. Right. I just want to check your view on that. 100% went to the moon.

That's pretty interesting, isn't it? Here's a few things I want to remark on. One, it looks like they're having that conversation between Morpheus and Neo in the Matrix. They're in this sort of white, expansive unspace. When Elon Musk talks about the nature of magic and the ability to transmit, transform, transcend, teleport, transport, I think it's important to sort of mark the distinction between dimensions and interdimensionality.

This is the material world. In the material world, we're material gods. We've got to move around rationally according to the laws of physics, which, by the way, have changed several times, haven't they? First there was Newtonian physics, Einsteinian physics, now we have quantum physics as we learn at depth the nature of our reality. And of course there is so much abundantly available in technology that would appear like magic to a less informed or regressed species.

There is a limit to, it's interesting we talked about meeting people in LA that are interested in spells, I bet that's some stuff that we'll be talking about in the coming months, you know, sort of magic, dark arts, that kind of stuff, certainly occultism.

My understanding of miracles is that we only understand a limited remit of the potential realities, i.e. we can only see a certain amount of the electromagnetic spectrum. We can only hear a certain amount of olfactory and audio information, but there must be information that's undetectable by us.

I'm beginning to understand this in a spiritual and explicitly and specifically Christian context, that if you can move between realms, if you can understand the ulterior realities, then the impossible becomes possible.

Can you magic your way to the moon? I don't think so. But perhaps if you are an a spatial and a temporal being with access to eternal consciousness, there is no difference between the moon or as they would say in the matrix, the spoon. When Christ says something like I saw Satan fall from heaven like lightning, what's being referred to there?

an atemporal, an aspatial reality, a reality that's beyond space and time, where emergent phenomena and emergent frequencies can be observed coming into being. I learned recently that light preceded the Big Bang, that of course the Big Bang is around 13.8 billion years ago, and that the existence of light precedes that somehow.

Our materialistic modalities and analysis cannot incorporate or calculate things that we know and things that we experience. This is a time not just of individual but collective awakening.

Interesting to see that Elon Musk has a theological interest. He's broadly a skeptic and a cynic, as you would imagine, like a technological genius to be a man who's brilliant at observing patterns. That's observable and measurable patterns, I suppose, in his case.

It's a pretty brilliant conversation. The kind of conversations I wouldn't like to see you could tell. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. If you're watching this on YouTube, remember, turn on the notification bell because the algorithm will direct you away from the truth and towards a kind of madness. And if you're watching this, as I pray, on Rumble, consider Rumble Premium. Because Rumble Premium... Now, this is another ad, okay, mate? So, Elaine, you ready, baby? Yes.

Rumble Premium is a frictionless way to enjoy Rumble, to support Rumble's content creators. Here's a message about that now.

The war against free speech is in full swing. We are the vanguard bravely fighting back. Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech. They've joined X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspire to block ad revenue from going to the platforms. Recently, they've launched Rumble Premium.

This, I think, is going to be a game changer for all of us. It's an ad-free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators. Rumble Premium will give you the ability to dive into your favorite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV and savor every uninterrupted second of my content. Why don't you upgrade to Rumble Premium today? Support my free speech and the free speech of others.

other content creators on this platform please go to rumble now rumble.com forward slash premium and if you use the code brand you'll save ten dollars and rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts so that's rumble.com forward slash premium and do use the code brand to save ten dollars anyway there's a link there at the bottom of the screen now we're posting it in the chat

This election will be fought between two types of institution, old school legacy media and new emergent independent media. On independent media, we can see Elon Musk talking to Tucker Carlson, information that would not be available to you if Hillary Clinton had her wishes in her way and was able to censor. And on...

60 Minutes, we saw Kamala Harris. It seemed to me blunder, falter and stumble several times, specifically on the subject of the border. We're going to start off looking at Elon Musk talking to Tucker about voter ID and the potential that being able to vote, the potential...

that is afforded by being able to vote without ID for election interference. Then we're going to talk, then we're going to look at Kamala Harris talking about why she opened the Southern border. This is pretty extraordinary. Let's have a look. First of all, Elon on Tucker talking about voter ID and the same people that demanded vaccine IDs for, if you want to travel or do anything, all the same ones who say no voter ID is required. Is there any reason to pass a law like that, except to abet voter fraud?

It's so that fraud cannot be proven. It enables large-scale fraud and no way to prove it. Because how would you prove it? It's literally impossible. No ID. You're not even allowed to show your ID. It's insane. Well, it is insane. Insane. So, yeah. The purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections. Obviously. Yeah.

There can be no other explanation. I mean, they come up with some nice sounding thing. People don't have IDs. Could you live in this country without an ID? Yeah. I mean, their common rebuttal is like it's racist to require ID, which is insane. I think it's actually racist and patronizing to say that people can't figure out how to get ID, obviously. But how could you live here without an ID? I don't think it's even possible. You can't. Yeah. You can't do anything. You need an ID for everything. Like the list of things you need an ID for is basically everything.

except voting.

That's a really extraordinary story. Do you see it in the same way? Let me know in the comments and the chat. Firstly, I suppose you have to agree with that analysis. I've seen Joe Rogan make the same argument to assume that certain people are not capable of getting an ID and that that would be defined by their race is in itself kind of madly and insanely racist. And then Elon's point that everything requires ID. I mean, I'm staying in your country at the moment. If you want to hire a car, you need ID. Most like this almost sort of pretty minor purchases require ID.

So if you can vote without ID, but you can't do all these other things without ID, what is the purpose of allowing people to vote without ID? Let me know what you think about that in the comments in the chat. Now, this pivot to Kamala Harris on centralized media, media funded by corporations, media that will receive significant ingestion online.

of funds from Big Pharma, the kind of media that when they're talking about war will invite on retired colonels and generals that now work for military industrial complex companies like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, often not declaring those connections. Now, let's see how they interview Kamala Harris on the border. Now, I've seen many commentators online on X specifically say that actually 60 Minutes did a good job of pressing Kamala Harris. Let's have a look at how it went down and judge for ourselves what we think about it.

You recently visited the southern border and embraced President Biden's recent crackdown on asylum seekers. And that crackdown produced an almost immediate and dramatic decrease in the number of border crossings. If that's the right answer now, why didn't your administration take those steps in 2021? The first bill we proposed to Congress was to fix our broken immigration system.

knowing that if you want to actually fix it, we need Congress to act. It was not taken up. Fast forward to a moment when a bipartisan group of members of the United States Senate, including one of the most conservative members of the United States Senate, got together, came up with a border security bill. Well, guess what happened? Donald Trump got word that this bill was afoot and could be passed immediately.

And he wants to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem. So he told his buddies in Congress, kill the bill. Don't let it move forward. But I've been covering the border for four years. And so I know this is not a problem that started with your administration. Correct. Correct. But there was an historic flood.

of undocumented immigrants coming across the border the first three years of your administration. As a matter of fact, arrivals quadrupled from the last year of President Trump. Was it a mistake to loosen the immigration policies as much as you did? It's a long-standing problem, and solutions are at hand. And from day one, literally,

We have been offering solutions. What I was asking was, was it a mistake to kind of allow that flood to happen in the first place? I think the policies that we have been proposing are about fixing a problem, not promoting a problem. But the numbers did quadruple under your watch. And the numbers today, because of what we have done,

We have cut the flow of illegal. What a mess. There are some old tropes available there. This exists in all nations. The blaming of the opposition or various institutions themselves. Oh, we can't get that through because of Congress. That was the previous administration that caused that problem.

I feel when I hear that kind of rhetoric, well, don't claim that you can solve the problem now then. Aren't we just preparing ourselves so when you say in one year or two years, oh, it was Congress or it was the previous administration, how can you simultaneously say, I'm going to solve all these problems for you, but at the moment I'm unable to solve these problems for you because of institutional and bureaucratic tangles or because of the problems of my forebears. It exposes something significant.

Also, it's difficult not to ponder the possibility that Elon Musk might be right, that the reason that there is a relaxation at the borders and simultaneously the removal of the requirement for ID is because there's some expedient purpose behind it.

I'm most wary about saying anything that sounds discriminatory or cruel or anything that in any way sort of attacks or opposes vulnerable people. My general sense is if you're a refugee or you're a migrant, you don't have much power. That doesn't mean, though, that the powerful can't exploit that situation. Traditionally, that's been done to reduce the ability of ordinary working class people, natives of any particular country. There could be any culture or any variety of race, by the way.

from getting good wages for their work because there's competition for low-paid jobs. Now it seems, in conjunction with this peculiar ID stuff or a lack of requirement for ID when voting, that this is at least something that has to be explored. And when you hear Kamala Harris, a person that's been the vice president for four years, that's currently... I mean, what is her role at the moment? What can Joe Biden possibly be doing? He's wheeled out occasionally. The coffin lid flicks open. He makes an announcement about Israel or whatever.

Kamala Harris is in a position of power right now. I would say that that interviewer and let me know if you agree with this in the comments and chat is doing an incredible job of interrogating Kamala Harris on this subject because I'm left thinking Kamala Harris can't be telling the truth about all these things.

Either she has the power to make these changes and she's not making them now, or she's a kind of filibuster prevaricator that don't get stuff done. And even when she refers to solutions that could take place, would that solution be?

A wall at all. And if that solution is a wall, we're way back now in 2016 where we were all told the thing that above all things made Donald Trump evil and malign above the locker room language, above the kind of.

casual use of exclamatory language and cussing and cursing and an interesting debate style was that war. So what does Kamala Harris mean when she says we have solutions that we've not implemented yet because of the previous administration or because of congressional tangles? And is it possible that Elon Musk and all those people that are talking about the exploitation of vulnerable people, migrant communities, refugees, illegals, call them what you want, it

is actually happening not because they want to help people, but because they want the opportunity to manipulate the outcomes of elections. Is that at least worth considering? I would say it is. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat. If you're watching this on YouTube, turn on the notification bell. If you're watching us on Rumble right now, and I pray that you are, get involved in the chat.

with High Priestess 93 and Sharkbait Jay. Join all those guys and consider becoming an Awake and Wonder where we have fantastic conversations. And we've got some staggering announcements coming soon. We've got a new offering coming for our locals community that you're going to just love. And the first episode that will be available from October the 11th, and that's

just a matter of days away now is a conversation exclusively available for our locals member members we've got more than one i think let me count one two yep there's two of them that will be is a conversation with tucker carlson tucker as you've never heard him before i can't wait to start showing you pieces of that conversation but for now let's have a look

Ah, Bobby Kennedy, who's come to the conversation with Bobby's out there right now. And he's talking about, you saw a little moment of this earlier when I played the wrong clip by mistake. Here he is talking about being endorsed by the former head of the CDC. This is the kind of change that is encouraging. When you see someone like, I think he's called Robert Redfield. I met him myself when I participated in an event with Bobby Kennedy earlier.

on the subject of addiction and in particular the opioid crisis. You might have seen on X my post, I went to a treatment center where people were being treated for fentanyl addiction. What a terrible bloat on your nation that is. Well, when someone like Robert Redfield, former head of the CDC, when he endorses Bobby Kennedy, you know things are changing fast because Bobby Kennedy took this dude to task in his Anthony Fauci book. So let's have a look at that.

If you're on Awake and Wonder, guys, I'm talking to you, Claude. I'm talking to you, Sissy Calendar. You can check it out now. But here's a little section for all of you guys. Who can fix this problem at HHS? Because everybody who goes into HHS gets captured there. First of all, to get appointed head of the HHS by any president of the United States, you already have to have been approved of and co-opted for a lifetime. Yes.

There you go. To see that conversation in full, become an awakened wonder. The details are available in the chat right now. We've got some incredible offerings coming for you soon. I'm very, very excited about. This is another lovely moment from Kamala Harris. This is Kamala Harris on 60 Minutes, prevaricating on the subject of prevarication itself. This woman, she oscillates, she vacillates, she underperforms.

She changes direction like a hurricane. Let's have a look at her talking about her policy positions and how they've changed. I'm really let me know if you agree. Enjoying that that interlocutor and interrogator from 60 Minutes. I think he's doing a fabulous job. Who is that guy? What your critics and the columnists say. OK, they say the reason so many voters don't know you.

is that you have changed your position on so many things. You were against fracking. Now you're for it. You supported looser immigration policies. Now you're tightening them up. You were for Medicare for all. Now you're not.

So many that people don't truly know what you believe or what you stand for. And I know you've heard that. In the last four years, I have been vice president of the United States. And I have been traveling our country. And I have been listening to folks.

and seeking what is possible in terms of common ground. I believe in building consensus. We are a diverse people, geographically, regionally, in terms of where we are in our backgrounds. And what the American people do want is that we have leaders who can build consensus, where we can figure out compromise and understand it's not a bad thing as long as you don't compromise your values.

to find common sense solutions. And that has been my approach.

What your relationship is to the subject of

war. Here, Kamala Harris refuses to commit to not going to war with China over Taiwan or whether or not she would attack Iran. Now, these are important subjects. I don't know about you, but I'm not looking forward to a global holy war or even sectarian or secular war. I don't want to have a war on any basis. Indeed, if nationalism can offer us something concrete and of value, it might be this. The beginnings of

of localism that each country is independent and within each country each community is independent and within each community each individual is independent and bound only by universal agreed upon principles fraternity kindness love service surrender acceptance gratitude spiritual principles in short so let's see what kamala harris believes in when it comes to the not unimportant subject of war and

And then we'll compare that with the brilliant Professor John Mearsheimer talking about Biden, the President of the United States. That's basically his job title. And what John Mearsheimer believes about him is essentially that he's a warmonger. First of all, though, here's Kamala Harris, essentially your current president and presidential candidate, saying that she will not rule out war with Iran and war with China. Eek! Which foreign country do you consider to be our...

greatest adversary? I think there's an obvious one in mind, which is Iran. Iran has American blood on their hands. This attack on Israel, 200 ballistic missiles, what we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power, that is one of my highest priorities. So if you had proof that Iran is building a nuclear weapon, would you take military action?

I'm not going to talk about hypotheticals at this moment. What about China? That's weird to not talk about hypotheticals. I mean, I'm not going to start using the imagination. What are you going to talk about then? Like what only things are actually happening? How can you have a policy? How can you have a plan without hypotheses? What about China? China, first of all, we must win the competition for the 21st century with China. We must be able to compete and win.

We should not seek conflict, but we have to understand that there are parameters in which we must operate that include ensuring, for example, that we protect American business interests. So say if China attacks Taiwan, would we use military force to support Taiwan? Bill, I'm not going to get into hypotheticals, but listen, we need to make sure... That's another hypothetical. I don't do hypotheticals. ...that we maintain a one-China policy...

But that includes supporting Taiwan's ability to defend itself, including what we need to do to ensure the freedom of the Taiwan Strait. We need to make sure we have open lines of communication with China, in particular, military to military. Got to have that.

Can't deal with any hypotheticals. The phrase that stuck out to me there, I wonder if you spotted it, the competition for the 21st century. That's called, she's been briefed there. You'll hear that a lot, I predict. That's the undergirding for an oppositional stance worldwide.

China, because there's a competition for the 21st century, which is a time period, an epoch, therefore an abstract concept that we are apparently, and when I say we, I mean those of us that are sort of either an ancillary member of the American empire or a literal member of the American empire. We're in war with,

for a piece of time. Think of the things we've had wars for now. The war against terror, the war against drugs, the war against COVID, the war against germs, the war against microbes. We're in all these wars and now we're in wars for pieces of time. How much more abstract and ridiculous is this going to get before we acknowledge the actual truth that we're in war for war's sake, wars of dominion and total control. Control is the aim, whether it's control over your free speech, control over your body, control over whether or not you can be killed, what category you're in. Are you a killer?

person. Let's have a look at Professor John Mearsheimer saying that Joe Biden is basically a warmonger. I want to see this. Let's just talk about first the Ukraine war and then talk about the Middle East.

I think if Trump had been president, he had been reelected in the 2020 election, that we would not have had the Ukraine war. It's clear to me that the Russians were very interested in avoiding a war. And then once the war started, shutting it down.

And at the same time, I believe that Biden had no interest in accommodating the Russians. He had no interest in working out a diplomatic solution. And I believe that he bears a huge amount of responsibility for this war. I think that

Biden's basic instincts are those of a warmonger. And I think that's not true of Trump. I think Trump is not that interested in fighting wars. And I think in the case of Ukraine, I can't prove this. We can't run the counterfactual. But I think if Trump had been president, we would not have had a war in Ukraine.

Hmm, can't run the counterfactuals, but what do you think about that? Let me know in the comments and the chat. When you see Kamala Harris refusing to engage in hypotheticals, when you see John Mearsheimer saying that Biden, who's basically, I would say, Kamala Harris in a different body suit.

is basically a warmonger. You know what the policies are likely to be. After this election, we could be facing more war, a campaign, a war for control over a lump of time called the 21st century. We could be in a world where free speech is censored, where X is controlled, where Elon Musk is flung in.

into jail. We could be living in a world where my body, my choice is a principle that alters whether or not we're talking about the subject of pro-life versus pro-choice or new medications that the WHO could demand that we take if their treaty advances. Let me know what leader of the free world you believe will stand up

up against corporatism and globalism and base that on their alliances. On one side, you've got Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney. On the other side, you've got Donald Trump, you've got Robert Kennedy, you've got Tulsi Gabbard. It's an interesting and unusual time, and I'm certainly not claiming to understand it or being able to discern what's the better direction for America or indeed the world. Simply, this is what we can offer you. Virtue means...

You have some sense of good and it's derived from something other than self-interest and the desire to place control over other people.

Maybe that can be some kind of guide at a time like this. And if you feel that someone's basically a warmonger, I don't know how much you can trust them. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat. If you watch this on YouTube, turn on the notification bell. It's the only way you will ever know that this even happened. But my prayer is you're watching this on Rumble or even Rumble Premium. There's a link in the chat telling you how you can get that. Become an awakened wonder. If you're not one now, get early access to our interviews. And from next week, a fantastic newscast.

new offering episode one of a new show that I can't even tell you the name of yet because it's too exciting, too beautiful. We'll be up and it's with Tucker Carlson and I know you'll love it. So become an awakened wonder. It's a brilliant journey that we're all on together.

Do you remember the glory days when Anthony Fauci was in charge of everything? Ah, COVID. That was a funny time, wasn't it? I didn't know whether to stand six foot apart from people, whether to wear a mask or not, whether to get a shot or not, whether or not freedom was a value worth pursuing, whether or not free speech was of any value. What?

causes myocarditis and turbo cancers? Will we ever know? Is there any possibility that Pfizer and Moderna's incredible influence through commercial expenditure on mainstream media channels grants them some influence? Is there any possibility that their great donations affords them the ability to direct

and maybe wag the dog the tail of which they so plainly are fleas on it maybe fleas on it maybe is it possible that there are not significant or sufficient investigations into the efficacy of medicines all those questions fade away when staring at the twinkling eyes of Anthony Fauci who may

light and simple breezy chit chat about the subject of the pandemic do you know he even caught covid himself one time that guy falchi he's just like you and me to your college reunion at holy cross and you face a situation that i think we've all faced uh i've faced it more than once uh i'm going into something and i see oh i'm the only one with a mask

What do I do? And to this day, I'm frequently on an airplane, the only one with a mask.

So let's do the Dr. Fauci's the only one with a mask passage at his college reunion, 60th college reunion at Holy Cross. I put on a mask as I always did in indoor public settings. When I looked into the reception hall where about 50 of my classmates were milling about and chatting, it was a welcome scene. But there was one problem. No one was wearing a mask. I didn't know what to do. We've all been there, right?

I thought to myself that if I kept my mask on, I might make some people feel uncomfortable. Ever since the spring of 2020, I had rarely faced this dilemma in Washington, D.C., because typically at social gatherings, we were masked and required to test in advance. But by the spring of 2022, maskless events were becoming more and more commonplace. And of course, we'd all started hugging each other again after two years of social distancing. Still, I was Dr. Fauci.

And I had to do a quick calculation, one that I know many Americans were familiar with. Do I take off my mask? Just then I saw my old buddy, Jim Mulhill, who had earned a dental degree from Harvard after Holy Cross and later headed the University of Connecticut Health Center. Hell, I thought, and quickly stuffed my mask into my pocket. I was a little nervous.

And the audience laughs because the mask is not a significant item, more an avatar of a political position. Ha, diddy, ha, ha, ha. Anthony Fauci promoting his book about my personal pandemic. Stay six feet away from me, Anthony Fauci unmasked. Let me know what you think would be a great title for Anthony Fauci's biography. How about this?

You little bastard. I was a little nervous, was fully aware that I was taking a risk, but my split-second decision was based on the fact that I intended to be in there for only a few minutes. I gave Jim a bear hug, and then I did the same with Jack Fallon, who in my day was Holy Cross's star football wide receiver and several other class of 62 alumni. I flew home masked and feeling grateful for these encounters.

And that's how Anthony Fauci got COVID. That's how I got COVID. But the story is more painful. It's much more painful. Because I got COVID three days before my daughter's wedding.

Oh, no, that could have been me. He's just like us. These people are just like us, you know. If they're just like us, maybe they shouldn't be granted centralized authority and the ability to lock whole countries and indeed an entire planet in their homes. If they're just like us, maybe they should be held to account when they one day say masks don't do anything and then the next day say we should all wear masks. Maybe.

Maybe if they're just like us, if they tell us we should get shots because it's to protect vulnerable older people or people with comorbidities who are more likely to die as a result of COVID, perhaps we should demand access to the clinical data that shows that these various medical measures are effective in stopping transmission. If they're just like us, maybe we should see what royalties they get from the pharmaceutical companies that they regulate. If they're just like us, let's have a little look.

at their role in the AIDS pandemic, well, not pandemic, epidemic, or whatever you want to call it, of the 1980s, if they're just like us. Let's know what their private communications were with the CIA and other deep state organizations when people were discussing whether or not it was a lab leak or a natural origin that led to the outbreak of COVID in the first place. Are they just like us? Should Anthony Fauci, about two of the world, promoting a book telling us that he's just like us? I'd say no.

Maybe not. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments in the chat. If you're watching this on YouTube, turn on the notification bell. It's the only way that you'll know this is happening. But my prayer is you're watching this on Rumble or better yet, Rumble Premium, a smooth, frictionless version of Rumble that you can enjoy. Become an awakened wonder where you get access to, for example, Russell Brand's stand-up breakdown. For the last ever episode, I broke down my own stand-up comedy and my...

word. It was pretty blasphemous. That will be posted, Awaken Wonders, in a matter of days, and I can't wait for you to see it. Take advantage of the Bobby Kennedy conversation that's up there now. It's pretty revelatory and enjoyable, I would say. He offers the clearest course of action yet. If you see Bobby Kennedy's name on the ballot, vote Donald Trump. That's what he's saying. Vote for an interrogation and investigation into American health. Vote for an end to war. Vote for your own free speech. Pretty interesting conversation. It's up

there now on locals now we've got so much fantastic stuff coming up over the next couple of days we've got a conversation with jordan peterson it's going to be fantastic with we're recording a little bit later today and it will be out soon we've got a live stream tomorrow that will be uh well i guess it's going to be me reacting to these kind of events thank you so much for joining us today i appreciate you and i love you join us tomorrow not for more of the same but for more of the different until then if you can stay free